MDC 5,915 Posted February 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, Ray Lewis's Limo Driver said: Indeed, they are paid pretty poorly as new/incoming, and DC does not have that nice a spread of housing. If you don't want to be shot at, or have your stuff stolen, you have to pay handsomely to get away from all that... Well, it’s also a second / working home for Congressman. I am not feeling too bad for them. $2000/month also isn’t crazy for DC. You’d be hard pressed to rent a place for less than $1500-$1800 even in Philly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,610 Posted February 21, 2019 they aren't paid poorly, the annual salary starts at like 159k Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted February 21, 2019 9 minutes ago, MDC said: Well, it’s also a second / working home for Congressman. I am not feeling too bad for them. $2000/month also isn’t crazy for DC. You’d be hard pressed to rent a place for less than $1500-$1800 even in Philly. It is lower end, but there are folks paying less, some who pay more, some who share to get access to the higher priced areas.....she is, of course, the one with her New Deal proposal promising “Safe, affordable, adequate housing” for all. Who repeatedly criticized luxury real estate developers during her campaign, claiming that their buildings hiked up rent prices and pushed low-income residents out of their neighborhoods. And here she is, using one of those real estate developers who does not support low-income housing. Imagine my surprise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,915 Posted February 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, Ray Lewis's Limo Driver said: It is lower end, but there are folks paying less, some who pay more, some who share to get access to the higher priced areas.....she is, of course, the one with her New Deal proposal promising “Safe, affordable, adequate housing” for all. Who repeatedly criticized luxury real estate developers during her campaign, claiming that their buildings hiked up rent prices and pushed low-income residents out of their neighborhoods. And here she is, using one of those real estate developers who does not support low-income housing. Imagine my surprise. The median rent in DC is $2700 - I doubt AOC’s $2000/month place qualifies as luxury housing. I don’t think it’s necessarily hypocritical to rent an apartment that’s 25% cheaper than average while saying everyone should have affordable housing. Unless you think she should be living in a tent out of solidarity with the poors or something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted February 21, 2019 1 minute ago, MDC said: The median rent in DC is $2700 - I doubt AOC’s $2000/month place qualifies as luxury housing. I don’t think it’s necessarily hypocritical to rent an apartment that’s 25% cheaper than average while saying everyone should have affordable housing. Unless you think she should be living in a tent out of solidarity with the poors or something. Agree to disagree. If the person in question is prominently proclaiming the evils of the wealthy, and how evil real estate people do not provide affordable housing, then you participate in tha that model.....typical leftists hypocrisy. People just need to do what she says or thinks, but she wont hold herself to that standard. The Ayn Rand factor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,915 Posted February 21, 2019 Just now, Ray Lewis's Limo Driver said: Agree to disagree. If the person in question is prominently proclaiming the evils of the wealthy, and how evil real estate people do not provide affordable housing, then you participate in tha that model.....typical leftists hypocrisy. People just need to do what she says or thinks, but she wont hold herself to that standard. The Ayn Rand factor. In what way is it hypocritical for someone who thinks everyone should have access to affordable housing to rent a townhouse that’s under market value? If she were renting a luxury townhome I could see it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted February 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, MDC said: In what way is it hypocritical for someone who thinks everyone should have access to affordable housing to rent a townhouse that’s under market value? If she were renting a luxury townhome I could see it. As stated, her manifesto attacked the people who provide the building in which she resides, there are countless people in DC who cannot afford that rental, and that owner makes no effort to provide affordable housing. She does care about people, she cares about attention, she lives separate from her credo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,915 Posted February 21, 2019 4 minutes ago, Ray Lewis's Limo Driver said: As stated, her manifesto attacked the people who provide the building in which she resides, there are countless people in DC who cannot afford that rental, and that owner makes no effort to provide affordable housing. She does care about people, she cares about attention, she lives separate from her credo. I haven’t read much about AOC. Did she attack all property owners or just luxury real estate developers? Is your issue that she is renting a place at all or that it’s not cheap enough? Her townhouse is 25% below market average. If it were 50% cheaper than the average DC rental would she no longer be hypocritical? Just trying to figure out your grievance formula. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 5,234 Posted February 21, 2019 21 minutes ago, Ray Lewis's Limo Driver said: Agree to disagree. If the person in question is prominently proclaiming the evils of the wealthy, and how evil real estate people do not provide affordable housing, then you participate in tha that model.....typical leftists hypocrisy. People just need to do what she says or thinks, but she wont hold herself to that standard. The Ayn Rand factor. What is the Ayn Rand analogy? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted February 21, 2019 9 minutes ago, jerryskids said: What is the Ayn Rand analogy? Through her writings, such as Atlas Shrugged, she extolled the virtues of self-reliance and avoiding social programs etc.....developing Randian heroes along the way, but as she grew older she realized that she actually needed those helpful socialist programs, so she changed her name and applied for them, clearly ashamed that she was not following her own stance..... Cortez apparently has no shame, she wants to tell the world how things should be, and when the opportunity to show the world through action....putting herself into it, she happily contributes to that same system she attacks....hypocrisy abounds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,403 Posted February 21, 2019 10 hours ago, RaiderHater's Revenge said: Bernie is already underfire, for making the only statement that I wholeheartedly agree with BERNIE SANDERS: We have got to look at candidates, you know, not by the color of their skin, not by - not by their sexual orientation or their gender and not by their age. I mean, I think we have got to try to move us toward a non-discriminatory society which looks at people based on their abilities. Strange how he left out religion... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 5,234 Posted February 21, 2019 17 minutes ago, Ray Lewis's Limo Driver said: Through her writings, such as Atlas Shrugged, she extolled the virtues of self-reliance and avoiding social programs etc.....developing Randian heroes along the way, but as she grew older she realized that she actually needed those helpful socialist programs, so she changed her name and applied for them, clearly ashamed that she was not following her own stance..... Cortez apparently has no shame, she wants to tell the world how things should be, and when the opportunity to show the world through action....putting herself into it, she happily contributes to that same system she attacks....hypocrisy abounds. Interesting, didn't know that. That being said, I don't think she opposed the existence of social programs per se, rather she opposed what she called "second handers" who were not truly needy. As an example in Fountainhead, she talks about the poor situation in the projects. She blames the husbands for going out drinking and otherwise not being responsible. But she also blames the slumlords who did little to nothing to improve the places. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,755 Posted February 21, 2019 AOC should have checked out Craigslist. I hear you can find a room to rent there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted February 21, 2019 26 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: So good..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,654 Posted February 22, 2019 I can't believe he's not a Jew. He's so... Jewy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,755 Posted February 22, 2019 19 minutes ago, wiffleball said: I can't believe he's not a Jew. He's so... Jewy He is Jewish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,654 Posted February 22, 2019 2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said: He is Jewish. Well there ya go. Surprised he's not yelling about moving down to Del Boca Vista. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted February 23, 2019 Love it. Bring on Bernie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,080 Posted February 23, 2019 He's such a piece of shiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cloaca du jour 2,069 Posted February 24, 2019 A whole generation who want everything free....good lord...bernie has a chance Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLS 313 Posted February 25, 2019 Bernie supporters are usually younger people. They observe the rich fat cats running everything and making more money. The Bernie Sanders' of the world (from here for, known as BS), promise that these folks won't be in control anymore if they win. Insurance prices will come down, jobs will pay more, etc. I get it. The problem is they don't recognize that the rich fat cats are that way BECAUSE of government. Not in spite of it. The LAST thing they really NEED is more government. And that's where we're at an impasse. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted February 25, 2019 8 minutes ago, BLS said: Bernie supporters are usually younger people. They observe the rich fat cats running everything and making more money. The Bernie Sanders' of the world (from here for, known as BS), promise that these folks won't be in control anymore if they win. Insurance prices will come down, jobs will pay more, etc. I get it. The problem is they don't recognize that the rich fat cats are that way BECAUSE of government. Not in spite of it. The LAST thing they really NEED is more government. And that's where we're at an impasse. You're right. I like a lot of what Bernie and Warren say about income inequality and the corporatization of America. Problem is, I know their solutions are largely bullsh!t promises that would never, and in most cases should never, happen. But how else, besides government, will change ever occur? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 25, 2019 39 minutes ago, titans&bucs&bearsohmy! said: But how else, besides government, will change ever occur? But electing someone outside the D.C. establishment................someone kind of like Trump? What change needs to occur? We're seeing wholesale change right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted February 25, 2019 38 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: But electing someone outside the D.C. establishment................someone kind of like Trump? What change needs to occur? We're seeing wholesale change right now. I think you are partially correct. We have seen some change in certain issues, yes. I don't know that the issue we were talking about, namely wealth disparity and too much corporate power, is best served by electing a billionaire corporatist, but in other issues, yes, trump has brought change. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,610 Posted February 25, 2019 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 25, 2019 5 minutes ago, titans&bucs&bearsohmy! said: I think you are partially correct. We have seen some change in certain issues, yes. I don't know that the issue we were talking about, namely wealth disparity and too much corporate power, is best served by electing a billionaire corporatist, but in other issues, yes, trump has brought change. I disagree with companies paying CEOs millions especially after they fock the company up. With that being said, how would you legislate that? Perhaps if you made corporate tax breaks tied to CEOs salaries. You want to keep the benefit of lower corporate rate? Knock off the bloated CEO salaries. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,403 Posted February 26, 2019 On 2/24/2019 at 7:37 PM, Filthy Fernadez said: I disagree with companies paying CEOs millions especially after they fock the company up. With that being said, how would you legislate that? Perhaps if you made corporate tax breaks tied to CEOs salaries. You want to keep the benefit of lower corporate rate? Knock off the bloated CEO salaries. A CEO making a fee less million wouldn't help the people working for them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 22, 2019 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2M4gkRW0AA7svl.jpg:large Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,610 Posted March 23, 2019 On 2/26/2019 at 12:27 PM, Cdub100 said: A CEO making a fee less million wouldn't help the people working for them. I think I read somewhere that the CEO of Walmart makes 19 million a year, and if they reduced his salary to 1 million a year, every Walmart employee would get 10$ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted March 23, 2019 10 hours ago, RaiderHater's Revenge said: I think I read somewhere that the CEO of Walmart makes 19 million a year, and if they reduced his salary to 1 million a year, every Walmart employee would get 10$ Well they have about 2.3 million employees. So I think that number is closer to $8. They can all get grandpa a couple extra sticks of roll on deodorant for Christmas each year with that kind of coin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,654 Posted April 8, 2019 and this is why the Democrats don't stand a chance. Headline out of Bernie's can't today is that he thinks all felons should be allowed to vote. Hey, it gets worse. They should be allowed to them while in prison. no, I don't give a damn how you feel about that particular subject. But just strategically, no matter what side of the aisle you're on, is this a big vote-getter? I'm guessing that you lose more votes than you gain here. beyond that, this is the kind of thing where the casual independent sees this headline, then rules out Bernie completely going forward. It doesn't matter if he is 99 great ideas. If his first idea out of the box is this one? Nobody's going to hear or listen to the other 99. This guy is just such a raving effing hippie and so completely out of touch with what it takes to win an election, I don't know why the hell he commands the kind of followers he does. And worse? You're telling me there's nobody from the DNC with enough gravitas to pull this idiot aside and say Hey Bernie, why don't we wait till you get in the white house before you start posing these stupid ass ideas? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 5,234 Posted April 8, 2019 1 hour ago, wiffleball said: and this is why the Democrats don't stand a chance. Headline out of Bernie's can't today is that he thinks all felons should be allowed to vote. Hey, it gets worse. They should be allowed to them while in prison. no, I don't give a damn how you feel about that particular subject. But just strategically, no matter what side of the aisle you're on, is this a big vote-getter? I'm guessing that you lose more votes than you gain here. beyond that, this is the kind of thing where the casual independent sees this headline, then rules out Bernie completely going forward. It doesn't matter if he is 99 great ideas. If his first idea out of the box is this one? Nobody's going to hear or listen to the other 99. This guy is just such a raving effing hippie and so completely out of touch with what it takes to win an election, I don't know why the hell he commands the kind of followers he does. And worse? You're telling me there's nobody from the DNC with enough gravitas to pull this idiot aside and say Hey Bernie, why don't we wait till you get in the white house before you start posing these stupid ass ideas? Agreed. I appreciate his sticking with his principles but... really? Also, I don't know that the DNC wants him; if not they are probably happy with him burning out on such positions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,755 Posted April 8, 2019 So, if you live in an area with a prison, the prisoners will be deciding who your representative is. A voting block of a few thousand goes a long way in local elections. So the pedophiles get to vote for the school board and the drug dealers for sheriff. Nice work Bernie. Really thought this one through. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,654 Posted April 8, 2019 ... and in a similarly stupid fashion, just saw a headline where Booker is introducing reparations legislation. Jesus, if Trump can manage not to shoot himself or implode he's going to win this thing running away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,915 Posted April 8, 2019 I like most of Bernie’s policies. I can’t get on board with prisoners voting but ex cons who’ve already paid their debt should be allowed to vote. I think he’s one of those guys who will help shape the direction of the party and maybe he’s even a behind the scenes kingmaker but he won’t ever be the guy. To anyone in middle American he’s going to come off as the cranky old hippy Jew and I don’t see enough appeal there. I think it was Thomas Jefferson who said the first job of a statesman is to get elected. I don’t think Bernie clears that hurdle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fireballer 2,394 Posted April 8, 2019 57 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: So, if you live in an area with a prison, the prisoners will be deciding who your representative is. A voting block of a few thousand goes a long way in local elections. So the pedophiles get to vote for the school board and the drug dealers for sheriff. Nice work Bernie. Really thought this one through. Hes a proven BLM puppet. Nuff said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites