Trump calls for the arrest and trial of 6 Democratic lawmakers for “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!”

[Fnord 2,563]

55 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

He should have thought about that before he used his status to implore soldiers to commit treason.  He said it, now be a man about it.  

Who did whatnow? I certainly never saw what you're referencing. 

[Gepetto 1,458]

The death penalty is justice, not murder.

Individuals have been executed for treason in the United States, though it is rare and has only happened a few times. The last time was in 1862 when William Bruce Mumford was hanged for tearing down an American flag during the Civil War, though this was a federal execution by a military tribunal. Other notable executions for state-level treason occurred during the 1847 Taos Revolt and the 1859 raid on Harpers Ferry, which resulted in John Brown's execution for treason against Virginia. 

[Mike Honcho 5,474]

Over 41K have liked Trump's "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!" post.  

[Fnord 2,563]

10 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

The death penalty is justice, not murder.

Individuals have been executed for treason in the United States, though it is rare and has only happened a few times. The last time was in 1862 when William Bruce Mumford was hanged for tearing down an American flag during the Civil War, though this was a federal execution by a military tribunal. Other notable executions for state-level treason occurred during the 1847 Taos Revolt and the 1859 raid on Harpers Ferry, which resulted in John Brown's execution for treason against Virginia. 

Fully agree with the bolded.

I'll point out that it's been 160+ years since the last time this happened in the US, and all of the above examples were carried out after a trial of some sort. While I do not literally think our dlckless wonder of a POTUS is advocating directly for political assassinations, some of his more deranged acolytes might, which he damn well knows. Dude survived a very near miss himself last year. For him to say stuff like this is just further example of how unfit he is.

[FrancieFootball 198]

4 hours ago, supermike80 said:

Meh.  That's Ok with me.  I have always been a fan of both parties having some power.  Never a fan of one party owning it all

Well, well, well. We see eye to eye on something!

[Tree of Knowledge 2,176]

39 minutes ago, MDC said:

Came off like a stunt to me, especially since they didn’t say what illegal activities the military is being asked to carry out.

But Trump is utterly deranged.

Trump should throw them in DC Gulag until we can be sure what they meant.  

[squistion 2,568]

Statements Trump just made on Fox:

 

"In the old days," what these Democratic lawmakers said was "punishable by death"

These Democrats are "in serious trouble" They've engaged in "seditious behavior"

"They broke the law"

He also says he's not threatening the Democrats. 

 

https://www.newser.com/story/379150/trump-im-not-threatening-death.html?taid=6920b341c731f70001f9fff5&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+New+Content+(Feed)&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter

[Ron_Artest 2,298]

 

 

[Tree of Knowledge 2,176]

5 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

 

 

AI

[Fnord 2,563]

@squistionNot to nitpick, but I don't recall the Don saying anything about a trial in those rants. Am I misremembering, or should you change the thread title?

[Ron_Artest 2,298]

2 hours ago, Gepetto said:

The death penalty is justice, not murder.

Individuals have been executed for treason in the United States, though it is rare and has only happened a few times. The last time was in 1862 when William Bruce Mumford was hanged for tearing down an American flag during the Civil War, though this was a federal execution by a military tribunal. Other notable executions for state-level treason occurred during the 1847 Taos Revolt and the 1859 raid on Harpers Ferry, which resulted in John Brown's execution for treason against Virginia. 

Who committed treason?

[dogcows 1,105]

8 hours ago, supermike80 said:

What's funny is you're right.  He rambles on and most of his raging should be ignored.  But the left cant...they are wayyy too emotional, about everything.   So on and on we go.

It's comical

Yes it’s funny to have a senile old man with the nuclear codes haha

[dogcows 1,105]

3 hours ago, MDC said:

Came off like a stunt to me, especially since they didn’t say what illegal activities the military is being asked to carry out.

But Trump is utterly deranged.

I don’t think it makes sense to specify what orders are illegal. The point is to get people thinking about what is or isn’t legal when they get orders. Also, it would cease to be relevant if different illegal orders were issued. 

[dogcows 1,105]

2 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Trump should throw them in DC Gulag until we can be sure what they meant.  

Another “freedom-loving” American who doesn’t want free speech allowed for people he disagrees with. 

[MDC 7,944]

4 minutes ago, dogcows said:

I don’t think it makes sense to specify what orders are illegal. The point is to get people thinking about what is or isn’t legal when they get orders. Also, it would cease to be relevant if different illegal orders were issued. 

Personally, I think if you’re going to imply that the military is getting illegal orders you’re obliged to explain what those illegal orders are. 

[dogcows 1,105]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

Personally, I think if you’re going to imply that the military is getting illegal orders you’re obliged to explain what those illegal orders are. 

I think the implication is that this president has no respect for the law and therefore they should be watching out for illegal orders. 
 

Just like if you’re in the same neighborhood as my uncle. I can’t tell what kind of crazy he is gonna pull, but you’d better look out if he’s in the vicinity. 

[MDC 7,944]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

I think the implication is that this president has no respect for the law and therefore they should be watching out for illegal orders. 
 

Just like if you’re in the same neighborhood as my uncle. I can’t tell what kind of crazy he is gonna pull, but you’d better look out if he’s in the vicinity. 

I guess we’ll agree to disagree on this one. Like all healthy normal people I hate Trump, but the video is pretty weird.

Don't get me wrong: Trump’s response is even weirder. But we already know he’s an unstable little girl.

[Maximum Overkill 2,486]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

Personally, I think if you’re going to imply that the military is getting illegal orders you’re obliged to explain what those illegal orders are. 

I agree. Just say what you're thinking, don't beat around the bush. 

We all know the intent behind that commercial, they do to, that's why they carefully chose their words. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,568]

when libs constantly say EVERYTHING TRUMP IS DOING IS ILLEGAL they are setting the bar for a military coup.  Trump deploying National Guards to protect federal buildings is not illegal (yet libs claim it is) Trump raising tariffs is not illegal, yet libs say he is.

this sets the stage for them to then tell the military to disobey chain of command orders based on feelings

 

[MDC 7,944]

12 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

when libs constantly say EVERYTHING TRUMP IS DOING IS ILLEGAL they are setting the bar for a military coup.  Trump deploying National Guards to protect federal buildings is not illegal (yet libs claim it is) Trump raising tariffs is not illegal, yet libs say he is.

this sets the stage for them to then tell the military to disobey chain of command orders based on feelings

 

Multiple courts have ruled that both these things are illegal.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,568]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

Multiple courts have ruled that both these things are illegal.

No lower activist judges ruled that. The president has control over the national guard. And protecting federal buildings. You can’t site a single thing that says otherwise in law 

and presidents throughout history have changed tariffs. But it’s illegal now that Trump did it. Got it

[squistion 2,568]

4 hours ago, Fnord said:

@squistionNot to nitpick, but I don't recall the Don saying anything about a trial in those rants. Am I misremembering, or should you change the thread title?

Thread title has not been changed and from my OP:

“It’s called SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL,” Trump charged in a post on Truth Social. “Each one of these traitors to our Country should be ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL. Their words cannot be allowed to stand - We won’t have a Country anymore!!! An example MUST BE SET.” 

[seafoam1 3,464]

35 minutes ago, squistion said:

Thread title has not been changed and from my OP:

“It’s called SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL,” Trump charged in a post on Truth Social. “Each one of these traitors to our Country should be ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL. Their words cannot be allowed to stand - We won’t have a Country anymore!!! An example MUST BE SET.” 

 still going on about this latest outrage from you. What a know nothing dope you are. 

[thegeneral 3,664]

7 hours ago, squistion said:

Should we have expected anything else from Mike Johnson?

 

Mike is Don’s little lap cat. 

[MDC 7,944]

1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

No lower activist judges ruled that. The president has control over the national guard. And protecting federal buildings. You can’t site a single thing that says otherwise in law 

and presidents throughout history have changed tariffs. But it’s illegal now that Trump did it. Got it

Judge rules Trump's National Guard deployment to D.C. is illegal

U.S. Court of International Trade rules certain emergency tariffs illegal

Supreme Court hasn’t ruled on that second one. 

The courts decide if it’s legal, not Daddy.

[Tree of Knowledge 2,176]

4 hours ago, dogcows said:

Another “freedom-loving” American who doesn’t want free speech allowed for people he disagrees with. 

Free speech.  Derp

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,568]

48 minutes ago, MDC said:

Judge rules Trump's National Guard deployment to D.C. is illegal

U.S. Court of International Trade rules certain emergency tariffs illegal

Supreme Court hasn’t ruled on that second one. 

The courts decide if it’s legal, not Daddy.

Things that judges only ruled on cause Trump. There was no other time when they did that when presidents did the exact same thing. But it’s ok OMB. 
 

most real Americans are for reducing crime. And using whatever we have as a source to do so. But we get it. You live in a hell hole and love all those criminals so of course you agree with not keeping dc safe 

[TimHauck 3,336]

2 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

No lower activist judges ruled that. The president has control over the national guard. And protecting federal buildings. You can’t site a single thing that says otherwise in law 

and presidents throughout history have changed tariffs. But it’s illegal now that Trump did it. Got it

Activist judges!

[squistion 2,568]

 

[Ron_Artest 2,298]

Goon squad heard the call and took action.

Maga is a disease 

[MDC 7,944]

14 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Things that judges only ruled on cause Trump. There was no other time when they did that when presidents did the exact same thing. But it’s ok OMB.
 

most real Americans are for reducing crime. And using whatever we have as a source to do so. But we get it. You live in a hell hole and love all those criminals so of course you agree with not keeping dc safe 

I don't remember the POTUS deploying the National Guard to fight crime or unilaterally applying sweeping tariffs at any other time in my life. 

Regardless, the courts decide if it’s legal not your Father. 

[jonnyutah 559]

13 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

I remember geek club righties hysterical after a right wing troll was assassinated.

You guys told us the rhetoric wasnt the problem. 

[dogcows 1,105]

 

12 minutes ago, squistion said:

 

MAGA supporters are violent and dangerous. And their fat senile pedophile leader is the worst of all. They should be ashamed of the entire movement. 
 

MAGA voters: Apologize to America and help us all kick the violent fascists in this administration to the curb for good. 

[thegeneral 3,664]

Trump and the Jihadist Mamdani…get a room you two. I think Donald was about to try and mount the guy.  

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,568]

5 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Activist judges!

100% lower court judges who have no authority on executive branch 

[Voltaire 5,498]

19 hours ago, Fnord said:

Fully agree with the bolded.

I'll point out that it's been 160+ years since the last time this happened in the US, and all of the above examples were carried out after a trial of some sort. While I do not literally think our dlckless wonder of a POTUS is advocating directly for political assassinations, some of his more deranged acolytes might, which he damn well knows. Dude survived a very near miss himself last year. For him to say stuff like this is just further example of how unfit he is.

Its a great point. With all the "Nazi," and "threat to democracy" rhetoric on the left, some left wing pyschos have bought into it and are turning into assassins while a large number who would never actually assassinate are celebrating and cheering them on.

Trump engaging in similar rhetoric identifies these six political opponents who "engaged in seditious conspiracy punishable by death" is in effect putting a target on their back for any right wing lunatics to do the same. 

I should end the post there. But I gotta go on a rant about what brought this up...

Military personnel akready know they don't have to follow illegal orders. With the Democrats claiming everything Trump does as illegal: deporting illegal aliens, making modifications to the White House, protecting federal property from rioters, eating steak with ketchup, negotiating peace deals in the Middle East, blowing up drug smugglers in international waters,  its really hard to pinpoint which of his orders they really truly mean are illegal. He abides by even the most absurd and ridiculous court order overstepping activist judges impose on him, not just regarding troop deployments and military matters but every other issue as well.

So I don't know what specific orders they angry about since they're angry about everything all the time and in the end, since their hair is constantly on fire over something Trump allegedly did as illegal so many time, until they lose in court on appeal far more than they win, and you see this over and over again. The reality its state and local level Democrats who engage in open defiance and active violations of immigration laws, not Trump.

Back to the topic at hand, the rhetoric is over the top insane, especially on the left. Here Trump is offering his political enemies more of the same and although he would never carry through with this stuff, it indirectly provides cover and reasoning for crazies to do so.

[Ron_Artest 2,298]

3 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

100% lower court judges who have no authority on executive branch 

You don't understand how the government works.

[Tree of Knowledge 2,176]

10 hours ago, squistion said:

 

Weird how Kyle never covers the SWATing of people with opposite views as him.  

[TimHauck 3,336]

4 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Weird how Kyle never covers the SWATing of people with opposite views as him.  

Thanks for the reminder.  Have there been any arrests on those?