Jump to content
craftsman

Trump's residence raided by the FBI

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Chronic Fockster said:

Alright you piece of sh1t, all of these aliases are from 20 years ago, when we used to have fun here.  I would just use one account, but you are the other snowflakes keep reporting me for hurting your feelings.  Also you retarded ape, you don't need to have multiple emails.  And I'm sure you have multiple aliases here as well. 

 

Right. Perfect lib response. Its always everyone else's fault. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Horseman said:

Right. Perfect lib response. Its always everyone else's fault. 

I like the "we used to have fun here". 

I haven't heard a liberal that doesn't b*tch about everything ever. "Fun" for them is the whining about Trump. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

Hillary didn’t have the authority to declassify anything.   Trump did. Get it now? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Horseman said:

Doesnt mean Jack coming from a guy that makes multiple email and forum accounts to keep posting in a place where he isnt wanted by the owner or the patrons. That's not just lost, that's unhinged. Amazing. 

If you are the one who keeps reporting Gutter, please delete your account, punch yourself in the face, and go back to FBG never to return.  We don't operate like those whiny biotches over there.  If you don't like someone's position on something, try posting an intelligent response.  TIA.  :thumbsup: 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Hillary didn’t have the authority to declassify anything.   Trump did. Get it now? 

Classified wasn't mentioned in any of the crimes on the warrant..so nope, don't get it.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Classified wasn't mentioned in any of the crimes on the warrant..so nope, don't get it.

Trump must have said classified 20 times in that clip. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's going to get prison time under his own law. :lol:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-made-it-a-felony-to-mishandle-classified-documents-in-2018_n_62f3c2e9e4b0133dd5b4f229

Quote

Tucked into a bill Trump signed into law in January 2018 was a provision increasing the punishment for knowingly removing classified materials with the intent to retain them at an “unauthorized location.”

Previously, someone found guilty of this crime could face up to one year in prison. When former CIA Director David Petraeus was charged in 2015 with mishandling classified data, he pleaded guilty under this statute to avoid a felony charge, as Politico pointed out. A similar situation unfolded a decade earlier, when former national security adviser Samuel Berger pleaded guilty to removing terrorism-related materials from the National Archives in 2005.

LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!

:banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

If you are the one who keeps reporting Gutter, please delete your account, punch yourself in the face, and go back to FBG never to return.  We don't operate like those whiny biotches over there.  If you don't like someone's position on something, try posting an intelligent response.  TIA.  :thumbsup: 

Settle down Karen.  I've never reported anyone anywhere for anything.  I'm a man and can take whatever you want to dish out without crying about it.  It's a foking message board for fok sake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Moved "up" to Huff Post.  🤣

If the Huffington Post said "Merry Christmas!" on its website on Dec. 25, you'd say it wasn't Christmas because the Huffington Post said it. 

😂

Here is the actual law, Sheepman:

https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ118/PLAW-115publ118.pdf

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Horseman said:

 

 

This one is new to me. How did the FBI interfere with the election? 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

If the Huffington Post said "Merry Christmas!" on its website on Dec. 25, you'd say it wasn't Christmas because the Huffington Post said it. 

😂

Here is the actual law, Sheepman:

https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ118/PLAW-115publ118.pdf

 

It's an interesting tell that you have to make up scenarios to fit your narrative.  You do that a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Horseman said:

It's an interesting tell that you have to make up scenarios to fit your narrative.  You do that a lot.

I've provided you with the actual law that Clownzo signed. It's not the Huffington Post, MSNBC, CNN, etc. It's the actual law. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, craftsman said:

I like the "we used to have fun here". 

I haven't heard a liberal that doesn't b*tch about everything ever. "Fun" for them is the whining about Trump. 

You spend all day here b1tching about liberals : 😂

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDC said:

This one is new to me. How did the FBI interfere with the election? 

As admitted by Zuckerberg yesterday - the FBI who had Hunter's laptop since 2019 went to the social media giants weeks before the 2020 election and told them their was about to be a dump of Russian propaganda.  Twitter banned reports about Hunter's laptop while Facebook "significantly" suppressed those reports.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I've provided you with the actual law that Clownzo signed. It's not the Huffington Post, MSNBC, CNN, etc. It's the actual law. 

For an admitted troll you out yourself more than any other poster on here.  You suck at it.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how this pans out for Trump in the end, maybe they finally found something on him, I rather doubt it.   The Dems are using the FBI/DOJ a little too often and with not enough restraint.

Regardless, lets keep in mind that if the Republicans can get control, and I think they will, the precedents being set here do not bode well for many Democrats.

If the Republicans decide to weaponize these organizations it will be rather unpleasant for a fair number of them.

In typical liberal fashion they are not thinking this through and are missing the fact that it can all come back to them.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a few of the differences here is number one, it's the national archives. Not known as a hotbed of partisan politics.

 

And two, the call is coming from within the house donald. It's getting ratted out by somebody very very close to him who knows exactly where those documents are. It's not like the FBI just went in there will nilly. These are documents that were requested specifically months before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Not sure how this pans out for Trump in the end, maybe they finally found something on him, I rather doubt it.   The Dems are using the FBI/DOJ a little too often and with not enough restraint.

Regardless, lets keep in mind that if the Republicans can get control, and I think they will, the precedents being set here do not bode well for many Democrats.

If the Republicans decide to weaponize these organizations it will be rather unpleasant for a fair number of them.

In typical liberal fashion they are not thinking this through and are missing the fact that it can all come back to them.

There are dozens of FBI whistleblowers that have already come to the GOP members of the Judiciary Committee.  Next couple of years are going to be a blast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Horseman said:

For an admitted troll you out yourself more than any other poster on here.  You suck at it.

Ah, the ol' alt-righty deflection activated. 

Like it or not, Clownzo signed into law a bill that stiffened the penalty for mishandling classified documents. 

This isn't some liberal shenanigan. It's an actual law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

I think a few of the differences here is number one, it's the national archives. Not known as a hotbed of partisan politics.

 

And two, the call is coming from within the house donald. It's getting ratted out by somebody very very close to him who knows exactly where those documents are. It's not like the FBI just went in there willingly. These are documents that were requested specifically months before.

Cankles used poor judgment in using her personal email for federal business.

Clownzo broke the law by toting home sensitive documents he wasn't entitled to take. He also broke the law in keeping the documents in his home. 

And he looks like the hypocrite that he is in doing so after spending so much of the 2016 ragging on Cankles about her poor judgment.

She was investigated and not charged with anything.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Not sure how this pans out for Trump in the end, maybe they finally found something on him, I rather doubt it.   The Dems are using the FBI/DOJ a little too often and with not enough restraint.

Regardless, lets keep in mind that if the Republicans can get control, and I think they will, the precedents being set here do not bode well for many Democrats.

If the Republicans decide to weaponize these organizations it will be rather unpleasant for a fair number of them.

In typical liberal fashion they are not thinking this through and are missing the fact that it can all come back to them.

And the people here decrying it right now will celebrate it. The people celebrating it will decry it. I will continue to say it's all silly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

67 classified documents.

92 secret documents.

25 top-secret documents.

Lock him up! Lock him up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Horseman said:

As admitted by Zuckerberg yesterday - the FBI who had Hunter's laptop since 2019 went to the social media giants weeks before the 2020 election and told them their was about to be a dump of Russian propaganda.  Twitter banned reports about Hunter's laptop while Facebook "significantly" suppressed those reports.


First article I found is this one:

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/3616579-zuckerberg-tells-rogan-that-facebook-suppressed-hunter-biden-laptop-story-after-fbi-warning-defends-agency-as-legitimate-institution/amp/

Zuck said the FBI warned him to take note of potentially polarizing content without specifically mentioning the laptop story.

Did anything ever come of the laptop? When the story broke I was told there would be kiddie pron and proof of pay to play. It’s almost 2 years later. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

And the people here decrying it right now will celebrate it. The people celebrating it will decry it. I will continue to say it's all silly.

Incorrect.  You cannot view others from your own liberal lens; how YOU act.

I hope that an appropriate use of the system is implemented, there is a correction required.  There are too many Democrats getting away with corruption and being shielded by political zealots in the media and DOJ.   That needs to be addressed, particularly the obvious corruption of the Biden's.

That being said, I do NOT want the Republicans to replicate what the Democrats have done with these fake investigations and fraudulent impeachments.  

I want them to ease back, go back to the Trump policies that delivered positive outcomes for everyone and welcome moderates into the fold.  Mute the influence of radicals like AOC and others.  Put the fringe back on the fringe. 

There are more reasonable people than not out there, but they get shouted down by radicals. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Incorrect.  You cannot view others from your own liberal lens; how YOU act.

I hope that an appropriate use of the system is implemented, there is a correction required.  There are too many Democrats getting away with corruption and being shielded by political zealots in the media and DOJ.   That needs to be addressed, particularly the obvious corruption of the Biden's.

That being said, I do NOT want the Republicans to replicate what the Democrats have done with these fake investigations and fraudulent impeachments.  

I want them to ease back, go back to the Trump policies that delivered positive outcomes for everyone and welcome moderates into the fold.  Mute the influence of radicals like AOC and others.  Put the fringe back on the fringe. 

There are more reasonable people than not out there, but they get shouted down by radicals. 

It is not a "liberal lens." You know damn well if the Republicans gets in and weaponize like you predict- it is the same damn thing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

It is not a "liberal lens." You know damn well if the Republicans gets in and weaponize like you predict- it is the same damn thing. 

Ray is under the childish delusion that only one side of the aisle are hypocrites and play dirty pool. 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MDC said:

Ray is under the childish delusion that only one side of the aisle are hypocrites and play dirty pool. 

Of course he is....but it is "liberal lens" to say that...That obviously ignores the idea of a conservative lens. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Cankles used poor judgment in using her personal email for federal business.

Clownzo broke the law by toting home sensitive documents he wasn't entitled to take. He also broke the law in keeping the documents in his home. 

And he looks like the hypocrite that he is in doing so after spending so much of the 2016 ragging on Cankles about her poor judgment.

She was investigated and not charged with anything.

:lol:

Did she use poor judgment in destroying the server?  I'd say good judgment actually, since it enabled the DOJ to say "I guess we take her word for it" and rubes like you to buy it.  :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the redacted warrant:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

46 pages. All you need to know about FFT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

You have 2760 pages of posts.

What does that have to due with the price of tea in China? I hardly ever post in this ridiculous political threads, unless it is to call out the loons

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

It is not a "liberal lens." You know damn well if the Republicans gets in and weaponize like you predict- it is the same damn thing. 

I hope not.  It is clear that Republicans know its wrong.  They are not exactly quiet about it. So then I hope they are able to be the adults and not play these childish and dangerous games.

I am going to just hope that through the diminishment of liberal power, some sense of a normal Democracy can be restored and these behaviors nullified. 

I mean, what else are we going to do, see this rise of political corruption of power continue? I cannot see it going on, it just has to stop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×