Media Bias

[MDC 7,405]

17 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Definitive proof:  Biden on tape saying, "Thank you for the bribe!  Because you gave me this bribe, I will work to make sure you get that extra $2 billion in aid."

You guys can start by saying what favor(s) Biden supposedly did for Burisma or whoever, what he got for it and when this occurred. From there you typically go about collecting evidence of the quid pro quo.

I look forward to the results of the House investigation! 

[Raven Fan 362]

1 hour ago, jonmx said:

Definitive proof:  Biden on tape saying, "Thank you for the bribe!  Because you gave me this bribe, I will work to make sure you get that extra $2 billion in aid."

If it was Trump, we just need some rumor and it is jail time.  

How about evidence that will stand up in a court of law?  Like for example if you've indicted someone for trying to overthrow a free and fair election and have them on tape "asking" for votes, pressuring state election officials not to certify, being in on the scheme to put forth fake electors, etc.

That kind of evidence.  Like country A deposited X dollars into Biden/Biden tangent bank account and Biden's actions thereafter were clearly influenced by said bribe.

Is this your guys first day?

[seafoam1 3,017]

1 minute ago, Raven Fan said:

How about evidence that will stand up in a court of law?  Like for example if you've indicted someone for trying to overthrow a free and fair election and have them on tape "asking" for votes, pressuring state election officials not to certify, being in on the scheme to put forth fake electors, etc.

That kind of evidence.  Like country A deposited X dollars into Biden/Biden tangent bank account and Biden's actions thereafter were clearly influenced by said bribe.

Is this your guys first day?

what?

[jonmx 2,429]

53 minutes ago, Raven Fan said:

How about evidence that will stand up in a court of law?  Like for example if you've indicted someone for trying to overthrow a free and fair election and have them on tape "asking" for votes, pressuring state election officials not to certify, being in on the scheme to put forth fake electors, etc.

That kind of evidence.  Like country A deposited X dollars into Biden/Biden tangent bank account and Biden's actions thereafter were clearly influenced by said bribe.

Is this your guys first day?

How is asking to find votes a violation of the law?  Al Gore and his team of hundreds of lawyers invaded Florida in search of 500 votes.   Unlike what Democrats actively do in Arizona and Georgia, it is not like Trump was having his minions harvesting ballots and also sabbataging voter machines in GOP districts to prevent them from voting.  

[Raven Fan 362]

9 minutes ago, jonmx said:

How is asking to find votes a violation of the law?  Al Gore and his team of hundreds of lawyers invaded Florida in search of 500 votes.   Unlike what Democrats actively do in Arizona and Georgia, it is not like Trump was having his minions harvesting ballots and also sabbataging voter machines in GOP districts to prevent them from voting.  

IDK, maybe asking the election officials to "find" the exact amount of votes you need to win the states could be construed as trying to cheat.

Did Al Gore get on the horn with Florida election officials and ask them to "find" the votes?  Or did Al Gore go through the courts like any normal person who wasn't trying to steal an election would?

[weepaws 3,191]

How about trying to steal votes , like lowering the mortgage rates, then after the election they rise again, putting more people in financial trouble.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,403]

2 hours ago, Raven Fan said:

How about evidence that will stand up in a court of law?  Like for example if you've indicted someone for trying to overthrow a free and fair election and have them on tape "asking" for votes, pressuring state election officials not to certify, being in on the scheme to put forth fake electors, etc.

That kind of evidence.  Like country A deposited X dollars into Biden/Biden tangent bank account and Biden's actions thereafter were clearly influenced by said bribe.

Is this your guys first day?

Son of a bich, they fired him. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,403]

1 hour ago, Raven Fan said:

IDK, maybe asking the election officials to "find" the exact amount of votes you need to win the states could be construed as trying to cheat.

Did Al Gore get on the horn with Florida election officials and ask them to "find" the votes?  Or did Al Gore go through the courts like any normal person who wasn't trying to steal an election would?

All the votes in Georgia were 100 pct legit? 

[RLLD 4,230]

Biden trolled by Glenn Youngkin after cracking election denial joke

Quote

Biden jokingly dubbed McAuliffe, who lost to Youngkin in his second bid for the governorship in 2021, as the “real governor” of Virginia at a campaign rally at George Mason University in the state. Youngkin responded to the joke in a post on X on Tuesday.

Wow.....so.....Biden was just being a jokester......but Trump....oh man.....he is just wrong when HE does it.....   

 

 

 

 

[RLLD 4,230]

On 12/12/2023 at 9:36 AM, RLLD said:

Republicans seize on message of a world on fire under Biden

Republicans seize on auto workers strike as opportunity to recapture the White House

Republicans Are Trying to Seize Control Over Voting in Texas’ Largest Democratic County

Republicans seized the state Supreme Court after changing how judges are elected.

Republicans seize on Mayor Adams’ dramatic remarks that migrant crisis will ‘dest

 

Now lets see how the media uses that term with Democrats....

‘Republicans Are in Ruin’: Democrats Seize Opportunity to Raise Money

Trump’s rivals seize on opportunities to challenge his acuity

 

 

 

[Dizkneelande 1,096]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

 

ANALYSIS: These 'Republicans Pounce' Headlines Are Out of Control As far as mainstream journalists are concerned, the GOP reaction is always a bigger story than the Democratic scandal

[BunnysBastatrds 2,436]

On 1/5/2024 at 3:38 PM, Raven Fan said:

How about evidence that will stand up in a court of law?  Like for example if you've indicted someone for trying to overthrow a free and fair election and have them on tape "asking" for votes, pressuring state election officials not to certify, being in on the scheme to put forth fake electors, etc.

That kind of evidence.  Like country A deposited X dollars into Biden/Biden tangent bank account and Biden's actions thereafter were clearly influenced by said bribe.

Is this your guys first day?

 ROTFL. You stupid weaker, pathetic and stupid nothing who posted nonsense comments on Think Progress fagabeefe.

[Ron_Artest 1,498]

9 minutes ago, BunnysBastatrds said:

  fagabeefe

Midnight madness criminally underrated.

[RLLD 4,230]

28 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

ANALYSIS: These 'Republicans Pounce' Headlines Are Out of Control As far as mainstream journalists are concerned, the GOP reaction is always a bigger story than the Democratic scandal

Correct.  The media is absolutely biased to an  extreme degree, and Fox is included in that.   We need to demand better from the media.  But we need at least some information as well.

Its a problem.....

[TBayXXXVII 2,545]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

Correct.  The media is absolutely biased to an  extreme degree, and Fox is included in that.   We need to demand better from the media.  But we need at least some information as well.

Its a problem.....

Leftists are ok with it because their side has the bigger fighter in the ring.  It's the little guy (so to speak), that's the problem.

[RLLD 4,230]

Just now, TBayXXXVII said:

Leftists are ok with it because their side has the bigger fighter in the ring.  It's the little guy (so to speak), that's the problem.

Liberals think in terms of utopia, and anything that might affirm such drivel is something they will readily consume.....so that is what the leftists in power feed them.....

I would hope that conservatives think a little more, but there is sufficient evidence to suggest that at least on the fringes they are more or less the same.

The extremes hold too much sway at the moment....

[MDC 7,405]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

 

You proved that the word “seize” is common in headlines. Great work!  

[jerryskids 6,790]

7 minutes ago, MDC said:

You proved that the word “seize” is common in headlines. Great work!  

I would have hoped that somebody who writes would understand the power of framing the story.  With the MSM, it's never "Dem does bad stuff," it's "Republicans pounce/seize on [Dem bad stuff.]"

Then again you probably knew that and are just trolling.   

[RLLD 4,230]

21 minutes ago, MDC said:

You proved that the word “seize” is common in headlines. Great work!  

Nothing gets by you.....

[MDC 7,405]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

I would have hoped that somebody who writes would understand the power of framing the story.  With the MSM, it's never "Dem does bad stuff," it's "Republicans pounce/seize on [Dem bad stuff.]"

Then again you probably knew that and are just trolling.   

Your Google box may be different from mine, but when I type “Democrats seize” into my search bar and click News I get many dozens of headlines that include that phrase.

[RLLD 4,230]

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4d2txKPx8s/?igsh=ZHMzcjE0cWR3Zm9h

[Hardcore troubadour 15,403]

49 minutes ago, RLLD said:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4d2txKPx8s/?igsh=ZHMzcjE0cWR3Zm9h

Hilarious. How do liberals keep up with themselves? It must be exhausting.  

[supermike80 1,906]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Hilarious. How do liberals keep up with themselves? It must be exhausting.  

That's just amazing and disgusting at the same time

[RLLD 4,230]

15 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

That's just amazing and disgusting at the same time

They clearly do not care about applying their bias, no one holds them accountable, save Trump.  They hide behind the veil of integrity forged by their predecessors.....but every day they shame those same people with their recklessness.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,403]

19 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

That's just amazing and disgusting at the same time

Shamelessness is their greatest asset. 

[jonmx 2,429]

6 hours ago, RLLD said:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4d2txKPx8s/?igsh=ZHMzcjE0cWR3Zm9h

The lefts distribution of talking points and the minions strict adherence to those talking points is amazing.  Those talking heads get paid tens of millions to stay on script and keep a straight face.  Very wealthy shameless hoes.

[RLLD 4,230]

https://rumble.com/v4o7mpr-msnbc-host-aghast-that-trump-told-donors-he-would-let-them-keep-more-of-the.html?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The Daily Caller

 

There is likely some truth to be found in here, probably more along the lines of the mortgage interest thing, but as usual, the media is really just lying Source

Quote

Congressional Democrats have argued that one of the best ways to pay for the legislation is to raise taxes on wealthy households, which, according to many on the left, have benefited disproportionately and unfairly from the 2017 tax reform law passed by Republicans and signed by former President Trump. The latest data, however, proves that this claim is pure mythology.

Income data published by the IRS clearly show that on average all income brackets benefited substantially from the Republicans’ tax reform law, with the biggest beneficiaries being working and middle-income filers, not the top 1 percent, as so many Democrats have argued.

A careful analysis of the IRS tax data, one that includes the effects of tax credits and other reforms to the tax code, shows that filers with an adjusted gross income (AGI) of $15,000 to $50,000 enjoyed an average tax cut of 16 percent to 26 percent in 2018, the first year Republicans’ Tax Cuts and Jobs Act went into effect and the most recent year for which data is available.

 

 

[RLLD 4,230]

 

Juan Williams tried to warn us about NPR a long time ago, and apparently they have gotten worse eh?

MSM is spewing liberal doctrine like a good propaganda machine should, this is what fascism looks like

[RLLD 4,230]

 

[RLLD 4,230]

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C90eF6bMCGr/?igsh=OW94YWd1NXdrbWt6

[jerryskids 6,790]

Even Colbert's audience knows that CNN is a bunch of biased hacks.  

 

 

[Strike 5,532]

Ooh, they got him now!!!!

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article290986070.html?taid=66bace93d1662d0001f210d5&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

 

[thegeneral 3,207]

Watching a bit of comedy this afternoon on Fox News.

Cavuto is decent. 

However, mid-morning show with a bunch of hysteric broads and now this show “The Five” is one giant “whatabout” cry fest. Imagine if Trump did this was like every segment

If people feel like they aren’t getting enough Republican cover from their press I suggest flipping this on.

[jerryskids 6,790]

Time Magazine:  hacks

 

[thegeneral 3,207]

Elon is such a whiny betch. Trump has been on the cover of Time like 40 times. They aren’t all going to be nice

Suck it up!

[jerryskids 6,790]

WaPo reporter asks KJP if the White House should censor Trump's interview with Musk, because muh misinformation.

I honestly think the Left thinks 1984 was a how-to manual.  

https://www.foxnews.com/media/wapo-reporter-suggests-white-house-censor-misinformation-trump-musk-interview-press-briefing

[thegeneral 3,207]

I don’t know about censoring but maybe the convo needed one of those “community checks” for all the bullshit Trump was spitting

[jerryskids 6,790]

3 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I don’t know about censoring but maybe the convo needed one of those “community checks” for all the bullshit Trump was spitting

I'm having a hard time laughing about a WaPo reporter suggesting that the White House censor its political opponent.   

[thegeneral 3,207]

3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I'm having a hard time laughing about a WaPo reporter suggesting that the White House censor its political opponent.   

I didn’t hear what they said or what she said. If it was “Trump (or insert politician here) just said a bunch of untrue things during this interview is there any responsibility to have these things flagged?”

That’s a fine question to ask and see what the answer is.

If it was “Elon shouldn’t be interviewing Trump and this should be censored” yeah that would be dumb. 

[jerryskids 6,790]

6 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I didn’t hear what they said or what she said. If it was “Trump (or insert politician here) just said a bunch of untrue things during this interview is there any responsibility to have these things flagged?”

That’s a fine question to ask and see what the answer is.

If it was “Elon shouldn’t be interviewing Trump and this should be censored” yeah that would be dumb. 

It was before the interview, so it was preemptive.  To her credit, KJP didn't quite bite.  The last paragraph below seems to be saying "we can't really do anything, but good on you for bringing it to the attention of the people!"

Quote

A reporter for The Washington Post openly suggested that the Biden White House censor so-called "misinformation" from the interview between X owner Elon Musk and former President Trump. 

During Monday's press briefing, the Washington Post's Cleve Wootson Jr. invoked Musk's highly anticipated viral conversation with Trump that night, insisting misinformation is not a "campaign issue" but "an America issue" as well.

"What role does the White House or the president have in sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of intervening in that? Some of that was about campaign misinformation, but, you know, it’s a wider thing, right?" Wootson Jr. asked White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.

Jean-Pierre responded by telling the reporter that social media companies have a "responsibility" of clamping down on misinformation on their platforms, adding that the Biden administration is "mindful" that they are private companies.

"It is incredibly important to call that out, as you’re doing. I just don’t have any specifics on what we have been doing internally," Jean-Pierre added.