Jump to content
squistion

Kilmar Abrego Garcia & Trump El Salvador deportations thread.

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, squistion said:

So clear that charges were never filed. 😁

Still waiting for someone, anyone to provide a link for charges filed against Garcia for domestic abuse.

Fun Fact: There were none. It didn't happen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, squistion said:

Still waiting for someone, anyone to provide a link for charges filed against Garcia for domestic abuse.

Fun Fact: There were none.

No one cares what you want. That's not that hard for you to understand is it? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

No one cares what you want. That's not that hard for you to understand is it? 

Ignoring this “guy” isn’t enough. I need to figure out how to make the site ignore they/them when they’re quoted as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, squistion said:

So clear that charges were never filed. 😁

Well, his wife was asked in a nationwide interview where she was trying to get sympathy for him and she couldn't bring herself to say "no, he didn't hit me" when asked about it.  That was the biggest softball interview and she didn't even offer even a token defense for him.  But you guys know this.  You can play stooges for him if you want, but it makes you look silly and unserious.  You defend him because your political side has chosen his cause.  The guy is a dirtbag.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mark Davis said:

Well, his wife was asked in a nationwide interview where she was trying to get sympathy for him and she couldn't bring herself to say "no, he didn't hit me" when asked about it.  That was the biggest softball interview and she didn't even offer even a token defense for him.  But you guys know this.  You can play stooges for him if you want, but it makes you look silly and unserious.  You defend him because your political side has chosen his cause.  The guy is a dirtbag.

I defend him because no charges have ever been filed for domestic abuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Ignoring this “guy” isn’t enough. I need to figure out how to make the site ignore they/them when they’re quoted as well. 

The squid needs to be heard I guess. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Mark Davis said:

Well, his wife was asked in a nationwide interview where she was trying to get sympathy for him and she couldn't bring herself to say "no, he didn't hit me" when asked about it.  That was the biggest softball interview and she didn't even offer even a token defense for him.  But you guys know this.  You can play stooges for him if you want, but it makes you look silly and unserious.  You defend him because your political side has chosen his cause.  The guy is a dirtbag.

Not sure which interview you’re referring to.  What was the question and what was her response?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Squizzy doesn't think this guy hit his wife but thinks Kavanaugh sexually assaulted some girl 40 years ago at a party the girl doesn't know the date, location of, who hosted it, and who's best friend says never happened. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Strike said:

Squizzy doesn't think this guy hit his wife but thinks Kavanaugh sexually assaulted some girl 40 years ago at a party the girl doesn't know the date, location of, who hosted it, and who's best friend says never happened. 

Yep.  The pretzel logic is off the charts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Did he say that?

No I didn't say that, but don't try to confuse them with the facts. 😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

 

Can’t imagine defending domestic abuse & human trafficking because of political ideology but some here have no problem 

A drowning man will clutch at a straw. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, squistion said:

Still waiting for someone, anyone to provide a link for charges filed against Garcia for domestic abuse.

Fun Fact: There were none. It didn't happen. 

This seems to be Squissy asserting that the domestic abuse definitively didn't happen.

Squissy ignores me because I biotch-slap him in discussions like this.  @TimHauck, can I get a ruling on my conclusion?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/27/2025 at 6:12 AM, TimHauck said:

Lol this dude ain’t going anywhere.

But if you’ve been following current events, a lot of them do show up for their court dates.  Maybe less will now though since ICE has been picking up people at their scheduled court dates

Lol?  It seems to me there are the following outcomes:

1. He is tried, found guilty, serves some time, then when he is released, gets deported.  Highly doubtful that his prison time would exceed Trump's term.

2. He is either not tried or not found guilty or serves no time, in which case he gets deported.

I don't see a reasonable outcome that keeps him from being deported.  How do you turn this into a Lol-level possibility that he would flee? :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

This seems to be Squissy asserting that the domestic abuse definitively didn't happen.

Squissy ignores me because I biotch-slap him in discussions like this.  @TimHauck, can I get a ruling on my conclusion?

No, “it” is clearly referring to being charged for the abuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

This seems to be Squissy asserting that the domestic abuse definitively didn't happen.

Squissy ignores me because I biotch-slap him in discussions like this.  @TimHauck, can I get a ruling on my conclusion?

Quoting you so little squissy aka the coont sees your post

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Lol?  It seems to me there are the following outcomes:

1. He is tried, found guilty, serves some time, then when he is released, gets deported.  Highly doubtful that his prison time would exceed Trump's term.

2. He is either not tried or not found guilty or serves no time, in which case he gets deported.

I don't see a reasonable outcome that keeps him from being deported.  How do you turn this into a Lol-level possibility that he would flee? :dunno: 

I agree he’s most likely getting deported.  I just find it highly unlikely he flees because so many people know what he looks like and I don’t think he can do so successfully.  And if he does, Stephen Miller will spend every waking moment trying to find him.  If the government actually goes through with the trial, it will likely drag out for a bit so he can still see his family while it’s going on.

 

in b4 “c’mon this dude doesn’t care about his family he’s a wife beating gang banger!!” 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

No, “it” is clearly referring to being charged for the abuse.

Exactly. I was obviously referring to the charges for abuse (and that should be obvious in the context of what I said).

I have never asserted that the domestic abuse "definitely didn't happen" (I have no opinion on the matter, maybe it did, maybe it didn't) but I do know that charges were never filed. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, squistion said:

Still waiting for someone, anyone to provide a link for charges filed against Garcia for domestic abuse.

Fun Fact: There were none. It didn't happen. 

Kavanaugh never assaulted Ford back in the day, right, because no charges were filed?

But back in 2018, you seemed to care about her word instead of charges.  Why isn't the lady that Garcia beat up credible?

https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/-🏛️-official-supreme-court-nomination-thread-amy-coney-barrett.741172/post-21382154

https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/-🏛️-official-supreme-court-nomination-thread-amy-coney-barrett.741172/post-21382226

 

Do you ever get tired of looking like a fool?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

No, “it” is clearly referring to being charged for the abuse.

If "it" meant the charges, he basically said the same sentence twice.  That's clear to you? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's surreal these two are still going at it about this same topic. They just keep repeating themselves ad nauseum. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BrahmaBulls said:

Kavanaugh never assaulted Ford back in the day, right, because no charges were filed?

But back in 2018, you seemed to care about her word instead of charges.  Why isn't the lady that Garcia beat up credible?

https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/-🏛️-official-supreme-court-nomination-thread-amy-coney-barrett.741172/post-21382154

https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/-🏛️-official-supreme-court-nomination-thread-amy-coney-barrett.741172/post-21382226

 

Do you ever get tired of looking like a fool?

Going back now and looking at all those whack jobs that ate it up is hilarious. Thanks for posting this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, BrahmaBulls said:

Kavanaugh never assaulted Ford back in the day, right, because no charges were filed?

But back in 2018, you seemed to care about her word instead of charges.  Why isn't the lady that Garcia beat up credible?

https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/-🏛️-official-supreme-court-nomination-thread-amy-coney-barrett.741172/post-21382154

https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/-🏛️-official-supreme-court-nomination-thread-amy-coney-barrett.741172/post-21382226

 

Do you ever get tired of looking like a fool?

Garcias wife even FILED A PETITION - so it's ensconced in public documentation and the legal system.  Whereas, Kavanaugh's accuser has nothing but some imaginary things she "remembers" and Lady Squiztard believed that w/out question.

Great work digging this up and pointing out what an extreme POS Lady Squiztard is.  She/They/Them is like 76 years old, too.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why Kavanaugh is being mentioned in the Kilmar Garcia thread. These situations are not really analagous.

Christine Blasey Ford testified under oath at the televised Senate Kavanaugh hearings, and repeated the accusations that she had been sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh. We were all able to listen to her testimony and judge her credibility.

In contrast, Garcia's wife has only given a written statement which indicates she did not find what was said in the protective order serious enough to follow through with and certainly not enough to merit deportation. 


https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5255035-abrego-garcias-wife-statement-domestic-violence-protective-order/

Abrego Garcia’s wife issues statement on domestic violence protective order

The wife of a Maryland man who the United States government mistakenly deported to a mega-prison in El Salvador stood in defense of her husband while acknowledging that she filed for a civil protective order four years ago. 

“After surviving domestic violence in a previous relationship, I acted out of caution following a disagreement with Kilmar by seeking a civil protective order, in case things escalated. Things did not escalate, and I decided not to follow through with the civil court process. We were able to work through the situation privately as a family, including by going to counseling,” Jennifer Vasquez Sura said in a statement to multiple outlets on Wednesday.

[...]

“Our marriage only grew stronger in the years that followed. No one is perfect, and no marriage is perfect,” Sura said. “But that is not a justification for ICE’s action of abducting him and deporting him to a country where he was supposed to be protected from removal.”

“Kilmar has always been a loving partner and father, and I will continue to stand by him and demand justice for him,” she added.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, squistion said:

I don't know why Kavanaugh is being mentioned in the Kilmar Garcia thread. These situations are not really analagous.

Christine Blasey Ford testified under oath at the televised Senate Kavanaugh hearings, and repeated the accusations that she had been sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh. We were all able to listen to her testimony and judge her credibility.

In contrast, Garcia's wife has only given a written statement which indicates she did not find what was said in the protective order serious enough to follow through with and certainly not enough to merit deportation. 


https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5255035-abrego-garcias-wife-statement-domestic-violence-protective-order/

Abrego Garcia’s wife issues statement on domestic violence protective order

The wife of a Maryland man who the United States government mistakenly deported to a mega-prison in El Salvador stood in defense of her husband while acknowledging that she filed for a civil protective order four years ago. 

“After surviving domestic violence in a previous relationship, I acted out of caution following a disagreement with Kilmar by seeking a civil protective order, in case things escalated. Things did not escalate, and I decided not to follow through with the civil court process. We were able to work through the situation privately as a family, including by going to counseling,” Jennifer Vasquez Sura said in a statement to multiple outlets on Wednesday.

[...]

“Our marriage only grew stronger in the years that followed. No one is perfect, and no marriage is perfect,” Sura said. “But that is not a justification for ICE’s action of abducting him and deporting him to a country where he was supposed to be protected from removal.”

“Kilmar has always been a loving partner and father, and I will continue to stand by him and demand justice for him,” she added.  

 

Was Kavanaugh charged?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

Was Kavanaugh charged?

Notice the backtracking and revisionist history?  It's his thing.  When it's shown he's a f'n liar, he desperately tries to backpedal.  :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, jerryskids said:

If "it" meant the charges, he basically said the same sentence twice.  That's clear to you? 

Yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Yes

So it's normal to say the same thing twice?  So it's normal to say the same thing twice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, BrahmaBulls said:

Was Kavanaugh charged?

Nope. But he was out through the ringer. And he is a legal citizen of the US. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, jerryskids said:

So it's normal to say the same thing twice?  So it's normal to say the same thing twice?

He didn’t write the exact same phrase twice, he wrote two things with, to use your words, “basically” the same meaning.  That is a very common writing tactic when someone is trying to emphasize their point.  HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, jerryskids said:

So it's normal to say the same thing twice?  So it's normal to say the same thing twice?

Timmy 2 Times 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love it if someone could send post cards to the Democrats who defended and supported this criminal from the location where he is being held.  SOmething like..."wishing you were here"......"missing you",    anything really.  😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I would love it if someone could send post cards to the Democrats who defended and supported this criminal from the location where he is being held.  SOmething like..."wishing you were here"......"missing you",    anything really.  😁

Criminal?  What happened to innocent until proven guilty? :lol:

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Criminal?  What happened to innocent until proven guilty? :lol:

He’S a CrImInAL bEcAUsE hE iS hErE iLlEgAlLy!!1!1!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×