Jump to content
Pimpadeaux

Ukraine - Doomsday

Recommended Posts

The difference between China foreign policy and American foreign policy is they give the bribes, and we take them. Hey Iraq, we will build homes for you, but it has to be our contractors. Like Bidens brother. What a joke. Hey Ukraine, we’ll help you develop your energy sector, but 10 pct for the big guy. And Hunter gets a no show , no work job.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, Hunter gets on Air Force 2 and goes to China with his dad, the VP, and comes home with a 30 million dollar deal from the CCP controlled bank. Whores. The world sees this, even if we won’t. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Iraqi’s couldn’t possibly run a construction project.  Nope, Bidens no experience brother was critical to the project. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

You should go to bed.

You should wake up. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You should wake up. 

You should stop being a dumbass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Look a the dopey person who believes his own government that has been lying to him his whole life. Yeah, you’re the smart one. I bet you have said at one point “ all politicians lie”.  But not this time.   Lol. Lol lol. 🤡

How much tin foil do you go through in a week?

22 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You should stop being a dumbass.

It's in his DNA. He can't

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

How much tin foil do you go through in a week?

It's in his DNA. He can't

You’re right. The government doesn’t continually lie. I’ve seen the light, thanks Sean Mooney! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

How much tin foil do you go through in a week?

It's in his DNA. He can't

First it was "THere was no crickets" in the other thread, and now no punctuation?

And they let you teach second grade? Wow. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Boots11234 said:

Well chit, we did have weapons labs in Ukraine.  WTF is going on??

I happened to catch this tonight. It will fly right over the heads of liberals because they won't be capable to listen, but it's focking powerful. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Yep a 15 year unbiased journalist who does actual research.

Journalism is almost always one of if not THE least trusted and least respected professions, going back forever.  Its pretty much a scarlet letter to say you've been a journalist for 15 years.  The fact that you do not know this suggests you are incredibly naive.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A children's hospital and maternity ward were bombed by Russia yesterday.  I sure feel safer sleeping at night knowing that Nazi babies no longer inhabit the same world as me.  Thank you Putin for saving mankind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, vomit said:

A children's hospital and maternity ward were bombed by Russia yesterday.  I sure feel safer sleeping at night knowing that Nazi babies no longer inhabit the same world as me.  Thank you Putin for saving mankind.

Were the Ukraine cowards using it as a staging ground like they were using schools?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

Were the Ukraine cowards using it as a staging ground like they were using schools?

No doubt.  Those nazi cowards will do anything to avoid detection.  god bless Putin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Boots11234 said:

Well chit, we did have weapons labs in Ukraine.  WTF is going on??

For the 50th time. The TS liberalism scale, again, over and over

1. Ostracize the messenger.

2. Deny the message is happening. 

3. Admit the message is happening but it's not a big deal.

4. Defend the message.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

Journalism is almost always one of if not THE least trusted and least respected professions, going back forever.  Its pretty much a scarlet letter to say you've been a journalist for 15 years.  The fact that you do not know this suggests you are incredibly naive.

I agree when then work for a mainstream company which Tim did and realized the bullsh1t and he started his own because of what he was told to say and do

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

I agree when then work for a mainstream company which Tim did and realized the bullsh1t and he started his own because of what he was told to say and do

He also has nothing holding him to any type of journalistic standard. He is on a platform where he can monetize craziness. And people like you and others here lap it up. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

He also has nothing holding him to any type of journalistic standard. He is on a platform where he can monetize craziness. And people like you and others here lap it up. 

I guess you feel the same way about substack as well? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I guess you feel the same way about substack as well? 

I feel the same way about anyone who is going to those services and monetizing craziness or echo chamber nonsense as opposed to having some sort of journalistic standards they are tied to. Again- Tim can say whatever he wants- who is going to fact check it? I mean look at what he was saying that people were buying and has been proven true over and over.

Substack, Tim, and people like that are just doing their own game of what has ruined news for America- prioritizing personality over professionalism and integrity and factual accuracy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sean Mooney said:

I feel the same way about anyone who is going to those services and monetizing craziness or echo chamber nonsense as opposed to having some sort of journalistic standards they are tied to. Again- Tim can say whatever he wants- who is going to fact check it? I mean look at what he was saying that people were buying and has been proven true over and over.

Substack, Tim, and people like that are just doing their own game of what has ruined news for America- prioritizing personality over professionalism and integrity and factual accuracy. 

The NY Times was awarded a Pulitzer for its reporting on the Russia hoax. Rachel Maddow, for three years, dedicated her show to the Russia hoax. CNN had to pay Nicholas Sandman a fortune for their reporting on his incident. But they aren’t behind a pay wall, so they have integrity? People on substack work for themselves, not a corporation. CNN gave Hillary the answers to a debate. Anyone lose their job over that? You’re a brand name consumer of news and information and you think you’re getting it straight? Andrew Cuomo got an Emmy. An Emmy for lying in the camera every day. It was easy. No one was reporting what was actually going on because they had so much integrity. Wow. And there’s a lot more than that 

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

I feel the same way about anyone who is going to those services and monetizing craziness or echo chamber nonsense as opposed to having some sort of journalistic standards they are tied to. Again- Tim can say whatever he wants- who is going to fact check it? I mean look at what he was saying that people were buying and has been proven true over and over.

Substack, Tim, and people like that are just doing their own game of what has ruined news for America- prioritizing personality over professionalism and integrity and factual accuracy. 

What did the fact checkers say about the bio labs in Ukraine? Who was their source? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

How much tin foil do you go through in a week?

 

Oh boy. The tinfoil reference. Clever. Never hear that being repeated over and over and over. 

It's like a liberal mantra. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

I feel the same way about anyone who is going to those services and monetizing craziness or echo chamber nonsense as opposed to having some sort of journalistic standards they are tied to. Again- Tim can say whatever he wants- who is going to fact check it? I mean look at what he was saying that people were buying and has been proven true over and over.

Substack, Tim, and people like that are just doing their own game of what has ruined news for America- prioritizing personality over professionalism and integrity and factual accuracy. 

You can fact check it all you want. You act as of fact checks are a real think. You never once have debunked anything he’s said you just say oh he’s on YouTube. Like you really believe cnn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

He also has nothing holding him to any type of journalistic standard. He is on a platform where he can monetize craziness. And people like you and others here lap it up. 

And nope I watch it and find it entertaining. I enjoy the way he presents articles and information and makes all sources readily available. I read almost every article and topic he discusses.  When was the last time you fact checked your idiots at cnn?  Do they ever have sources?  Oh yes they have according to someone familiar with how someone might think. Brilliant. Journalistic integrity lol. Cuomo news network 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The NY Times was awarded a Pulitzer for its reporting on the Russia hoax. Rachel Maddow, for three years, dedicated her show to the Russia hoax. CNN had to pay Nicholas Sandman a fortune for their reporting on his incident. But they aren’t behind a pay wall, so they have integrity? People on substack work for themselves, not a corporation. CNN gave Hillary the answers to a debate. Anyone lose their job over that? You’re a brand name consumer of news and information and you think you’re getting it straight? Andrew Cuomo got an Emmy. An Emmy for lying in the camera every day. It was easy. No one was reporting what was actually going on because they had so much integrity. Wow. And there’s a lot more than that 

That's gonna leave a gash

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The NY Times was awarded a Pulitzer for its reporting on the Russia hoax. Rachel Maddow, for three years, dedicated her show to the Russia hoax. CNN had to pay Nicholas Sandman a fortune for their reporting on his incident. But they aren’t behind a pay wall, so they have integrity? People on substack work for themselves, not a corporation. CNN gave Hillary the answers to a debate. Anyone lose their job over that? You’re a brand name consumer of news and information and you think you’re getting it straight? Andrew Cuomo got an Emmy. An Emmy for lying in the camera every day. It was easy. No one was reporting what was actually going on because they had so much integrity. Wow. And there’s a lot more than that 

You consider Rachel Maddow a journalist? Boy who is the liberal now?

CNN paid a ton of money on bad reporting...you do see how that makes my point right? Like when TimCool says a bunch of stuff that isn't true who holds his feet to the fire on it? No one, that's who.

Yes Brazile "left" CNN after the debate stuff.....again- you are proving my point.

Andrew Cuomo is a journalist? They give Emmys for journalism?

You don't get your news from a brand? Never watch FOX News? Never read the NY Post? Never read anything from the AP or Reuters?

It is very very simple- when you are a video conspiracist on YouTube or any of those places (Substack is slightly less of an issue but there are still issues there- I mean Michael Moore is there I believe. You think he is unbiased? I sure as sh!t don't)....you can say whatever you want encumbered by reality or responsibility. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

You can fact check it all you want. You act as of fact checks are a real think. You never once have debunked anything he’s said you just say oh he’s on YouTube. Like you really believe cnn

Such nonsense you present. Fact checks are far more real thought than turning on a video camera and editing a video together so people drop a few extra dollars at you.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/02/25/fact-check-claim-us-biolabs-ukraine-disinformation/6937923001/

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/03/social-media-posts-misrepresent-u-s-ukraine-threat-reduction-program/

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/25/tweets/there-are-no-us-run-biolabs-ukraine-contrary-socia/

https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.32478V9

 

 

5 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

And nope I watch it and find it entertaining. I enjoy the way he presents articles and information and makes all sources readily available. I read almost every article and topic he discusses.  When was the last time you fact checked your idiots at cnn?  Do they ever have sources?  Oh yes they have according to someone familiar with how someone might think. Brilliant. Journalistic integrity lol. Cuomo news network 

Of course you do...Snappy videos are far easier to understand than actually trying to read something and get reality. I don't watch CNN. The most I ever get from them is financial market numbers and news and I see that on the website. Otherwise- don't care what they say. Again- I want news, not personality driven nonsense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Such nonsense you present. Fact checks are far more real thought than turning on a video camera and editing a video together so people drop a few extra dollars at you.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/02/25/fact-check-claim-us-biolabs-ukraine-disinformation/6937923001/

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/03/social-media-posts-misrepresent-u-s-ukraine-threat-reduction-program/

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/25/tweets/there-are-no-us-run-biolabs-ukraine-contrary-socia/

https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.32478V9

 

 

Of course you do...Snappy videos are far easier to understand than actually trying to read something and get reality. I don't watch CNN. The most I ever get from them is financial market numbers and news and I see that on the website. Otherwise- don't care what they say. Again- I want news, not personality driven nonsense. 

again, NOBODY CLAIMED THE US RUNS BIOLABS, if you watched the focking video you would have known that, but yah USA today leftist, politifact leftists, factcheck.org lol they are the ones that fact check facebook.  Anyone is free to fact check anything they want

Snappy videos, yah 30 mins on a topic discussing both sides of the topic is a snappy video, but you get your 30 seconds of analysis of what the govt media wants to feed you and its 100% legit.

you would be the same guy who said the Gulf of Tonkin was a real thing cause the news fact check said so

put on your Juicy Smellet had and fock off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From 2010:

Biolab opens in Ukraine
by Tina Redlup on June 18, 2010

U.S. Sen. Lugar applauded the opening of the Interim Central Reference Laboratory in Odessa, Ukraine, this week, announcing that it will be instrumental in researching dangerous pathogens used by bioterrorists.

The level-3 bio-safety lab, which is the first built under the expanded authority of the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction program, will be used to study anthrax, tularemia and Q fever as well as other dangerous pathogens.

“The continuing cooperation of Nunn-Lugar partners has improved safety for all people against weapons of mass destruction and potential terrorist use, in addition to advancements in the prevention of pandemics and public health consequences,” Lugar said.

Lugar said plans for the facility began in 2005 when he and then Senator Barack Obama entered a partnership with Ukrainian officials. Lugar and Obama also helped coordinate efforts between the U.S and Ukrainian researchers that year in an effort to study and help prevent avian flu.

The Nunn-Lugar Act, which established the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, was established in 1991. Since that time it has provided funding and assistance to help the former Soviet Union dismantle and safeguard large stockpiles of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. The program has also been responsible for destroying chemical weapons in Albania, Lugar said.

https://web.archive.org/web/20110522081423/http://www.bioprepwatch.com/news/213421-biolab-opens-in-ukraine

And:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/08/under-secretary-victoria-nuland-admits-u-s-funded-biological-research-labs-exist-in-ukraine/

Where Marco Foam Party and Vicky Nudelman discuss these bio labs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

From 2010:

Biolab opens in Ukraine
by Tina Redlup on June 18, 2010

U.S. Sen. Lugar applauded the opening of the Interim Central Reference Laboratory in Odessa, Ukraine, this week, announcing that it will be instrumental in researching dangerous pathogens used by bioterrorists.

The level-3 bio-safety lab, which is the first built under the expanded authority of the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction program, will be used to study anthrax, tularemia and Q fever as well as other dangerous pathogens.

“The continuing cooperation of Nunn-Lugar partners has improved safety for all people against weapons of mass destruction and potential terrorist use, in addition to advancements in the prevention of pandemics and public health consequences,” Lugar said.

Lugar said plans for the facility began in 2005 when he and then Senator Barack Obama entered a partnership with Ukrainian officials. Lugar and Obama also helped coordinate efforts between the U.S and Ukrainian researchers that year in an effort to study and help prevent avian flu.

The Nunn-Lugar Act, which established the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, was established in 1991. Since that time it has provided funding and assistance to help the former Soviet Union dismantle and safeguard large stockpiles of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. The program has also been responsible for destroying chemical weapons in Albania, Lugar said.

https://web.archive.org/web/20110522081423/http://www.bioprepwatch.com/news/213421-biolab-opens-in-ukraine

And:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/08/under-secretary-victoria-nuland-admits-u-s-funded-biological-research-labs-exist-in-ukraine/

Where Marco Foam Party and Vicky Nudelman discuss these bio labs.

fact check FALSE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

fact check FALSE

By whom, the extension of the DNC known as Politifact or that focked-up couple that comprises Snopes?

Anyway, why would we need to fund these bio labs in other countries to research dangerous pathogens used by terrorists?  Isn't that what Ft. Detrick is for?  Don't we know enough about Anthrax and it's negative effects?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

He also has nothing holding him to any type of journalistic standard. He is on a platform where he can monetize craziness. And people like you and others here lap it up. 

Journalistic standard is an oxymoron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Boots11234 said:

Well chit, we did have weapons labs in Ukraine.  WTF is going on??

Tucker and his resting constipation face. 😂

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

By whom, the extension of the DNC known as Politifact or that focked-up couple that comprises Snopes?

Anyway, why would we need to fund these bio labs in other countries to research dangerous pathogens used by terrorists?  Isn't that what Ft. Detrick is for?  Don't we know enough about Anthrax and it's negative effects?

I know its true, bro, I was channeling Sean Moroney

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

From 2010:

Biolab opens in Ukraine
by Tina Redlup on June 18, 2010

U.S. Sen. Lugar applauded the opening of the Interim Central Reference Laboratory in Odessa, Ukraine, this week, announcing that it will be instrumental in researching dangerous pathogens used by bioterrorists.

The level-3 bio-safety lab, which is the first built under the expanded authority of the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction program, will be used to study anthrax, tularemia and Q fever as well as other dangerous pathogens.

“The continuing cooperation of Nunn-Lugar partners has improved safety for all people against weapons of mass destruction and potential terrorist use, in addition to advancements in the prevention of pandemics and public health consequences,” Lugar said.

Lugar said plans for the facility began in 2005 when he and then Senator Barack Obama entered a partnership with Ukrainian officials. Lugar and Obama also helped coordinate efforts between the U.S and Ukrainian researchers that year in an effort to study and help prevent avian flu.

The Nunn-Lugar Act, which established the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, was established in 1991. Since that time it has provided funding and assistance to help the former Soviet Union dismantle and safeguard large stockpiles of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. The program has also been responsible for destroying chemical weapons in Albania, Lugar said.

https://web.archive.org/web/20110522081423/http://www.bioprepwatch.com/news/213421-biolab-opens-in-ukraine

And:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/08/under-secretary-victoria-nuland-admits-u-s-funded-biological-research-labs-exist-in-ukraine/

Where Marco Foam Party and Vicky Nudelman discuss these bio labs.

Kill shot.  Doesn’t matter if we funded them. If we knew about them, and we did as shown here, we should have put a stop to it. Congrats dumbasses, you just gave Putin his justification. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×