Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 15, 2018 Remember guys, no one here is credible. No one here backs up their arguments with facts and links. No one here has ever won against Slo. He is the only one here who is capable of having a discussion. He is the only here not biased. Jesus this guy is pathetic. And when someone points it out to him he gets all angry, tells them to run along, and that they dont know what they are talking about. Its hilarious to see someone fail so much on a daily basis You bring literally nothing to the table but bogus attacks and then claim you or everyone kicks my ass. You are a focking joke...and no, I have no need to get angry about a little pissant nipping at my ankles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted June 15, 2018 They "had a suspect" in the e-mail hacking and delivery to Wikileaks. Wonder what happened. https://www.yahoo.com/news/clapper-suspect-kremlin-wikileaks-transfer-124145177.html?soc_trk=gcm&soc_src=5e53fef9-5fa4-39a8-abc4-01c97ce294c4&.tsrc=notification-brknews Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,745 Posted June 15, 2018 REad the report...there was bias but the bias didnt affect the work or conclusions. The worst it did was possibly affect the focus on one investigation over another at one point. Thats all youve got? Oof In addition on that possible bias the conclusion on prioritizing? Sad Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted June 15, 2018 You bring literally nothing to the table but bogus attacks and then claim you or everyone kicks my ass. You are a focking joke...and no, I have no need to get angry about a little pissant nipping at my ankles. Your posts are full of name calling and swearing. You are one angry and unhinged person. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 15, 2018 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/15/ig-2-0-could-be-even-worse-for-fbi-as-feds-brace-for-trump-spying-probe.html I.G.'s next MOAB inbound. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted June 15, 2018 You bring literally nothing to the table but bogus attacks and then claim you or everyone kicks my ass. You are a focking joke...and no, I have no need to get angry about a little pissant nipping at my ankles. I come from a land down under Cant you hear can you hear that thunder Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 15, 2018 Cant you hear can you hear that thunder That's Loretta Lynch running for an attorney Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted June 16, 2018 What a disgrace the leadership and lead investigators of Obamas FBI were. Pure disgrace. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 16, 2018 What a disgrace the leadership and lead investigators of Obamas FBI were. Pure disgrace. Made mistakes...still made the proper conclusion and their mistakes actually hurt Hillary and not helped her. Sorry you didnt get the bombshell you wanted...but I warned you that would happen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted June 16, 2018 Made mistakes...still made the proper conclusion and their mistakes actually hurt Hillary and not helped her. Sorry you didnt get the bombshell you wanted...but I warned you that would happen. Heres the thing though. It might have hurt Hillary but their intention wasnt to hurt her but help her and keep Trump from winning. You have to admit that much is true Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 16, 2018 Heres the thing though. It might have hurt Hillary but their intention wasnt to hurt her but help her and keep Trump from winning. You have to admit that much is true Its not true. The report specifically states there is no evidence of that. And as far as Comey...his mistakes and deviation from protocol was because he feared leaks out of the NY office. None of that was done to keep Trump from winning. Had they wanted that...they would have leaked that his campaign was undermining investigation.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted June 16, 2018 Made mistakes...still made the proper conclusion and their mistakes actually hurt Hillary and not helped her. Sorry you didnt get the bombshell you wanted...but I warned you that would happen. Read the report numbnuts. Comey thought he was helping Hillary by legitimizing her and her inevitable presidency. These people, like you, are dumb. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted June 16, 2018 Its not true. The report specifically states there is no evidence of that. And as far as Comey...his mistakes and deviation from protocol was because he feared leaks out of the NY office. None of that was done to keep Trump from winning. Had they wanted that...they would have leaked that his campaign was undermining investigation.. Sho the report literally has texts saying that they wont let Trump become president. How is that no evidence? Thats clear cut evidence Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 16, 2018 Sho the report literally has texts saying that they wont let Trump become president. How is that no evidence? Thats clear cut evidence And it literally states they didnt take actions to do so. It literally says they didnt have evidenceto say they took action. Dont just read clips you find...read the conclusions too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted June 16, 2018 And it literally states they didnt take actions to do so. It literally says they didnt have evidenceto say they took action. Dont just read clips you find...read the conclusions too. it does not state that they didnt take actions to do so. Its states there's no evidence they did.(which is a joke) Big difference Why lie ? Don't forget, this isn't the actual report. This report has been edited.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 16, 2018 it does not state that they didnt take actions to do so. Its states there's no evidence they did.(which is a joke) Big difference Why lie ? Don't forget, this isn't the actual report. This report has been edited.... Exactly. It states there is no evidence and in reality we know there was another investigation that wasnt leaked prior to the election. There simply werent actions taken. And you going with the Trump excuse that the real stuff was redacted now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 4,003 Posted June 16, 2018 So an FBI agent interviewed Hitlery's personal IT person and had this exchange with a colleague after: FBI Employee: “boom…how did the [witness] go” Agent 1: “Awesome. Lied his ass off. Went from never inside the scif [sensitive compartmented information facility] at res, to looked in when it was being constructed, to remove the trash twice, to troubleshot the secure fax with HRC a couple times, to everytime there was a secure fax i did it with HRC. Ridic,” FBI Employee: “would be funny if he was the only guy charged n this deal” Agent 1: “I know. For 1001. Even if he said the truth and didnt have a clearance when handling the secure fax — aint noone gonna do s--t” Lieing to an FBI agent in an interview is illegal and a prosecutable offense yet for some reason this guy got off...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fireballer 2,394 Posted June 16, 2018 And it literally states they didnt take actions to do so. It literally says they didnt have evidenceto say they took action. Dont just read clips you find...read the conclusions too. Dude, youre a hack, as are a bunch of the conservative whack jobs here. Ive read enough of your stuff to know that, if this report was about a Trump appointee, you would be melting down. You like to call people out on "whataboutism", but like many dense libtards and conservative hacks, you dismiss valid points as "whataboutism". Your whataboutism claims are actually pointing out a double standard. And your so blind you wont recognize that you lose all credibility dismissing a double standard as "whataboutism". So, in this topic,as many others, you have no credibility because everyone knows that you would be throwing a tantrum if the shoe is on the other foot. Youre not the only offender, just usually the worst. Go ahead and dismiss my comments with a response like "who are you, guy" or "youre a troll", but you know its true. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 16, 2018 Dude, youre a hack, as are a bunch of the conservative whack jobs here. Ive read enough of your stuff to know that, if this report was about a Trump appointee, you would be melting down. You like to call people out on "whataboutism", but like many dense libtards and conservative hacks, you dismiss valid points as "whataboutism". Your whataboutism claims are actually pointing out a double standard. And your so blind you wont recognize that you lose all credibility dismissing a double standard as "whataboutism". So, in this topic,as many others, you have no credibility because everyone knows that you would be throwing a tantrum if the shoe is on the other foot. Youre not the only offender, just usually the worst. Go ahead and dismiss my comments with a response like "who are you, guy" or "youre a troll", but you know its true. What in my posts were whataboutism? You are entitled to your opinion... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted June 16, 2018 Dude, youre a hack, as are a bunch of the conservative whack jobs here. Ive read enough of your stuff to know that, if this report was about a Trump appointee, you would be melting down. You like to call people out on "whataboutism", but like many dense libtards and conservative hacks, you dismiss valid points as "whataboutism". Your whataboutism claims are actually pointing out a double standard. And your so blind you wont recognize that you lose all credibility dismissing a double standard as "whataboutism". So, in this topic,as many others, you have no credibility because everyone knows that you would be throwing a tantrum if the shoe is on the other foot. Youre not the only offender, just usually the worst. Go ahead and dismiss my comments with a response like "who are you, guy" or "youre a troll", but you know its true. Exactly! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,483 Posted June 17, 2018 Dude, youre a hack, as are a bunch of the conservative whack jobs here. Ive read enough of your stuff to know that, if this report was about a Trump appointee, you would be melting down. You like to call people out on "whataboutism", but like many dense libtards and conservative hacks, you dismiss valid points as "whataboutism". Your whataboutism claims are actually pointing out a double standard. And your so blind you wont recognize that you lose all credibility dismissing a double standard as "whataboutism". So, in this topic,as many others, you have no credibility because everyone knows that you would be throwing a tantrum if the shoe is on the other foot. Youre not the only offender, just usually the worst. Go ahead and dismiss my comments with a response like "who are you, guy" or "youre a troll", but you know its true. +1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted June 17, 2018 You know its bad when there Every single person here is calling you out on something but you wont acknowledge it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 17, 2018 You know its bad when there Every single person here is calling you out on something but you wont acknowledge it I know Im right when digster pulls the everyone card. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted June 17, 2018 I know Im right when digster pulls the everyone card. Yet you ignore everyone else come on man be better than this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted June 17, 2018 Yet you ignore everyone else come on man be better than this He can’t. He has no grasp of reality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted June 17, 2018 Yet you ignore everyone else come on man be better than thisHis lack of self awareness is stunning. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 17, 2018 Yet you ignore everyone else come on man be better than thisYou telling me to be better...high comedy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted June 17, 2018 Its so bad its funny. Everyone knows hes a hack. Everyone calls him a hack. He refuses to acknowledge it. Its downright hilarious and sad at the same time. So he tries to deflect from it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted June 17, 2018 Its so bad its funny. Everyone knows hes a hack. Everyone calls him a hack. He refuses to acknowledge it. Its downright hilarious and sad at the same time. So he tries to deflect from it That’s a fact. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 17, 2018 Its so bad its funny. Everyone knows hes a hack. Everyone calls him a hack. He refuses to acknowledge it. Its downright hilarious and sad at the same time. So he tries to deflect from itNo deflection needed...younthink I give a fock that a bunch of right wing jackholes call me a hack?But hey...good day for you, looks like you may have Hawker and the Beave stroking you off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted June 17, 2018 .younthink I give a fock that a bunch of right wing jackholes call me a hack? . Yes you do and that’s a fact. You prove it every day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 18, 2018 So Peter Strzok will testify, NOT plead the Fifth. Why didn't he resign/get fired like the other 2 dozen people? Why wasn't this released to the public earlier? Why is he still employed by FBI? Because he was the key/Lynch pin to several illegal operations and cut a deal. He's still an employee so the I.G./DOJ can compel him to testify. You know ALL the FBI/DOJ scumbags are sh!tting their collective pants at the news. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 18, 2018 Gowdy apparently is a white hat........... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,133 Posted June 18, 2018 And it literally states they didnt take actions to do so. Oh whew, thanks for clearing that up. I almost thought the FBI was corrupt for a second. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 18, 2018 http://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/392745-clapper-declares-it-is-time-for-mueller-to-wrap-up-the-russia-probe-soon Clapper now wanting Mueller probe to finish up. Methinks he's waving the white flag wanting to call a cease fire now that his gun is empty. NO DEAL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 18, 2018 https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1008695783745572864.html https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Df-cM5pUEAIGr-p.jpg Ghattas.............a new name to me mentioned in the I.G. report. He took the lead to work with a review of the MYE (HRC email inv). SIC/HIC have been wanting to interview this guy for awhile now. Turns out Ghattas is ALSO on Mueller Team. JFC...........the '30,000' view' of these conspirators represents just how brazen they've been leading up to and after the Mueller investigation starting. Focking Clown show continues......... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 18, 2018 This IG testimony has been brutal for the Dems. Admits there was bias. Admits there was political bias by the AG. Admits that there is no difference between "gross negligence" and "careless recklessness", except that one is classified as criminal and the other not. Sho and the sky screamers are going to pretend today did not happen. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,489 Posted June 18, 2018 This IG testimony has been brutal for the Dems. Admits there was bias. Admits there was political bias by the AG. Admits that there is no difference between "gross negligence" and "careless recklessness", except that one is classified as criminal and the other not. Sho and the sky screamers are going to pretend today did not happen. That is why they are complaining about an immigration policy that has been around for decades. Why didn’t Obama change this policy when he had a super majority? He could have created open borders. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 18, 2018 This IG testimony has been brutal for the Dems. Admits there was bias. Admits there was political bias by the AG. Admits that there is no difference between "gross negligence" and "careless recklessness", except that one is classified as criminal and the other not. Sho and the sky screamers are going to pretend today did not happen. As are you...as usual, you spin all of it and leave out key parts. Typical of the troll yiubare. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
