nobody 2,791 Posted August 8 Too bad Egregious George finally realized he's to smart for us and left us losers behind. He could shed some light on this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted August 8 2 hours ago, nobody said: Too bad Egregious George finally realized he's to smart for us and left us losers behind. He could shed some light on this. I asked chatgpt, here is what it said The complaint filed in February 2024, officially titled Carano v. The Walt Disney Co., confirms that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, which is a requirement for federal jurisdiction under diversity-of-citizenship rules. It doesn't specify exactly $75,000 in the claim, but it clearly states the damages in question exceed that threshold . 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,683 Posted August 8 Love it when weaklings use chatgpt to try and sound smart. It's like giving up on life. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted August 8 1 minute ago, Horseman said: Love it when weaklings use chatgpt to try and sound smart. It's like giving up on life. Anyone who uses AI gives up on life? This should age well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,683 Posted August 8 Just now, Ron_Artest said: Anyone who uses AI gives up on life? This should age well. Your words again tiny. Have one of your kids translate it for you. Let's see if your student loans are paying off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted August 8 1 minute ago, Horseman said: Your words again tiny. Have one of your kids translate it for you. Let's see if your student loans are paying off. I don't have any student loans. Maybe use AI to understand that if you want to give up on life Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,853 Posted August 8 23 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: I asked chatgpt, here is what it said The complaint filed in February 2024, officially titled Carano v. The Walt Disney Co., confirms that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, which is a requirement for federal jurisdiction under diversity-of-citizenship rules. It doesn't specify exactly $75,000 in the claim, but it clearly states the damages in question exceed that threshold . So will RainHackMan admit he was wrong? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,138 Posted August 8 3 hours ago, nobody said: Court doc clearly says compensation based on lost wages to be determined but exceeding $75k. Anyone thinks she settled for $75k or less is being naive. I mean unless she's claiming she only lost 75k in wages. I read she made $25k per episode. So maybe she only missed out on 3 episodes from the season or something Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 714 Posted August 8 28 minutes ago, TimHauck said: I read she made $25k per episode. So maybe she only missed out on 3 episodes from the season or something "but exceeding $75k" Just man up, you were wrong Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,138 Posted August 8 13 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said: "but exceeding $75k" Just man up, you were wrong $75,000.01 exceeds $75K Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 714 Posted August 8 2 minutes ago, TimHauck said: $75,000.01 exceeds $75K Yep, and thats more than 75K You are wrong, no matter how you tweek it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,138 Posted August 8 3 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said: Yep, and thats more than 75K You are wrong, no matter how you tweek it I was wrong, just off by a penny. Quibbling over a penny is peak Geek Club 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 714 Posted August 8 Just now, TimHauck said: I was wrong, just off by a penny. Quibbling over a penny is peak Geek Club Your hubris is raising its ugly head 1 minute ago, TimHauck said: I was wrong, just off by a penny. Quibbling over a penny is peak Geek Club Presenting your opinion as fact, peak FBG Geek clubers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,302 Posted August 8 KarenHauck is STILL trying to push forth a false narrative to get a "gotcha"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,138 Posted August 8 7 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: KarenHauck is STILL trying to push forth a false narrative to get a "gotcha"? Well since we’re in the Disney thread, are you ever going to admit you got duped by a cropped picture when you thought the 8 diverse people were meant to replace the 7 dwarves? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted August 8 19 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said: Yep, and thats more than 75K You are wrong, no matter how you tweek it Strike was wrong too. She didn't sue for millions. She didn't sue for any specific amount. But you give strike a pass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 714 Posted August 8 3 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Strike was wrong too. She didn't sue for millions. She didn't sue for any specific amount. But you give strike a pass. Strikes not hear screaming he was right HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,853 Posted August 8 23 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Strike was wrong too. She didn't sue for millions. She didn't sue for any specific amount. But you give strike a pass. I don't believe I ever said she was seeking millions. I believe the closest thing I did was post an article that suggested that and I concurred with their assessment saying it made more sense than 75k. I happen to be aware of how these things tend to work which is to let the jury decide and implore them to send a message to large corporations which 75k won't do. So do I expect that she would have been awarded millions had she won her case? Yes. But did I ever say that she was suing for millions? I don't believe I did but if you can find that post I'll admit I'm wrong, unlike HackRainman. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,853 Posted August 8 9 hours ago, Ron_Artest said: Disney "bent the knee" to a 2 bit actress suing for $75k Artest pushing the same lie as RainHack. Is he a big enough man to admit he was wrong or is he just a gutterboy? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,138 Posted August 8 8 minutes ago, Strike said: I don't believe I ever said she was seeking millions. I believe the closest thing I did was post an article that suggested that and I concurred with their assessment saying it made more sense than 75k. I happen to be aware of how these things tend to work which is to let the jury decide and implore them to send a message to large corporations which 75k won't do. So do I expect that she would have been awarded millions had she won her case? Yes. But did I ever say that she was suing for millions? I don't believe I did but if you can find that post I'll admit I'm wrong, unlike HackRainman. lol more semantics. You said it would make “a lot more sense” while simultaneously trashing the first link I posted, despite later acknowledging you had read a different article that also stated $75K but quibbling over the phrase “at least.” Keep in mind Disney didn’t even admit any wrongdoing with the settlement. So no one really knows how much she actually got Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,853 Posted August 9 39 minutes ago, TimHauck said: lol more semantics. You said it would make “a lot more sense” while simultaneously trashing the first link I posted, despite later acknowledging you had read a different article that also stated $75K but quibbling over the phrase “at least.” Keep in mind Disney didn’t even admit any wrongdoing with the settlement. So no one really knows how much she actually got Yeah you think she settled for 75k. ROFLMAO Keep making a fool of yourself clown. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted August 9 55 minutes ago, Strike said: Artest pushing the same lie as RainHack. Is he a big enough man to admit he was wrong or is he just a gutterboy? I was the one who posted the legal doc, dummy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,853 Posted August 9 21 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: I was the one who posted the legal doc, dummy. You made the post I quoted long before posting the legal doc. Basically, you owned yourself. So, are you going to admit you were wrong the first time or not? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,887 Posted August 9 1 hour ago, Strike said: You made the post I quoted long before posting the legal doc. Basically, you owned yourself. So, are you going to admit you were wrong the first time or not? Bro, I was the one who found the document and posted it here. It's not a self own it's getting the facts out. I was wrong when I assumed she only sued for $75k Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,853 Posted August 9 17 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Bro, I was the one who found the document and posted it here. It's not a self own it's getting the facts out. I was wrong when I assumed she only sued for $75k All you had to say is you were wrong the first time. That's all I asked you to do earlier but you chose to argue instead Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 7,134 Posted August 9 I’m with @Strike on this one. Could be $80,000. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,138 Posted August 9 8 hours ago, Ron_Artest said: Bro, I was the one who found the document and posted it here. It's not a self own it's getting the facts out. I was wrong when I assumed she only sued for $75k Thank you for finding the legal doc. I looked for it but couldn’t find it. I’ve said in the past I prefer primary sources so this only reinforces that. I’ll say I was wrong in saying that she didn’t ask for more than $75K + her role back, because she asked for punitive damages etc. too. But claiming $75k was wrong because the only part that lists an actual number says “exceeds” $75K is retarded. And we still don’t know what she actually got. We do know that Disney didn’t admit any wrongdoing, nor did they publicly promise her a role. And the fact that she specifically again thanked Musk suggests (but no, doesn’t confirm) that Disney didn’t pay her legal fees. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,791 Posted August 9 I wouldn't be surprised if the phrase exceeding 75k was there to satisfy some rule or law that says a complaint has to exceed 75k or whatever to qualify for some specific treatment by the court. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 714 Posted August 9 4 hours ago, TimHauck said: Thank you for finding the legal doc. I looked for it but couldn’t find it. I’ve said in the past I prefer primary sources so this only reinforces that. I’ll say I was wrong in saying that she didn’t ask for more than $75K + her role back, because she asked for punitive damages etc. too. But claiming $75k was wrong because the only part that lists an actual number says “exceeds” $75K is retarded. And we still don’t know what she actually got. We do know that Disney didn’t admit any wrongdoing, nor did they publicly promise her a role. And the fact that she specifically again thanked Musk suggests (but no, doesn’t confirm) that Disney didn’t pay her legal fees. blah blah blah blah blah but but but It was confirmed more than 75K, end of story no matter how you try to twist it 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peenie 1,944 Posted August 22 1 hour ago, Strike said: This is awesome!!! How about: They adopted her. One might be a man but looks like a woman, that is called a transexual. Look at how simple the truth was instead of pretending children are stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,853 Posted August 22 9 minutes ago, peenie said: How about: They adopted her. One might be a man but looks like a woman, that is called a transexual. Look at how simple the truth was instead of pretending children are stupid. Not surprised you don't get it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,031 Posted 4 hours ago Libs are now boycotting Disney. Hot Dog, Hot Dog, Hot Diggity Dog. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,166 Posted 4 hours ago It’s a win-win. lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,031 Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, KSB2424 said: It’s a win-win. lol I hope this means shorter lines for Tron Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
