Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Utilit99

Cortez on Vanity Fair cover in a $14,000 suit

Recommended Posts

She talks about how her lipstick helps her. For real. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, iam90sbaby said:

I don't get why people simp so hard for her, she isn't even that hot.

Not even that hot?? She's about as hot as a 🐷. These people fight for socialism yet flaunt their $30,000 refrigerators filled with their favorite ice cream, own three homes and tell you to go to hell if you bring it up because they earned it, then put on and show off $14,000 outfits to the masses so they can wake up the next day and fight for bread lines in the future.

Socialism is for the masses, not the socialists themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Not even that hot?? She's about as hot as a 🐷. These people fight for socialism yet flaunt their $30,000 refrigerators filled with their favorite ice cream, own three homes and tell you to go to hell if you bring it up because they earned it, then put on and show off $14,000 outfits to the masses so they can wake up the next day and fight for bread lines in the future.

Socialism is for the masses, not the socialists themselves.

I don't view the culture war as capitalism vs. socialism, I'm going to be successful in any economy, so would you... I view it as the original inhabitants vs immigrants. She falls under the latter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Par for the course. All socialists have nice shLt. Premiere liquors, wine,  high dollar clothes, homes. They are not using an out house, growing field peas and potatoes and don't give and of their stuff away. I give more than Biden and AOC combined looking at their records. They are all full compacted full of shLt. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys.  She didn't buy that.  It's the cover of Vanity Fair.  Every designer in the world would fall all over themselves to give her that suit to wear for the cover.  I'd bet she got another 5 designer suits shipped to her house unsolicited hoping she would pick theirs.

Undue righteous indignation is supposed to be their schtick.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

Par for the course. All socialists have nice shLt. Premiere liquors, wine,  high dollar clothes, homes. They are not using an out house, growing field peas and potatoes and don't give and of their stuff away. I give more than Biden and AOC combined looking at their records. They are all full compacted full of shLt. 

That's communism not socialism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

That's socialism too.

Japan, Norway, Finland etc... would all be considered socialist by american standards and none of them sh!t in outhouses and give all their stuff away. Socialism and communism aren't the same thing. Communism has no social classes or currency. Big difference. Boomers gonna boom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, nobody said:

Guys.  She didn't buy that.  It's the cover of Vanity Fair.  Every designer in the world would fall all over themselves to give her that suit to wear for the cover.  I'd bet she got another 5 designer suits shipped to her house unsolicited hoping she would pick theirs.

Undue righteous indignation is supposed to be their schtick.

Guy, it doesn't matter. She is representing it. And it is against what she preaching to the "commoner". She's a retard that doesn't even know what she is doing. Or most likely, doesn't care as that is what what socialists are about. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, iam90sbaby said:

Japan, Norway, Finland etc... would all be considered socialist by american standards and none of them sh!t in outhouses and give all their stuff away. Socialism and communism aren't the same thing. Boomers gonna boom

Japan, Norway and Finland would all tell you to GFY for calling them Socialist.  They, themselves, say they are not socialists. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Japan, Norway and Finland would all tell you to GFY for calling them Socialist.  They, themselves, say they are not socialists. 

Do you know the difference between communism and socialism?

2020 USA is a socialist country in comparison to 1950 USA. 

Are you against federally funded primary school?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

Both suck azz and take my stuff.

Every capitalist country has socialist elements to it. There's hundreds of socialized programs in the US. All you had to say was you didn't know the difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

Every capitalist country has socialist elements to it. There's hundreds of socialized programs in the US. All you had to say was you didn't know the difference.

All you had to say is you are full of deuchebaggery. Both take others peoples shLt and redistribute it to shLtbags.

I never said social program didn't exist in the US. I hate all programs that do it. If people truly are in need the community will help them as they always did before social programs. How in the phuck is soda the #1 item purchased with food stamps. Eggs? Milk? No. Phucking 2 liter bottles of Orange Fanta...meh.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

All you had to say is you are full of deuchebaggery. Both take others peoples shLt and redistribute it to shLtbags.

I never said social program didn't exist in the US. I hate all programs that do it. If people truly are in need the community will help them as they always did before social programs. How in the phuck is soda the #1 item purchased with food stamps. 

 

 

In your opinion how many socialized programs does a country have to have until it tips over and is officially a socialist country? Are we socialist now? If we had universal community college would we officially be socialist at that point? Do you want to get rid of every social program that currently exists? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

In your opinion how many socialized programs does a country have to have until it tips over and is officially a socialist country? Are we socialist now? If we had universal college would we officially be socialist at that point? Do you want to get rid of every social program that currently exists? 

Yes. Get rid of all of it. We didn't have it for a long long time and nothing horrible happened. Communities and churches filled the gap. All they need is the basics. Food, water, shelter and basic healthcare. What we have now are programs that buy them 2 liter orange soda, doughnuts and whatever crap they eat to include methadone pills. Ditch it and give them back some dignity instead of glorifying gluttony and sloth.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

Yes. Get rid of all of it. We didn't have it for a long long time and nothing horrible happened. Communities and churches filled the gap. All they need is the basics. Food, water, shelter and basic healthcare. What we have now are programs that buy them 2 liter orange soda, doughnuts and whatever crap they eat to include methadone pills. Ditch it and give them back some dignity instead of glorifying gluttony and sloth.  

I think the SNAP program and similar programs are stupid. I'm not against universal trade schools/colleges though. As long as private trade schools and colleges could coe-exist. I'd be fine with everything else being 100% private. 

I just don't think AOC represents socialism and boomer peeps want to make everything left a representation of socialism. Antifa/BLM don't even know wtf socialism is and it isn't what they are thinking about when they are burning down and terrorizing America so I find it amusing when people try to make socialism public enemy no 1. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

I think the SNAP program and similar programs are stupid. I'm not against universal trade schools/colleges though. As long as private trade schools and colleges could coe-exist. I'd be fine with everything else being 100% private. 

I just don't think AOC represents socialism and boomer peeps want to make everything left a representation of socialism. Antifa/BLM don't even know wtf socialism is and it isn't what they are thinking about when they are burning down and terrorizing America so I find it amusing when people try to make socialism public enemy no 1. 

All democrats are a representaion of socialism otherwise they wouldn't support that party in the least over the last 15 years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

I think the SNAP program and similar programs are stupid. I'm not against universal trade schools/colleges though. As long as private trade schools and colleges could coe-exist. I'd be fine with everything else being 100% private. 

I just don't think AOC represents socialism and boomer peeps want to make everything left a representation of socialism. Antifa/BLM don't even know wtf socialism is and it isn't what they are thinking about when they are burning down and terrorizing America so I find it amusing when people try to make socialism public enemy no 1. 

We already have free college, healthcare, skills training and a paycheck for the able body which most of them are. Join the reserves. If they are not able body then yes, help them. Everyone else take it or leave it. No reason why Reserve numbers are so low yet all these people are getting something for no contribution. They could be helping with storms, floods, water rescue. Why can't they do these things if they are able.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

All democrats are a representaion of socialism otherwise they wouldn't support that party in the least over the last 15 years. 

You think minorities (D's largest base) vote Democrat because they are socialists? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, iam90sbaby said:

You think minorities (D's largest base) vote Democrat because they are socialists? 

Socialist wannabes. Yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Socialist wannabes. Yes.

Givemefreesh1talists. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are you guys such boneheads??? That’s not her suit!! It’s provided for her. Also, she can’t take it home. Da fuq? Morons....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And she is attractive whether you agree with her politics or not. You know it you big liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, peenie said:

And she is attractive whether you agree with her politics or not. You know it you big liars.

Oh she's hot. She is the only female I would WANT to have another guy there for, just to make sure something was in her mouth at all times.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, peenie said:

And she is attractive whether you agree with her politics or not. You know it you big liars.

She's just fine peenie. But as far as the suit goes, the right doesn't care,  it's just pointing out that she claims to care, but really doesn't. We are all Republicans at heart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, peenie said:

And she is attractive whether you agree with her politics or not. You know it you big liars.

She starts out about a 6 1/2. The dumb crap that she spews daily knocks her down to a 4. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, nobody said:

Guys.  She didn't buy that.  It's the cover of Vanity Fair.  Every designer in the world would fall all over themselves to give her that suit to wear for the cover.  I'd bet she got another 5 designer suits shipped to her house unsolicited hoping she would pick theirs.

Undue righteous indignation is supposed to be their schtick.

While this is true, it a bad look. Pimping clothes, you know somehow she is getting $ for it. Unappealing skank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, peenie said:

And she is attractive whether you agree with her politics or not. You know it you big liars.

She is definitely not attractive...

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, posty said:

She is definitely not attractive...

Big horse teeth, horse faced loser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, posty said:

She is definitely not attractive...

Please. If her identical twin gave you half a chance, you'd hit that in a heartbeat. Every single geek here has nailed far worse, and many have married worse. I did (the first time).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, lod001 said:

Big horse teeth, horse faced loser.

Exactly, she looks like a horse...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, titans&bucs&bearsohmy! said:

Oh she's hot. She is the only female I would WANT to have another guy there for, just to make sure something was in her mouth at all times.

Ball gag would come in handy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, titans&bucs&bearsohmy! said:

Please. If her identical twin gave you half a chance, you'd hit that in a heartbeat. Every single geek here has nailed far worse, and many have married worse. I did (the first time).

You and I seem to be the only people here who can look past the stupidity and see a fairly attractive woman with a smoking body.   No one would be ashamed to bring someone of her caliber around family and friends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, peenie said:

Why are you guys such boneheads??? That’s not her suit!! It’s provided for her. Also, she can’t take it home. Da fuq? Morons....

She doesn't have to own it dimwit. She's representing it. And no. She aint hot in the least. She looks used and abused. Gross.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×