Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
MDC

Two Dem lawmakers shot, one dead in MN

Recommended Posts

Just now, TimHauck said:

Guy still hasn’t been caught right?

I think that’s evidence he was a righty, since a lib would have either been caught or killed himself amirite?

How was he not caught? The police engaged him at the house and he just vanished? Minnesota cops cant be the brightest. A one mile perimeter to catch a 57 year old should of been plenty 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

They weren’t blue enough.  

Often that's the greater sin. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, League Champion said:

How was he not caught? The police engaged him at the house and he just vanished? Minnesota cops cant be the brightest. A one mile perimeter to catch a 57 year old should of been plenty 

What a mess that state is. Their governor let their biggest city burn, his wife said she liked the smell of it, then they elected him again. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

An every day occurrence on this board.

😂 

My Twitter sleuthing... Always super reliable... Suggests he's a magat because he had some list of targets and it had pro abortion folks included.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

What a mess that state is. Their governor let their biggest city burn, his wife said she liked the smell of it, then they elected him again. 

Holy shìt.  Is that true?  Gotta be some context missing right? 

Geez what a shìtbag if there isn't more to that story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, MDC said:

 

Walz said online has activated the State Emergency Operation Centers. 

 

Interesting to see that when it's one of them, they suddenly can do stuff.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, nobody said:

Holy shìt.  Is that true?  Gotta be some context missing right? 

Geez what a shìtbag if there isn't more to that story.

No, it isn't true and there is always context missing from this shut-in, who has time to post in every thread in this forum, but never the time to verify what he posts as being factually accurate or to provide a link. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NY Post did at least add some info.  This appears to be the more likely motive for targeting Hortman:

The apparent hit list included abortion providers, clinics and Planned Parenthood, sources told The Post. Both of the Democrats he targeted were pro-choice. 

Hortman was staunchly pro-choice and led the Minnesota House in passing the PRO Act in 2023, which codified the legality of abortion and other forms of reproductive health care. She also boosted funding for abortion clinics and passed protections for providers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, nobody said:

Holy shìt.  Is that true?  Gotta be some context missing right? 

Geez what a shìtbag if there isn't more to that story.

Yeah man, it’s all true. As a matter of fact, the police had to evacuate a precinct in Minneapolis and the left wing rioters and looters took it over and burned it. Walz did nothing. And yeah, his wife said she liked the smell of her city burning during the riots. She said she kept her windows open to smell it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, squistion said:

 

And we still don't know that much as far as the shooter's motives are concerned. Yes, he was appointed by Walz but the board he was appointed to was bipartisan. Yes, he had "No Kings" flyers in his car but we don't know why he did. His assassination target list was all prominent Democrats but was it for party affiliation or their anti-Abortion position? Many questions still to be answered.

Walz appointee is pretty damning, and we don't know if they were all prominent dems.  The article said there were 70 names and only Dems were cited.  We need the whole list. 

So for this critical piece of the puzzle of whether he was blue or red, let's review:

Red team indicators: killed Dems, had a list of targets with a bunch of Dems, seemed to not be cool with abortion.

Blue team indicators: worked for walz!  The no king protest fliers which I guess is some dem thing.  He killed people, and that's usually a blue team thing.

If he didn't work for walz I'd say this dude had to be red team certified.  I'm still going red team since the job thing is the only real evidence for blue team, but people sell out all the time.  I knew a guy that supported every lib agenda in the book.  He also took a job working for rush Limbaugh and stole from his states unemployment.  

Verdict: Team Red

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yeah man, it’s all true. As a matter of fact, the police had to evacuate a precinct in Minneapolis and the left wing rioters and looters took it over and burned it. Walz did nothing. And yeah, his wife said she liked the smell of her city burning during the riots. She said she kept her windows open to smell it. 

Dang, y'all going to make me look into this.  Squistion says it's BS.  You say it's true.  I definitely trust you more than her, but I can't say I trust anyone here to not be biased all that much to be honest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, nobody said:

Walz appointee is pretty damning, and we don't know if they were all prominent dems.  The article said there were 70 names and only Dems were cited.  We need the whole list. 

So for this critical piece of the puzzle of whether he was blue or red, let's review:

Red team indicators: killed Dems, had a list of targets with a bunch of Dems, seemed to not be cool with abortion.

Blue team indicators: worked for walz!  He killed people, and that's usually a blue team thing.

If he didn't work for walz I'd say this dude had to be red team certified.  I'm still going red team since the job thing is the only real evidence for blue team, but people sell out all the time.  I knew a guy that supported every lib agenda in the book.  He also took a job working for rush Limbaugh and stole from his states unemployment.  

Verdict: Team Red.  

Also: registered Republican and alleged Trump voter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, nobody said:

Dang, y'all going to make me look into this.  Squistion says it's BS.  You say it's true.  I definitely trust you more than her, but I can't say I trust anyone here to not be biased all that much to be honest.

It’s cool. Just google Gwen Walz smell. Also Minneapolis third police precinct burned. Squishy is not a trustworthy poster. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Also: registered Republican and Trump voter

Oh.  Done deal if that's true.  Red team gotta take this guy.  

Okay red team.  Let's strategize.  Try to think long term.  The reason I was so harsh on the J6 folks saying they should get mowed down is I knew when the lefties had the next summer of love, J6 would get brought up.  

So make sure to be over the top in condemning this dude.  Don't do like team blue and say violence bad, but this, this, this, this, this, this, this this, this, this, this, and this.  Just violence bad.  Murder bad.  this guy.  String him up for treason.  Red team can still use this to its advantage.  We know blue is going to kill way more people, so if you advocate here for extraordinary punishment, you free yourself to advocate for it for the blue team.  And at the end of the day.  The guy is a murderer, so no need to defend him in any way anyway.

Okay... Ready .. break!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, nobody said:

Oh.  Done deal if that's true.  Red team gotta take this guy.  

Okay red team.  Let's strategize.  Try to think long term.  The reason I was so harsh on the J6 folks saying they should get mowed down is I knew when the lefties had the next summer of love, J6 would get brought up.  

So make sure to be over the top in condemning this dude.  Don't do like team blue and say violence bad, but this, this, this, this, this, this, this this, this, this, this, and this.  Just violence bad.  Murder bad.  this guy.  String him up for treason.  Red team can still use this to its advantage.  We know blue is going to kill way more people, so if you advocate here for extraordinary punishment, you free yourself to advocate for it for the blue team.

Okay... Ready .. break!

Will be interesting how that plays out since most labeled him a lib the second they saw “appointed by Walz”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Will be interesting how that plays out since most labeled him a lib the second they saw “appointed by Walz”

Biggest piece of evidence is always the target.  Would've had to be walz's lover and chief of staff to overcome that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, nobody said:

Walz appointee is pretty damning, and we don't know if they were all prominent dems.  The article said there were 70 names and only Dems were cited.  We need the whole list. 

So for this critical piece of the puzzle of whether he was blue or red, let's review:

Red team indicators: killed Dems, had a list of targets with a bunch of Dems, seemed to not be cool with abortion.

Blue team indicators: worked for walz!  The no king protest fliers which I guess is some dem thing.  He killed people, and that's usually a blue team thing.

If he didn't work for walz I'd say this dude had to be red team certified.  I'm still going red team since the job thing is the only real evidence for blue team, but people sell out all the time.  I knew a guy that supported every lib agenda in the book.  He also took a job working for rush Limbaugh and stole from his states unemployment.  

Verdict: Team Red

Yes, he worked for Walz, but the board he was appointed to was non-partisan.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, squistion said:

Yes, he worked for Walz, but the board he was appointed to was non-partisan.

I would assume that's BS, but I guess it mustve been.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So on the day of the nationwide “no kings” anti Trump rally this guy had “no kings” flyers in his car? Case closed. Unhinged  TDS sufferer.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So on the day of the nationwide “no kings” anti Trump rally this guy had “no kings” flyers in his car? Case closed. Unhinged  TDS sufferer.  

He was probably going to murder protesters.

He is maga.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Maybe he was angry because there wasn't enough Tampons in his bathroom?

🤣💥

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

He was probably going to murder protesters.

He is maga.

I thought that too, but why would he need so amny

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, nobody said:

Maybe he didn't want protestors to see the flyers so he took them all.

Like when democrats took down the posters of Jewish people held hostage by Hamas? Maybe. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, nobody said:

Maybe he didn't want protestors to see the flyers so he took them all.

That crossed my mind as a plausible explanation, but at this point we just don't know (and it doesn't seem to fit any narrative). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×