Supreme Court weighing same-sex marriage case

[Alias Detective 1,416]

19 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

The federal government shouldn't be involved in personal contracts.  I say remove same and opposite sex marriage from the governments purview.  This would open the door to fixing a ton of other issues.

TAXES TAXES TAXES

[TBayXXXVII 2,566]

1 minute ago, Alias Detective said:

TAXES TAXES TAXES

They can do that without "marriages".  It's even in their best interest to do that if they force everyone to file their own taxes instead of joint.  Still, the easy thing to do is let any two people who live together, file jointly.

[iam90sbaby 2,642]

1 hour ago, TheNewGirl said:

Married men live longer than single men, so not entirely pointless. Men do better with a wife.

The paradox is that married women live shorter lives than single women. 

I WILL agree with you that there aren't many modern women, or men for that matter that are marriage material. Lots of man babies out there. 

I don’t even know if that’s true but if it is I’d assume it’s for other reasons… they probably have less dangerous hobbies 

I disagree, men are the same as they’ve always been, not much has changed. Feminism infecting western women is the reason divorce rates are sky high and the country is full of broken homes. 

[TheNewGirl 1,519]

4 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

I don’t even know if that’s true but if it is I’d assume it’s for other reasons… they probably have less dangerous hobbies 

I disagree, men are the same as they’ve always been, not much has changed. Feminism infecting western women is the reason divorce rates are sky high and the country is full of broken homes. 

Mothers have been coddling men and boys more, IMO. Maybe this is part of feminism, but modern men are generally looking for an extension of their mother; someone to take care of them. And then when shiiite gets hard, they leave. 

More men leave their wives when the wives get sick; women are more likely to stick around if the husband gets ill. And please dn't tell me this doesn't happen, I am literally living it; watching my father do it to my mother. 

[Sandy Loam 207]

3 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Mothers have been coddling men and boys more, IMO. Maybe this is part of feminism, but modern men are generally looking for an extension of their mother; someone to take care of them. And then when shiiite gets hard, they leave. 

More men leave their wives when the wives get sick; women are more likely to stick around if the husband gets ill. And please dn't tell me this doesn't happen, I am literally living it; watching my father do it to my mother. 

It happens, but you have a tendency to generalize what you've seen and experienced. 

A whopping majority of the men I know are old-school loyal, hard-working providers and not these California sissy men who bail on their women the second some mild inconvenience enters their lives.

[iam90sbaby 2,642]

8 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

And then when shiiite gets hard, they leave. 

More men leave their wives when the wives get sick; women are more likely to stick around if the husband gets ill. And please dn't tell me this doesn't happen, I am literally living it; watching my father do it to my mother. 

That’s a cool theory except for the fact that women initiate 70% of divorces. So you can *think* whatever you want because you had a sh!tty bf one time but the facts are the facts. 

Anyways, my original point was it’s pointless for men to get married. They get focked 99% of the time in court and lose everything and more often than not they’re the one that worked for everything that they had. That coupled with women overwhelmingly initiating divorces makes it pointless and stupid to get married. Make your own money and have as many gfs as you want is the better choice 

[seafoam1 3,182]

6 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

It happens, but you have a tendency to generalize what you've seen and experienced. 

A whopping majority of the men I know are old-school loyal, hard-working providers and not these California sissy men who bail on their women the second some mild inconvenience enters their lives.

It's great that you can marry your boyfriend now since you got the knife and are now a sandy. 

[Sandy Loam 207]

Peefoam hopes the Supreme Court lifts the restrictions on marriage defined as same species. 

[seafoam1 3,182]

Just now, Sandy Loam said:

Peefoam hopes the Supreme Court lifts the restrictions on marriage defined as same species. 

Princess Sandy is happy he can marry his boyfriend now that he gets tranny therapy. 

[avoiding injuries 1,607]

1 hour ago, Sandy Loam said:

Never going to happen. 

Society can dream…

[TheNewGirl 1,519]

1 hour ago, Sandy Loam said:

It happens, but you have a tendency to generalize what you've seen and experienced. 

A whopping majority of the men I know are old-school loyal, hard-working providers and not these California sissy men who bail on their women the second some mild inconvenience enters their lives.

You're also older Gen X and likely associate with more men like this. 

I am talking about younger generations of men. 

At any rate, being the only female poster here, I am in the minority and this discussion is pointless. I will always be wrong here. 

[Alias Detective 1,416]

1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

They can do that without "marriages".  It's even in their best interest to do that if they force everyone to file their own taxes instead of joint.  Still, the easy thing to do is let any two people who live together, file jointly.

Brothers?

[TBayXXXVII 2,566]

12 minutes ago, Alias Detective said:

Brothers?

Who cares?  If they're living in the same household, no different than a married couple, why can't they get the same tax breaks/benefits if they're sharing the same expenses.

[purdygood 355]

1 hour ago, TheNewGirl said:

Mothers have been coddling men and boys more, IMO. Maybe this is part of feminism, but modern men are generally looking for an extension of their mother; someone to take care of them. And then when shiiite gets hard, they leave. 

More men leave their wives when the wives get sick; women are more likely to stick around if the husband gets ill. And please dn't tell me this doesn't happen, I am literally living it; watching my father do it to my mother. 

Also, most of these "Men" are MAGA.

[Sandy Loam 207]

25 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

You're also older Gen X and likely associate with more men like this. 

I am talking about younger generations of men. 

At any rate, being the only female poster here, I am in the minority and this discussion is pointless. I will always be wrong here. 

While I've seen my share of man children in the world, I have a lot of young families as clients and don't see any that match what you have described. I attribute a lot of this to demographics. This is God-fearing, ruby-red, conservative country where men for the most part man up.

[TBayXXXVII 2,566]

3 minutes ago, purdygood said:

Also, most of these "Men" are MAGA.

Millennials switched parties?

[Alias Detective 1,416]

9 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Who cares?  If they're living in the same household, no different than a married couple, why can't they get the same tax breaks/benefits if they're sharing the same expenses.

Well, if brothers "live" to together for tax breaks but sleep at their wife's home 364 days a year that's just taking advantage.  Right?

 

And yes, people will do it.

[purdygood 355]

37 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Millennials switched parties?

Most incels who hate women are MAGA.

[TheNewGirl 1,519]

44 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

While I've seen my share of man children in the world, I have a lot of young families as clients and don't see any that match what you have described. I attribute a lot of this to demographics. This is God-fearing, ruby-red, conservative country where men for the most part man up.

Perhaps they do.

 

[TBayXXXVII 2,566]

1 hour ago, purdygood said:

Most incels who hate women are MAGA.

Same on the left, those "men" hate women too, we just call them gay.

[Sandy Loam 207]

If the Supreme Court declines to take the case, Peefoam can still realize his dream of marrying the male blow-up doll he fell in love with a few years ago.

[seafoam1 3,182]

Just now, Sandy Loam said:

If the Supreme Court declines to take the case, Peefoam can still realize his dream of marrying the male blow-up doll he fell in love with a few years ago.

Rusty's coming out song after he transitioned to princess Sandy. His boyfriend is so proud.

 

[TBayXXXVII 2,566]

2 hours ago, Alias Detective said:

Well, if brothers "live" to together for tax breaks but sleep at their wife's home 364 days a year that's just taking advantage.  Right?

 

And yes, people will do it.

Why would that make sense to do?  You'd have 2 brothers who are married... filing jointly, their wives are filing as single.  So, 2 couples filing 3 returns instead for 2 returns.  That sounds like a really stupid idea.  If only one is married, the net is the same.  Two brothers filing jointly one wife filing as single.  So, 3 people 2 returns. How is that different then the husband and wife filing joint returns and the brother filing as single?

Example:

Joe & Tom are brothers

Joe is married to Jane

Tom is married to Tammy

 

Why would it make sense to the 4 of them for Tom and Joe to file jointly while Jane and Tammy file as single?

 

If only Tom is married, but he files with Joe while Tammy files as single... how is that different than Tom & Tammy filing jointly and Joe filing as single?

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,374]

On 8/11/2025 at 12:36 PM, Sandy Loam said:

https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-faces-decision-same-sex-marriages-2111822

Let the thoughtful, intellectual discussion commence!

good federal govt shouldn't jump on states rights, alot of blue states voted against gay marriage

that being said I dont give a rat's a55 about it, one way or another

the govt should stay out of all marriages

[Sandy Loam 207]

43 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

good federal govt shouldn't jump on states rights, alot of blue states voted against gay marriage

that being said I dont give a rat's a55 about it, one way or another

the govt should stay out of all marriages

Likewise, it shouldn't send in federal troops to do city police work that's handling the job just fine.

[seafoam1 3,182]

3 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

Likewise, it shouldn't send in federal troops to do city police work that's handling the job just fine.

Tranny. 

[TheNewGirl 1,519]

20 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

Likewise, it shouldn't send in federal troops to do city police work that's handling the job just fine.

Who determines if city police are doing "just fine?" 

[Horseman 2,525]

1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Why would that make sense to do?  You'd have 2 brothers who are married... filing jointly, their wives are filing as single.  So, 2 couples filing 3 returns instead for 2 returns.  That sounds like a really stupid idea.  If only one is married, the net is the same.  Two brothers filing jointly one wife filing as single.  So, 3 people 2 returns. How is that different then the husband and wife filing joint returns and the brother filing as single?

Example:

Joe & Tom are brothers

Joe is married to Jane

Tom is married to Tammy

 

Why would it make sense to the 4 of them for Tom and Joe to file jointly while Jane and Tammy file as single?

 

If only Tom is married, but he files with Joe while Tammy files as single... how is that different than Tom & Tammy filing jointly and Joe filing as single?

The two earners and spenders could itemize all their deductions together while it's no big deal for the women to file as single because they didn't make any money?

[seafoam1 3,182]

Just now, TheNewGirl said:

Who determines if city police are doing "just fine?" 

Some tranny named sandy in Texas I guess. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,198]

6 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Just leave it alone.

And it was left alone until the Rainbow Mob got greedy and started putting designs on other people's kids for indoctrination and conversion.  Of course, the degeneracy and perversion on display every June also massively pushed this issue to the top.  And trannies shooting schools up too. 

I can see the SC going either way, TBH, but the reason we are here now is the reasons I just stated.  They have no one but themselves to blame.

[Sandy Loam 207]

12 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Who determines if city police are doing "just fine?" 

The takeover of Los Angeles was so unnecessary that the bored troops suffered terrible morale as the wondered why they were there.

It has been widely reported that D.C. crime is way down, so that means police are doing their jobs. D.C. does not rank among the top two dozens in this country when it comes to violent-crime rate.

So ask yourself why Trump sent troops there. 

[Horseman 2,525]

4 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

The takeover of Los Angeles was so unnecessary that the bored troops suffered terrible morale as the wondered why they were there.

It has been widely reported that D.C. crime is way down, so that means police are doing their jobs. D.C. does not rank among the top two dozens in this country when it comes to violent-crime rate.

So ask yourself why Trump sent troops there. 

Pretty simple. DC isn't a state its a federal district where Trump has the authority. The BOSS gets to determine how safe it needs to be.  

[TheNewGirl 1,519]

7 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

The takeover of Los Angeles was so unnecessary that the bored troops suffered terrible morale as the wondered why they were there.

It has been widely reported that D.C. crime is way down, so that means police are doing their jobs. D.C. does not rank among the top two dozens in this country when it comes to violent-crime rate.

So ask yourself why Trump sent troops there. 

I don't need to ask myself anything, Rusty.  

I was only curious about who and how it's determined if police are doing a great job. 

[jerryskids 6,890]

25 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

The takeover of Los Angeles was so unnecessary that the bored troops suffered terrible morale as the wondered why they were there.

It has been widely reported that D.C. crime is way down, so that means police are doing their jobs. D.C. does not rank among the top two dozens in this country when it comes to violent-crime rate.

So ask yourself why Trump sent troops there. 

Widely reported?   By the commander suspended for cheating the data?  Certainly not the police union, which confirmed that DC is a crime cluster fock.

[seafoam1 3,182]

27 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

The takeover of Los Angeles was so unnecessary that the bored troops suffered terrible morale as the wondered why they were there.

It has been widely reported that D.C. crime is way down, so that means police are doing their jobs. D.C. does not rank among the top two dozens in this country when it comes to violent-crime rate.

So ask yourself why Trump sent troops there. 

Princess sandy is hurting. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,374]

2 hours ago, Sandy Loam said:

Likewise, it shouldn't send in federal troops to do city police work that's handling the job just fine.

where is that happening?

are you one of those retards that think cutting murder from 35/100k to 28 is doing a fine job? 

its the job of the federal govt to PROTECT its citizens against foreign and domestic threats, aka DC

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,198]

1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

where is that happening?

are you one of those retards that think cutting murder from 35/100k to 28 is doing a fine job? 

 

No he's the one that's pointing to the cooked and manipulated data and still using it as a source of fact. 

He's as dumb as a box of rocks, but the perfect liberal.  Believe the dogma, not the facts.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,274]

10 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:

Married men live longer than single men, so not entirely pointless. Men do better with a wife.

The paradox is that married women live shorter lives than single women. 

I WILL agree with you that there aren't many modern women, or men for that matter that are marriage material. Lots of man babies out there. 

People have no idea how to remove their dependence on external things for fulfillment. They never realize that the last dozen things they bought or tried to find joy didn't last very long.

They suffer because nothing works. Including relationships, which they put all of their hopes in finally becoming "fixed" by the other person.

If people understood how to become emotionally unattached to the external world while processing their own baggage, successful relationships would sky rocket.

[The Real timschochet 6,932]

2 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

its the job of the federal govt to PROTECT its citizens against foreign and domestic threats, aka DC

Then why isn’t Trump sending national guard into high crime cities in red states, like Memphis or Houston? 
 

The answer obviously is that this isn’t about fighting crime, it’s about fighting Trump’s enemies. And it’s performative. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,198]

7 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Then why isn’t Trump sending national guard into high crime cities in red states, like Memphis or Houston? 
 

The answer obviously is that this isn’t about fighting crime, it’s about fighting Trump’s enemies. And it’s performative. 

We all see what you did there, Tim.  Red States but solid blue cities is what you meant, right?  Because it's liberal enclaves that have the most crime and where the cockroaches need to be eliminated from.