Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Strike said: For the record, there is a federal law "73.1217 Broadcast hoaxes" that may have been broken by Jimmy Kimmel: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-73/subpart-H/section-73.1217 So the FCC commissioner's comments may not have been 100% unwarranted. I still would have rather he kept his trap shut but let's not pretend Jimmy Kimmel is innocent here. BROADCAST HOAX Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,389 Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Strike said: For the record, there is a federal law "73.1217 Broadcast hoaxes" that may have been broken by Jimmy Kimmel: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-73/subpart-H/section-73.1217 So the FCC commissioner's comments may not have been 100% unwarranted. I still would have rather he kept his trap shut but let's not pretend Jimmy Kimmel is innocent here. What's Kimmel guilty of, other than being an insensitive idiot that doesn't know when to shut his mouth? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,853 Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: Ro Khanna: "They're making comedy illegal. Brendan Carr pressured ABC to cancel Jimmy Kimmel, and Disney cancels Jimmy Kimmel. This canceling from an administration that lectured us about cancel culture. That's why today I'm introducing a motion to subpoena Brendan Carr." boom Stupid. There wasn't anything comedic about his comments. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Strike said: Stupid. There wasn't anything comedic about his comments. For many of us that Trump video was funny. The audience laughed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,389 Posted 3 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Gepetto said: What corruption? What law or constitutional writing has been violated? Start here. Just one of dozens of examples. He's been violating the emoluments clause of the constitution since day 1, term 1. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,011 Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: They're making comedy illegal. Tony Hinchcliffe says hi Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonnyutah 444 Posted 3 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Strike said: For the record, there is a federal law "73.1217 Broadcast hoaxes" that may have been broken by Jimmy Kimmel: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-73/subpart-H/section-73.1217 So the FCC commissioner's comments may not have been 100% unwarranted. I still would have rather he kept his trap shut but let's not pretend Jimmy Kimmel is innocent here. This is great information. I mean its the letter of the law right? That is what I always hear when they lock up granny praying to stop babies from being killed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,348 Posted 3 hours ago 33 minutes ago, KSB2424 said: Of course you are right. Conservatives have been yelling that from the rooftops for over a decade. I mean Charlie Kirk was assassinated for crying out loud. I can’t get over it finally took a late night no good comedian to simply lose a gig for all the Libs to open their eyes to it. It’s incredible to watch. Charlie Kirk was murdered by a lone nut. Jimmy Kimmel was taken off the air due to govt. pressure. They aren't the same. HTH, but I know it won't, cause well, you are you. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,389 Posted 3 hours ago 9 minutes ago, jonnyutah said: Emoluments, lol. Yeah. The clause in the constitution forbidding the president from financially profiting from his position. Basically the anti-grifter clause. The one that's supposed to prevent the chief executive from selling off his country to the highest foreign bidder. As opposed to opening a crypto company then accepting billions from foreign governments in pay-to-play schemes like oil and semi-conductor production. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonnyutah 444 Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Fnord said: Yeah. The clause in the constitution forbidding the president from financially profiting from his position. Basically the anti-grifter clause. The one that's supposed to prevent the chief executive from selling off his country to the highest foreign bidder. As opposed to opening a crypto company then accepting billions from foreign governments in pay-to-play schemes like oil and semi-conductor production. Whatever you say, big guy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,389 Posted 3 hours ago Just now, jonnyutah said: Whatever you say, big guy Don't believe me, FFS. Read for yourself. Or don't, little man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,166 Posted 3 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: Charlie Kirk was murdered by a lone nut. Jimmy Kimmel was taken off the air due to govt. pressure. They aren't the same. HTH, but I know it won't, cause well, you are you. Of course they are not even close to the same. One guy is DEAD. The other goes home to his family. Liberals like yourself have championed cancel culture for 15 years. Government pressure deplatformed people questioning Covid or the vaccine. It’s WHY Musk even cared to buy Twitter. Zuckerberg admitted it publicly with Facebook. Now yall are clutching your pearls about free speech . It’s hilarious. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Fnord said: Don't believe me, FFS. Read for yourself. Or don't, little man. He's saying that Biden did the same thing, reference to the fake news about 10% for the big guy. Biden did nothing that Trump has done. Not even close. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, KSB2424 said: Of course they are not even close to the same. One guy is DEAD. The other goes home to his family. Liberals like yourself have championed cancel culture for 15 years. Government pressure deplatformed people questioning Covid or the vaccine. It’s WHY Musk even cared to buy Twitter. Zuckerberg admitted it publicly. Now yall are clutching your pearls. It’s hilarious. The govt was trying to control misinformation during a global pandemic. That's a good thing. Trump got Kimmel canned because he hurt his feelings. That's a bad thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,853 Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Ron_Artest said: The govt was trying to control misinformation during a global pandemic. That's a good thing. Trump got Kimmel canned because he hurt his feelings. That's a bad thing. No, it's not. The word misinformation is just a fancy word for "Information WE DECIDE you shouldn't know." There is no such thing as misinformation. There is information. It's up to the individual to decide what is good information and what is bad information. The way smart people with decent critical thinking skills get fooled is when some information is suppressed so they can't fully research the issue, which is what the government tried to do with Covid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,166 Posted 3 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: The govt was trying to control misinformation during a global pandemic. That's a good thing. Trump got Kimmel canned because he hurt his feelings. That's a bad thing. It wasn’t “misinformation”. Listen to Mark himself. https://x.com/breaking911/status/1968460247653040148?s=46&t=r0y3bJ1CDXchoYAztDxmqw Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,389 Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: He's saying that Biden did the same thing, reference to the fake news about 10% for the big guy. Biden did nothing that Trump has done. Not even close. Yeah, I know. I'm just tired of how little evidence is required for some folks to believe the worst possible things about others, while expertly compartmentalizing and denying piles of evidence of worse actions perpetrated by those they continue to support. Even if the Twitter Files stuff was exactly the same situation as we have here (it isn't), at best you have a bunch of MAGA playing fools in their outrage then vs. their acquiescence and silent endorsement now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Strike said: No, it's not. The word misinformation is just a fancy word for "Information WE DECIDE you shouldn't know." There is no such thing as misinformation. There is information. It's up to the individual to decide what is good information and what is bad information. The way smart people with decent critical thinking skills get fooled is when some information is suppressed so they can't fully research the issue, which is what the government tried to do with Covid. The "information" that covid was fake, Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are good treatments, masks don't work, vaccines don't work, was all false and deadly. To you it's the same thing as mocking the president. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,740 Posted 3 hours ago Stephen A Smiff to replace Kimmel.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BudBro 183 Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, edjr said: Stephen A Smiff to replace Kimmel.. nobody will watch him either. There was a black, woman comedian serving as guest host a few weeks ago. She was good at it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonnyutah 444 Posted 3 hours ago 20 minutes ago, Fnord said: Don't believe me, FFS. Read for yourself. Or don't, little man. Everything goes right over your heads. My lord. Lighten up once in a while. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonnyutah 444 Posted 3 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Fnord said: Yeah, I know. I'm just tired of how little evidence is required for some folks to believe the worst possible things about others, while expertly compartmentalizing and denying piles of evidence of worse actions perpetrated by those they continue to support. Even if the Twitter Files stuff was exactly the same situation as we have here (it isn't), at best you have a bunch of MAGA playing fools in their outrage then vs. their acquiescence and silent endorsement now. No. You didnt. You needed ron of all people to explain it to you. Idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,371 Posted 2 hours ago Quote Remember when Kimmel fired Dicky Barrett after working for him for almost 20 years because he didn’t accept the covid vaccine into his life? Don't blame Kimmel, it was not his decision. Barrett lost his job because the parent company of ABC (which aired Jimmy Kimmel Live!), required all employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,348 Posted 2 hours ago 28 minutes ago, Strike said: No, it's not. The word misinformation is just a fancy word for "Information WE DECIDE you shouldn't know." There is no such thing as misinformation. There is information. It's up to the individual to decide what is good information and what is bad information. The way smart people with decent critical thinking skills get fooled is when some information is suppressed so they can't fully research the issue, which is what the government tried to do with Covid. It's good and healthy to stick your tongue in an electrical socket. That's just information, not bad or good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted 2 hours ago President Donald Trump on Thursday suggested that the federal government might revoke the licenses of broadcast television networks that are “against me.” Trump’s comment came a day after ABC suspended airing the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” show because of comments its host made linking the alleged killer of conservative activist Charlie Kirk to Trump’s MAGA movement. “There is a license. I’ll give you an example,” Trump told reporters. “I have read someplace that the networks were 97% against me again, 97% negative, and yet I won and easily, all 7 swing states,” the president said, referring to his 2024 election win. “They’re 97% against, they give me only bad press. They’re getting a license,” Trump said. “I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said. The president said that decision “will be up to Brendan Carr,” the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. “I think Brendan Carr is outstanding, he’s a patriot,” said Trump, who nominated Carr to his position. “He loves our country, and he’s a tough guy. So we’ll have to see.” He's a childish dictator Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,403 Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: President Donald Trump on Thursday suggested that the federal government might revoke the licenses of broadcast television networks that are “against me.” Trump’s comment came a day after ABC suspended airing the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” show because of comments its host made linking the alleged killer of conservative activist Charlie Kirk to Trump’s MAGA movement. “There is a license. I’ll give you an example,” Trump told reporters. “I have read someplace that the networks were 97% against me again, 97% negative, and yet I won and easily, all 7 swing states,” the president said, referring to his 2024 election win. “They’re 97% against, they give me only bad press. They’re getting a license,” Trump said. “I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said. The president said that decision “will be up to Brendan Carr,” the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. “I think Brendan Carr is outstanding, he’s a patriot,” said Trump, who nominated Carr to his position. “He loves our country, and he’s a tough guy. So we’ll have to see.” He's a childish dictator Come on everyone…we can agree this is absurd thing for a President to say. Can’t we? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Come on everyone…we can agree this is absurd thing for a President to say. Can’t we? Well Biden told facebook to take down posts about horse dewormer curing covid, so it's like the same thing. Liberal tears. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonnyutah 444 Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Well Biden told facebook to take down posts about horse dewormer curing covid, so it's like the same thing. Liberal tears. Yes! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,011 Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, edjr said: Stephen A Smiff to replace Kimmel.. I’d rather the Slippery Slope Guy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,389 Posted 2 hours ago 56 minutes ago, jonnyutah said: No. You didnt. You needed ron of all people to explain it to you. Idiot. You think Biden allegedly taking kickbacks (scant evidence, not even being pursued by Trump's DOJ b/c it was BS, they won the election so the lie is no longer useful) is the same as the Trump family accepting a $2B investment from a foreign nation right before he authorizes giving them computer chips (which his own intelligence agencies warned him against due to connections between UAE and China). And you call me an idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Fnord said: You think Biden allegedly taking kickbacks (scant evidence, not even being pursued by Trump's DOJ b/c it was BS, they won the election so the lie is no longer useful) is the same as the Trump family accepting a $2B investment from a foreign nation right before he authorizes giving them computer chips (which his own intelligence agencies warned him against due to connections between UAE and China). And you call me an idiot. peefoam is definitely an idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,618 Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Fnord said: You think Biden allegedly taking kickbacks (scant evidence, not even being pursued by Trump's DOJ b/c it was BS, they won the election so the lie is no longer useful) is the same as the Trump family accepting a $2B investment from a foreign nation right before he authorizes giving them computer chips (which his own intelligence agencies warned him against due to connections between UAE and China). And you call me an idiot. All 537 of them are on the take. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,618 Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, edjr said: Stephen A Smiff to replace Kimmel.. He's not funny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,389 Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said: All 537 of them are on the take. Maybe. But I know which ones will get attention for it and which won't (if any ever do). How about we investigate the ones with funky financials and prosecute where necessary? Dems, Reps, Indies, the whole lot of em. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,138 Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Strike said: Stupid. There wasn't anything comedic about his comments. What was false about them? ”MAGA tried to characterize the shooter as anything other than one of them.” Fact check: true. IANAL but IMO there’s no legal argument here. Edit: Well unless you argue that MAGA wasn’t arguing he was “anything other,” they were pretty much only arguing that he was a leftist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BirdGang 402 Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said: For many of us that Trump video was funny. The audience laughed. Only the lib scumbags. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites