Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
JustinCharge

NATO confirms russia is moving nuclear missiles into position

Recommended Posts

Pimpadoosh posts an article that cites the thoroughly debunked bounties. Shameless or ignorant? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Pimpadoosh posts an article that cites the thoroughly debunked bounties. Shameless or ignorant? 

Show us where those 37 examples got debunked. Your word is 💩.

You might be able to debunk some of them, but no all of them. 

You wanted examples. You got examples, which you'll dismiss because you don't like them.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

Putin didn't attack Ukraine while Clownzo was president because he knew which side of the toast was buttered.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Pimpadoosh posts an article that cites the thoroughly debunked bounties. Shameless or ignorant? 

Both? :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

Show us where those 37 examples got debunked. Your word is 💩.

You might be able to debunk some of them, but no all of them. 

You wanted examples. You got examples, which you'll dismiss because you don't like them.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

Putin didn't attack Ukraine while Clownzo was president because he knew which side of the toast was buttered.

 

I generally stop when someone lies right off the bat. Especially a doozy like that.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

I generally stop when someone lies right off the bat. Especially a doozy like that.  

You're like one of those tiny shell fragments that falls into the bowl with a freshly-cracked egg. It's elusive and hard to pin down for removal.

You dismiss them all because you didn't like the first one.

You wanted examples. They're in there, plenty of them impossible to debunk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

You're like one of those tiny shell fragments that falls into the bowl with a freshly-cracked egg. It's elusive and hard to pin down for removal.

You dismiss them all because you didn't like the first one.

You wanted examples. They're in there, plenty of them impossible to debunk.

Troll troll troll your bot...

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, craftsman said:

Troll troll troll your bot...

Facts are simple and facts are straight
Facts are lazy and facts are late
Facts all come with points of view
Facts don't do what I want them to
Facts just twist the truth around
Facts are living turned inside out
Facts are getting the best of them
Facts are nothing on the face of things
Facts don't stain the furniture
Facts go out and slam the door
Facts are written all over your face
Facts continue to change their shape

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Facts are simple and facts are straight
Facts are lazy and facts are late
Facts all come with points of view
Facts don't do what I want them to
Facts just twist the truth around
Facts are living turned inside out
Facts are getting the best of them
Facts are nothing on the face of things
Facts don't stain the furniture
Facts go out and slam the door
Facts are written all over your face
Facts continue to change their shape

You should learn some facts. So far you are batting .000

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, craftsman said:

You should learn some facts. So far you are batting .000

I posted 37 examples of Clownzo being soft on Russia. 

In addition, Clownzo has a long history of business dealings in Russia.

He has in the past surrounded himself with people who did business with and were sympathetic toward Russia.

https://swalwell.house.gov/issues/russia-trump-his-administration-s-ties

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/seeing-trumps-approach-putin-russia-brutal-new-light-rcna17565

Clownzo even called Putin a "genius" and "savvy" for the Ukraine invasion.

Keep digging into that Rolodex, childish clown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I posted 37 examples of Clownzo being soft on Russia. 

In addition, Clownzo has a long history of business dealings in Russia.

He has in the past surrounded himself with people who did business with and were sympathetic toward Russia.

https://swalwell.house.gov/issues/russia-trump-his-administration-s-ties

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/seeing-trumps-approach-putin-russia-brutal-new-light-rcna17565

Clownzo even called Putin a "genius" and "savvy" for the Ukraine invasion.

Keep digging into that Rolodex, childish clown.

It was ok when the Obama administration sucked up to him. And took his money. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It was ok when the Obama administration sucked up to him. And took his money. 

Irrelevant.

Subject matter: Why didn't Putin invade while Trump was in power?

You: Wanting examples of what Trump did or didn't to that benefitted Russia.

Me: I post 37 examples.

You: You didn't like the first one, or the source for that matter, so you outright dismiss them all, even you many of those are impossible to debunk. 

Me: I post more supportive information about Trump and Russia.

You: Backed into a corner, you quickly pivot to Obama in an effort to gish gallop your way.

You might be able to dismiss some of the 37 examples, but you can't dismiss all of them.

Pimpadeaux wins again!

:first:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Putin is smart. He's got Biden turning the US into being energy dependant again, all the while having Biden spending 10s of billions on Ukraine instead of helping our own military and our own citizens with that money.

He is so much smarter than Biden and it's obvious how he's paddling Joe's ass in public.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, craftsman said:

Putin is smart. He's got Biden turning the US into being energy dependant again, all the while having Biden spending 10s of billions on Ukraine instead of helping our own military and our own citizens with that money.

He is so much smarter than Biden and it's obvious how he's paddling Joe's ass in public.

If he were that smart, he wouldn't be getting his ass kicked in Ukraine.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

If he were that smart, he wouldn't be getting his ass kicked in Ukraine.

You care more about crooked Ukraine than the US. Your opinion is useless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

If he were that smart, he wouldn't be getting his ass kicked in Ukraine.

It’s like it’s his Viet Nam. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

If he were that smart, he wouldn't be getting his ass kicked in Ukraine.

He's killing the US slowly and you cheer for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Facts are simple and facts are straight
Facts are lazy and facts are late
Facts all come with points of view
Facts don't do what I want them to
Facts just twist the truth around
Facts are living turned inside out
Facts are getting the best of them
Facts are nothing on the face of things
Facts don't stain the furniture
Facts go out and slam the door
Facts are written all over your face
Facts continue to change their shape

Ghey as fok.  🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Irrelevant.

Subject matter: Why didn't Putin invade while Trump was in power?

You: Wanting examples of what Trump did or didn't to that benefitted Russia.

Me: I post 37 examples.

You: You didn't like the first one, or the source for that matter, so you outright dismiss them all, even you many of those are impossible to debunk. 

Me: I post more supportive information about Trump and Russia.

You: Backed into a corner, you quickly pivot to Obama in an effort to gish gallop your way.

You might be able to dismiss some of the 37 examples, but you can't dismiss all of them.

Pimpadeaux wins again!

:first:

It’s my fault you cited an opinion piece with a blatant lie. How about some personal responsibility? It would be a first. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, craftsman said:

You care more about crooked Ukraine than the US. Your opinion is useless.

It's OK to care about more than one thing.

Ukraine is the world's breadbasket and a fledgling democracy that has come a long way since its days under Soviet rule and the shaky years afterward. 

The actions of a brutal, ruthless autocrat and leader of one of the Earth's most powerful nations can't have this kind of unprovoked aggression go unchecked by the rest of the world.

Our well-being would be in far greater danger by not addressing this now, like Hitler should have been addressed before he got too big for his britches.

But I get that you're a carpet-wetting kick dog and white nationalist who sees the world through MAGAtard-colored lenses, and you don't have the mental tools to engage in an actual debate, instead falling back on your tired old name-calling and MAGAtard buzzwords. 

You're as useless as teets on a chicken.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It’s my fault you cited an opinion piece with a blatant lie. How about some personal responsibility? It would be a first. 

Nice deflection, but you're still going to have to prove the other 36 wrong to show that Clownzo wasn't soft on Russia, which is why Putin didn't invade. 

The United States pulling out of NATO would have been quite the Christmas present for him. 

Now, more nations are joining. 

Ha!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I generally stop when someone lies right off the bat. Especially a doozy like that.  

Quote

Trump has repeatedly praised Putin

While he was a private citizen, during his 2016 campaign and throughout his presidency, Trump has showered Putin with praise. He said Putin was “so nice,” he called Putin a “strong leader” and said Putin has done “a really great job outsmarting our country.” Trump also claimed he’d “get along very well” with Putin. Few, if any, Western leaders have echoed these comments.

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-vladimir-putin-donald-trump-campaigns-foreign-policy-4625a28e59996ff16085fdf30910a449

So "right off the bat," you say Clownzo's praise of Putin was debunked.

But his praise of Putin has been well-documented, including calling him "savvy" and a "genius" for the Ukraine invasion.

Do you actually read anything?

😂

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-vladimir-putin-donald-trump-campaigns-foreign-policy-4625a28e59996ff16085fdf30910a449

So "right off the bat," you say Clownzo's praise of Putin was debunked.

But his praise of Putin has been well-documented, including calling him "savvy" and a "genius" for the Ukraine invasion.

Do you actually read anything?

😂

Obama tried to work it out with Putin.  So did Trump. But Trump isn’t allowed to I guess. Also don’t post lies from dubious sources anymore. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Obama tried to work it out with Putin.  So did Trump. But Trump isn’t allowed to I guess. 

Work what out? Not invading Ukraine?

Again, the discussion has nothing to do with Obama. It's about whether Clownzo was soft on Russia, and I cited 37 examples, none of which you have disproven, and I proved the first one, which you said was debunked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

Work what out? Not invading Ukraine?

Again, the discussion has nothing to do with Obama. It's about whether Clownzo was soft on Russia, and I cited 37 examples, none of which you have disproven, and I proved the first one, which you said was debunked.

Then bounty thing is real? I guess it’s ignorance. Shameless too, but ignorant is the lead. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Then bounty thing is real? I guess it’s ignorance. Shameless too, but ignorant is the lead. 

So are you saying Clownzo did not praise Putin?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

So are you saying Clownzo did not praise Putin?

I’m saying you cited an opinion piece that contains a huge lie, in order to disparage the subject.  Why would anyone put any credence in anything beyond that? I thought you were an editor? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russian President Vladimir Putin often became frustrated with President Donald Trump over his lack of knowledge on geopolitical issues, Fiona Hill said, adding that this played into Moscow's decision on the timing of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

 

One of the reasons Putin invaded Ukraine with President Joe Biden in the White House was that he expected the US to "sue for peace" and thought it would be better to deal with Biden than trying to negotiate with someone like Trump, whom the Russian leader had "to explain everything to all the time," Hill, who served as the top Russia advisor on the National Security Council under Trump, said Tuesday at a Chicago Council on Global Affairs event.

 

"He thought that somebody like Biden — who's a transatlanticist, who knows all about NATO, who actually knows where Ukraine is, and actually knows something about the history, and is very steeped in international affairs — would be the right person to engage with," Hill said.

 

"You could see that he got frustrated many times with President Trump because he had to keep explaining things, and Putin doesn't like to do that," Hill said, adding: "Even though he loves to be able to spin his own version of events, he wants to have predictability in the person that he's engaging with

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Russian President Vladimir Putin often became frustrated with President Donald Trump over his lack of knowledge on geopolitical issues, Fiona Hill said, adding that this played into Moscow's decision on the timing of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

 

One of the reasons Putin invaded Ukraine with President Joe Biden in the White House was that he expected the US to "sue for peace" and thought it would be better to deal with Biden than trying to negotiate with someone like Trump, whom the Russian leader had "to explain everything to all the time," Hill, who served as the top Russia advisor on the National Security Council under Trump, said Tuesday at a Chicago Council on Global Affairs event.

 

"He thought that somebody like Biden — who's a transatlanticist, who knows all about NATO, who actually knows where Ukraine is, and actually knows something about the history, and is very steeped in international affairs — would be the right person to engage with," Hill said.

 

"You could see that he got frustrated many times with President Trump because he had to keep explaining things, and Putin doesn't like to do that," Hill said, adding: "Even though he loves to be able to spin his own version of events, he wants to have predictability in the person that he's engaging with

Being frustrated with Trump makes sense and doesn't surprise me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I’m saying you cited an opinion piece that contains a huge lie, in order to disparage the subject.  Why would anyone put any credence in anything beyond that? I thought you were an editor? 

What is the lie?

Trump called Russian bounty story a ‘hoax’

Rejecting the findings from US intelligence agencies, Trump said allegations that Russia paid Taliban militants to kill US troops were “another hoax” that was “made up by fake news.” By saying he doesn’t believe the allegations against Russia, Trump publicly sided with the Kremlin, which denies paying any bounties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I’m saying you cited an opinion piece that contains a huge lie, in order to disparage the subject.  Why would anyone put any credence in anything beyond that? I thought you were an editor? 

The first item listed is about Clownzo praising Putin. You said "right off the bat," meaning that first item, had been debunked.

Where has it been debunked that Clownzo praised Putin? How was it a "huge lie?"

For starters, it was well-documented that he called Putin "savvy" and "a genius" at the onset of the war.

Seems like a stone-cold fact. Show us where it was debunked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

The first item listed is about Clownzo praising Putin. You said "right off the bat," meaning that first item, had been debunked.

Where has it been debunked that Clownzo praised Putin? How was it a "huge lie?"

For starters, it was well-documented that he called Putin "savvy" and "a genius" at the onset of the war.

Seems like a stone-cold fact. Show us where it was debunked.

The bounty thing is mentioned before the 37 , so right off the bat. You didn't even read your own article. What a Fockin clown. I win. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The bounty thing is mentioned before the 37 , so right off the bat. You didn't even read your own article. What a Fockin clown. I win. 

"Off the bat" is about Clownzo praising Putin. 

You seem to have some kind of dyslexia here, like you did with Juneteenth being in December.

If you're talking about the bounty thing, go ahead and cross out that one if it makes you feel better and then try to debunk the other 36 examples.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Facts are simple and facts are straight
Facts are lazy and facts are late
Facts all come with points of view
Facts don't do what I want them to
Facts just twist the truth around
Facts are living turned inside out
Facts are getting the best of them
Facts are nothing on the face of things
Facts don't stain the furniture
Facts go out and slam the door
Facts are written all over your face
Facts continue to change their shape

Thanks Dr. Seuss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

"Off the bat" is about Clownzo praising Putin. 

You seem to have some kind of dyslexia here, like you did with Juneteenth being in December.

If you're talking about the bounty thing, go ahead and cross out that one if it makes you feel better and then try to debunk the other 36 examples.

 No. I don’t consider a source that lies right off the bat. If you actually read your own posted article you wouldn’t be attempting to deflect so much.  Flailing.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The bounty thing is mentioned before the 37 , so right off the bat. You didn't even read your own article. What a Fockin clown. I win. 

Again where is the lie?  Trump did dispute his own intelligence reports, where are they wrong in this article?

Most recently, Trump has denied the veracity of US intelligence reports accusing Russia of paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill US troops in Afghanistan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, OldMaid said:

Thanks Dr. Seuss.

It's from a kick-ass Talking Heads song, "Crosseyed and Painless," Molly Musicencyclopedia. 😂

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

 No. I don’t consider a source that lies right off the bat. If you actually read your own posted article you wouldn’t be attempting to deflect so much.  Flailing.  

Did Trump ever praise Putin?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Again where is the lie?  Trump did dispute his own intelligence reports, where are they wrong in this article?

Most recently, Trump has denied the veracity of US intelligence reports accusing Russia of paying bounties to Taliban fighters to kill US troops in Afghanistan.

The whole thing was debunked. That Kinda needs to be mentioned. You people are unreal. So weak, clinging to this nonsense. Look at you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Obama tried to work it out with Putin.  So did Trump. But Trump isn’t allowed to I guess. Also don’t post lies from dubious sources anymore. 

Trump was just better at it since he drew the line in the sand and Putin had no other choice but to be good. 

Obama went into office, Putin invades. Biden in office, Putin invades. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Did Trump ever praise Putin?

Don’t recall. Biden sure did though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×