Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
wiffleball

No Muslim Refugee has ever committed an act of terror in the U.S.

Recommended Posts

FBI, CIA and NIS heads go in front of congress and say they can't vet the refugees properly. Obama does nothing. Trump decides to do something and he's the bad guy? Wether you like the way Trump has gone about it or not, it's way better than the nothing we were getting.

 

Not to mention, as I posted a few days ago, the Feds are revetting a large number of Syrian refugees due to a "glitch" in the vetting process. Sho just brushed it off as insignificant and the rest of the Libs around here just pretended like it hadn't happened. What is the purpose of having a vetting process if it doesn't work?

 

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-syria-refugees-vetting-gap-20170125-story.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Serious question....

 

If this EO was an effort to put the clamps down on a bad process, revamp it, then roll out an improved process at a later time....why did he sign it into action that Friday instead of first thing Monday? Hadn't he issued several EOs before this one? And so in waiting those extra days, was the old, ineffective process of vetting refugees used during that time?

 

:dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Not to mention, as I posted a few days ago, the Feds are revetting a large number of Syrian refugees due to a "glitch" in the vetting process. Sho just brushed it off as insignificant and the rest of the Libs around here just pretended like it hadn't happened. What is the purpose of having a vetting process if it doesn't work?

 

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-syria-refugees-vetting-gap-20170125-story.html

The left should have been angry with Obama for not addressing it on his watch. His own people told him it wasn't working. But once again, he escapes any criticism from the media or his fan base. Easier to yell at the guy trying to fix it. They preferred not fixing it I guess.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Probably because they felt it made sense, just like they feel the current order makes sense.

 

The two orders are focking different...yet you expect people to have the same reaction about them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Serious question....

 

If this EO was an effort to put the clamps down on a bad process, revamp it, then roll out an improved process at a later time....why did he sign it into action that Friday instead of first thing Monday? Hadn't he issued several EOs before this one? And so in waiting those extra days, was the old, ineffective process of vetting refugees used during that time?

 

:dunno:

 

I suspect you know the answer...don't expect supporters to get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The two orders are focking different...yet you expect people to have the same reaction about them.

 

You say they're different. On a technical level they have different wording. Those of us who have no issue with Trump's EO probably feel similarly about what Obummer did. Both were trying to ensure proper vetting to protect our country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You say they're different. On a technical level they have different wording. Those of us who have no issue with Trump's EO probably feel similarly about what Obummer did. Both were trying to ensure proper vetting to protect our country.

I say they are different because that isa factual statement. One only delayed new visa applications from Iraq. Because there was an issue. The other did far more than that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man who claimed mom died in Iraq after Trump's ban lied, Imam confirms

 

My kidneys are failing, think I'll leave an American hospital and visit a 3rd world country. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FBI, CIA and NIS heads go in front of congress and say they can't vet the refugees properly

 

 

Was this already posted somewhere in this thread? (examples?). thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man who claimed mom died in Iraq after Trump's ban lied, Imam confirms

http://www.foxla.com/news/local-news/233065483-story

 

Ooops!!!!!

 

:doh:

 

I'm actually glad to hear that - that would have been a crappy story.

 

However, my fear is it's no different than Ferguson. Scream the lie - and a willing audience M.E. Muslims) sucks it up.

Whisper the retraction - and the story is already in people's consciousness.

 

A little like the WMD scam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm actually glad to hear that - that would have been a crappy story.

 

However, my fear is it's no different than Ferguson. Scream the lie - and a willing audience M.E. Muslims) sucks it up.

Whisper the retraction - and the story is already in people's consciousness.

 

A little like the WMD scam.

 

So now you're saying Trump shouldn't enact policies because people might lie about them and stir the pot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So now you're saying Trump shouldn't enact policies because people might lie about them and stir the pot?

WTF are you talking about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FBI, CIA and NIS heads go in front of congress and say they can't vet the refugees properly

 

 

Was this already posted somewhere in this thread? (examples?). thanks!

That's what you're bringing Wiff? How about dealing with what was said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nope...you're still incorrect and spinning actual words.

What the hell are you talking about, this is absolutely positively 100% Newbie's position. Have you been punching yourself in the face again? :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FBI, CIA and NIS heads go in front of congress and say they can't vet the refugees properly

 

 

Was this already posted somewhere in this thread? (examples?). thanks!

NPR and CNN never reported that huh??? :overhead:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NPR and CNN never reported that huh??? :overhead:

Yeah, it's funny like that. See I actually posted experts from various agencies Who said Just the opposite. But when I asked for the same thing in return To support These assertions, There's nothing but crickets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's funny like that. See I actually posted experts from various agencies Who said Just the opposite. But when I asked for the same thing in return To support These assertions, There's nothing but crickets.

 

Link?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What the hell are you talking about, this is absolutely positively 100% Newbie's position. Have you been punching yourself in the face again? :unsure:

wrong guy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only a few people affected is what some tried t claim you n defense...

Try about 100,000 visas revoked.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/government-reveals-over-100000-visas-revoked-due-to-travel-ban/2017/02/03/7d529eec-ea2c-11e6-b82f-687d6e6a3e7c_story.html?utm_term=.76699c29585c

 

Not temporary on hold...revoked.

People here...if they travel could then lose theirs as well and not be allowed back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only a few people affected is what some tried t claim you n defense...

Try about 100,000 visas revoked.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/government-reveals-over-100000-visas-revoked-due-to-travel-ban/2017/02/03/7d529eec-ea2c-11e6-b82f-687d6e6a3e7c_story.html?utm_term=.76699c29585c

 

Not temporary on hold...revoked.

People here...if they travel could then lose theirs as well and not be allowed back.

That's what a ban means. But thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama and crew did a great job of pointing out where the trouble spots were. Trump did something about it and people are complaining. It's like that commercial "I'm not an exterminator, I'm just a monitor. You have termites".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only a few people affected is what some tried t claim you n defense...

Try about 100,000 visas revoked.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/government-reveals-over-100000-visas-revoked-due-to-travel-ban/2017/02/03/7d529eec-ea2c-11e6-b82f-687d6e6a3e7c_story.html?utm_term=.76699c29585c

 

Not temporary on hold...revoked.

People here...if they travel could then lose theirs as well and not be allowed back.

 

That's kind of the idea chief.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

That's kind of the idea chief.

Temporary til we can fox vetting means revoke visas. Oof...and this refutes but the bogus claim made by some (including within the administration) that it only affected a few people.

 

Oh...and another judge has put a TRO on the whole thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Temporary til we can fox vetting means revoke visas. Oof...and this refutes but the bogus claim made by some

 

Oof... English, do you speak it? :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Temporary til we can fox vetting means revoke visas. Oof...and this refutes but the bogus claim made by some (including within the administration) that it only affected a few people.

 

Oh...and another judge has put a TRO on the whole thing.

You gotta lay off the weed man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Oof... English, do you speak it? :dunno:

Yes...sorry for typos while quickly zipping thru on my phone.

 

Point...claim was made that this didn't affect many. This refutes that.

Point 2. A temporary "ban" to improve vetting did not mean revoking visas. Now we se they did so.

 

There is no logical defense of this...yet some will try...others will divert and deflect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So when Mike bans people here, they still should have access? Someone tell Mike he's being a racist and UnAmerican. :lock:

Psst...you al,Trump and the admin tried claiming it wasn't a ban. That it was temporary and just like what Obummer did.

Now you are claiming it was a ban and Visas should have been revoked?

Oof

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Psst...you al,Trump and the admin tried claiming it wasn't a ban. That it was temporary and just like what Obummer did.

Now you are claiming it was a ban and Visas should have been revoked?

Oof

 

Where did I say it wasn't a ban? Link..........?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Where did I say it wasn't a ban? Link..........?

You all was the generic for Trump guy. HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Last time I checked, the word all had two Ls. Go back and reread what you posted.

 

Class dismissed.

Typos are all you have left...not that you had anything in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Typos are all you have left...not that you had anything in the first place.

 

Just reacting to your inane posts. "Psst...you al,Trump and the admin tried claiming it wasn't a ban."

 

Usually I can decipher your tardness but that one was full retahd. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I guess we can put to rest this whole "Trump is a facist" nonsense. The legal system has had its say and hey look, the judge isn't in any danger of being arrested. This issue will now be litigated in a peaceful manner. I can only hope the left takes notice of how we do things here in the U.S. I don't think we will see any protests or civil discord from the right about this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just reacting to your inane posts. "Psst...you al,Trump and the admin tried claiming it wasn't a ban."

 

Usually I can decipher your tardness but that one was full retahd. :lol:

One letter threw you off that bad?

Fock man...get a grip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×