[** Official President Joe Biden Thread **]

[Dizkneelande 1,094]

3 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

The experience is having a last name. Have you heard of nepotism? 

If laws were broken we will see charges. 

If laws were broken . These people are allowed to insider trade for phucksakes. Why was the last name worth so much money and why were foreign adversaries willing to shell out 40 million dollars while Biden served office? Are you going with the Tim reason of hope?

[Pimpadeaux 2,405]

6 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

 

When you're wearing a bonnet and robe and shoveling radioactive dirt out in The Colonies, you'll remember what I said.

[thegeneral 3,100]

10 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

If laws were broken . These people are allowed to insider trade for phucksakes. Why was the last name worth so much money and why were foreign adversaries willing to shell out 40 million dollars while Biden served office? Are you going with the Tim reason of hope?

Inside trade what?

 

[Strike 5,385]

You can't make this sh*t up:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/close-biden-political-aide-weiss-hunter

[Dizkneelande 1,094]

10 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Inside trade what?

 

It’s one big uni-party and you and I ain’t in it sh!tlib.

[thegeneral 3,100]

2 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

It’s one big uni-party and you and I ain’t in it sh!tlib.

Well you kind of skipped the question which is what the real issue is but yeah nepotism sucks. Hunter Biden is an entitled I’d guess. Cashed in on his Dad name his whole life. Pretty common. Politicians wouldn’t be immune to this.

 

[Dizkneelande 1,094]

11 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Well you kind of skipped the question which is what the real issue is but yeah nepotism sucks. Hunter Biden was the bagman for his corrupted dad while he oversaw policy in the places offering them millions of dollars. 

 

Fixed your post for you.

I answered the question dingleberry you think they are going to pass laws (something you stated) which prohibits the grift when they won’t even stop members of congress from insider trading. 

[thegeneral 3,100]

2 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Fixed your post for you.

I answered the question dingleberry you think they are going to pass laws (something you stated) which prohibits the grift when they won’t even stop members of congress from insider trading. 

This should be easily proved. If it is have at it. 

The ability for members of Congress to trade is a good topic. I go back and forth on this. IMO all their trades should be public day of (I believe it’s now something like within a month). Suspiciously successful trades would be analyzed checked versus what info they had through committees, etc. We could also trail their trades if we liked this way.

Could also just force them to put everything in a trust or something but these would get very complex (what about spouses, relatives, etc). So not sure how effective that would be.

[RLLD 4,191]

4 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Your statement is false. @dogcows is defending Biden because he honestly believes that Biden has done nothing seriously wrong. I share that belief. If we thought, as you do, that Biden was guilty of serious crimes, we would not defend him. There is no double standard. 

Perhaps you are correct.  But that is a little challenging to digest.  Given teh dearth of information leading to the Trump investigations, which he professes to have supported, and now suddenly the more plentiful information associated with Biden is not enough.  The behavior is suggestive that his distaste for Trump allows less information and his preference for Biden requires more.

There is absolutely a double standard.  And I do not care who the players are, I want ALL politicians held to account.  What I see is that what I liked in terms of Trump accountability I am not getting with regard to Biden.  That is a problem. 

[RLLD 4,191]

4 hours ago, dogcows said:

False equivalency.

Has anybody ever heard of probable cause? Or do we just investigate every president just because they are president? Biden was in office for 40+ years and there was never a whiff of corruption ever brought up. Until Trump started making insinuations. So if you want to bring up Trump, remember his desire to get “dirt” on his political was the genesis of all this.

Incorrect.  You can  choose what ever you need to defend your actions.  To defend your allowance for Biden.  I will not allow myself this luxury, this maleable morality.  I leave it to you. 

[seafoam1 2,913]

Trump has been the most vetted president in the history of the US.

[Dizkneelande 1,094]

1 hour ago, Strike said:

You can't make this sh*t up:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/close-biden-political-aide-weiss-hunter

This is my shocked face

[dogcows 1,030]

36 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Perhaps you are correct.  But that is a little challenging to digest.  Given teh dearth of information leading to the Trump investigations, which he professes to have supported, and now suddenly the more plentiful information associated with Biden is not enough.  The behavior is suggestive that his distaste for Trump allows less information and his preference for Biden requires more.

There is absolutely a double standard.  And I do not care who the players are, I want ALL politicians held to account.  What I see is that what I liked in terms of Trump accountability I am not getting with regard to Biden.  That is a problem. 

You invoked Trump. Then when called out for that, you accused others of being biased against Trump even though YOU are the one who brought him up!

Forget about T-pump and focus on this investigation. Enough with the orange man and the deflections and accusing others of being biased.

It seems like you’re incapable of discussing this investigation on its merits. And I get it. The evidence does not support the premise that Joe Biden took any bribes. So you have to deflect.

[RLLD 4,191]

3 minutes ago, dogcows said:

You invoked Trump. Then when called out for that, you accused others of being biased against Trump even though YOU are the one who brought him up!

Forget about T-pump and focus on this investigation. Enough with the orange man and the deflections and accusing others of being biased.

It seems like you’re incapable of discussing this investigation on its merits. And I get it. The evidence does not support the premise that Joe Biden took any bribes. So you have to deflect.

Of course  I called out Trump.  He is the measure by which I want the rest held to account.  I presume we can at least agree that the accountability applied to him was appropriate?

I am unable to forget about Trump, because with him we were affored what i consider the be the correct level of scruitiny, and I want that more. 

I am discussing this on its merits.  Eventually you and I will agree, and that will be happenstance because your political zealotry will eventually cross paths with actual morality and common sense.  

[dogcows 1,030]

Just now, RLLD said:

Of course  I called out Trump.  He is the measure by which I want the rest held to account.  I presume we can at least agree that the accountability applied to him was appropriate?

I am unable to forget about Trump, because with him we were affored what i consider the be the correct level of scruitiny, and I want that more. 

I am discussing this on its merits.  Eventually you and I will agree, and that will be happenstance because your political zealotry will eventually cross paths with actual morality and common sense.  

You refuse to stop talking about Trump, but I’m the biased one.

[RLLD 4,191]

Just now, dogcows said:

You refuse to stop talking about Trump, but I’m the biased one.

Because there is no better example of how I want a politician to be treated than Trump.  GIVE ME THAT.   Over and over.

[seafoam1 2,913]

21 minutes ago, dogcows said:

You refuse to stop talking about Trump, but I’m the biased one.

You consistently want to attack Trump in a [** Official President Joe Biden Thread **]

 

[Dizkneelande 1,094]

According to three different people who spoke to Business Insider, Hunter knew the names of who bought his art. One of them was a Biden donor who around the same time was rewarded with an appointment to a prestigious federal commission.

Another person, according to Insider, paid a whopping $875,000 for Hunter's art. 

[seafoam1 2,913]

1 minute ago, Dizkneelande said:

According to three different people who spoke to Business Insider, Hunter knew the names of who bought his art. One of them was a Biden donor who around the same time was rewarded with an appointment to a prestigious federal commission.

Another person, according to Insider, paid a whopping $875,000 for Hunter's art. 

Oh.... This has to be a lie because it's not printed by liberals. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,228]

2 hours ago, Dizkneelande said:

According to three different people who spoke to Business Insider, Hunter knew the names of who bought his art. One of them was a Biden donor who around the same time was rewarded with an appointment to a prestigious federal commission.

Another person, according to Insider, paid a whopping $875,000 for Hunter's art. 

Just nepotism I guess.  Happens all the time. 

[Dizkneelande 1,094]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Just nepotism I guess.  

They are paying for hope HT

Also this 

you 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,228]

5 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

They are paying for hope HT

Also this 

you 

What does that guy know? 

[Dizkneelande 1,094]

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

What does that guy know? 

He knows nothing he’s a lying cultist 

[Strike 5,385]

Well I'm sure glad Diaper Joe fulfilled one of his campaign promises and ended Cancer.  I know I speak for many of us who have said "F Cancer" around here so let's all say a big THANK YOU to Joe Biden for putting an end to it!!!!!!

[Baker Boy 1,694]

16 minutes ago, Strike said:

Well I'm sure glad Diaper Joe fulfilled one of his campaign promises and ended Cancer.  I know I speak for many of us who have said "F Cancer" around here so let's all say a big THANK YOU to Joe Biden for putting an end to it!!!!!!

Tax filings reveal Biden cancer charity spent millions on salaries, zero on research

https://nypost.com/2020/11/14/biden-cancer-initiative-spent-millions-on-payroll-zero-on-research-report/

[Strike 5,385]

5 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

Tax filings reveal Biden cancer charity spent millions on salaries, zero on research

https://nypost.com/2020/11/14/biden-cancer-initiative-spent-millions-on-payroll-zero-on-research-report/

Makes it even MORE amazing that he ended it, doesn't it?

[BirdGang 385]

29 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

Tax filings reveal Biden cancer charity spent millions on salaries, zero on research

https://nypost.com/2020/11/14/biden-cancer-initiative-spent-millions-on-payroll-zero-on-research-report/

Libs are outraged…..oh wait…where are they?

[squistion 2,105]

3 minutes ago, BirdGang said:

Libs are outraged…..oh wait…where are they?

It is hard to get outraged over a NYPost article. 

[DonS 3,292]

1 hour ago, Strike said:

Well I'm sure glad Diaper Joe fulfilled one of his campaign promises and ended Cancer.  I know I speak for many of us who have said "F Cancer" around here so let's all say a big THANK YOU to Joe Biden for putting an end to it!!!!!!

Whew.  Guess I can skip my yearly follow up scan then!!!!

I feel bad for all the oncologists that will now be out of work, though. 

[DonS 3,292]

23 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

When you're wearing a bonnet and robe and shoveling radioactive dirt out in The Colonies, you'll remember what I said.

OK this one was actually funny.

[seafoam1 2,913]

Just now, DonS said:

Whew.  Guess I can skip my yearly follow up scan then!!!!

I feel bad for all the oncologists that will now be out of work, though. 

They can easily learn to code. 

[DonS 3,292]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

They can easily learn to code. 

I almost included that, but figured I'd tee it up for someone else.

[seafoam1 2,913]

Just now, DonS said:

I almost included that, but figured I'd tee it up for someone else.

You da man. 

[Baker Boy 1,694]

15 minutes ago, squistion said:

It is hard to get outraged over a NYPost article. 

1. It’s not happening.

[Dizkneelande 1,094]

19 minutes ago, squistion said:

It is hard to get outraged over a NYPost article. 

So you’re going with the tax filings are fake?

[squistion 2,105]

4 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

So you’re going with the tax filings are fake?

The NYPost has track record of posting false and misleading articles. I need to see this from a legitimate source, not a tabloid with an anti-Biden bias.

[RLLD 4,191]

5 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

1. It’s not happening.

   Nice....

 

We are here
VVVVVVVV
First deny, then when caught.....minimize by saying "its just that one store" or "its isolated" and as it spreads declare it to be a "right wing conspiracy theory" and as it surges....blame Republicans....rinse.....repeat....

[Dizkneelande 1,094]

22 minutes ago, squistion said:

The NYPost has track record of posting false and misleading articles. I need to see this from a legitimate source, not a tabloid with an anti-Biden bias.

Like the Hunter Biden laptop story? Here’s your favorite fact checker Snopes. This is comedy gold. Also, you suck.

The Biden Cancer Initiative spent millions on salaries but nothing on cancer research.

Rating:Mixture

About this rating 

What's True

The Biden Cancer Initiative, a charity founded by U.S. President-elect Joe Biden and soon-to-be first lady Jill Biden in 2017, spent more than $3 million on salaries when it was in operation.

What's False

Although the charity spent no money on cancer research grants, this fact is misleadingly framed in that the Biden Cancer Initiative wasn't a grant-giving organization.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-cancer-charity/

[Dizkneelande 1,094]

These people are the biggest corrupted grifters of all time!!

Far Right Politico

Joe Biden’s brother told executives at a healthcare firm that the former vice president’s cancer initiative would promote their business, according to a participant in the conversation, who said the promise came as part of a pitch on behalf of potential investors in the firm. 

The allegation is the latest of many times Biden’s relatives have invoked the former vice president and his political clout to further their private business dealings. It is the first that involves the Biden Cancer Initiative, a project Joe Biden made the centerpiece of his post-White House life following the death of his son Beau.

Biden’s brother, James, made the promise to executives at Florida-based Integrate Oral Care during a phone call on or around November 8, 2018, according to Michael Frey, CEO of Diverse Medical Management, a health-care firm that is suing James Biden. At the time, James Biden’s business partners were pursuing a potential investment in Integrate, according to Frey and court records. Frey, who had a business relationship with James Biden and his associates, had introduced the group to Integrate.

 

[Reality 3,121]

5 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Like the Hunter Biden laptop story? Here’s your favorite fact checker Snopes. This is comedy gold. Also, you suck.

The Biden Cancer Initiative spent millions on salaries but nothing on cancer research.

Rating:Mixture

About this rating 

What's True

The Biden Cancer Initiative, a charity founded by U.S. President-elect Joe Biden and soon-to-be first lady Jill Biden in 2017, spent more than $3 million on salaries when it was in operation.

What's False

Although the charity spent no money on cancer research grants, this fact is misleadingly framed in that the Biden Cancer Initiative wasn't a grant-giving organization.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-cancer-charity/

That's incredible.