Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 2, 2017 "Yet the states kept less than half of 1 percent of the $82 million they had amassed from the extravagant fund-raisers Hillarys campaign was holding, just as Gary had described to me when he and I talked in August. When the Politico story described this arrangement as essentially money laundering for the Clinton campaign, Hillarys people were outraged at being accused of doing something shady. Bernies people were angry for their own reasons, saying this was part of a calculated strategy to throw the nomination to Hillary. I wanted to believe Hillary, who made campaign finance reform part of her platform, but I had made this pledge to Bernie and did not want to disappoint him. I kept asking the party lawyers and the DNC staff to show me the agreements that the party had made for sharing the money they raised, but there was a lot of shuffling of feet and looking the other way. When I got back from a vacation in Marthas Vineyard I at last found the document that described it all: the Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America. The agreementsigned by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Eliasspecified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the partys finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings. I had been wondering why it was that I couldnt write a press release without passing it by Brooklyn. Well, here was the answer." So she claims to be wanting to prove to Bernie how he got screwed over but forgets she helped by giving HRC questions ahead of debates. Hillary loaned DNC money (she pilfered from states?) in exchange for full control. Used the lawyer Elias too. DNC is still a sock puppet of Hillary and won't be taking back either house til she's gone. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,286 Posted November 2, 2017 Seriously...Let it go man. She lost. It's over. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 2, 2017 Seriously...Let it go man. She lost. It's over. You missed the point. It isn't over and the Dems will continue losing until they pry out that cancer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus Chrysler 29 Posted November 2, 2017 This is huge!!! She is such a huge political influence as she walks her dog in the woods and makes tea at home. (Pssst. She lost. It's over. She can't hurt you anymore) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,567 Posted November 2, 2017 Is that the porn lady? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 2, 2017 This is huge!!! She is such a huge political influence as she walks her dog in the woods and makes tea at home. (Pssst. She lost. It's over. She can't hurt you anymore) I want her to stick around to ensure Dems keep losing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,482 Posted November 2, 2017 It's not over until she is in a jail cell where she belongs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus Chrysler 29 Posted November 2, 2017 It's not over until she is in a jail cell where she belongs. If this investigation actually finds something of substance, I have no problem with that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,482 Posted November 2, 2017 America needs investigators who aren't on her payroll. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,286 Posted November 2, 2017 It's not over until she is in a jail cell where she belongs. THIS is where I go what????? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus Chrysler 29 Posted November 2, 2017 THIS is where I go what????? He was obviously one of the nitwits chanting 'lock her up' at a Trump rally. MAGA! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,315 Posted November 2, 2017 Dude, the election was over a year ago now. And your guy won!! JFC move on Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,315 Posted November 2, 2017 It's not over until she is in a jail cell where she belongs. This is how those sh1tty third world banana republics operate. Jail your political opponents. You know that, right? Why the fock do you want us to be like them? Seriously a lot of you stupid motherfockers need to smarten up quick or were screwed (or even more screwed) as a country. Honestly. Straight talk here. Focking pull yourself together. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 459 Posted November 2, 2017 Seriously...Let it go man. She lost. It's over. This is huge!!! She is such a huge political influence as she walks her dog in the woods and makes tea at home. (Pssst. She lost. It's over. She can't hurt you anymore) Dude, the election was over a year ago now. And your guy won!! JFC move on Interesting how all the leftists react the same exact way - and all neatly avoid addressing the real point. The real point is the poison within the DNC itself; what corrupt forces within it continue to operate and continue to damage the DNC in the eyes of its shrinking constituency. Hillary lost because of this perception fellas, whether you like it or not. And just because she lost doesn't mean that her influence - and Obama's, as he's now being implicated in lots of these corrupt activities - doesn't continue. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 2, 2017 Left leaners still want to blame Comey (as recently as this week). Even when one of their leaders exposes Hillary's corruption and their failed leadership, they bury their heads in the sand. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,315 Posted November 2, 2017 Seriously, this isnt good for you guys. Or the country, since theres apparently so damn many of you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 459 Posted November 2, 2017 This is how those sh1tty third world banana republics operate. Jail your political opponents. You know that, right? And it appears that the 'banana republic' thing has been in full effect in the DNC: railroading Bernie, and now the IRS being forced to pay a 7 digit damages payout to various RW 501-c3's because the IRS has been weaponized by Obama. Right? Facts in evidence. They had to pay. And now we hear the same about the FBI being weaponized. Why the fock do you want us to be like them? ...he says, while attempting to deflect blame from the only entity which has engaged in "banana republic" activity: the DNC and its bad actors. Another distinction: "banana republics" jail and persecute political opponents for no good reason other than disagreeing with politics. Like Obama has done with Lerner and Koskinen - and like the DNC has done with Bernie. And like it appears that both the DNC/HRC campaign, with Obama's assistance, has attempted to do with this nonsense dossier that was then given as an excuse (we'll shortly see) for the FBI's executing of FISA warrants. Seeking JUSTICE isn't "banana republic" behavior. That's what Representative Republics which are desperately attempting to hold on to 'Rule of Law' do. Not by saying crap like "oh, she lost already! Move on. That's what bad actors in Banana Republics say. Seriously a lot of you stupid motherfockers need to smarten up quick or were screwed (or even more screwed) as a country. Honestly. Straight talk here. Focking pull yourself together. Your 'straight talk' is laughable cognitive dissonance. Seeking JUSTICE is straight talk. You're farting out bullsht. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus Chrysler 29 Posted November 2, 2017 This is like Belichick gameplanning to stop Ladian Tomlinson in the playoffs this year. Do you guys realize how focking stupid this obsession is? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 459 Posted November 2, 2017 This is like Belichick gameplanning to stop Ladian Tomlinson in the playoffs this year. Do you guys realize how focking stupid this obsession is? LaDainian Tomlinson isn't on the team anymore, doubtless why you were unable to answer the question: does Obama or the Clintons still influence DNC politics? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 2, 2017 This is like Belichick gameplanning to stop Ladian Tomlinson in the playoffs this year. Do you guys realize how focking stupid this obsession is? I guess you missed the part where Hillary is still in control of the DNC? That was handed over as part of an agreement for her to fund some of it. Like now we get it though you can't be bothered with reading. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus Chrysler 29 Posted November 2, 2017 LaDainian Tomlinson isn't on the team anymore, doubtless why you were unable to answer the question: does Obama or the Clintons still influence DNC politics? Please list all offices held by a Clinton or an Obama. Go! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 2, 2017 Please list all offices held by a Clinton or an Obama. Go! She is in charge of the DNC. Go read the article Meathead Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 2, 2017 What is the left's fascination with Hillary? Someone tell Brazile it's over. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,562 Posted November 2, 2017 Third time's the charm. Hillary in 2020!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 459 Posted November 2, 2017 Please list all offices held by a Clinton or an Obama. Go! Over and over again I challenge you with questions that you will not and cannot answer. How could someone possibly delude themselves into thinking their positions are defensible when they offer no defense? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,645 Posted November 2, 2017 Bigger picture. I bet there aren't 1,000 people in the entire country who could name the head of the Democratic Party right now. Which is his fault. That's stupid f***** needs to step up or step out. He needs to knock heads on Hillary and this fat Broad and others and tell them to shut the f****** and get the f*** out. Trump won largely based upon the fact that everybody hates Hillary. And this whole last election was a f****** s*** show from the get-go. So clean anybody who had anything to do with it right the f*** out and start all over again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,594 Posted November 2, 2017 Over and over again I challenge you with questions that you will not and cannot answer. How could someone possibly delude themselves into thinking their positions are defensible when they offer no defense? On the other hand the geeks on the offense have been quite offensive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus Chrysler 29 Posted November 2, 2017 Over and over again I challenge you with questions that you will not and cannot answer. How could someone possibly delude themselves into thinking their positions are defensible when they offer no defense? I've been very clear. You Trump-humpers are obsessed with Hillary and Obama. And it's not surprising since your orange Messiah is also obsessed with them. It's hilarious watching it from our vantage point. Pathetic, but hilarious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 2, 2017 I could literally spend hours every day rehashing the last election and how the left focked it all up. I can understand why the left doesn't want to discuss it, but they should. Their party is shambles. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,594 Posted November 2, 2017 I could literally spend hours every day rehashing the last election and how the left focked it all up. I can understand why the left doesn't want to discuss it, but they should. Their party is shambles. I believe you and you are not the only geek. Many others as well are discussing last year's election ad nauseum. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 459 Posted November 2, 2017 On the other hand the geeks on the offense have been quite offensive. What's offensive is coming to a forum in which the purpose is to discuss, and then refuse to discuss anything. Here, again below, is Chrysler feeling that it's fine to attack someone's position without substance - restate his own position - but being utterly unable to defend the argument itself. I've been very clear. You Trump-humpers are obsessed with Hillary and Obama. And it's not surprising since your orange Messiah is also obsessed with them. It's hilarious watching it from our vantage point. Pathetic, but hilarious. Derp. Hillary and Obama are major - if not the primary influences over the DNC. That makes their discussion germane. Particularly since it appears as though they're guilty of abuses of power. Do you find that 'offensive', MTS? How can we help? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 2, 2017 I believe you and you are not the only geek. Many others as well are discussing last year's election ad nauseum. You should be paying close attention to the second part of the statement. Hillary controlled the DNC bank account since August of 2015. The fact that the left doesn't want it hear it is mindboggling. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,594 Posted November 2, 2017 What's offensive is coming to a forum in which the purpose is to discuss, and then refuse to discuss anything. Here, again below, is Chrysler feeling that it's fine to attack someone's position without substance - restate his own position - but being utterly unable to defend the argument itself. You will notice in my reply i did not call out any geek, it was simply a play on words meant to be funny. Do you find that 'offensive', MTS? Yes, I am downright triggered, those are fighting words :mad: How can we help? You could send me a thousand dollars. That would help. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus Chrysler 29 Posted November 2, 2017 Hillary and Obama are major - if not the primary influences over the DNC. That makes their discussion germane. Particularly since it appears as though they're guilty of abuses of power. Do you find that 'offensive', MTS? How can we help? LOL In YOUR mind. And the rest of you obsessed rightie losers. If not for Trump and his followers obsessing, I wouldn't have heard a peep about a Clinton or an Obama. Oh wait, I think I saw five ex Presidents together recently. So I'd have heard their names once. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,645 Posted November 2, 2017 You should be paying close attention to the second part of the statement. Hillary controlled the DNC bank account since August of 2015. The fact that the left doesn't want it hear it is mindboggling. I'd like to see some proof of that. Because that seems like that would violate FTC regulations big time. And, while we're at it, one of the trolls promised that this week there would be documentation about the alleged 12 million dollars that the DNC paid somebody for something related to the uranium deal. I'd like to see that too. But I have a feeling both stories came from just south of Vladivostok. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted November 2, 2017 Why is Donna surprised at this? None of this is shocking. Hillary is an unethical person and only cares about herself. She is scum. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted November 2, 2017 #orangemeathead 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DankNuggs 305 Posted November 2, 2017 What is the left's fascination with Hillary? Someone tell Brazile it's over. She is selling a book and trying to reposition herself as a victim as opposed to being in on the rigging... Good she found no improprieties besides this agreement (bernie signed something similar 3 months later)... Those hacked emails were definitely forged, even if the debate questions the fake emails gave were actually the real debate questions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 470 Posted November 2, 2017 This is hardly news.Reports over the Victory Fund were out there already. Back. In. April. Of. 2016.https://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/hillary-clinton-fundraising-democratic-national-committee-222156 No one wanted to listen. Bernie got focked. Those that supported him got focked. This sad excuse of a human (Brazille) doesn't deserve sympathy. She is complicit as well. Fock her too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 459 Posted November 2, 2017 You will notice in my reply i did not call out any geek, it was simply a play on words meant to be funny. Ah. Missed that. Still missing it. Yes, I am downright triggered, those are fighting words :mad: No worries. Safe spaces everywhere. You could send me a thousand dollars. That would help. Sounds very liberal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites