[** Official President Joe Biden Thread **]

[shorepatrol 1,871]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Biden is going to confiscate 90% of the guns in the US?  Shoot, maybe there really will be a civil war 

You dopey fock 

[Shooter McGavin 618]

5 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

Under their definition of "assault weapons" it's confiscation of 90 % fuckoooooo 

He's not taking your guns away.  Don't be dumb.

Y'all said the same sh1t about Obama, never happened.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

Look at Gutterbich and Hack.   I make them dumber than they already are. Lol. 

[TimHauck 2,932]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Look at Gutterbich and Hack.   I make them dumber than they already are. Lol. 

So you think Biden is trying to confiscate 90% of the guns in America?

[shorepatrol 1,871]

6 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

He's not taking your guns away.  Don't be dumb.

Y'all said the same sh1t about Obama, never happened.

Can you read? 

[jerryskids 6,854]

12 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’d say greater than 50%.  What % of the legally owned guns in the US do assault weapons make up?  
 

HT said Biden told us he’s going to take our guns.  Except he’s not, because most people don’t have assault weapons.

Wow   

I guess it is your world and we just live in it.  Thanks for the definition; if Biden were to take 48% of the guns, I'd enjoy your explaining to us that he didn't take the guns.   

[Shooter McGavin 618]

3 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

Can you read? 

You're focking retarded

[shorepatrol 1,871]

3 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

You're focking retarded

Let's not get off subject 

[TimHauck 2,932]

5 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Wow   

I guess it is your world and we just live in it.  Thanks for the definition; if Biden were to take 48% of the guns, I'd enjoy your explaining to us that he didn't take the guns.   

I’m not saying that wouldn’t be a big deal.  I’m saying HT was implying he’s going to take away the majority of the guns.  Majority is more than 50%.  But I’m sure HT will whine and say that’s not what he was saying.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’m not saying that wouldn’t be a big deal.  I’m saying HT was implying he’s going to take away the majority of the guns.  Majority is more than 50%.  But I’m sure HT will whine and say that’s not what he was saying.

[TimHauck 2,932]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Check out the Bill Maher thread my friend

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Check out the Bill Maher thread my friend

I did. We were taking about murders. Why did you shift it to something else?

[TimHauck 2,932]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

I did. We were taking about murders. Why did you shift it to something else?

I didn’t 

[jerryskids 6,854]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I didn’t 

Can you stop being Tim for once and just post the link?

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,366]

32 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’d say greater than 50%.  What % of the legally owned guns in the US do assault weapons make up?  
 

HT said Biden told us he’s going to take our guns.  Except he’s not, because most people don’t have assault weapons.

do you even know what an assault weapon is?  Mr Centrist guy?

please tell us again how you voted for Trump, jeezus you worship this administration every step of the way

[TimHauck 2,932]

10 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

do you even know what an assault weapon is?  Mr Centrist guy?

please tell us again how you voted for Trump, jeezus you worship this administration every step of the way

Here’s how the last bill defined it: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1808

Yes, I voted for Trump.  A Fox News poll found 57% of registered voters supported an assault weapons ban, which apparently is an all time low - https://www.foxnews.com/us/assault-weapons-ban-all-time-low

This article estimates the number in the US around 20 million, which would be about 5% of the guns in circulation, and I have a feeling the % of gun owners that have one is even less (meaning I’d bet people are more likely to own multiple assault weapons than multiple guns in general) - https://www.newsweek.com/not-joke-biden-insists-hell-reinstate-ban-assault-weapons-1750979?amp=1

 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,366]

5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Here’s how the last bill defined it: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1808

Yes, I voted for Trump.  A Fox News poll found 57% of registered voters supported an assault weapons ban, which apparently is an all time low - https://www.foxnews.com/us/assault-weapons-ban-all-time-low

This article estimates the number in the US around 20 million, which would be about 5% of the guns in circulation, and I have a feeling the % of gun owners that have one is even less (meaning I’d bet people are more likely to own multiple assault weapons than multiple guns in general) - https://www.newsweek.com/not-joke-biden-insists-hell-reinstate-ban-assault-weapons-1750979?amp=1

 

so you are ok, with a group of people who know absolutely nothing about firearms, have never been trained using firearms, changing definitions to however it sees fit.

fwiw, I know exactly what the last bill said

here is a hint, any firearm is an assault weapon.  Guns are made to kill

but these idiots can ban one gun and keep another when they are the same exact weapon with a diff grip position

not to mention people are scared of AR style weapons despite not being responsible for hardly any deaths

and of those 57% polled, probably 100% of them think AR stands for assault rifle, and that is intentional

This bill makes it a crime to knowingly import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon (SAW) or large capacity ammunition feeding device (LCAFD).

just so you know this represents close to 75% of all firearms sold

[TimHauck 2,932]

6 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

so you are ok, with a group of people who know absolutely nothing about firearms, have never been trained using firearms, changing definitions to however it sees fit.

fwiw, I know exactly what the last bill said

here is a hint, any firearm is an assault weapon.  Guns are made to kill

but these idiots can ban one gun and keep another when they are the same exact weapon with a diff grip position

not to mention people are scared of AR style weapons despite not being responsible for hardly any deaths

and of those 57% polled, probably 100% of them think AR stands for assault rifle, and that is intentional

This bill makes it a crime to knowingly import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon (SAW) or large capacity ammunition feeding device (LCAFD).

just so you know this represents close to 75% of all firearms sold

Link to it being 75%?

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,366]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Link to it being 75%?

https://www.safehome.org/data/firearms-guns-statistics

guns sold in 2020

https://www.pewpewtactical.com/best-selling-guns-2020/

That’s 11.9 million handguns, 7.1 million rifles and shotguns, and 854,836 parts classified as firearms, according to data published by the FBI.

handguns are generally semi-automatic, as well as most rifles, and some shotguns as well

 

[craftsman 1,045]

12 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Link to it being 75%?

Another liberal that can't research his own questions. 

[TimHauck 2,932]

2 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

https://www.safehome.org/data/firearms-guns-statistics

guns sold in 2020

https://www.pewpewtactical.com/best-selling-guns-2020/

That’s 11.9 million handguns, 7.1 million rifles and shotguns, and 854,836 parts classified as firearms, according to data published by the FBI.

handguns are generally semi-automatic, as well as most rifles, and some shotguns as well

 

Your claim is they want to ban most handguns?

I don’t see in the links where it says the % of those sales that will be banned.

Oh and another reason HT is wrong is that the last bill said all existing legally purchased guns would be grandfathered, so technically Biden wasn’t planning to take any guns, unless he’s planning a new bill that’s more strict than the last one they didn’t pass - https://www.pewpewtactical.com/assault-weapons-ban-2022/

 

[nobody 2,694]

3 hours ago, jerryskids said:

So if one gun were to remain, you'd consider that "Tim FTW$#@!  "

Because he didn't get all of the guns?  

With centrists, they're allowed to apply nuance and deduce implications when it suits them.  Then when it's convenient for them, everything said must be taken absolutely literally.  Shooter has been doing this for years.

[nobody 2,694]

If anyone thinks Biden only wants a specific class of firearms, they're are straight fūcking retarded.  The blue team has already shown they'll do whatever they want.  Change definition of words...  Allow rioters to run amok...  I'm not a gun guy by any stretch, but it would be absolute insanity to let them pass a single gun law if you care about having even a sling shot.

Or are we supposed to act like we don't know the playbook is chip at gun rights?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

Bidens family refers to him as Pedo Peter. I wonder why? 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

Biden thinks congress voted on his student loan bailout. It’s obvious at this point they are just shoving things in front of him to sign. It’s not fair to the people to have a presidency run like this. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,366]

7 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Your claim is they want to ban most handguns?

I don’t see in the links where it says the % of those sales that will be banned.

Oh and another reason HT is wrong is that the last bill said all existing legally purchased guns would be grandfathered, so technically Biden wasn’t planning to take any guns, unless he’s planning a new bill that’s more strict than the last one they didn’t pass - https://www.pewpewtactical.com/assault-weapons-ban-2022/

 

My claim is the bolded. Most handguns are semi automatic. The bill says semi automatic. So what’s your question?

[TimHauck 2,932]

1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

My claim is the bolded. Most handguns are semi automatic. The bill says semi automatic. So what’s your question?

My question is: Would 75% of firearms sold have been outlawed by the proposed assault weapon ban?  

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,366]

39 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

My question is: Would 75% of firearms sold have been outlawed by the proposed assault weapon ban?  

The proposed ban is vague and says semi automatic. But since you trust the government you tell me. 

[TimHauck 2,932]

5 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

The proposed ban is vague and says semi automatic. But since you trust the government you tell me. 

It doesn’t just say semiautomatic, it says semiautomatic and also containing one of a list of other features.

I’ve stated I don’t know much about guns, and tried to research this myself and don’t see much of anything talking about the % of guns that would have been illegal if it passed.  I feel like places would have been up in arms if it was anywhere near 75%, or even like 30%.  I did see this article from the same website you linked, which doesn’t seem all that worked up about it, even though that was in part due to it being not likely to pass.  Basically it sounds like the proposal was pretty similar to the one under Clinton. 

https://www.pewpewtactical.com/assault-weapons-ban-2022/

I also saw that Biden “suggested” a ban on 9mm pistols, so I take that to mean they would not have been banned by the last failed proposal.

If you want to argue that Biden/Dems may try to take more guns 10 years from now or whatever, sure.  But HT said Biden told everyone he was doing it after the midterms.  

[Strike 5,605]

Biden:

Quote

My legislation says there can be no more than eight bullets in a round, okay

Shouldn't he learn a little more about guns before he tries banning them?

[jerryskids 6,854]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

It doesn’t just say semiautomatic, it says semiautomatic and also containing one of a list of other features.

I’ve stated I don’t know much about guns, and tried to research this myself and don’t see much of anything talking about the % of guns that would have been illegal if it passed.  I feel like places would have been up in arms if it was anywhere near 75%, or even like 30%.  I did see this article from the same website you linked, which doesn’t seem all that worked up about it, even though that was in part due to it being not likely to pass.  Basically it sounds like the proposal was pretty similar to the one under Clinton. 

https://www.pewpewtactical.com/assault-weapons-ban-2022/

I also saw that Biden “suggested” a ban on 9mm pistols, so I take that to mean they would not have been banned by the last failed proposal.

If you want to argue that Biden/Dems may try to take more guns 10 years from now or whatever, sure.  But HT said Biden told everyone he was doing it after the midterms.  

Tim, you are like a yip yip dog hanging on here.  He's trying to take guns, like Trump said.  You are just arguing arbitrary limits you decide on how many is "enough."  Take the L and move on.   

[TimHauck 2,932]

Just now, jerryskids said:

Tim, you are like a yip yip dog hanging on here.  He's trying to take guns, like Trump said.  You are just arguing arbitrary limits you decide on how many is "enough."  Take the L and move on.   

He’s trying to take some guns, not “the guns”

Edit: and actually he isn’t trying to take ones you already own.  Take the L and move on

[craftsman 1,045]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He’s trying to take some guns, not “the guns”

Edit: and actually he isn’t trying to take ones you already own.  Take the L and move on

You really don't know what phasing out means do you? 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

I said Biden was going to take all the guns? 

[TimHauck 2,932]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I said Biden was going to take all the guns? 

You said “the guns”

[Masshole 642]

Yup:

 

[TimHauck 2,932]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I said Biden was going to take all the guns? 

And again, he won’t be taking any guns that people already own

HT wrong again 

[craftsman 1,045]

1 minute ago, Masshole said:

Yup:

 

We are not even 2 years in to this debacle of a presidency and you can't even keep up with how many terrible things Biden is doing to this country. 

It's exhausting to create a list every time you want to post it. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You said “the guns”

Yeah, the guns he was referring to, because I was referring to what Biden said. Do you need me to tie your shoes too? Your  HTDS is played and desperate. Stop it. 

[TimHauck 2,932]

19 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yeah, the guns he was referring to, because I was referring to what Biden said. Do you need me to tie your shoes too? Your  HTDS is played and desperate. Stop it. 

He’s not taking anyone’s guns.