peenie 1,988 Posted November 4, 2007 Whom would you NEVER vote for for President of the U.S.? Clinton (D) Kucinich (D) Gravel (D) Paul ® Brownback ® Tancredo ® McCain ® Hunter ® Giuliani ® Romney ® Edwards (D) Thompson ® Dodd (D) Biden (D) Obama (D) Huckabee ® Richardson (D) my answer: tom tancredo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted November 4, 2007 Clinton (D) Kucinich (D) Gravel (D) Edwards (D) Dodd (D) Biden (D) Obama (D) Richardson (D) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GiantsRule 0 Posted November 4, 2007 Clinton (D)Kucinich (D) Gravel (D) Edwards (D) Dodd (D) Biden (D) Obama (D) Richardson (D) You could have saved yourself space by saying "any candidate that could actually help my country instead of running it into the ground like my current President." Actually, that would take a lot more space but make more sense than your list. For me, it's Mitt Romney. What a no-nothing piece of sh!t who only got his job (as MA gov) because the broad that was in office before him (Jane Swift) was such a fvcking disaster! Even Recliner Pissant could have taken office after that debacle! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted November 4, 2007 You could have saved yourself space by saying "any candidate that could actually help my country instead of running it into the ground like my current President." To you I guess the following is "running the country into the ground": Pulling us out of the Clinton recession. Overcoming the economic impact of 9/11 Tax cuts for every person in the country who pays income taxes. Record revenue coming into the Gubmint. Record low unemployment. 166,000 jobs created last month alone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GiantsRule 0 Posted November 4, 2007 Pulling us out of the Clinton recession. Wow, you really are a spinning douche! Back to ignore with ye! Keep convincing yourself that GWB isn't the biggest disgrace of a two-term President this country has had in over 100 years. You're one of the few Republitards that still feel that way! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toro 3 Posted November 4, 2007 Keep convincing yourself that GWB isn't the biggest disgrace of a two-term President this country has had in over 100 years. You're one of the few Republitards that still feel that way! He has been the biggest republican disgrace. Jimmy Carter still takes the cake. That being said, I still believe that even though the Bush administration has done some very bad and stupid things, we are in a better place now than we would be if Gore had been elected or if Kerry had been elected. I would also vote for Jimmy Carter before I would vote for Hillary Clinton. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gratefulted 14 Posted November 4, 2007 Clinton Brownback Tancredo Hunter Giuliani Romney Thompson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GiantsRule 0 Posted November 4, 2007 He has been the biggest republican disgrace. Jimmy Carter still takes the cake. That being said, I still believe that even though the Bush administration has done some very bad and stupid things, we are in a better place now than we would be if Gore had been elected or if Kerry had been elected. I would also vote for Jimmy Carter before I would vote for Hillary Clinton. Good point, but my assessment of GWB still stands since I qualified him with "two-term President." You can't go by "what ifs" when it comes to the Presidency. While I'm not sold that Kerry would have done a good job, I'm sure Gore would have done just fine through the first four years. Having less than zero charisma or personality isn't a prerequisite for knowing what you're doing. Bush is charming...in a third grader fingerpaints a picture for his Mommy kind of way. Doesn't really mean much in the long run though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted November 4, 2007 You could have saved yourself space by saying "any candidate that could actually help my country instead of running it into the ground like my current President."Actually, that would take a lot more space but make more sense than your list. For me, it's Mitt Romney. What a no-nothing piece of sh!t who only got his job (as MA gov) because the broad that was in office before him (Jane Swift) was such a fvcking disaster! Even Recliner Pissant could have taken office after that debacle! Shh! Don't ruin the Democrats' strategy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted November 4, 2007 Wow, you really are a spinning douche! Back to ignore with ye! So Mr. Economist, when did the recession start? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toro 3 Posted November 4, 2007 Good point, but my assessment of GWB still stands since I qualified him with "two-term President." You can't go by "what ifs" when it comes to the Presidency. While I'm not sold that Kerry would have done a good job, I'm sure Gore would have done just fine through the first four years. Having less than zero charisma or personality isn't a prerequisite for knowing what you're doing. Bush is charming...in a third grader fingerpaints a picture for his Mommy kind of way. Doesn't really mean much in the long run though. ok, two term. Bush's mistake has been his overreaction. Bush truly believes this is a global struggle of us vs. them (America vs. Islam). I think the one thing most democrats can't understand is how he got reelected. The reelection of Bush was also an overreaction. I'll try and put it into terms that I believe to be true. I think the choice was having a president who would go in and do whatever they can (even at the cost of civil liberties, human lives, and most importantly our soldiers lives) to eliminate the threat and a president that would waffle in the face of public opinion and go back to the status quo of having the foreign policy of the United States influenced by organizations such as the UN. What these same people fail to realize is the possibility of this foreign policy could create a bigger threat and that the civil liberties surrendered might be used in other ways. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted November 4, 2007 Whom would you NEVER vote for for President of the U.S.?Clinton (D) Kucinich (D) Brownback ® Hunter ® Edwards (D) Dodd (D) Huckabee ® There you have it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GettnHuge 2 Posted November 4, 2007 Whom would you NEVER vote for for President of the U.S.?Clinton (D) Kucinich (D) Gravel (D) Edwards (D) Dodd (D) Biden (D) Obama (D) Richardson (D) hth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flashover 0 Posted November 4, 2007 The candidates with a ® after their name. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Saint Elistan 106 Posted November 5, 2007 Anyone who votes strictly based on party is: A ) Retarded B ) Not deserving of the right to vote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,956 Posted November 5, 2007 Rudy Giuliani, cause he's got yellow teeth and likes it balls-deep up the ass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted November 5, 2007 Anyone who votes strictly based on party is: A ) Retarded B ) Not deserving of the right to vote Exactly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EAwer 1 Posted November 5, 2007 Clinton (D) Kucinich (D) Gravel (D) Brownback ® Tancredo ® McCain ® Hunter ® Giuliani ® Romney ® Edwards (D) Thompson ® Dodd (D) Biden (D) Obama (D) Huckabee ® Richardson (D) thisnovemember5th.com its almost here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smashmouths@blf 33 Posted November 5, 2007 I won't vote for the B*tch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,030 Posted November 5, 2007 The Black one(s). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kilroy69 1,271 Posted November 5, 2007 Clinton I am not interested in having 2 familys controll the country for the entire time that I have been able to vote so far. 2 bushes 2 clintons= trouble. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MicktheGreat 1 Posted November 5, 2007 Of the legit candidates, I'd never vote for: Clinton (D) McCain ® Romney ® Thompson ® Guiliani ® That leaves me (in no particular order): Edwards (D) Obama (D) Paul ® With Clinton/Guiliani leading the polls, it's not looking good... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,505 Posted November 5, 2007 Mike Huckabee because I loathe the Evangelical agenda (even though I personally like him and think he has integrity) Mitt Romney- Biggest two faced craven chameleon liar I've ever seen. Will say anything to anybody. Has no core beliefs, they just change with the prevailing winds. I expected him to convert to Southern Baptist by now, but maybe that move would that be too obvious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hoytdwow 202 Posted November 5, 2007 Awesome poll, peenie! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,797 Posted November 5, 2007 Hillary. Instantly unelectable in my book. I'd honestly vote for a 3rd term for Bush. But, that's mostly because I want him to have to wallow in the chit-pile he and his buddies created. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brown Eyed Girl 1 Posted November 5, 2007 Well, if I have to pick just one... Clinton takes the top spot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seattle_pt1 0 Posted November 5, 2007 Clinton Romney Edwards Thompson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peenie 1,988 Posted November 5, 2007 Awesome poll, peenie! not sure what this means? are you really complimenting me on this thread? why thank you. although, i can't take credit. i just did a copy and paste from zogby. or were you mad that i didn't make it an official poll? eh, this way is more interesting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rattlesnake 0 Posted November 6, 2007 To you I guess the following is "running the country into the ground": Pulling us out of the Clinton recession. Overcoming the economic impact of 9/11 Tax cuts for every person in the country who pays income taxes. Record revenue coming into the Gubmint. Record low unemployment. 166,000 jobs created last month alone. Wow, you're actually, seriously, trying to argue that Bush is a good President. Holy crap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rattlesnake 0 Posted November 6, 2007 I won't vote for the B*tch. Please be more specific. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted November 6, 2007 Wow, you're actually, seriously, trying to argue that Bush is a good President. Holy crap. Um, I was addressing his "running the country into the ground" crack. I know you don't like the Iraq war, but you don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to the issues I brought up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VikesFan 1 Posted November 6, 2007 Clinton (D) Kucinich (D) Gravel (D) Brownback ® McCain ® Hunter ® Giuliani ® Romney ® Edwards (D) Thompson ® Dodd (D) Biden (D) Obama (D) Huckabee ® Richardson (D) Just about all of them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baby Jesus 0 Posted November 6, 2007 Clinton (D)Kucinich (D) Gravel (D) Brownback ® McCain ® Hunter ® Giuliani ® Romney ® Edwards (D) Thompson ® Dodd (D) Biden (D) Obama (D) Huckabee ® Richardson (D) Just about all of them. Who would you vote for? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EAwer 1 Posted November 6, 2007 Who would you vote for? Dr. Ron Paul of course. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Quickolas1 80 Posted November 6, 2007 guiliani if he was elected president, i'd strongly consider moving to france Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeRedneck 3 Posted November 6, 2007 Clinton (D) Kucinich (D) Gravel (D) Tancredo ® McCain ® Hunter ® Giuliani ® Romney ® Edwards (D) Thompson ® Dodd (D) Biden (D) Obama (D) Huckabee ® Richardson (D) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
congressmanreality 1 Posted November 6, 2007 I would NEVER vote for for President of the U.S.?Clinton (D) Kucinich (D) Gravel (D) Brownback ® Tancredo ® McCain ® Hunter ® Giuliani ® Romney ® Edwards (D) Thompson ® Dodd (D) Biden (D) Huckabee ® Richardson (D) So basically, Ron Paul. But if he doesn't win the ® nomination and Obama steals the nomination from Hillary, I'd toss him a vote, because he's one of the few legit candidates that is not on record as supporting our debacle in the ME. And it'd hopefully signal to the current ® establishment that they need to change. Also, anyone that is arguing that Bush is a good President, particularly that he has helped the economy in any way, shape, or form, is either an idiot, or heavily invested in foreign markets (specifically, China's). The Canadian dollar is worth more than ours, for Christ's sake. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted November 6, 2007 not sure what this means?are you really complimenting me on this thread? why thank you. although, i can't take credit. i just did a copy and paste from zogby. or were you mad that i didn't make it an official poll? eh, this way is more interesting. I'd go with option #2. HTH!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites