RFK Jr. is embarrassing himself before Congress

[seafoam1 3,236]

6 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

@Ron_Artest goes to Reddit for political advice and OnlyFans to beat off to Tranny Feet pics  

I think I'll start Twitter and Reddit accounts under a different alias and make comments there, then copy them here to "prove" all my posts here are indeed factual. 

[Maximum Overkill 2,206]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

I think I'll start a Twitter account under a different alias and make comments there, then copy them here to "prove" all my posts here are indeed factual. 

That's the liberal way

[seafoam1 3,236]

2 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

That's the liberal way

We already know there tens of thousands of them out there. I don't know why they feel the need to try to prove that over and over again on this site.

Libs on tiktok was much more entertaining when those were a hot topic here. 

 

[WhiteWonder 2,847]

3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

One other tidbit from that video that I like to call out is the chart shown at 6:25, which debunks the claim that “Democrats didn’t want the vaccine in 2020!” - even in 2020, Democrats were always more likely than Republicans to want to take the vaccine.

it's not a matter of the democratic public not wanting a vaccine in 2020. the sheeple public is going to do what they are told and obviously any member of the public that is okay with vaccinations would want one for covid as soon as possible.   the entire idea is that the democratic PARTY wanted to delay the news until after the election, in what they knew would be a close and highly contested one, because obviously you don't want your opponent to be able to say "look what we delivered... a great vaccine, the best vaccine... we did that, I did that"  I am sure you can read that in his voice. 

Regardless if it was pfizer or big pharma overlords in general, or the FDA. The idea I presented is simply hypothesis and yes, a conspiracy theory. I even mentioned I'm not big on them, but the timing of everything makes it seem so utterly obvious. 

[WhiteWonder 2,847]

3 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Oh right, I remember reading about Topol.  His delay was due to safety, right?

So @jerryskids was wrong when he said you have strong evidence to show Pfizer delayed the announcement for politics.

And @WhiteWonder never bothered to give any evidence nor would he give an explanation why Pfizer would do this.

Given how friendly trump was to Pfizer, giving them ward speed and billions in doses, I can't see why Pfizer would fock him by delaying the results.

Conspiracy theories always lack logic.  The human brain just tries so hard to make the pieces fit.

Are you really going to @ me after getting absolutely destroyed with your repeated display of lack of simple reading ability? 

honestly, interaction with you in this thread is possibly making me wonder if you are in fact the dumbest poster on this board (and not peafoam). You don't need to agree with my thoughts on pfizer and the vaccine announcement. It is very clearly stated as my opinion on what happened. You just mentioned conspiracy theories. This is my theory. I have no reason to scour the internet for evidence of something that we know can't be proven. I never claimed to have any, I never claimed any other poster did. 

And actually, the pharma industry has started to lean democrat with its donations ever since 2020. You can indeed find evidence of that. So I don't think it matters what Trump or any other president had done for them in the past. 

I also did post my reasoning of why they would do this. I even mentioned discussing the idea with family months before and not even making a claim that it was either party pulling the strings, just that with the election right around the corner, someone was. If pfizer announced the results 3 weeks before election day, I would be here telling you the republicans controlled the timing of the announcement. 

you are perfectly entitled to believe that it is mere coincidence that pfizer announced a 90% effective vaccine  the first business day after the election results 

[Ron_Artest 1,786]

24 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said:

Are you really going to @ me after getting absolutely destroyed with your repeated display of lack of simple reading ability? 

honestly, interaction with you in this thread is possibly making me wonder if you are in fact the dumbest poster on this board (and not peafoam). You don't need to agree with my thoughts on pfizer and the vaccine announcement. It is very clearly stated as my opinion on what happened. You just mentioned conspiracy theories. This is my theory. I have no reason to scour the internet for evidence of something that we know can't be proven. I never claimed to have any, I never claimed any other poster did. 

And actually, the pharma industry has started to lean democrat with its donations ever since 2020. You can indeed find evidence of that. So I don't think it matters what Trump or any other president had done for them in the past. 

I also did post my reasoning of why they would do this. I even mentioned discussing the idea with family months before and not even making a claim that it was either party pulling the strings, just that with the election right around the corner, someone was. If pfizer announced the results 3 weeks before election day, I would be here telling you the republicans controlled the timing of the announcement. 

you are perfectly entitled to believe that it is mere coincidence that pfizer announced a 90% effective vaccine  the first business day after the election results 

Absolutely destroyed?  I missed a word, admitted I was wrong, it happens I'm human.  What I didn't do was make some weird conspiracy theory and then fail to provide any reason to support the theory.

I read your post about where you told your family a vaccine might be announced before or after the election, mighty bold.  A vaccine was announced well before that and human trials were started.  Was curious for your reasoning why Pfizer would delay the results but understand if you don't have any.

As far as corp political donations, corps will donate to whoever they think will help them.  It's generally about access not ideology.

[WhiteWonder 2,847]

9 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Absolutely destroyed?  I missed a word, admitted I was wrong, it happens I'm human.  What I didn't do was make some weird conspiracy theory and then fail to provide any reason to support the theory.

I read your post about where you told your family a vaccine might be announced before or after the election, mighty bold.  A vaccine was announced well before that and human trials were started.  Was curious for your reasoning why Pfizer would delay the results but understand if you don't have any.

As far as corp political donations, corps will donate to whoever they think will help them.  It's generally about access not ideology.

It's football sunday so i'm not going to spend any more time on this beyond this post but yes, you were destroyed. You tripled or possibly quadrupled down trying "gotchas" all because you failed to read. 

now you're acting like I predicted "before or after" the election like it could be a super wide range, rather than a span of a few weeks before or after. I'm not even patting myself on the back for predicting it, more so stating that this isn't a pro or anti Trump thing. I wasn't clamoring that the fix was in on Trump. I just felt with the political climate, the timing of an announcement would be very telling, for one side or the other.

Of course a vaccine was announced. We are very clearly talking about the timing of the announcement that it was 90% effective and basically ready.

I already explained my reasoning for why they would delay the results, you're choosing to ignore it. A further explanation is that $$$ tops everything and if a company is in bed with politicians and promises are made, anything is possible and not acknowledging that is naivety. Maybe it was pure coincidence that they announce it right after Biden won. 

[Ron_Artest 1,786]

20 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said:

 Maybe it was pure coincidence that they announce it right after Biden won. 

Thank you 

[jerryskids 6,944]

5 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Oh right, I remember reading about Topol.  His delay was due to safety, right?

So @jerryskids was wrong when he said you have strong evidence to show Pfizer delayed the announcement for politics.

And @WhiteWonder never bothered to give any evidence nor would he give an explanation why Pfizer would do this.

Given how friendly trump was to Pfizer, giving them ward speed and billions in doses, I can't see why Pfizer would fock him by delaying the results.

Conspiracy theories always lack logic.  The human brain just tries so hard to make the pieces fit.

Seems you missed yet another word; I never said Pfizer delayed it.

Quote

There is actually strong evidence that it was delayed. @TimHauckhas provided the receipts before.

That being said, yeah, Topol was all about safety and not delaying it past the election.   

[MDC 7,625]

MAGAs want Don to get credit for the vaccine they won’t take for the disease they don’t believe in. 

 

[seafoam1 3,236]

32 minutes ago, MDC said:

MAGAs want Don to get credit for the vaccine they won’t take for the disease they don’t believe in. 

 

mdpee has nothing left in life. 

[Ron_Artest 1,786]

45 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Seems you missed yet another word; I never said Pfizer delayed it.

That being said, yeah, Topol was all about safety and not delaying it past the election.   

Whitewonder said pfizer was playing politics, I assumed you were backing him up.  Guess not.