***Official Seattle Seahawks Thread 2012***

[FlaHawker 24]

Yikes...

 

Away Games 2011 (3-5)

@ San Francisco - L 33-17

@ Pittsburgh - L 24-0

@ New York - W 36-25

@ Cleveland - L 6-3

@ Dallas - L 23-13

@ St. Louis - W 24-7

@ Chicago - W 38-14

@ Arizona - L 23-20 (OT)

 

Away Games 2010 (2-6)

@ Denver - L 31-14

@ St. Louis - L 20-3

@ Chicago - W 23-20

@ Oakland - L 33-3

@ Arizona - W 36-18

@ New Orleans - L 34-19

@ San Francisco - L 40-21

@ Tampa Bay - L 38-15

 

Ole Pete just can't win without a stadium specifically designed to amplify fan noise, eh?

 

Think he'll ever win at Candlestick? He's only got one more chance!

On the other hand, those poor bears just can't beat you at Soldier Field. Weird that you've played there three years in a row...

STFU

[Saint Elistan 106]

Hope the Vikings can do it again (doubtful) at Lambeau. Would be nice to trounce the Redskins in your honor.

[Groundhog 24]

Yikes...

 

Away Games 2011 (3-5)

@ San Francisco - L 33-17

@ Pittsburgh - L 24-0

@ New York - W 36-25

@ Cleveland - L 6-3

@ Dallas - L 23-13

@ St. Louis - W 24-7

@ Chicago - W 38-14

@ Arizona - L 23-20 (OT)

 

Away Games 2010 (2-6)

@ Denver - L 31-14

@ St. Louis - L 20-3

@ Chicago - W 23-20

@ Oakland - L 33-3

@ Arizona - W 36-18

@ New Orleans - L 34-19

@ San Francisco - L 40-21

@ Tampa Bay - L 38-15

 

Ole Pete just can't win without a stadium specifically designed to amplify fan noise, eh?

 

Think he'll ever win at Candlestick? He's only got one more chance!

On the other hand, those poor bears just can't beat you at Soldier Field. Weird that you've played there three years in a row...

 

What's the takeaway here? That if they were 3-5 on the road last year, and 3-5 on the road this year, I guess they're not much better?

On the small chance that you are not trolling and actually believe that, think about how the five road losses actually played out this year:

 

- @ Arizona, wk1: lost 20-16 on last play of game when 4-yd pass by Wilson falls incomplete

- @ St. Louis, wk4: lost 19-13 when Wilson gets intercepted at Rams 25 with a minute to go.

- @ San Fran, wk7: lost 13-6 but pretty much a beatdown, Seattle staying in the game because of solid D. Wilson simply couldn't get anything going.

- @ Detroit, wk8: lost 28-24 with 20 seconds to go on a 1-yd TD pass by Stafford. Stop them there, they likely kick a FG to tie at 24 and the game goes to OT, pretty much a coin-flip

- @ Miami, wk12: lost 24-21 on last play of game, long field goal. If the kick misses, it goes to OT, tied at 21-all, again another coin flip

 

Total: 5 road losses, combined pojnt differential of 24 points in those five games. Avg. road loss in those five games of a bit less than 5 pts., a one-score game.

 

Now compare this to 2011. Total of 5 road losses, combined point differential of 56 points, or about 11 per game - a two-score situation, on average.

Or compare to 2010. Total of six road losses, combined point differential in those six losses of 121 points, or an average loss in those games of about 20 pts. A three-score situation.

 

Seems to me that they have been getting better on the road little by little. 2011 was an improvement over 2010, and 2012 has been an improvement over 2011.

[NewbieJr 541]

Faghawker is sooooo easy to get riled up. Lolol. Talk about a mental midget.

[Lackman 0]

What's the takeaway here? That if they were 3-5 on the road last year, and 3-5 on the road this year, I guess they're not much better?

On the small chance that you are not trolling and actually believe that, think about how the five road losses actually played out this year:

 

- @ Arizona, wk1: lost 20-16 on last play of game when 4-yd pass by Wilson falls incomplete

- @ St. Louis, wk4: lost 19-13 when Wilson gets intercepted at Rams 25 with a minute to go.

- @ San Fran, wk7: lost 13-6 but pretty much a beatdown, Seattle staying in the game because of solid D. Wilson simply couldn't get anything going.

- @ Detroit, wk8: lost 28-24 with 20 seconds to go on a 1-yd TD pass by Stafford. Stop them there, they likely kick a FG to tie at 24 and the game goes to OT, pretty much a coin-flip

- @ Miami, wk12: lost 24-21 on last play of game, long field goal. If the kick misses, it goes to OT, tied at 21-all, again another coin flip

 

Total: 5 road losses, combined pojnt differential of 24 points in those five games. Avg. road loss in those five games of a bit less than 5 pts., a one-score game.

 

Now compare this to 2011. Total of 5 road losses, combined point differential of 56 points, or about 11 per game - a two-score situation, on average.

Or compare to 2010. Total of six road losses, combined point differential in those six losses of 121 points, or an average loss in those games of about 20 pts. A three-score situation.

 

Seems to me that they have been getting better on the road little by little. 2011 was an improvement over 2010, and 2012 has been an improvement over 2011.

 

Thank you for saving me the time and effort in answering in a similar fashion.

 

It's also somewhat symptomatic of just how dominant of a home field advantage this team has, as the only undefeated team this year in home games. Beating Dallas, Green Bay, New England, Minnesota, San Francisco at home, among other teams. Considering that 7 road games were one possession games (excluding the blowout over Buffalo) in which Seattle went 2-5 in, that could just as easily have been a 5-2 straight up mark. A big part of that 2-5 mark is randomness and bad luck, with a smidgen of a young team growing up. But if the road mark improved to 6-2, you'd still have the media saying a 14-2 team can't win on the road. By comparision. I mean, what else are you going to pick on as a weakness. The most dominant home team in the NFL is less dominant on the road. Der. Also, because they don't do the time and effort to do research.

 

On the pregame shows, I heard Warren Sapp say that Seattle can't win on the road because Russell Wilson thrown too many interceptions. Huh? He had 8 picks in the first 5 games on the road, and ZERO in the last three. This team has improved greatly in the 2nd half of the season and everybody seems to be using the 1st half of the season data. I was too, when I was down on Wilson. But the proof is in the numbers, and this team improved greatly in the past 2 months.

 

Stupid Collinsworth was gushing how Griffin was the first guy to arrive in the lockerroom and the last one to leave every day. Didn't he just say the same thing last week about Wilson? I mean, Carroll says that about Wilson nearly every press conference. The media is just plum lazy in every possible way.

[FlaHawker 24]

Faghawker is sooooo easy to get riled up. Lolol. Talk about a mental midget.

Welcome to a playoff thread.

[NewbieJr 541]

Welcome to a playoff thread.

Meh. Seahawks got a win because of replacement refs early-on at home. Then they barely squeaked by the Rams at home yesterday. Plus, they are a very, very average team on the road. One and done for the team with the cheating defensive backs.

[Lackman 0]

Meh. Seahawks got a win because of replacement refs early-on at home. Then they barely squeaked by the Rams at home yesterday. Plus, they are a very, very average team on the road. One and done for the team with the cheating defensive backs.

 

Wilson, the final 3 road games.

 

21 for 27, 224 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs; 38 yards rushing. 125.9 rating.

23 for 37, 293 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs; 71 yards rushing. 104.9 rating.

14 for 23, 205 yards, 1 TDs, 0 INTS; 92 yards rushing, 3 TDs rushing. 104.4 rating.

 

The road game argument has been debunked and buried. The replacement refs performed better than the regular refs during the course of the season, as after the strike, the union refs blew dozens of games with their awful calls and incompetence. The Rams were undefeated in the best division in football, the NFC West, until yesterday. San Fran couldn't beat the Rams in two tries. The Seattle secondary is the best in football. The NFL tried to screw the Seahawks, but Sherman got vindicated. How exactly is a cheating a drug also a drug that schools are forcing kids to take? The NFL is full of sh!t.

[FlaHawker 24]

Meh. Seahawks got a win because of replacement refs early-on at home. Then they barely squeaked by the Rams at home yesterday. Plus, they are a very, very average team on the road. One and done for the team with the cheating defensive backs.

You've been watching bad, bad Filthydelphia football for far too long. Your brain is mush.

[devouredbychaos 0]

Meh. Seahawks got a win because of replacement refs early-on at home. Then they barely squeaked by the Rams at home yesterday. Plus, they are a very, very average team on the road. One and done for the team with the cheating defensive backs.

 

This guy speaks the truth.

 

Seattle is extremely overrated. They barely beat a horrible Rams team...at home none the less. Plus they cheated, and got away with it. Even if they do happen to win, it'll be marred by a BIG *

 

[FlaHawker 24]

This guy speaks the truth.

 

Seattle is extremely overrated. They barely beat a horrible Rams team...at home none the less. Plus they cheated, and got away with it. Even if they do happen to win, it'll be marred by a BIG *

 

Hi Newbie

[Lackman 0]

This guy speaks the truth.

 

Seattle is extremely overrated. They barely beat a horrible Rams team...at home none the less. Plus they cheated, and got away with it. Even if they do happen to win, it'll be marred by a BIG *

 

 

How does a team get overrated when the media completely ignores the franchise year in, year out? There is a clear East Coast bias in NFL hype and media coverage. Seattle is UNDERrated.

 

How does a team at 7-7-1 going into the game qualify as horrible? St Louis beat Washington this year. Does that make Washington beyond horrible? St Louis went 1-0-1 vs San Fran. Does that make San Fran horrific?

 

How can you be convicted of cheating when there is no proof?

[NewbieJr 541]

Wilson, the final 3 road games.

 

21 for 27, 224 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs; 38 yards rushing. 125.9 rating.

23 for 37, 293 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs; 71 yards rushing. 104.9 rating.

14 for 23, 205 yards, 1 TDs, 0 INTS; 92 yards rushing, 3 TDs rushing. 104.4 rating.

 

The road game argument has been debunked and buried. The replacement refs performed better than the regular refs during the course of the season, as after the strike, the union refs blew dozens of games with their awful calls and incompetence. The Rams were undefeated in the best division in football, the NFC West, until yesterday. San Fran couldn't beat the Rams in two tries. The Seattle secondary is the best in football. The NFL tried to screw the Seahawks, but Sherman got vindicated. How exactly is a cheating a drug also a drug that schools are forcing kids to take? The NFL is full of sh!t.

Just because the sample was mishandled, doesn't mean the results were wrong. It's like a guy driving 100 mph getting out of the ticket because the cop wrote a number wrong in the license plate field. Cheating is cheating.

 

But it's irrelevant. The ride is over. They would have needed a home game to have any chance against a playoff caliber team. Four of their five road losses were at the hands of teams that didn't even make the playoffs. They're done.

[devouredbychaos 0]

How does a team get overrated when the media completely ignores the franchise year in, year out? There is a clear East Coast bias in NFL hype and media coverage. Seattle is UNDERrated.

 

How does a team at 7-7-1 going into the game qualify as horrible? St Louis beat Washington this year. Does that make Washington beyond horrible? St Louis went 1-0-1 vs San Fran. Does that make San Fran horrific?

 

How can you be convicted of cheating when there is no proof?

 

Obviously you haven't been watching the NFL for the past month if you claim the Seahawks are "UNDERrated". The media has been all about them recently. They've made them out to be better than they actually are. Beating up on weak teams over the past few weeks doesn't really say too much. Considering how good all you homers say the Seahawks are, they should've blown the Rams out of the water, like New England did.

 

And kids, the proof is in the positive test. Are you really that stupid?

[devouredbychaos 0]

Hi Newbie

 

I didn't realize I was still considered a newbie 2 years later. In any event, hi homer

[FlaHawker 24]

Just because the sample was mishandled, doesn't mean the results were wrong. It's like a guy driving 100 mph getting out of the ticket because the cop wrote a number wrong in the license plate field. Cheating is cheating.

 

But it's irrelevant. The ride is over. They would have needed a home game to have any chance against a playoff caliber team. Four of their five road losses were at the hands of teams that didn't even make the playoffs. They're done.

Yea because test results are never wrong Your brain is fockin mush.

[TwentyFourSeven 23]

Steelers fan rooting for the Seahawks this postseason

[Lackman 0]

Obviously you haven't been watching the NFL for the past month if you claim the Seahawks are "UNDERrated". The media has been all about them recently. They've made them out to be better than they actually are. Beating up on weak teams over the past few weeks doesn't really say too much. Considering how good all you homers say the Seahawks are, they should've blown the Rams out of the water, like New England did.

 

And kids, the proof is in the positive test. Are you really that stupid?

 

The media has been harping about the 3-5 road record, not on Seattle's overall accomplishments. They spent most of Sunday telling us how the Seattle St Louis game didn't matter despite the divisional ramifications. Now, they are all over Griffin's balls and how Seattle should just stay home on Sunday. Sure, blowing out 3 straight opponents is extremely difficult to do, as the modern day NFL records show, but you demand a fourth blowout win in a row. New England beat St Louis. And Seattle beat New England. In fact, New England went 1-3 against the NFC West, the top division in football, a division that St Louis was 4-0-1 against until yesterday. So, how does comparing what New England did against St Louis extrapolate to support your silly argument in any way. Rather, is shows the strength of Seattle's schedule.

 

A tainted positive test is not a positive at all. You can't imagine evidence. Sherman was innocent all along. Being stupid is trying to convict someone of an action without any evidence whatsoever.

[FlaHawker 24]

Obviously you haven't been watching the NFL for the past month if you claim the Seahawks are "UNDERrated". The media has been all about them recently. They've made them out to be better than they actually are. Beating up on weak teams over the past few weeks doesn't really say too much. Considering how good all you homers say the Seahawks are, they should've blown the Rams out of the water, like New England did.

 

And kids, the proof is in the positive test. Are you really that stupid?

Welcome to the idiot club

[FlaHawker 24]

The Seahawks are in the playoffs and the trolls are beside themselves.

 

 

The fear is growing....

[Portis26 0]

I used to be an AFC Seahawks fan so I'm happy for their success. Road fav this weekend @ Washington after a lack luster performance vs Rams . Should be interesting as the Seahawks have very good team but RG3 will prove too much IMO

.

[FlaHawker 24]

I used to be an AFC Seahawks fan so I'm happy for their success. Road fav this weekend @ Washington after a lack luster performance vs Rams . Should be interesting as the Seahawks have very good team but RG3 will prove too much IMO

.

You used to be an AFC Seahawk fan? What the hell does that mean? You people need to pay more attention o the NFL. The Rams are a decent team. That was a good win yesterday.

[NewbieJr 541]

You used to be an AFC Seahawk fan? What the hell does that mean? You people need to pay more attention o the NFL. The Rams are a decent team. That was a good win yesterday.

Psssst. Idiot, the Seahawks were in the AFC for years before the league switched them to the NFC. I can see you're a longtime fan.

 

Andf no, sorry. Squeaking out a home win over the Rams is not a good win. The Rams finished with a losing record. With teh Seahawks ridiculous home field advantage, they have to beat average teams a little more convingly than that. That would have been a nice way to go into the playoffs hot. Not limping into them by barely beating crappy teams.

[FlaHawker 24]

Psssst. Idiot, the Seahawks were in the AFC for years before the league switched them to the NFC. I can see you're a longtime fan.

 

Andf no, sorry. Squeaking out a home win over the Rams is not a good win. The Rams finished with a losing record. With teh Seahawks ridiculous home field advantage, they have to beat average teams a little more convingly than that. That would have been a nice way to go into the playoffs hot. Not limping into them by barely beating crappy teams.

My god you are one stupid mofo. I'm going to have to spell this out for you I see. I was alluding to the fact that he roots for multiple teams. Idiot.

 

As for the rest of your gibberish, well, that crappy team the Hawks beat yesterday, yea that same crappy team beat the Redskins. So I guess the Redskins suck according to your fockin assinine logic. Funny how an idiot eagles fan is going on an on about playoff teams sucking. Your brain is pile of shite. Move on you moronic troll.

[NewbieJr 541]

My god you are one stupid mofo. I'm going to have to spell this out for you I see. I was alluding to the fact that he roots for multiple teams. Idiot.

 

As for the rest of your gibberish, well, that crappy team the Hawks beat yesterday, yea that same crappy team beat the Redskins. So I guess the Redskins suck according to your fockin assinine logic. Funny how an idiot eagles fan is going on an on about playoff teams sucking. Your brain is pile of shite. Move on you moronic troll.

The Redskins were 3-6 at one point. I hate to tell you this, Baldy, but that ain't the team the Seahawks will be playing.

 

So go jerkoff on your Jim Zorn action figure and leave the football talk to the real men. Toodles

[FlaHawker 24]

The Redskins were 3-6 at one point. I hate to tell you this, Baldy, but that ain't the team the Seahawks will be playing.

 

So go jerkoff on your Jim Zorn action figure and leave the football talk to the real men. Toodles

Oh so that win doesn't count? But the fact that Seattle lost 3 close road games, in division, in the first half of the year does count? What a fockin turd you are. But keep trolling a Seahawk thread you loser. I love smacking that big fat melon you call a head.

[NewbieJr 541]

Oh so that win doesn't count? But the fact that Seattle lost 3 close road games, in division, in the first half of the year does count? What a fockin turd you are. But keep trolling a Seahawk thread you loser. I love smacking that big fat melon you call a head.

No, the games all count. But the Reskins won a huge game against a good football team just yesterday. At teh same time, the Seahawks could barely muster a win against a losing team in their own stadium. Now, they have to leave the advantage that place gives them.

 

24-10, Redskins.

[FlaHawker 24]

No, the games all count. But the Reskins won a huge game against a good football team just yesterday. At teh same time, the Seahawks could barely muster a win against a losing team in their own stadium. Now, they have to leave the advantage that place gives them.

 

24-10, Redskins.

Whoa Whoa Whoa simpleton!! You walk around telling anyone who will listen and starting threads about what a choker Tony Romo is and so by that logic there was no way the Redksins would lose, and now it is a big game??? Weak trolling but then again you're a focking nitwit so it doesn't suprise me that you can't keep your stories straight.

[NewbieJr 541]

Whoa Whoa Whoa simpleton!! You walk around telling anyone who will listen and starting threads about what a choker Tony Romo is and so by that logic there was no way the Redksins would lose, and now it is a big game??? Weak trolling but then again you're a focking nitwit so it doesn't suprise me that you can't keep your stories straight.

I don't quite follow your logic because I don't speak retard.

 

I said Romo choked because he threw three interceptions in a win-and-in game. What does that have to do with the Seahawks sucking on the road?

[FlaHawker 24]

Ok so let's sum up Newbie's nonsense:

 

The Seahawks are a mediocre team, who can't win on the road and because they barely beat a crappy team yesterday (whose record is 7-8-1), they will lose to a Redskin team who actually lost to the crappy team Seattle beat but that doesn't count because it was earlier in the year and the Redksins also beat a really good Cowboy team (whose record is 8-8) despite the fact that Cowboys have a QB who is the biggest choker in the history of the NFL in big games.

 

Another product of Filthydelphia schools

[FlaHawker 24]

I don't quite follow your logic because I don't speak retard.

 

I said Romo choked because he threw three interceptions in a win-and-in game. What does that have to do with the Seahawks sucking on the road?

Riiiggghhtttt

[devouredbychaos 0]

The media has been harping about the 3-5 road record, not on Seattle's overall accomplishments. They spent most of Sunday telling us how the Seattle St Louis game didn't matter despite the divisional ramifications. Now, they are all over Griffin's balls and how Seattle should just stay home on Sunday. Sure, blowing out 3 straight opponents is extremely difficult to do, as the modern day NFL records show, but you demand a fourth blowout win in a row. New England beat St Louis. And Seattle beat New England. In fact, New England went 1-3 against the NFC West, the top division in football, a division that St Louis was 4-0-1 against until yesterday. So, how does comparing what New England did against St Louis extrapolate to support your silly argument in any way. Rather, is shows the strength of Seattle's schedule.

 

A tainted positive test is not a positive at all. You can't imagine evidence. Sherman was innocent all along. Being stupid is trying to convict someone of an action without any evidence whatsoever.

 

I stopped reading after you claimed the NFC West was the best division in football. That just shows your obvious lack of knowledge.

 

Sherman tested positive for PEDs, and that's a fact. A leak or crack in the cup didn't change the outcome of his test from being positive.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

 

Sherman tested positive for PEDs, and that's a fact. A leak or crack in the cup didn't change the outcome of his test from being positive.

Prove it.

[Joey Gladstone 33]

This guy speaks the truth.

 

Seattle is extremely overrated. They barely beat a horrible Rams team...at home none the less. Plus they cheated, and got away with it. Even if they do happen to win, it'll be marred by a BIG *

 

 

Poor trolling attempt. I'd point out the stupid parts of your post but it's not worth the time. Please don't get a DD tonight.

 

You could of at least changed it up a bit from your Footballguys schtick.

[devouredbychaos 0]

Poor trolling attempt. I'd point out the stupid parts of your post but it's not worth the time. Please don't get a DD tonight.

 

You could of at least changed it up a bit from your Footballguys schtick.

 

I love how if you don't agree with a homers posts or opinions its considered trolling.

 

I actually don't mind the Seahawks really, but their fanbase on here and Footballguys make them out to be the second coming of Christ.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

 

You could of at least changed it up a bit from your Footballguys schtick.

Speaking of Football Guys, have you seen the thread started by our dear, dear friend, Sweetness? If not, check this out. Classic ownage!

 

Owning Sweetness

 

The poosay started this thread and has done what he always does, disappears.

[Joey Gladstone 33]

I love how if you don't agree with a homers posts or opinions its considered trolling.

 

I actually don't mind the Seahawks really, but their fanbase on here and Footballguys make them out to be the second coming of Christ.

 

Fans getting excited over their team? When does that ever happen?!!

 

And I'm not disagreeing. You claimed things in your initial post that were false.

[FlaHawker 24]

I love how if you don't agree with a homers posts or opinions its considered trolling.

 

This is like a 49er fan going to Seahawks home game decked out in 49 gear and then complaining when you get hassled. You come into a Seahawk thread, talk trash, and you get your head handed to you. Simple. Happy New Year

[Joey Gladstone 33]

Seattle is extremely overrated.

 

False

 

They barely beat a horrible Rams team...at home none the less.

 

The Rams are far from horrible. They've beaten and tied San Fran and defeated the Redskins (now there is an overrated team). Fisher is one hell of a coach and he has these guys pointed in the right direction. Their roster is full of high draft picks just waiting to be tapped into. Now if you don't follow the NFC West closely I can understand how you wouldn't know this. Either way, there is NO shame in being played close by St. Louis.

 

Plus they cheated, and got away with it. Even if they do happen to win, it'll be marred by a BIG *

 

Seems like this has already been touched on. Main points:

 

A. It was focking Adderall and Sherman seems to be playing JUST fine off it.

B. The NFL focked up. They couldn't say beyond a shadow of a doubt that Sherman was dirty. There is some cloudiness to it, but such is life. I feel that Roethlisberger is a rapist and Ray Lewis was an accessory to murder. The official line will always read differently. Oh. Focking. Well. If you're going to go back an asterisk anything Seattle accomplishes this season you better grab a bunch of pens and be ready to go over a LOT of recent NFL history.

[devouredbychaos 0]

This is like a 49er fan going to Seahawks home game decked out in 49 gear and then complaining when you get hassled. You come into a Seahawk thread, talk trash, and you get your head handed to you. Simple. Happy New Year

 

A came into a Seahawks thread, stated the truth, and got a few homers trying to sound like they know what they are talking about. Not exactly what I'd call getting my head handed to me.

 

Happy New Year to you as well