Baker Boy 1,703 Posted August 10, 2022 4D Chess: Trump Saves His Cache Of Classified Documents From FBI Confiscation By Labeling Them 'Epstein’s Client List' https://babylonbee.com/news/father-who-knows-40-year-old-baseball-stats-only-vaguely-aware-of-kids-ages Report: FBI Raided Mar-A-Lago After Tip That Parents Were Protesting A School Board Meeting There https://babylonbee.com/news/report-fbi-raided-mar-a-lago-on-false-tip-that-parents-were-protesting-a-school-board-meeting-there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: I just thought a crime was a crime. That’s the consensus here. You know, no one is above the law and all that. Guess not. How many times must I tell you- they should present the case and bust him for it then? Like what about that do you think is me saying Hunter Biden should be allowed to go scot free? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,504 Posted August 10, 2022 The national archives by god! The more I say it the more I laugh. Yeah, it was about that. . Fishing expedition. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,504 Posted August 10, 2022 2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: How many times must I tell you- they should present the case and bust him for it then? Like what about that do you think is me saying Hunter Biden should be allowed to go scot free? This is about no one being above the law. When you say no one, that means no one. So you can all stop saying it now. It’s not true. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: This is about no one being above the law. When you say no one, that means no one. So you can all stop saying it now. It’s not true. What are you not connecting here. I think no one should be above the law but I don't make these cases in courts. Remember I'm a teacher- you tell me how much I suck at it and I'm grooming kids or some such nonsense over and over along with other dopes here. Now you want me to be a lawyer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 11 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: "Accused of some things that probably weren't real"- can you read? The first impeachment was about the call with Zelensky. The Senate Republicans rejected documents and witnesses and then voted. I believe it is still the only impeachment trial in US history with no witnesses called. Even Trump's defense didn't deny he did what he was accused of just that "it wasn't against the law." Sad you don't pay attention. We were talking about the definition of a witch hunt. You are wrong. It was all a witch hunt even up until current day. They found nothing on him and that means, there were no "real" things which = witch hunt. Hell, we have Biden on video boasting about withholding money from Ukraine if they don't fire a certain prosecutor. Not even a mention by the anyone on that. But 3+ years of hearing about Russian collusion? Every liberal wanted more. That's crazy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 1 minute ago, craftsman said: We were talking about the definition of a witch hunt. You are wrong. It was all a witch hunt even up until current day. They found nothing on him and that means, there were no "real" things which = witch hunt. Hell, we have Biden on video boasting about withholding money from Ukraine if they don't fire a certain prosecutor. Not even a mention by the anyone on that. But 3+ years of hearing about Russian collusion? That's crazy. Whataboutism aside.... Trump's own lawyer didn't deny Trump did what he was accused of in the first impeachment. A witch hunt implies things are completely fabricated- at the very least in that instance it was legitimate and not a witch hunt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pimpadeaux 2,406 Posted August 10, 2022 1 hour ago, Hawkeye21 said: Jesus. Please find some way to take down Hunter then. Who the fock cares about him anymore. No on here defends him or cares about him. I hope he gets taken down so people like you finally shut the fock up about him. I didn't see this Hunter Biden obsession among the CroMAGAnons until one day in summer 2020 at the gym, where TVs are on crap like Newsmax. (Rusty III works there and sometimes changes the channels to CNN or MSNBC just to fock with the owner.) This woman and her elderly mom used to come in and ride the stationary bikes almost daily. On this day, the mom was on the bike, and the daughter got off a nearby treadmill and excitedly walked up to her. I guess the daughter had seen something on Newsmax. The conversation went something like this: Daughter: THEY GOT HIM! Elderly mom: Daughter: Hunter! They got him, dead to rights! Elderly mom: Hunter who? Daughter: Hunter Biden, Joe Biden's son. They got him, and he's going to go to prison. Elderly mom: Um, k, if you say so. The mom had no idea who Hunter Biden was or why her daughter was so enthusiastic about his potential arrest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said: Whataboutism aside.... Trump's own lawyer didn't deny Trump did what he was accused of in the first impeachment. A witch hunt implies things are completely fabricated- at the very least in that instance it was legitimate and not a witch hunt. "Whataboutism" is overused. We are comparing treatment of the government officials based upon their political affiliation here. Did Trump's own lawyer come out and say he colluded with Russia? What was not fabricated? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pimpadeaux 2,406 Posted August 10, 2022 Just now, craftsman said: "Whataboutism" is overused. We are comparing treatment of the government officials based upon their political affiliation here. Did Trump's own lawyer come out and say he colluded with Russia? What was not fabricated? Unlike "woke," "MSM," "cuck," "snowflake," "libtard," "canceled" and a bunch of other overused, meaningless MAGAisms. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 4 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said: Unlike "woke," "MSM," "cuck," "snowflake," "libtard," "canceled" and a bunch of other overused, meaningless MAGAisms. I don't think I've ever said, "cuck", "snowflake", "libtard", "cancelled". Some people do go "woke" so I think that is valid and it definitely has a specific meaning. "MSM"? No such thing as main stream media? What's a "MAGAism"? Is that some liberal term to try to put down conservatives who voted for Trump? Are you spewing a "BBBism" right now? Isn't that Biden's thing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 8 minutes ago, craftsman said: "Whataboutism" is overused. We are comparing treatment of the government officials based upon their political affiliation here. Did Trump's own lawyer come out and say he colluded with Russia? What was not fabricated? You can say about Russia all you want. I was not talking about Russia. Why are you ignoring that he admitted he did what he was accused of with Zelensky 4 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said: Unlike "woke," "MSM," "cuck," "snowflake," "libtard," "canceled" and a bunch of other overused, meaningless MAGAisms. Can we add "witch hunt"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said: You can say about Russia all you want. I was not talking about Russia. Why are you ignoring that he admitted he did what he was accused of with Zelensky Can we add "witch hunt"? Can you add with Trump has been found guilty off over the past 7 years? And add the proof. And glad you love the state of the economy, open borders, soon to banned rifles, and massive government spending over what Trump had in place. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 Just now, craftsman said: Can you add with Trump has been found guilty off over the past 4 years? And add the proof. I did talk about a specific event and you keep trying to change the subject. That the best you got? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: I did talk about a specific event and you keep trying to change the subject. That the best you got? He did not solicit foreign interference to win any election. It was proven false. Again, witch hunt. That the best you got? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 2 minutes ago, craftsman said: He did not solicit foreign interference to win any election. It was proven false. Again, witch hunt. That the best you got? Why are you talking about something different than me and trying to use that to prove your point? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 Just now, Sean Mooney said: Why are you talking about something different than me and trying to use that to prove your point? You said you talked specifically about something he did wrong. You have nothing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 11 minutes ago, craftsman said: You said you talked specifically about something he did wrong. You have nothing. I'll go slowly. The first impeachment trial. His own lawyer never denied what he did, only that it was not against the law. So there is one. First, and only, impeachment hearing in history where no witnesses were called. Thoughts on that- without yelling Russia. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: I'll go slowly. The first impeachment trial. His own lawyer never denied what he did, only that it was not against the law. So there is one. First, and only, impeachment hearing in history where no witnesses were called. Thoughts on that- without yelling Russia. Is not denying the same as saying he's guilty of something? Last I checked, that's not some major proof of anything. Do you have evidence of him saying, "I don't deny it"? Who cares if witnesses were called or not? Does that prove he's guilty? It seems like you have a whole lot of negative "evidence". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 10 minutes ago, craftsman said: Is not denying the same as saying he's guilty of something? Last I checked, that's not some major proof of anything. Do you have evidence of him saying, "I don't deny it"? Who cares if witnesses were called or not? Does that prove he's guilty? It seems like you have a whole lot of negative "evidence". You seem unwilling to see the obvious...which is ironic considering what you have cried about on here for like the past 48 hours. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,294 Posted August 10, 2022 50 minutes ago, craftsman said: "Whataboutism" is overused. We are comparing treatment of the government officials based upon their political affiliation here. Did Trump's own lawyer come out and say he colluded with Russia? What was not fabricated? No, his campaign manager did. Quote Ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort admits sharing info with Russians Paul Manafort, the chairman of former president Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, has admitted sharing confidential campaign polling data with a suspected Russian intelligence officer at the same time Moscow was interfering in the 2016 election on Mr Trump’s behalf. In an interview with Insider, Mr Manafort — who was later convicted of tax evasion but received a pardon from the ex-president — said he shared the data, which the Department of the Treasury described as “sensitive information on polling and campaign strategy”, with suspected Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik in hopes of financial gain for himself, not to aid Russia’s efforts to help Mr Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. "The data that I shared with him was a combination of public information and stuff for the spring that was — it was old,” said Mr Manafort, whose claim is at odds with what he told his former deputy, Rick Gates, in an email seized by federal investigators during the Justice Department’s probe into whether the Trump campaign had ties to Russia’s pro-Trump interference efforts. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said: You seem unwilling to see the obvious...which is ironic considering what you have cried about on here for like the past 48 hours. I cried about nothing. I just called it a witch hunt. And it is. Fact. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,621 Posted August 10, 2022 2 hours ago, -Vyse- said: I’m a 27 year old guy and I use tiktok. So do all my friends and coworkers. Guys stationed in the military around here use it. Celebrities use it. What’s your problem with tiktok so much that you feel the need to say that you lose your manhood if you’re on it? Like I said it's Chinese bullsh!t and the target audience is teenagers. You still using Snapchat too? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said: No, his campaign manager did. So they got him for the dreaded tax evasion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,294 Posted August 10, 2022 2 minutes ago, craftsman said: So they got him for the dreaded tax evasion. So no argument that your 'no collusion' argument was wrong, cause it will be nice to not hear you misrepresent that anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 12 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: So no argument that your 'no collusion' argument was wrong, cause it will be nice to not hear you misrepresent that anymore. Who was charged and convicted of collusion with Russia? I guess I didn't follow his trials. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,339 Posted August 10, 2022 So what evidence are we thinking they’re planting right now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-Vyse- 65 Posted August 10, 2022 13 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said: Like I said it's Chinese bullsh!t and the target audience is teenagers. You still using Snapchat too? Who cares who owns it. There’s some hilarious stuff on that app as well as some hot girls including porn stars. I use Snapchat as well. I’m not a dork that doesn’t use social media. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,504 Posted August 10, 2022 The National Archives! Fockin jerk offs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: The National Archives! Fockin jerk offs. U mad Bro? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,477 Posted August 10, 2022 6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: The National Archives! Fockin jerk offs. They don't want to understand it. They are TERRIFIED of Trump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,621 Posted August 10, 2022 13 minutes ago, -Vyse- said: Who cares who owns it. There’s some hilarious stuff on that app as well as some hot girls including porn stars. I use Snapchat as well. I’m not a dork that doesn’t use social media. A lot of people care who owns it, hints why it's banned in so many countries. Go get your dopamine hit and carry on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 not just terrified but TERRIFIED. It takes a special kind of goofy to believe that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 17 minutes ago, Djgb13 said: So what evidence are we thinking they’re planting right now? Oh hell. Who the heck knows? Maybe naked pictures of Hillary? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 Just now, craftsman said: Oh hell. Who the heck knows? Maybe naked pictures of Hillary? Ain't nobody wanna see that....not even Bill Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 5 minutes ago, Horseman said: They don't want to understand it. They are TERRIFIED of Trump. There is no other explaination for the constant witch hunt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
craftsman 1,045 Posted August 10, 2022 5 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Ain't nobody wanna see that....not even Bill Hunter would hit that I bet. Joe would just freeze and stutter at the sight of her. As would I now that I think about it. Bill would say, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,477 Posted August 10, 2022 6 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: not just terrified but TERRIFIED. It takes a special kind of goofy to believe that I know your work and life doesn't require much from you, but, you are in here all day about Trump. You should free up some rent space in your head and find another hobby. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,984 Posted August 10, 2022 3 minutes ago, Horseman said: I know your work and life doesn't require much from you, but, you are in here all day about Trump. You should free up some rent space in your head and find another hobby. Are you terrified about what I do with my time or TERRIFIED?!?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,477 Posted August 10, 2022 4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Are you terrified about what I do with my time or TERRIFIED?!?! What makes you think there is anything terrifying about a life loser? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites