[** Official President Joe Biden Thread **]

[TimHauck 2,931]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Headline: “Biden Pledges To Ban Assault Rifles If Democrats Control Congress After Mid-Terms”.  My claim is spot on. 

So “assault rifles” equals “the guns”?

[dogcows 1,030]

Democrats are gonna take away all guns. Then they’re gonna CRT-indoctrinate you, A Clockwork Orange style, 24/7. Next comes the forced transgender surgery, followed by 1000 vaccines and a double mask permanently stapled to your face. Of course, if your name appears on the Green New Deal death panel list, they’ll just euthanize you first.

As a final insult, they’ll force the National League to adopt the Designated Hitter.

Better get into your bunkers now, suckers!

[Horseman 2,493]

 

17 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I was referring to HT claiming Biden is going to do it after the midterms.  If you want to call that “minutiae,” whatever.  

 

18 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

He’s working on it. He just said the other day if the democrats win he’s coming for the guns. Watch the news once in a while man. 

Per every news outlet ever:

Quote

President Joe Biden has pledged to ban assault weapons if the Democrats manage to strengthen their precarious hold over the House of Representatives and Senate at November’s midterm elections

 

Dementia patient thinks there is a chance.   

[craftsman 1,045]

5 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Democrats are gonna take away all guns. Then they’re gonna CRT-indoctrinate you, A Clockwork Orange style, 24/7. Next comes the forced transgender surgery, followed by 1000 vaccines and a double mask permanently stapled to your face. Of course, if your name appears on the Green New Deal death panel list, they’ll just euthanize you first.

As a final insult, they’ll force the National League to adopt the Designated Hitter.

Better get into your bunkers now, suckers!

More proof that liberals are idiots...

[Horseman 2,493]

6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So “assault rifles” equals “the guns”?

 

17 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

 If you want to call that “minutiae,” whatever.  

[TimHauck 2,931]

1 minute ago, Horseman said:

 

…

19 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

But hilarious that Horseman is the one saying that, argue about minutiae is literally all he does.

 

[Shooter McGavin 618]

12 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Everyone knows Trump is in bed with the NRA.  Well, everyone that isn't a dummy.

Then why did he say he wants to take away our guns?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

11 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So “assault rifles” equals “the guns”?

I’ll explain it again. I was referring to what Biden said. Biden never said he was going to take all the guns. You think, that I thought, that Biden was going to confiscate everyone’s guns? Seeing as he can’t do that, and I am aware he can’t, why would I be saying that, and not what he actually said, when referring to what he said? You’re a desperate, giant retard, who is obsessed with me and everything I say. Go ahead and cling to your ridiculous claim if it makes you feel better.  I’ll play along for you. Eye roll. 

[Horseman 2,493]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

…

 

 

17 hours ago, TimHauck said:

HT said Biden told us he’s going to take our guns.  Except he’s not, because most people don’t have assault weapons.

[Horseman 2,493]

2 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Then why did he say he wants to take away our guns?

Because assault rifles are a subset of our guns.  

JFC  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

1 minute ago, Horseman said:

Because assault rifles are a subset of our guns.  

JFC  

Imagine having a conversation IRL with these idiots? You would calmly excuse yourself and walk away. 

[TimHauck 2,931]

1 minute ago, Horseman said:

Because assault rifles are a subset of our guns.  

JFC  

lol do you even know who you’re responding to dumbass? He was talkIng about Trump

[JustinCharge 2,397]

its 2022, Biden is president, and now schools require all kids to wear clear backpacks to make sure they are not bringing in books to class and instead are bringing cardboard construction paper, poles , tape and markers and bernie stickers and hammer and sickle flags to properly protest capitalism.  and thats just kindergarten.

[Shooter McGavin 618]

6 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Because assault rifles are a subset of our guns.  

JFC  

No you focking idiot, please try and follow along.

If Trump is in bed with the NRA, then why did Trump say that he wants to confiscate our guns?

[Shooter McGavin 618]

Just now, JustinCharge said:

its 2022, Biden is president, and now schools require all kids to wear clear backpacks to make sure they are not bringing in books to class and instead are bringing cardboard construction paper, poles , tape and markers and bernie stickers and hammer and sickle flags to properly protest capitalism.  and thats just kindergarten.

Where do you people come from?

[craftsman 1,045]

2 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Where do you people come from?

From your males can have babies pedo tranny beliefs?

[Horseman 2,493]

4 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

No you focking idiot, please try and follow along.

If Trump is in bed with the NRA, then why did Trump say that he wants to confiscate our guns?

Right.  Let's step out of the minutiae and address the real claim.  If you can set aside your TDS a minute.  

17 hours ago, Shooter McGavin said:

It's just as dumb as you saying a potential assault weapons ban means he's confiscating guns.

 

1 hour ago, Horseman said:

You always get hung up in the minutiae.

Biden wants to confiscate guns, he ran on it.  It's a good thing he's incompetent and the radical libs don't have full control of the congress.

Directly from joebiden.com

At the very least a bunch of people not able to pass an ATF background check and application would lose their weapons.  What that even looks like under Biden's Department of Justice is anyone's guess.

Depending on how they categorize "assault weapons" they could go the way of machine guns and render them effectively completely illegal.  See Gun Control Act of 1968 and Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986.

 

 

[Horseman 2,493]

10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

lol do you even know who you’re responding to dumbass? He was talkIng about Trump

Says the guy that hung his hat on "our guns".  

[Shooter McGavin 618]

Looks like everyone wants to ignore Trump saying he wants to confiscate guns, but insist Biden already did.  Have a great day!

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

1 minute ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Looks like everyone wants to ignore Trump saying he wants to confiscate guns, but insist Biden already did.  Have a great day!

I’m good with anyone that wants to take guns from crazy people. We already have that in place, but the FBI keeps dropping the ball. 

[TimHauck 2,931]

26 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I’ll explain it again. I was referring to what Biden said. Biden never said he was going to take all the guns. You think, that I thought, that Biden was going to confiscate everyone’s guns? Seeing as he can’t do that, and I am aware he can’t, why would I be saying that, and not what he actually said, when referring to what he said? You’re a desperate, giant retard, who is obsessed with me and everything I say. Go ahead and cling to your ridiculous claim if it makes you feel better.  I’ll play along for you. Eye roll. 

If someone tells me someone is “coming for the guns,” that to me is implying at least the majority of them.

It’s funny because half of you idiots are saying that’s not what you meant, and the other half is actually trying to say Biden already tried to ban the majority of guns…

[JustinCharge 2,397]

 

1 hour ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Also Trump was the one that wanted to confiscate guns, not Biden.

President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed to be dangerous, even if it violates due process rights.

“I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida … to go to court would have taken a long time,” Trump said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety and gun violence.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/376097-trump-take-the-guns-first-go-through-due-process-second/

Rush Limbaugh actually discussed this issue with Trump and guns.

https://www.gunowners.org/rush-limbaugh-trumps-gun-control-will-hurt-gop-at-polls/

 

Written by Rush Limbaugh Published: 09 August 2019

Compromising with Democrats Never Works

George Bush “never recovered from [his broken promise on taxes] and it’s probably one of the key reasons he did not get reelected in 1992. Same kind of potential pitfall is out there again awaiting Trump [on gun control].” — Rush Limbaugh, August 9, 2019

---

You know, I don’t know if it’s become apparent to everybody yet, but [the Left Wingers are] not going away. And you cannot satisfy them. You cannot make them happy. You cannot compromise with them.

Like they’re talking about gun control. Don’t give them a thing! It’s not gonna buy us anything! … Trump is making it appear that he’s got some negotiating room with the left on gun control things.

I know this. I know that there are people in the West Wing, in the Trump administration, urging him to do it, swamp-dwelling Republicans. Just like there were people in the George H. W. Bush West Wing, “You’ve gotta compromise on that tax cut promise you made. You gotta do it! You gotta raise taxes, you gotta give the left something.” George H. W. Bush who had said “Read my lips: No new taxes” raised taxes. And any kind of a deal with the Democrats on guns is going to risk the same fate happening to Trump….

 And people make the ongoing mistake — I’ve been watching this mistake made for 30 years — thinking that you can calm them down, make them go away, make them like you, make them drop the issue, even, if you just compromise with ’em. It never works because they’re never happy because their objective, as is now plain as day, is wiping us out. Plain as day. There is no desire for peaceful coexistence or compromise. Their objective is to wear you out and to wipe us out. No two ways about it.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Now, up next were some comments on the NRA. Now, Trump loves the NRA, and the NRA loves him. But there is a potential pitfall lurking ahead as the left continues to ramp up its pressure in the aftermath of these shootings. There isn’t a person in the world who thinks that new laws are gonna change or end the shootings, including the people who want to take your guns away. Nobody thinks that. That’s just what they want you to believe they think. Everybody knows we have enough laws on the books.

Every one of these shooters already violated some law — including murder! You don’t need any more laws. There’s not a single new law that would change anything. The only thing a new law would do is it would drive a wedge between Trump and his voters and the NRA. ‘Cause make no mistake, they want your guns. They want every gun you’ve got as quickly as they can get it. They want guns out of your hands. When the movie The Hunt becomes real, they don’t want you to have a way of firing back.

They don’t want you to have the freedoms that are codified in the Bill of Rights and the United States Constitution. This is not an exaggeration. This is who they are. And the pressure that is always on Republican politicians to bend and flex and to compromise and to somehow show that we’re not racists, that we’re not nationalists, that we’re not uncaring about people getting shot? This is this kind of thing that leads and has led in the past to Republicans making stupid deals.

Talk about stupid! These stupid compromise deals with the left, with the Democrat Party on things they claim are of great importance to them. And it’s always done never so solve the issue. There isn’t a person in the world who believes that any gun control compromise is gonna fix this. What they’re trying to do on our side is (sobbing), “Limit the criticism! Stop saying these things about us. We want to show the American people we’re not what you say.” That’s been going on my whole life too.

Republicans feeling compelled to do things and say things so that the people of America will see the media and the Democrats are wrong. How has that worked out for anybody? The Democrats are still saying it no matter how much they’ve been given. They will continue to say it no matter how much they give them. Folks, if they succeed… Just to give you an analogy, an example, if they ever succeeded in eliminating the Second Amendment, do you think they would go away?

Nope. Then they’d go for the First Amendment, if it still was in place. And then after those, they would go for every other codification of freedom until there isn’t any more. That’s what they’re truly opposed to is freedom and all the manifestations of it. Here’s Trump on the NRA, and you’ll hear him say he spoke to Mitch, he spoke to senators, and they’re gonna take a hard line on the Second Amendment.

THE PRESIDENT: I have a great relationship with the NRA. I have a lot of respect for the people at the NRA. And I have already spoken to them on numerous occasions. And, frankly, we need intelligent background checks, okay? This isn’t a question of NRA, Republican, or Democrat. I spoke to Mitch McConnell yesterday. He’s totally on board. We don’t want insane people, mentally ill people, bad people, dangerous people…

We don’t want guns in the hands of the wrong people. I spoke yesterday to Nancy Pelosi. We had a great talk. I spoke to Chuck Schumer. We had a great talk. We have tremendous support for really common-sense, sensible, important background checks. Look, the NRA has over the years taken a very, very tough stance on everything — and I understand it. You know, it’s a slippery slope. They think you approve one thing and that leads to a lot of bad things. I don’t agree with that.

RUSH: Now, I’m just gonna tell you that your basic Trump voter doesn’t want Trump talking to Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer about this. They are not the people to talk to about guns, background checks, intelligent background checks. We don’t want insane people, mentally ill people, bad people, dangerous people having guns in their hands. Well, who gets to sit there and determine who’s insane and who isn’t?

So I’m gonna tell you, this is a potential red flag, and I just want to remind everybody, “Read my lips: No new taxes.” George H. W. Bush thought that he was demonstrating to Americans that he had compassion. The media was out there, Democrats were talking about what a cold-hearted guy he was, people were going hungry because of these tax cuts, Bush needed to raise taxes, blah, blah.

 And finally, because he thought he could work with Tom Foley, because he thought he could make a deal with Tom Foley. He didn’t trust George Mitchell in the Senate, but he loved Foley. He thought they could make a deal. And he never recovered from it. Never recovered from it and it’s probably one of the key reasons he did not get reelected in 1992. Same kind of potential pitfall is out there again awaiting Trump [on gun control].

And again, not to be redundant, but I think his instincts are fine, but I’m telling you there have got to be, because of the law of averages, there are people in the White House who are career Washington people who live and think as swamp dwellers do who believe that they can sue the Democrats for peace or they need to do something to show the American people that they’re not gun crazy racists or what have you.

And so they’ll want Trump to make some kind of deal. I guarantee you he’s being pushed. I don’t know who these people are. Don’t misunderstand. I just know that they’re there. I mean, there are people in the Trump White House who are trying to sabotage his policies in a lot of different places.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Now, I probably don’t have to do this, but I’m gonna explain to you why I think this Amendment II, gun control thing is so crucial. It’s an issue the Democrats have lost totally. Remember us marveling in 2008, 2012, 2016, the Democrats laying off of gun control. Remember John Kerry going (imitating Kerry), “Is this where I get me a huntin’ license?”

And Hillary Clinton putting on the fatigues like she’s gonna go out there and hunt sharks in Iowa, whatever she thought she was gonna do. They have totally lost the issue of gun control. It is polling way, way against them. Then these shootings happen and guess what happens? The left gets reenergized about it.

Now, I had some people email me, “Rush, what do you mean people don’t want to see Trump talking to Pelosi and Schumer? That’s exactly how Washington ought to work. Real people want to see Trump talking with ’em.” Wait just a minute. We got an election coming up in 2020. If Donald Trump loses his base, all the rest of this is academic.

And Donald Trump’s base — correct me if I’m wrong — we’ll find out here, I guess, in a minute — Donald Trump’s base is not cool with Pelosi and Schumer having a say-so about the Second Amendment, when they did not win the election.

Now, we say this with caveats because Trump does this a lot. Appears to bring ’em in — he’s done this with Dianne Feinstein on a number of things, and then the next meeting or a week later, he drops the hammer on ’em. So I’m not raising the panic flag here yet, folks. I’m just telling you, it’s a pitfall out there, potential.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

to sum that up, Rush Limbaugh said that Trump was under tremendous pressure from some of his advisors to adopt bad gun policy, and that Trump was making a mistake in doing so, and that it could cost him in 2020 as bad tax policy cost Bush41 in 1992.

At the same time, Rush points out that this is actually a common Trump operational negotiating tactic.  He makes contradictory statements in public and swings wildly between positions to get his political opponents off-balance.  He did the same with North Korea where he made some warlike statements before going peace and meeting with them in person.  trump threaten to totally destroy north korea in fall 2017, then met with kim jong un in summer 2019 in person.  so i would discount his gun comments for that reason.

[Horseman 2,493]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

If someone tells me someone is “coming for the guns,” that to me is implying at least the majority of them.

That's because you are an idiot.  Everyone knows it starts with assault rifles.    

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

If someone tells me someone is “coming for the guns,” that to me is implying at least the majority of them.

It’s funny because half of you idiots are saying that’s not what you meant, and the other half is actually trying to say Biden already tried to ban the majority of guns…

10-4 Hack. You’re right. I thought Biden said he was going to take everyone’s guns. But in actuality, if I thought Biden said that, I would have said this foolish, corrupt old man actually thinks he can take everyone’s guns. But do your contortionist thing if it gets you thorough another stress filled day arguing like an Asperger’s kid. 

[Horseman 2,493]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

10-4 Hack. You’re right. I thought Biden said he was going to take everyone’s guns. But in actuality, if I thought Biden said that, I would have said this foolish, corrupt old man actually thinks he can take everyone’s guns. But do your contortionist thing if it gets you thorough another stress filled day arguing like an Asperger’s kid. 

Another day after a long weekend.  

[TimHauck 2,931]

4 minutes ago, Horseman said:

That's because you are an idiot.  Everyone knows it starts with assault rifles.    

So you don’t agree with @RaiderHaters Revenge and @shorepatrol who said 75%+ of guns would be included as part of an “assault weapons” ban?  Shorepatrol even used the word “confiscate,” but I digress

[Baker Boy 1,704]

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/seller-exploits-gun-buyback-loophole-3d-printer-91341801
 

Seller exploits gun-buyback loophole with help of 3D printer

The New York attorney general’s office has tightened rules on gun buybacks after a critic of the policy boasted online about receiving $21,000 in gift cards for weapon parts made on a 3D printer

[JustinCharge 2,397]

some people are so smart.  i wish i had thought of that.

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

So you don’t agree with @RaiderHaters Revenge and @shorepatrol who said 75%+ of guns would be included as part of an “assault weapons” ban?  Shorepatrol even used the word “confiscate,” but I digress

He doesn't know what he believes. He is too busy flinging his poo at the wall of his house. 

[Reality 3,121]

Yup, this happened.

 

[TimHauck 2,931]

4 hours ago, Horseman said:

Another day after a long weekend.  

Go scavenge for some more N95 masks so you can save $2, life loser 

[Horseman 2,493]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Go scavenge for some more N95 masks so you can save $2, life loser 

Since my tax dollars have to pay for all the deadbeats like you on the government tit I paid a lot more than $2. And the bag of masks I got were definitely worth more than $2. I think I may have come out ahead on the portion I paid for everyone's masks.  

Now how do I get a positive ROI for all those dumb test kits from China?

 

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

21 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Go scavenge for some more N95 masks so you can save $2, life loser 

I'm surprised he could get the N95 mask over the oxygen mask he has to wear to live. 

[jerryskids 6,853]

3 hours ago, Reality said:

Yup, this happened.

 

I don't see the political benefit of this on any level.  Why do the interview at all?  All it will do is alienate people on the fence.   

 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

Concrete is made by adding sand and gravel to cement, whisking the mixture with water and pouring it into moulds before it dries. Making the cement is the most carbon-intensive part: it involves using fossil fuels to heat a mixture of limestone and clay to more than 1,400 °C in a kiln.

[craftsman 1,045]

9 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

Concrete is made by adding sand and gravel to cement, whisking the mixture with water and pouring it into moulds before it dries. Making the cement is the most carbon-intensive part: it involves using fossil fuels to heat a mixture of limestone and clay to more than 1,400 °C in a kiln.

But, infrastructure bill.!!!!!

[JustinCharge 2,397]

 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,365]

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CkHTDvoAAVT/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=