Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
NorthernVike

Looks like newbie is outta here again.

Recommended Posts

Oh it's way worse than that.

Many have this obsession about 'winning ' a thread like it's a high school debate.

Newbie did too.

Many here have no life at all and live for this place so they can win a thread

And others love to complain and antagonize just like the very people they are bitchling about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are one weird creepy stalker. Three times now you have called me Newbie. Let me issue you a challenge, Francis. Send an email to Mike and ask him to check my IP address. You might finally move the heck on when you don't get the answer you want. Grow up already.

The ole send Mickey an IP address check email. That's gonna make him stop calling you Newbie?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet if you polled all the "libtard" posters, their political opinions would be much less similar than their conservative counterparts.

Where does one go to ensure they are mindlessly following the correct brand of liberal rhetoric?

If only one portion of a fleet of ships is equipped with rudders, a destination, and a navigation chart to arrive, that part's course is predictable, and the results reliable.

 

When contemplating Right and Wrong, there is usually only one Right, but an endless number of Wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet if you polled all the "libtard" posters, their political opinions would be much less similar than their conservative counterparts.

 

Where does one go to ensure they are mindlessly following the correct brand of liberal rhetoric?

You should put together a test. But maybe conservatives tend to appear more in lock step because they keep it simple? If you start with keeping the government at arms length as much as possible it tends to lead to more straight forward reasoning. Low taxes and sticking to the constitution doesn't present the variables that the lefts want of the government controlling everything and social engineering do. Plus the PC nonsense like gender designation. Mr or Mrs and he and she work fine. Sorry to be so cis gender

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should put together a test. But maybe conservatives tend to appear more in lock step because they keep it simple? If you start with keeping the government at arms length as much as possible it tends to lead to more straight forward reasoning. Low taxes and sticking to the constitution doesn't present the variables that the lefts want of the government controlling everything and social engineering do. Plus the PC nonsense like gender designation. Mr or Mrs and he and she work fine. Sorry to be so cis gender

There are social Conservatives; fiscal Conservatives, and social and fiscal Conservatives. There are the same categories for liberals. There are moderates; there are progressives.

 

But the common strain amongst all is whether or not their ideologies are based upon fundamental principles. If they are, their beliefs are going to be commonly found amongst a large group. If they're not, they won't, and they can be categorized as radicals.

 

Radicals differ tremendously. It's why we see so many radicals on the left also at each other's throats regularly. It's why we also see so many radical Muslim factions at their throats regularly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least on this site, anyone to the left of Grover Norquist is pretty much considered a communist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least on this site, anyone to the left of Grover Norquist is pretty much considered a communist.

...says the guy with the communist wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...says the guy with the communist wife.

I joke about her being a communist. She is far to the left of me though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I joke about her being a communist. She is far to the left of me though.

If she is far to the left of you, she is at best communistic.

 

What I'm really saying is that your own personal position results in you being unable (or unwilling) to see that your first comment isn't true at all. You have a frame of reference that prevents it: your wife is clearly radical.

 

Don't underestimate our ability to distinguish positions. Communist ideology is very basic, and has aspects of it that are shared by everyone on the left.

 

There is a place for it (for instance: in the family unit).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah. They all think exactly alike. And yet think they are the free thinkers somehow.

Less taxes, no trannies in wrong restrooms, frredom to arm yourself, work for what you want, don't have kids you can't afford, abortion isn't a contraceptive, defend your nations borders, support those protecting society, etc....

 

Now reverse all of that and that's what liberals stand for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet if you polled all the "libtard" posters, their political opinions would be much less similar than their conservative counterparts.

 

Where does one go to ensure they are mindlessly following the correct brand of liberal rhetoric?

Maybe, if you're talking about this board. But do you really believe that's the case in the real world?

 

Within my immediate circle of friends, family, and acquaintances, the political affilations and opinions on social issue vary greatly. There are very few that I could pigeon hole as strictly conservative or liberal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah. They all think exactly alike. And yet think they are the free thinkers somehow.

I guess it depends what side of the fence you're on because this statement describes most liberals I know. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If she is far to the left of you, she is at best communistic.

 

What I'm really saying is that your own personal position results in you being unable (or unwilling) to see that your first comment isn't true at all. You have a frame of reference that prevents it: your wife is clearly radical.

 

Don't underestimate our ability to distinguish positions. Communist ideology is very basic, and has aspects of it that are shared by everyone on the left.

 

There is a place for it (for instance: in the family unit).

I am fairly sure that a message board thats 99% upper middle class white men, where nonsense like the Laffer Curve is taken as gospel and posters wish violent death in black people for even peaceful protests, may be right of center.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am fairly sure that a message board thats 99% upper middle class white men, where nonsense like the Laffer Curve is taken as gospel and posters wish violent death in black people for even peaceful protests, may be right of center.

C'mon MDC. The only thing in the statement above that I'll cede is that there are more posters in this forum that are right leaning than left leaning - and much of the reason that is true is because the arguments and style of arguments of those on the left isn't compelling, and isn't winning the debates here.

 

I was addressing a statement you made that demanded that your political opponents possess only binary thinking ability. What's worth pointing out in that claim of yours is your subsequent demonstration that you are the one engaging in that form of binary thinking. See above. Those are binary - if not downright inaccurate and inflammatory (no reason for you to claim that those right of center wish death on peaceful protesters, black or otherwise) - claims you make.

 

See above link. Conservatives understand liberals, but the reverse is clearly not true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C'mon MDC. The only thing in the statement above that I'll cede is that there are more posters in this forum that are right leaning than left leaning - and much of the reason that is true is because the arguments and style of arguments of those on the left isn't compelling, and isn't winning the debates here.

 

I was addressing a statement you made that demanded that your political opponents possess only binary thinking ability. What's worth pointing out in that claim of yours is your subsequent demonstration that you are the one engaging in that form of binary thinking. See above. Those are binary - if not downright inaccurate and inflammatory (no reason for you to claim that those right of center wish death on peaceful protesters, black or otherwise) - claims you make.

 

See above link. Conservatives understand liberals, but the reverse is clearly not true.

I was thinking of RLLD who said he hopes BLM protesters who dont engage in property damage / crime die in a fire.

 

I dont consider the time wasting and slapfights here to be debate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking of RLLD who said he hopes BLM protesters who dont engage in property damage / crime die in a fire.

Didn't see that, nor is one poster really emblematic of a group.

 

I dont consider the time wasting and slapfights here to be debate.

Not if they're constantly turned into such things, no. I, for instance, was attempting debate with Worms about tax cuts and the revenues they raise, and he absolutely ran away from it, but not before taking as many shots as possible to deflect from the topic itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't see that, nor is one poster really emblematic of a group.

 

 

Not if they're constantly turned into such things, no. I, for instance, was attempting debate with Worms about tax cuts and the revenues they raise, and he absolutely ran away from it, but not before taking as many shots as possible to deflect from the topic itself.

Yeah. MDC is known for his in depth, policy driven debates on current events. Wait, no, he's the trollingest troll around. I misspoke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah. MDC is known for his in depth, policy driven debates on current events. Wait, no, he's the trollingest troll around. I misspoke.

Youre known for being a fake Marine, RP. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah. MDC is known for his in depth, policy driven debates on current events. Wait, no, he's the trollingest troll around. I misspoke.

 

Youre known for being a fake Marine, RP. :thumbsup:

Is there any desire to stop this sort of thing? Any at all? I know what TOS says for this forum, but it's absolutely ignored.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh it's way worse than that.

Many have this obsession about 'winning ' a thread like it's a high school debate.

Newbie did too.

 

Many here have no life at all and live for this place so they can win a thread

Mike wins. Thread over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Is there any desire to stop this sort of thing? Any at all? I know what TOS says for this forum, but it's absolutely ignored.

Youd prefer less bickering Mr Pot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Youre known for being a fake Marine, RP. :thumbsup:

Sorry Jody, 100 pct Devil Dog. Birthday was Friday. Oooh-rah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Is there any desire to stop this sort of thing? Any at all? I know what TOS says for this forum, but it's absolutely ignored.

Nope

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Youd prefer less bickering Mr Pot?

I know, you love calling names. Yes, I would, and I demonstrated it when I returned, didn't I? Nearly every one of my posts was responded to with insults, and nearly every one of my responses for the first couple of weeks simply implored posters to not just fire insults.

 

Until these requests were ignored; until whoever moderates here didn't take any action at all, and until I realized that there was no point in avoiding insults with those interested in simply throwing them.

 

So I participated. I am absolutely confident that I'm at least as good at doing so as I am at anything else, so that's what I did.

 

But that doesn't mean that I prefer it. I find it juvenile, not constructive, and as tiring as anything else could be, after awhile.

 

Yes, I prefer it stop. I have actually called in each poster with whom I've had exchanges, and said plainly: if they agree to a truce and adhere to it, so will I.

 

I've asked you too, but it's possible you may have missed it. Are you game? Truce starts now if you say so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike wins. Thread over.

Not to derail this thread's lovely and substantive topic, but I looked into Ethereum (and Litecoin) and was fascinated with it, and bought a decent amount of both (ETH @ 286 and LTC @ 54). Both are up. :thumbsup:

 

BTC I've noticed took a substantial hit, down below 6k briefly. Is your sense of BTC that of a crypto-currency that has jumped the shark, in terms of an investment? It seems like one could set up trading ranges on all three of these and make a killing with buy/sell tactics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, you love calling names. Yes, I would, and I demonstrated it when I returned, didn't I? Nearly every one of my posts was responded to with insults, and nearly every one of my responses for the first couple of weeks simply implored posters to not just fire insults.

 

Until these requests were ignored; until whoever moderates here didn't take any action at all, and until I realized that there was no point in avoiding insults with those interested in simply throwing them.

 

So I participated. I am absolutely confident that I'm at least as good at doing so as I am at anything else, so that's what I did.

 

But that doesn't mean that I prefer it. I find it juvenile, not constructive, and as tiring as anything else could be, after awhile.

 

Yes, I prefer it stop. I have actually called in each poster with whom I've had exchanges, and said plainly: if they agree to a truce and adhere to it, so will I.

 

I've asked you too, but it's possible you may have missed it. Are you game? Truce starts now if you say so.

You and HT are by far the single most responsible posters for slapfighting here. Just embrace it and save the whiny victim bullsh1t.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You, NEWBIE and HT are by far the single most responsible posters for slapfighting here. Just embrace it and save the whiny victim bullsh1t.

 

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You and HT are by far the single most responsible posters for slapfighting here. Just embrace it and save the whiny victim bullsh1t.

With you, yes I am. Nice try though. Its your usual punk MO, not surprising.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You and HT are by far the single most responsible posters for slapfighting here. Just embrace it and save the whiny victim bullsh1t.

*sigh*

 

I knew it. I told you what happened - it's recorded here - and I didn't even single you out when I described it, in fact, I only cited you as a result of you choosing to say "Mr. Pot".

 

Your response? Call someone else the reason for the trouble. Please: you and I both know that it wasn't me who instantly threw insults when I returned here; you and I know what really happened. It took over 2 weeks for me to begin returning fire to you and others, because you demonstrated - like you are now - zero desire to have it be otherwise.

 

And now more than just you and I can see who it is who is unwilling to simply declare a ceasefire. You complain about slapfighting, but you don't want to be part of what ends it. You want to use it as a silencing tactic, because the strength of your own arguments so badly fails at doing so.

 

So your intention here is clear: you want to both be the reason for insults and fighting, and want to complain that others are the reason for it.

 

I'm willing to put all that in the past. I want you to be willing to put it in the past.

 

So are you game, or are you not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With you, yes I am. Nice try though. Its your usual punk MO, not surprising.

I have days at a time where I dont post here much at all and whenever I check in, you and Mensa are still here swordfighting all day long every day.

 

The common denominator is you. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have days at a time where I dont post here much at all and whenever I check in, you and Mensa are still here swordfighting all day long every day.

 

The common denominator is you. :thumbsup:

Yes, you're so above the Fray. Please. You attempted to go at it with me over some lame contrived garbage last night out of nowhere. Take off the makeup and take a good look at yourself. What you think you are ain't what you is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is that newbie will be back before too long.

 

He's gone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you're so above the Fray. Please. You attempted to go at it with me over some lame contrived garbage last night out of nowhere. Take off the makeup and take a good look at yourself. What you think you are ain't what you is.

I never said Im above the fray. Im saying that you and Mensa are by far the two biggest offenders.

 

At least unlike Mensa you dont sob about how you didnt want to slapfight but everybody else made you do it. :cry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*sigh*

 

I knew it. I told you what happened - it's recorded here - and I didn't even single you out when I described it, in fact, I only cited you as a result of you choosing to say "Mr. Pot".

 

Your response? Call someone else the reason for the trouble. Please: you and I both know that it wasn't me who instantly threw insults when I returned here; you and I know what really happened. It took over 2 weeks for me to begin returning fire to you and others, because you demonstrated - like you are now - zero desire to have it be otherwise.

 

And now more than just you and I can see who it is who is unwilling to simply declare a ceasefire. You complain about slapfighting, but you don't want to be part of what ends it. You want to use it as a silencing tactic, because the strength of your own arguments so badly fails at doing so.

 

So your intention here is clear: you want to both be the reason for insults and fighting, and want to complain that others are the reason for it.

 

I'm willing to put all that in the past. I want you to be willing to put it in the past.

 

So are you game, or are you not?

Whos complaining? I dont sit here crying woe is me. Youre the one pouting bub. How about if you dont want to argue you stop picking fights and stop taking the bait?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you 3 jagovs right now are proving what trolls you are

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you 3 jagovs right now are proving what trolls you are

You're peaheaded brain cannot understand there genius.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×