TimHauck 3,013 Posted 8 hours ago 20 minutes ago, Strike said: It's like you didn't read the article. Not a serious poster. Congrats on successfully moving the goalposts Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,615 Posted 8 hours ago 5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: Of course it’s legal. The voters of California are going to decide whether or not to change the rules. If they decide to do so it’s perfectly legal. Texas refuses to let their voters decide. And as I mentioned Texas is violating the Voters Rights Act as traditionally understood, Yet you have no problem with CA violating the 2A as traditionally understood. Hypocrite much? ETA: we already voted on it. Now he wants to change it. Like he always does. Ignore the will of the voters. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,216 Posted 8 hours ago Just now, 5-Points said: Yet you have no problem with CA violating the 2A as traditionally understood. Hypocrite much? Weird how that works. It's almost as if Hypocrisy is a plank in the liberal platform. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,013 Posted 8 hours ago 2 hours ago, Strike said: Sure. You're a jew too!!!!! I am. Shalom. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,615 Posted 8 hours ago 3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Weird how that works. It's almost as if Hypocrisy is a plank in the liberal platform. It's the founding principle. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,680 Posted 24 minutes ago How could anyone support the political elites removing the votes of constituents? Maga has completely lost their minds. You guys are sheep. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
