nuclear war - doomsday⌛

[nobody 2,691]

I'd be 100% sure this dude is paid to be here as a Russian propagandist, but why would they pay anyone to post here?  I mean he's so terrible at it, maybe this is where they stick the people who need performance improvement before they go to places like Reddit and Twitter? 

 

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

2 minutes ago, nobody said:

I'd be 100% sure this dude is paid to be here as a Russian propagandist, but why would they pay anyone to post here?  I mean he's so terrible at it, maybe this is where they stick the people who need performance improvement? 

 

I think he is just drinking a bunch of vodka and pretending he is Russian.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,360]

55 minutes ago, nobody said:

So, liberals are going to want to kill whites, but since many liberals are white, they'll just commit suicide.

And this is after Biden decides to surrender to Russia.

What the fūck?   How can anyone tell me this dude isn't employed by Russia.

 

 

Russians aren’t chargers fans 

[nobody 2,691]

21 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Russians aren’t chargers fans 

It's part of his cover.  No one can be this in love with Russia without getting some rubles out of it.

I can see it.  Russian handbook.  Chapter 1.  How to act like an American... Pretend to like football.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

8 hours ago, nobody said:

I'd be 100% sure this dude is paid to be here as a Russian propagandist, but why would they pay anyone to post here?  I mean he's so terrible at it, maybe this is where they stick the people who need performance improvement before they go to places like Reddit and Twitter? 

 

delusional.

first im made fun of for  warning of civil unrest.  then it happens and its forgotten.

then im made fun of for warning of civil war.  now weve got a lot of right wingers openly calling for it and its forgotten.

now instead of thinking maybe ive got merit, i MUST be a paid putin plant.

just stop dude.  you look like an idiot.

 

we are at a point here with nobody that if a democrat source discusses nuclear war with russia, its ok.  but if someone on the right talks about it, hes a paid putin plant.  as i say, im pretty sure nobody is a closet liberal.  

[vomit 502]

13 hours ago, nobody said:

So, liberals are going to want to kill whites, but since many liberals are white, they'll just commit suicide.

And this is after Biden decides to surrender to Russia.

What the fūck?   How can anyone tell me this dude isn't employed by Russia.

 

 

I don't know where he gets this sh1t from but it's hilarious, and keeps getting better.

[nobody 2,691]

You don't have merit.  Nothing you've non-predicted has come true.

[bboy1011 8]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Hills_Ordnance_Depot

 

This is about 70 miles south of where I live. You used to be able to drive through this "town", now there is a gate to get in, with armed guards. People are buying these up for a lot of money, and turning them into houses.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

8 hours ago, nobody said:

You don't have merit.  Nothing you've non-predicted has come true.

look, we've already established you just make shiit up.  you can stop proving it.

[nobody 2,691]

1 hour ago, JustinCharge said:

look, we've already established you just make shiit up.  you can stop proving it.

Show the receipts of your non-predictions.

I bet I can find where I predicted you would take credit for the George Floyd riots as a success for your non-prediction of food riots when the covid lockdowns started.

But I don't even understand what you're trying to take credit for.  You didn't predict anything, remember?

[JustinCharge 2,397]

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/07/us-nuclear-strategy-cold-war-russia/638441/

WE HAVE NO NUCLEAR STRATEGY

The U.S. can’t keep ignoring the threat these weapons pose.

By Tom Nichols

[  excerpts pertaining to the current situation  ]

This brings us, of course, to Ukraine. The war there could put four nuclear-armed powers—Russia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France—onto the same battlefield, and yet arguments over the U.S. and NATO response to the Russian invasion have sometimes taken place in a nuclear void. President Joe Biden has rallied a global coalition against Moscow while remaining determined to avoid a direct military conflict with Russia. He wisely declined to raise U.S. nuclear readiness to match Putin’s nuclear alert. But he has had to steer this careful path while buffeted by demands from people who seem unmoved (or untouched) by memories of the Cold War. Calls for a more aggressive confrontation with Russia, including demands for a no-fly zone over Ukraine, backed by American power, have been advanced by a range of prominent figures. Republican Representative Adam Kinzinger even introduced a congressional resolution authorizing Biden to use American military force against Russia.

These demands ignore the reality, as the Harvard professor Graham Allison wrote earlier this year, that in the event of a hot war between nuclear superpowers, “the escalation ladder from there to the ultimate global catastrophe of nuclear war can be surprisingly short.” Allison’s warning is especially relevant today, when Russia and NATO have effectively switched places: Russia is now the inferior conventional power, and is threatening a first use of nuclear weapons if faced with a regime-threatening defeat on the battlefield.

Our collective amnesia—our nuclear Great Forgetting—undermines American national security. American political leaders have a responsibility to educate the public about how, and how much, the United States relies on nuclear weapons for its security. If we mean to reduce U.S. conventional forces and go back to relying on nuclear weapons as a battlefield equalizer, then the public should know it and think about it. If the U.S. nuclear arsenal exists solely to deter the use of enemy nuclear weapons, then it is time to say so and spell out the consequences.

Every presidential administration since 1994 has released a “nuclear posture review” that supposedly answers the question of why, exactly, America has a nuclear arsenal. Is it to fight nuclear wars or to deter a nuclear attack? And every administration has fudged the response by saying, essentially, it’s a little of both. This is not a serious answer. And it avoids the deeper question: If we do not in fact wish to use nuclear weapons, then what must we do to ensure that our conventional capabilities match our international commitments?

We have accepted evasions from our leaders because we take strategic nuclear deterrence for granted—as something that exists around us almost independently, like gravity or the weather. But deterrence relies on human psychology and on the agency and decisions of actual people, who must continually manage it.

Decades of denial have left Americans ill-prepared to think about the many choices that keep the nuclear peace. Effective deterrence, even in a post–Cold War world, requires the capacity to face the reality of nuclear war squarely. And it means understanding once again what it would feel like to hear the sirens—and to wonder whether they are only a drill.

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

If nothing else, I take comfort in knowing most of you live in urban areas that are prime targets for nuclear attack, while I live in an unincorporated rural community with zero strategic significance.

[craftsman 1,045]

50 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

If nothing else, I take comfort in knowing most of you live in urban areas that are prime targets for nuclear attack, while I live in an unincorporated rural community with zero strategic significance.

Just like your life. 

[nobody 2,691]

7 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

If nothing else, I take comfort in knowing most of you live in urban areas that are prime targets for nuclear attack, while I live in an unincorporated rural community with zero strategic significance.

You act like surviving a hypothetical global nuclear war is better than dying in it.*

*This in no way is meant to lend credence to any idea that nuclear war is imminent.

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

4 minutes ago, nobody said:

You act like surviving a hypothetical global nuclear war is better than dying in it.*

*This in no way is meant to lend credence to any idea that nuclear war is imminent.

No one dies in a hypothetical nuclear war, unless the guy running the hypothetical program has a heart attack or something. 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

On 8/23/2022 at 10:44 AM, Pimpadeaux said:

If nothing else, I take comfort in knowing most of you live in urban areas that are prime targets for nuclear attack, while I live in an unincorporated rural community with zero strategic significance.

fallout will kill many more, not just in urban areas.

if nuclear war is big enough, it will trigger a nuclear winter for 1-25 years, which will kill even more.

some scientists believe a huge nuclear war will destroy the ozone layer, which means the entire Earth would be almost sterilized by the sun's rays.  almost all plants would die in a few days because photosynthesis would be impossible.  then you just go up the food chain.  life would revert back to before the cambrian explosion.  some areas in the deep ocean could support photosynthesis without an ozone layer.  scientists believe the cambrian explosion occurred because the ozone layer was built up, allowing photosynthesis everywhere.

to truly survive nuclear war, wed need a deep sea city to grow food.

the entire idea of hiding in bunkers and waiting it out for a month only works in a limited nuclear war.

[TimHauck 2,909]

On 8/16/2022 at 7:21 PM, nobody said:

So, liberals are going to want to kill whites, but since many liberals are white, they'll just commit suicide.

And this is after Biden decides to surrender to Russia.

What the fūck?   How can anyone tell me this dude isn't employed by Russia.

 

 

Wait so the Civil War and Nuclear War non-predictions are now blending together?

[fandandy 3,313]

On 8/23/2022 at 1:27 PM, JustinCharge said:

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/07/us-nuclear-strategy-cold-war-russia/638441/

WE HAVE NO NUCLEAR STRATEGY

The U.S. can’t keep ignoring the threat these weapons pose.

By Tom Nichols

[  excerpts pertaining to the current situation  ]

This brings us, of course, to Ukraine. The war there could put four nuclear-armed powers—Russia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France—onto the same battlefield, and yet arguments over the U.S. and NATO response to the Russian invasion have sometimes taken place in a nuclear void. President Joe Biden has rallied a global coalition against Moscow while remaining determined to avoid a direct military conflict with Russia. He wisely declined to raise U.S. nuclear readiness to match Putin’s nuclear alert. But he has had to steer this careful path while buffeted by demands from people who seem unmoved (or untouched) by memories of the Cold War. Calls for a more aggressive confrontation with Russia, including demands for a no-fly zone over Ukraine, backed by American power, have been advanced by a range of prominent figures. Republican Representative Adam Kinzinger even introduced a congressional resolution authorizing Biden to use American military force against Russia.

These demands ignore the reality, as the Harvard professor Graham Allison wrote earlier this year, that in the event of a hot war between nuclear superpowers, “the escalation ladder from there to the ultimate global catastrophe of nuclear war can be surprisingly short.” Allison’s warning is especially relevant today, when Russia and NATO have effectively switched places: Russia is now the inferior conventional power, and is threatening a first use of nuclear weapons if faced with a regime-threatening defeat on the battlefield.

Our collective amnesia—our nuclear Great Forgetting—undermines American national security. American political leaders have a responsibility to educate the public about how, and how much, the United States relies on nuclear weapons for its security. If we mean to reduce U.S. conventional forces and go back to relying on nuclear weapons as a battlefield equalizer, then the public should know it and think about it. If the U.S. nuclear arsenal exists solely to deter the use of enemy nuclear weapons, then it is time to say so and spell out the consequences.

Every presidential administration since 1994 has released a “nuclear posture review” that supposedly answers the question of why, exactly, America has a nuclear arsenal. Is it to fight nuclear wars or to deter a nuclear attack? And every administration has fudged the response by saying, essentially, it’s a little of both. This is not a serious answer. And it avoids the deeper question: If we do not in fact wish to use nuclear weapons, then what must we do to ensure that our conventional capabilities match our international commitments?

We have accepted evasions from our leaders because we take strategic nuclear deterrence for granted—as something that exists around us almost independently, like gravity or the weather. But deterrence relies on human psychology and on the agency and decisions of actual people, who must continually manage it.

Decades of denial have left Americans ill-prepared to think about the many choices that keep the nuclear peace. Effective deterrence, even in a post–Cold War world, requires the capacity to face the reality of nuclear war squarely. And it means understanding once again what it would feel like to hear the sirens—and to wonder whether they are only a drill.

The most important sentence in the entire article IMO and something that is utterly baffling to me.

Quote

With hardly any debate, over a period of 30 years we doubled the number of nations under NATO’s nuclear guarantee.

And now we they are talking about adding Sweden and Finland?

Pure insanity.

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

https://countingdownto.com/?c=4301335

[OldMaid 2,130]

What if Putin decided to invade Ukraine because of the stuff Trump sold him from his secret stash? This is probably an indication that we won’t have a nuclear war. He knew ahead of time we would just let it happen.

Am I doing this right?

[wiffleball 4,790]

I still think it's most likely KJU nooks first. 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

Russia fought battles in focking chernobyl in this war.  the russian army set up camp on radioactive soil.  now russia is bombing the zapor nuke plant.  russia has no regard for their OWN soldiers when it comes to radioactive material.  but some here think theyd never nuke the USA.

the truth is, they dont value human life like we do.

[Chronic Fockster 106]

12 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

Russia fought battles in focking chernobyl in this war.  the russian army set up camp on radioactive soil.  now russia is bombing the zapor nuke plant.  russia has no regard for their OWN soldiers when it comes to radioactive material.  but some here think theyd never nuke the USA.

the truth is, they dont value human life like we do.

Aug is just about over.  That leaves just 4 months for your prediction of nuclear war to come true.  Get ready to eat your balls.

The ironic part is you are going to be praying for war just so you can save face

[craftsman 1,045]

13 hours ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Aug is just about over.  That leaves just 4 months for your prediction of nuclear war to come true.  Get ready to eat your balls.

The ironic part is you are going to be praying for war just so you can save face

There already is war. And there will be more under Biden. No one respects that clown. He killed his own people in Afghanistan and left 1000s of others behind. 

You liberals are really dumb.

[Chronic Fockster 106]

1 hour ago, craftsman said:

There already is war. And there will be more under Biden. No one respects that clown. He killed his own people in Afghanistan and left 1000s of others behind. 

You liberals are really dumb.

Nuclear war you focking idiot.  Putin is gonna nuke us before year end.

[craftsman 1,045]

22 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Nuclear war you focking idiot.  Putin is gonna nuke us before year end.

Whatever you say. 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

i cant speak to anyone's religion or lack thereof here, but there are some things the Old and New Testament agrees on, and certainly homosexuality being a sin is one of them.  The very word Sodomy comes from Sodom and Gomorrah, which references anal sex and gay sex.  God destroy those cities and turned people into pillars of salt.   Jesus also references Sodom and Gomorrah in his teachings as a great evil.  So Jesus was clearly against homosexuality as well.

There's a very biblical feel to all of this.  If God exists, and he looked at America accepting homosexuality, he would send someone like Putin to turn it to ash.  And Putin references it as well.   And American society has abandoned Christianity to such an extent that what I'm talking about probably never crosses anyone's mind.  And its all so QUICK.  30 years ago this wouldn't happen.  We accept LBGTQ+ and in about 10 years, Putin is ready to destroy us.

[Chronic Fockster 106]

Damn, I always thought Jesus loved everyone.

If I go out a murder a couple of gays, can we be saved from nuclear winter?

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

8 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

i cant speak to anyone's religion or lack thereof here, but there are some things the Old and New Testament agrees on, and certainly homosexuality being a sin is one of them.  The very word Sodomy comes from Sodom and Gomorrah, which references anal sex and gay sex.  God destroy those cities and turned people into pillars of salt.   Jesus also references Sodom and Gomorrah in his teachings as a great evil.  So Jesus was clearly against homosexuality as well.

There's a very biblical feel to all of this.  If God exists, and he looked at America accepting homosexuality, he would send someone like Putin to turn it to ash.  And Putin references it as well.   And American society has abandoned Christianity to such an extent that what I'm talking about probably never crosses anyone's mind.  And its all so QUICK.  30 years ago this wouldn't happen.  We accept LBGTQ+ and in about 10 years, Putin is ready to destroy us.

Wow.  Just... Wow.

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

11 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

i cant speak to anyone's religion or lack thereof here, but there are some things the Old and New Testament agrees on, and certainly homosexuality being a sin is one of them.  The very word Sodomy comes from Sodom and Gomorrah, which references anal sex and gay sex.  God destroy those cities and turned people into pillars of salt.   Jesus also references Sodom and Gomorrah in his teachings as a great evil.  So Jesus was clearly against homosexuality as well.

There's a very biblical feel to all of this.  If God exists, and he looked at America accepting homosexuality, he would send someone like Putin to turn it to ash.  And Putin references it as well.   And American society has abandoned Christianity to such an extent that what I'm talking about probably never crosses anyone's mind.  And its all so QUICK.  30 years ago this wouldn't happen.  We accept LBGTQ+ and in about 10 years, Putin is ready to destroy us.

[TheNewGirl 1,498]

Patiently waiting for Justin to break out Nostradamus warnings at this point.  

[nobody 2,691]

There's much more decadent countries than the US out there.  Wouldn't Thailand have been smote well before the US?  Or does god and Putin only care about gays in the US?

[OldMaid 2,130]

2 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:

Patiently waiting for Justin to break out Nostradamus warnings at this point.  

I’m waiting to hear his take on what the Farmer’s Almanac has to say on the subject.

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

6 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Wow.  Just... Wow.

I grew up in the Baptist church - Southern Baptist - have been a member of Methodist churches and attended services at Jewish, Catholic, Lutheran, Episcopal and other worship places. JustinClowncar's homophobic diatribe underscores another disturbing aspect of the extremist right, a safe place for fascists. 

In all the services I've ever attended - and that's a whole lot of services - did I hear a preacher screaming about gays the way JustinClowncar has. 

Why?

Because Baptist churches in particular focus on the New Testament, with the exception of Old Testament stories such as Moses, Noah and whatnot told in kiddie Sunday-school classes.

And then for him to say God put Putin here to destroy wicked America is about the profoundly most mentally deranged thing ever posted here.

But please don't stop. It's too entertaining.

[craftsman 1,045]

19 minutes ago, nobody said:

There's much more decadent countries than the US out there.  Wouldn't Thailand have been smote well before the US?  Or does god and Putin only care about gays in the US?

Yeah I wish it were only about "the gays in the US" these days.

[nobody 2,691]

4 minutes ago, craftsman said:

Yeah I wish it were only about "the gays in the US" these days.

Well, Justincharge's premise is that god's primary reason for using putin to smite the US is gays.  Did you read it another way?

[JustinCharge 2,397]

1 hour ago, nobody said:

There's much more decadent countries than the US out there.  Wouldn't Thailand have been smote well before the US?  Or does god and Putin only care about gays in the US?

thailand isnt a world superpower pushing their culture on everyone else by force if need be.  were openly asking for it.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

1 hour ago, nobody said:

oh gee im going to lie about what justin believes.  AGAIN.

of course you didnt read it at all lol.  thats you.  lie about everyone.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

me:  if you are a bible thumper, all of this looks like wrath of god type stuff.

nobody:  hmm, i will lie about justin today and say justin believes this is wrath of god stuff.