Jump to content
Patented Phil

Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Did he have a sign on that said "I'm a Pedo"?

What if it had been a father with lots of kids that the low IQ, trigger happy moron took the hand of?

Such a stupid argument you make boyo. 

If a drunk driver kills a pedo do we celebrate the act of drunk driving?  No, just dumb luck for a dumb dumb boy. 

Rittenhouse had no idea of the background of anyone he shot that night (or took a shot at). As the expression goes it is better to be lucky than smart and Kyle get just lucky (as he certainly wasn't smart). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BeachGuy23 said:

You feel me boyo?

My Brother. 

Killing Pedos is a good thing no matter who does it or how they do it. That's my point here, there's no gray area. 

But also understand that the Pedo CLEARLY attacked Rittenhouse who CLEARLY defended himself. Again, am I wrong? It's all on video. 

There's a legit time and place for your argument, but not here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Doesn't matter BOYO

You obviously value the Pedos life over Rittenhouse. That's concerning. 

Say "Nice job Kyle" and move on. 

I hope liberals kill every Pedo on the planet and I really don't care how they do it. I wish you felt the same. 

Let me put it this way boyo.  If moron Kyle had targeted, hunted down, and killed this known pedo deliberatly I'd have wanted to shake his hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, squistion said:

Rittenhouse had no idea of the background of anyone

It doesn't matter dumbasss. He still acted in self defense. The guy just happened to be a Pedo. 

Why are you upset?? Self defense and he took out a Pedo. Nothing to see here just like the courts ruled. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

My Brother. 

Killing Pedos is a good thing no matter who does it or how they do it. That's my point here, there's no gray area. 

But also understand that the Pedo CLEARLY attacked Rittenhouse who CLEARLY defended himself. Again, am I wrong? It's all on video. 

There's a legit time and place for your argument, but not here. 

I don't disagree that moron Kyle defended himself.  He was rightfully acquitted.  Nor do I disagree that wounding the pedo wasn't a great thing for society.

We simply disagree on whether or not his action of putting himself in that situation in the first place is justified because he luckily took out a pedo.

I say not, you say yes.  I believe we can agree to disagree here and remain boyos. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BeachGuy23 said:

.  If moron Kyle had targeted, hunted down, and killed this known pedo deliberatly I'd have wanted to shake his hand.

This guy hunted Kyle down, watch the video. 

Self defense is self defense BOYO. If you want to argue whether or not Kyle should of been there then that's another story. I'm with you. 

But he also didn't initiate it, he was physically attacked. 

Your mad because he was a Liberal. If it was the other way around you'd be defending his right to self defense. 

Don't be a hypocrite BOYO. Call it like it is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

This guy hunted Kyle down, watch the video. 

Self defense is self defense BOYO. If you want to argue whether or not Kyle should of been there then that's another story. I'm with you. 

But he also didn't initiate it, he was physically attacked. 

Your mad because he was a Liberal. If it was the other way around you'd be defending his right to self defense. 

Don't be a hypocrite BOYO. Call it like it is. 

Boyo read my other post por favor.

And I'm not mad in the least at anyone Kyle killed or wounded.  Weren't they all scum?

You know I try not to be a hypocrite. 

Try...

😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No concern about the kid that pushed the old woman down the church steps in Queens landing her in critical condition.  He’s only been arrested 9 times. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Grosskreutz should be in jail for attempted murder.  What a loser.  The fact that a university would give that lying thug a job illustrates what is wrong with universities.   

No because what he did would not be considered attempted murder in any jurisdiction. He didn't take a shot at Rittenhouse (which might be considered attempted murder depending on the circumstances). He was chasing Rittenhouse, who he thought had committed a murder and was fleeing the scene of the crime. Grosskreutz was trying to stop him, so that he could be held for authorities (which was a poorly thought-out plan to chase someone who carrying an assault rifle he had just used to kill someone). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, squistion said:

No because what he did would not be considered attempted murder in any jurisdiction. He didn't take a shot at Rittenhouse (which might be considered attempted murder depending on the circumstances). He was chasing Rittenhouse, who he thought had committed a murder and was fleeing the scene of the crime. Grosskreutz was trying to stop him, so that he could be held for authorities (which was a poorly thought-out plan to chase someone who carrying an assault rifle he had just used to kill someone). 

revisionist history

so lets take your story, what this doushbag did was ok cause he thought he was chasing a criminal

now do ahmed arbury

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Won't be long before Kyle OD's or shoots someone he won't get off for.

Dude's a straight up high functioning retard.  Or in another words your typical MAGA incel. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, squistion said:

No because what he did would not be considered attempted murder in any jurisdiction. He didn't take a shot at Rittenhouse (which might be considered attempted murder depending on the circumstances). He was chasing Rittenhouse, who he thought had committed a murder and was fleeing the scene of the crime. Grosskreutz was trying to stop him, so that he could be held for authorities (which was a poorly thought-out plan to chase someone who carrying an assault rifle he had just used to kill someone). 

Meh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, squistion said:

No because what he did would not be considered attempted murder in any jurisdiction. He didn't take a shot at Rittenhouse (which might be considered attempted murder depending on the circumstances). He was chasing Rittenhouse, who he thought had committed a murder and was fleeing the scene of the crime. Grosskreutz was trying to stop him, so that he could be held for authorities (which was a poorly thought-out plan to chase someone who carrying an assault rifle he had just used to kill someone). 

You have zero clue on anything especially the law.  Grosskreutz had no actual knowledge of what happened earlier.  He was following the mob which wrongly believed Rittenhouse was a murderer.  The mob was the aggressor/chaser.  Vigilantism is not legal and does not justify chasing someone down and assaulting them. 

Now if Rittenhouse was an actual active shooter and was in the process of shooting someone, then the mob would be justified with using deadly force to stop him. But as it was, Rittenhouse was a kid with a gun running from an angry mob and they were making wrong assumptions. They had zero actual knowledge that Rittenhouse was an active shooter, so they have no legal protection.  

At a minimum, Grosskreutz was guilty of assault with a deadly weapon.  If they could prove intent to kill, it would bump up to attempted murder.  And unlike Rittenhouse, whose weapon was legally carried, Grosskrutz prior convictions prohibited him from owning and carrying a weapon.   

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Liberals feel sorry for the pedophile that Kyle shot? Seriously? 🌈 

 

 

1 hour ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Won't be long before Kyle OD's or shoots someone he won't get off for.

Dude's a straight up high functioning retard.  Or in another words your typical MAGA incel. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, double tour said:

Rittenhouse is a hero. :thumbsup:

And a very good shot.  Beachball23 is sad that a Pedophile/ Biden voter is dead in a swing state. Pedophiles are one of the democrats base groups. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

And a very good shot.  Beachball23 is sad that a Pedophile/ Biden voter is dead in a swing state. Pedophiles are one of the democrats base groups. 

Yah. That's why these libs jump into every violent tranny call-out thread and say things like, "you're obsessed", "oh, another thread about a transexual?", "oh, here we go again with the tranny posts". 

The libs hate bring called out for defending all the sickness so instead of ignoring the thread if they don't like it, they HAVE to join in and try to play it off as if it's no big deal because they support it all to no end. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

And a very good shot.  Beachball23 is sad that a Pedophile/ Biden voter is dead in a swing state. Pedophiles are one of the democrats base groups. 

A very well raised young man that every child should strive to be. He took out a convicted pedophile and domestic abuser. 

God Bless that young Man 🇺🇸

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone who thinks it's OK for a deluded 17-year-old boy with an assault rifle to involve himself in that situation is mentally ill.

Anyone who thinks he's a hero is even more mentally ill.

He didn't know the criminal backgrounds of those he shot.

But if you idiots think this is an act of heroism and vigilante justice, there are sex offender registries that list home addresses, so you keyboard warriors should get off your fat asses and go kill all the pedophiles you can find.

Man up, boyos!

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

A very well raised young man that every child should strive to be. He took out a convicted pedophile and domestic abuser. 

God Bless that young Man 🇺🇸

He did this against his mother's wishes, you know ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Maximum Overkill said:

 

 

Well, that's just silly. 

But again, police should be handling these situations, which a 17-year-old boy had no business bringing a gun into.

He's not a hero.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This exactly why we should never ban guns.

Police told to stand down while peoples lives are destroyed because the politicians wanted to weaponizes protests.

Citizens rightfully step in and protect their community.

The army of idiots at the politician's disposal blame the guy that was attacked for defending himself and say he shouldn't have been there.

What a load of baby back bìtches.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I guess Kyle told his mom and sister to pull themselves up by their bootstraps

https://www.newsweek.com/kyle-rittenhouse-family-plea-money-after-being-evicted-1915618

 

Bud Light should hire Kyle Rittenhouse as a spokesman on his 21st birthday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this type of rioting happened in 1776 there would have been a lot more than 1 17 year old standing in the town square with their musket, defending their community & neighbors property & livelihood. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kyle is a great Kid and a true American Hero. 

Liberals are upset that he shot one of their fellow Pedos. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Nomad99 said:

If this type of rioting happened in 1776 there would have been a lot more than 1 17 year old standing in the town square with their musket, defending their community & neighbors property & livelihood. 

It wasn’t his community, was it? As I recall he drove into a community far from his own, looking for trouble, like the white supramacist thug he is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

It wasn’t his community, was it? As I recall he drove into a community far from his own, looking for trouble, like the white supramacist thug he is. 

No.

He lived nearby.

No, he wasn't looking for trouble. He was there to protect against the rioters if they got out of hand.

He's not a white supremacist. 

Stop with your lies already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

It wasn’t his community, was it? As I recall he drove into a community far from his own, looking for trouble, like the white supramacist thug he is. 

You recall incorrectly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

It wasn’t his community, was it? As I recall he drove into a community far from his own, looking for trouble, like the white supramacist thug he is. 

It didn't have to be his community........just any community in distress. That you picked that hill to die on shows the weakness of your argument. How do you know he was looking for trouble? Because he had a gun? Guess what.....when you go to protect people & businesses from violent looters & arsonist,  you most likely bring a weapon with you. That caveat doesn't mean you are looking for trouble,  rather, you are prepared for it. There is no substantial evidence whatsoever that he is a white supremacist......that's your assumption. 

Why don't you focus on the REAL unchecked violence & lawlessness of those events. It's certainly one of the better recent examples of why the 2nd amendment is so important. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

No.

He lived nearby.

No, he wasn't looking for trouble. He was there to protect against the rioters if they got out of hand.

He's not a white supremacist. 

Stop with your lies already.

Nearby in another state where he had to cross state lines.

He had no connection with the business he purported to defend.

Yes he was looking for trouble and he found it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×