nuclear war - doomsday⌛

[Hawkeye21 1,849]

7 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

thailand isnt a world superpower pushing their culture on everyone else by force if need be.  were openly asking for it.

Wouldn't that be exactly what Russia is trying to do?  Also sounds like what the far left and far right are trying to do as well.

[nobody 2,037]

49 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

me:  if you are a bible thumper, all of this looks like wrath of god type stuff.

nobody:  hmm, i will lie about justin today and say justin believes this is wrath of god stuff.

You need to understand that your communication does this.  If you don't believe it, say that.  The more outlandish the theory, the more you need to say you don't actually believe it.

Typically, how normal people communicate is if they don't believe something, they don't say it (or post it).  

Let's look at your post.

i cant speak to anyone's religion or lack thereof here, but there are some things the Old and New Testament agrees on, and certainly homosexuality being a sin is one of them. 

So you don't know if people are religious, but "certainly homosexuality is a sin" presumably because it's in the old and new testament.  Nowhere in here does it state you don't believe it and your language is strong... it's "certainly" a sin.  

The very word Sodomy comes from Sodom and Gomorrah, which references anal sex and gay sex.  God destroy those cities and turned people into pillars of salt.   Jesus also references Sodom and Gomorrah in his teachings as a great evil.  So Jesus was clearly against homosexuality as well.

Once again.  Jesus clearly is against gays.  No qualifiers in this paragraph. Just statements of fact.

There's a very biblical feel to all of this. 

To whom is there a biblical feel?  I suppose you claim it's not your feelings.  If not, then whose?

If God exists, and he looked at America accepting homosexuality, he would send someone like Putin to turn it to ash. 

Objection, your honor.  Speculation.  Do you presume to know the thought process of God?

And Putin references it as well.   And American society has abandoned Christianity to such an extent that what I'm talking about probably never crosses anyone's mind.  And its all so QUICK.  30 years ago this wouldn't happen.  We accept LBGTQ+ and in about 10 years, Putin is ready to destroy us.

You assert that American society abandoned Christianity which is false, but whatever.  You clearly seem to be asserting that since the US accepted gays, Putin wants to destroy the country over it.  The proceeding statements are clearly indicating that Putin is being sent by god.  If you don't believe it, why even say it?

[OldMaid 1,838]

FYI: Arguing with a lunatic is never going to go anywhere. So, good luck with that. 

[nobody 2,037]

By the way, if you think Putin cares about Nazis or gays, you're an idiot.  Putin himself is a known murderer.  He regularly sacrifices his own soldiers indiscriminately. He uses "cleansing of the evils" as pretext for conflict.  How is this not obvious?

[nobody 2,037]

1 minute ago, OldMaid said:

FYI: Arguing with a lunatic is never going to go anywhere. So, good luck with that. 

It's not for him.  I don't want people to think we don't know this guy is an idiot.

[Hawkeye21 1,849]

2 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

FYI: Arguing with a lunatic is never going to go anywhere. So, good luck with that. 

Entertainment purposes?

[OldMaid 1,838]

8 minutes ago, nobody said:

It's not for him.  I don't want people to think we don't know this guy is an idiot.

It’s patently obvious, at this point. 

[craftsman 1,045]

7 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

It’s patently obvious, at this point. 

You are like a broken record at this point.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,618]

33 minutes ago, nobody said:

You need to understand that your communication does this.  If you don't believe it, say that.  The more outlandish the theory, the more you need to say you don't actually believe it.

Typically, how normal people communicate is if they don't believe something, they don't say it (or post it).  

Let's look at your post.

i cant speak to anyone's religion or lack thereof here, but there are some things the Old and New Testament agrees on, and certainly homosexuality being a sin is one of them. 

So you don't know if people are religious, but "certainly homosexuality is a sin" presumably because it's in the old and new testament.  Nowhere in here does it state you don't believe it and your language is strong... it's "certainly" a sin.  

The very word Sodomy comes from Sodom and Gomorrah, which references anal sex and gay sex.  God destroy those cities and turned people into pillars of salt.   Jesus also references Sodom and Gomorrah in his teachings as a great evil.  So Jesus was clearly against homosexuality as well.

Once again.  Jesus clearly is against gays.  No qualifiers in this paragraph. Just statements of fact.

There's a very biblical feel to all of this. 

To whom is there a biblical feel?  I suppose you claim it's not your feelings.  If not, then whose?

If God exists, and he looked at America accepting homosexuality, he would send someone like Putin to turn it to ash. 

Objection, your honor.  Speculation.  Do you presume to know the thought process of God?

And Putin references it as well.   And American society has abandoned Christianity to such an extent that what I'm talking about probably never crosses anyone's mind.  And its all so QUICK.  30 years ago this wouldn't happen.  We accept LBGTQ+ and in about 10 years, Putin is ready to destroy us.

You assert that American society abandoned Christianity which is false, but whatever.  You clearly seem to be asserting that since the US accepted gays, Putin wants to destroy the country over it.  The proceeding statements are clearly indicating that Putin is being sent by god.  If you don't believe it, why even say it?

Tl/dr. Religion bad? 

[nobody 2,037]

2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Tl/dr. Religion bad? 

Not even close, but please don't imply JustinCharge is religious just because he wrote a bunch about how someone (not him) feels like the end of days is coming because god hates gays and is sending Putin to nuke us because he doesn't believe that at all.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

So Russia here is setting up the premise that if we continue to supply arms and aid to Ukraine, it will eventually be used as justification to nuke the US.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/russia-warns-us-off-sending-145319107.html

Russia warns US off sending long-range weapons to Ukraine

VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV

Fri, September 2, 2022, 7:53 AM

MOSCOW (AP) — A senior Russian diplomat sternly warned Washington Friday against supplying long-range weapons to Ukraine, noting that the U.S. is balancing on the edge of direct involvement in the conflict.

Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov also pointed to the country's military doctrine that envisages the use of nuclear weapons in case of a threat to the existence of the Russian state.

“We have repeatedly warned the U.S. about the consequences that may follow if the U.S. continues to flood Ukraine with weapons," Ryabkov said. “It effectively puts itself in a state close to what can be described as a party to the conflict.”

Speaking on state television, Ryabkov warned that ”a very narrow margin that separates the U.S. from becoming a party to the conflict mustn't create an illusion for rabid anti-Russian forces that everything will remain as it is if they cross it.”

He emphasized that Russia will push its offensive in Ukraine until it reaches its aims.

“Russia is capable of fully defending its interests, and the goals of the special military operation will be fully achieved,” Ryabkov said.

He pointed out that Russia’s military doctrine stipulates that it could use nuclear weapons in case of aggression against Russia and its allies involving mass destruction weapons, or an aggression involving conventional weapons that threatens the very existence of the Russian state.

[Chronic Fockster 106]

Only 17 weeks left.  We will get nuked within the next 17 weeks!

[OldMaid 1,838]

5 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Only 17 weeks left.  We will get nuked within the next 17 weeks!

Hey, at least we won’t have to buy Christmas presents.

[nobody 2,037]

1 hour ago, OldMaid said:

Hey, at least we won’t have to buy Christmas presents.

Asshøles will probably nuke us Christmas eve.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

Ukraine is having military success in the war.  that just means the odds of Putin nuking before November just went WAAAAY up.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,618]

On 9/2/2022 at 1:42 PM, JustinCharge said:

So Russia here is setting up the premise that if we continue to supply arms and aid to Ukraine, it will eventually be used as justification to nuke the US.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/russia-warns-us-off-sending-145319107.html

Russia warns US off sending long-range weapons to Ukraine

VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV

Fri, September 2, 2022, 7:53 AM

MOSCOW (AP) — A senior Russian diplomat sternly warned Washington Friday against supplying long-range weapons to Ukraine, noting that the U.S. is balancing on the edge of direct involvement in the conflict.

Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov also pointed to the country's military doctrine that envisages the use of nuclear weapons in case of a threat to the existence of the Russian state.

“We have repeatedly warned the U.S. about the consequences that may follow if the U.S. continues to flood Ukraine with weapons," Ryabkov said. “It effectively puts itself in a state close to what can be described as a party to the conflict.”

Speaking on state television, Ryabkov warned that ”a very narrow margin that separates the U.S. from becoming a party to the conflict mustn't create an illusion for rabid anti-Russian forces that everything will remain as it is if they cross it.”

He emphasized that Russia will push its offensive in Ukraine until it reaches its aims.

“Russia is capable of fully defending its interests, and the goals of the special military operation will be fully achieved,” Ryabkov said.

He pointed out that Russia’s military doctrine stipulates that it could use nuclear weapons in case of aggression against Russia and its allies involving mass destruction weapons, or an aggression involving conventional weapons that threatens the very existence of the Russian state.

Libtards won’t pay attention to any of that. 

[nobody 2,037]

How does Ukraine taking back occupied Ukrainian territory constitute an existential threat to Russia?

[Chronic Fockster 106]

10 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

Ukraine is having military success in the war.  that just means the odds of Putin nuking before November just went WAAAAY up.

How do you get higher than 100%?

[Chronic Fockster 106]

Marshall beat ND today, that means Putin nukes us next Tuesday 

[craftsman 1,045]

33 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Marshall beat ND today, that means Putin nukes us next Tuesday 

How can anyone be this stupid?

[nobody 2,037]

1 hour ago, Chronic Fockster said:

How do you get higher than 100%?

100% is for end of year.  Putin was probably saving his nukes for when he was ready to invade the rest of Europe by winter as Justin indicated.

[Pimpadeaux 2,258]

11 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

Ukraine is having military success in the war.  that just means the odds of Putin nuking before November just went WAAAAY up.

According to you, who likes to turn lemonade into lemons. 

[craftsman 1,045]

10 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

According to you, who likes to turn lemonade into lemons. 

Kind of like you thinking Ukraine isn't getting blown to bits? 

[Pimpadeaux 2,258]

34 minutes ago, craftsman said:

Kind of like you thinking Ukraine isn't getting blown to bits? 

Read the news lately, skippy? They're taking back territory. Pay attention. Ukraine is winning the war. 

[Brad GLuckman 518]

41 minutes ago, craftsman said:

Kind of like you thinking Ukraine isn't getting blown to bits? 

Dude, just Google "Ukraine war updates" before you post about it

[Pimpadeaux 2,258]

3 minutes ago, Brad GLuckman said:

Dude, just Google "Ukraine war updates" before you post about it

He's not going to do that thanks to the bliss he finds in his never-ending ignorance. Just another blanket whitewasher.

[craftsman 1,045]

8 minutes ago, Brad GLuckman said:

Dude, just Google "Ukraine war updates" before you post about it

 

52 minutes ago, Brad GLuckman said:

I don't fully understand the significance of the gains made by Ukraine in these last few days, but it seems huge. I just don't see how it ends. Russia is not going to accept defeat. Ukraine is not willing to forfeit territory in a truce. Eventually will Putin stop calling it a special military operation and go all out and declare war to save face?

Why would someone Google "Ukraine war updates" if it's not a war? 

[craftsman 1,045]

1 hour ago, Brad GLuckman said:

Dude, just Google "Ukraine war updates" before you post about it

You said it's not a war.

[nobody 2,037]

2 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Read the news lately, skippy? They're taking back territory. Pay attention. Ukraine is winning the war. 

Let's not get too crazy, now.

[craftsman 1,045]

2 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Read the news lately, skippy? They're taking back territory. Pay attention. Ukraine is winning the war. 

Yeah. Their country is destroyed, their women and children are gone, they lost natural resource territories, and you call it a win. 

You set a really low bar for "winning".  Skippy.

[Brad GLuckman 518]

7 hours ago, craftsman said:

You said it's not a war.

Here is my post:

Quote

I don't fully understand the significance of the gains made by Ukraine in these last few days, but it seems huge. I just don't see how it ends. Russia is not going to accept defeat. Ukraine is not willing to forfeit territory in a truce. Eventually will Putin stop calling it a special military operation and go all out and declare war to save face?

I am very clearly saying Putin is not calling it a war. You were unaware of this and tried to mock me in the Ukraine thread. You made yourself look a little silly because this is common knowledge to anyone that follows the war at all. 

Instead of just saying "I didn't know that", you're going to keep playing this little game because that's what you do.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

there are other internet forums where someone raises the issue of Putin potentially nuking in response to this Ukrainian offensive.  Leftists immediately zoom in and either laugh at them or demand they get banned.  seeing threads getting locked too.   the usual inability to discuss severely important issues.

if Russia does a tactical nuke, there will probably be loads of liberals ready to be offended by anything people not on the left say about it.  And humanity just goes to hell from there.  Screaming and fart noises.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

so far, Putin has not nuked on the 20th anniversary of 911.

If he wanted to be precise in terms of time, he already missed nuking at the same moment the twin towers were hit.  the pentagon was hit about 15 minutes from now on this day in 2001.  The south tower collapsed at the top of the hour.  the north tower collapsed about an hour from now.  

[JustinCharge 2,397]

there is speculation that Russia's decision to just outright pull all the troops out of the Izium region without a fight implies a potential tactical nuke incoming very very soon.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

if aliens visited the ruins of human civilization at some point in the future and discovered we nuked ourselves to oblivion, they might dig into the media archives to determine what the disagreement was about.  they might settle on "pronoun usage" as the cause, with people bickering over using him or her or it.

[Hawkeye21 1,849]

Looney tunes

[Pimpadeaux 2,258]

1 hour ago, JustinCharge said:

if aliens visited the ruins of human civilization at some point in the future and discovered we nuked ourselves to oblivion, they might dig into the media archives to determine what the disagreement was about.  they might settle on "pronoun usage" as the cause, with people bickering over using him or her or it.

You're really up and atom this morning.

[nobody 2,037]

My sources are saying Putin is waiting for the Chargers first home game.  He is concerned the Chargers dominance is an existential threat to Russia.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

52 minutes ago, nobody said:

My sources are saying Putin is waiting for the Chargers first home game.  He is concerned the Chargers dominance and is an existential threat to Russia.

ah confirmed troll.  and most likely just another liberal bot masquerading as a conservative

[JustinCharge 2,397]

2 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Looney tunes

just keep moving THAT goal post.  cant say it response to me warning of civil unrest for years now.  cant say it in response to warnings of civil war when you get the reaction to Ts raid and hell griffin' comments.  so move the goalposts to nuclear war.  moron.