Congresswoman Linda Sanchez (HOR-D/CA38) Attempts To "Cancel" The Wrong "Marcus Allen"

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

 

Democratic Representative Attempts to Tie Twitter Account To Witness During Weaponization Committee Meeting

Marcus Allen: 'That Is Absolutely Not My Account'...California representative Linda Sanchez attempted to attribute a Twitter account to a witness during a Thursday Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government meeting....The meeting featured testimony from three FBI whistleblowers claiming the agency targeted pro-life groups along with practicing Catholics and parents attending school board meetings by identifying them as a domestic (terrorism) threats.

Sanchez asked suspended FBI staff operations specialist Marcus Allen if he used Twitter, to which Allen responded he had “utilized” the platform.

The California representative continued by asking Allen if his Twitter handle was XX@XXMarcusA97050645.

“That is absolutely not my account,” ..... FBI staff operations specialist responded.

Sanchez.... “On December 5, 2022, an account under the name Marcus Allen retweeted a tweet that said quote —”

“That’s not my account, ma’am,” Allen repeated.

“You haven’t let me finish the question, sir,” Sanchez contested. “The time is mine.”

“On December 5, 2022, an account under the name of Marcus Allen retweeted a tweet that said, quote, ‘Nancy Pelosi staged January 6. Retweet if you agree,'” she continued, asking Allen if he agreed with the statement. Allen attempted to reiterate the account did not belong to him though was cut off by Sanchez who said, “I’m asking whether you agree with that statement, yes or no.”

A number of lawmakers jokingly associated Sanchez with a user by the same name — who tweeted “Donald Trump is the greatest President of my lifetime” — in an attempt to demonstrate Twitter account owners may share the same name.

https://timcast.com/news/democratic-representative-attempts-to-tie-twitter-account-to-witness-during-weaponization-committee-meeting/

 

 

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

 

 

 

[thegeneral 2,908]

Guy had a nose for the endzone.

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

 

 

The "Streisand Effect" is in play here. The overall American public didn't pay attention to this issue, because it's been mostly suppressed in the national daily media cycle by the activist complicit hard left leaning MSM. 

However Linda Sanchez (D) made a huge mistake in highlighting the entire hearing and testimony of these FBI Agents by taking a cheap shot and attempting to smear "Marcus Allen" with a social media account that did not belong to him. Now Allen and the entire controversy/hearing have all gone viral. Sanchez played stupid games and now the entire DNC has to reap the clear stupid prizes that comes with it. 

Here is his testimony, along with the statements of the other two FBI Agents 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,932]

Liberals are ok with all of this. 

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

 

(Sanchez) supports gay rights and opposes discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender.[18] On October 4, 2011, Sánchez made a statement on LGBT History Month, saying: "We must continue to strive to end discrimination in the workplace based on sexual orientation and fight so that all Americans have the right to marry and start families with those they love. I remain committed to supporting marriage equality, investments in HIV/AIDS care, treatment and research, and campaigns that take action against bullying in schools."[24]

Sánchez married Jim Sullivan on April 13, 2009, in the district office of Congressman John B. Larson, who introduced the two about two years before the wedding.[37] The marriage is Sánchez's second, and Sullivan has three sons from a previous marriage.[38] On May 13, 2009, she became the eighth woman to give birth while serving in Congress when she had her first son.[39]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_S%C3%A1nchez

 

 

 

******

Linda Sanchez is one of a very small handful of women who have given birth while as a sitting member of Congress. 

It is common etiquette in Congressional hearings to call her and many others as "Congresswoman" 

The question becomes why is this acceptable and why is this not seen as an attack on the LGBT community? 

Shouldn't Linda Sanchez ask, based on her clear record of LGBT activism, to be called a "Congressional Birthing Person" instead?  Wouldn't it indicate that she's clearly a bigot if she refuses to do so and because she has not yet done so? 

 

[squistion 1,949]

"Congresswoman Linda Sanchez (HOR-D/CA38)"

That's commentary is all you need to know about the OP, Blue Horseshoe (aka GordonGekko) and the value of the threads he starts.

[seafoam1 2,799]

Liberals are so stupid.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,932]

5 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Liberals are so stupid.

Sanchez is so fat. Of course she is, she’s stupid, pissed and has blue or purple hair.  Every time. 

[RLLD 4,143]

12 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Liberals are so stupid.

But entertaining.....  you have to admit.  Democrats are a living SNL skit man 

[BillyKing 83]

18 hours ago, squistion said:

"Congresswoman Linda Sanchez (HOR-D/CA38)"

That's commentary is all you need to know about the OP, Blue Horseshoe (aka GordonGekko) and the value of the threads he starts.

The fact that you try to belittle OP instead of addressing the issue tells us all we need to know about your retarded ass  Bet you thought she had a good point too didn’t you?

[squistion 1,949]

5 minutes ago, BillyKing said:

The fact that you try to belittle OP instead of addressing the issue tells us all we need to know about your retarded ass  Bet you thought she had a good point too didn’t you? 

It is impossible for anyone to seriously address the issue when the OP refers to the Congresswoman as (HOR-D/CA38).

[RLLD 4,143]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

It is impossible for anyone to seriously address the issue when the OP refers to the Congresswoman as (HOR-D/CA38).

No, its not, but use any means available to avoid the truth of course.  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,932]

7 minutes ago, squistion said:

It is impossible for anyone to seriously address the issue when the OP refers to the Congresswoman as (HOR-D/CA38).

Sure you can. You just don’t want to. 

[DonS 3,292]

10 minutes ago, squistion said:

It is impossible for anyone to seriously address the issue when the OP refers to the Congresswoman as (HOR-D/CA38).

Am I missing something?  Is the congresswoman not a Democrat in the House of Representatives representing the 38th district of California? 

[squistion 1,949]

38 minutes ago, DonS said:

Am I missing something?  Is the congresswoman not a Democrat in the House of Representatives representing the 38th district of California? 

Yes, but that designation is redundant, since he already said that she is a "congresswoman" 

[The Real timschochet 6,416]

I’ve met Linda Sanchez. I’ve helped her with the YMCA in Lakewood. She’s a great woman, very pro-business. I like her and trust her. 

[DonS 3,292]

13 minutes ago, squistion said:

Yes, but that designation is redundant, since he already said that she is a "congresswoman" 

Oh is that why you can't take it "seriously"?   That's pretty focking lame if true.

Thank God he didn't say anything ridiculous like not needing to know basic math because of muh phone has a calculator. 

 

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

10 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’ve met Linda Sanchez. I’ve helped her with the YMCA in Lakewood. She’s a great woman, very pro-business. I like her and trust her. 

She’s a scum bag and a crook. Figures toy would like and trust her.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/08/linda-sanchez-house-democrats-978770

“Sources close to the 49-year-old Sanchez said she has no thoughts of resigning or retiring from office. However, the allegations against Sullivan directly involve Sanchez, a former ranking member of the House Ethics Committee.”

“Sullivan is alleged to have improperly charged personal expenses to the Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative, a consortium of six municipal electric utilities. These alleged improper expenses included taking Sanchez to the Kentucky Derby in 2013 and 2014. Those trips were first reported by the Norwich Bulletin in early 2017.”

[DonS 3,292]

I think I understand the confusion regarding the topic stating "Congresswoman" followed by HOR. 

I think the OP meant to type WH0RE but his phone probably autocorrected.  Hate when that happens. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,932]

Disgusting pigs. Her, Nadler and Porter.  

[The Real timschochet 6,416]

On 5/20/2023 at 1:28 PM, Dizkneelande said:

She’s a scum bag and a crook. Figures toy would like and trust her.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/08/linda-sanchez-house-democrats-978770

“Sources close to the 49-year-old Sanchez said she has no thoughts of resigning or retiring from office. However, the allegations against Sullivan directly involve Sanchez, a former ranking member of the House Ethics Committee.”

“Sullivan is alleged to have improperly charged personal expenses to the Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative, a consortium of six municipal electric utilities. These alleged improper expenses included taking Sanchez to the Kentucky Derby in 2013 and 2014. Those trips were first reported by the Norwich Bulletin in early 2017.”

She’s not a scumbag and I don’t think she’s a crook either .

[iam90sbaby 2,486]

10 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

She’s not a scumbag and I don’t think she’s a crook either .

She married a fraudster, she's pro immigration, she's anti gun and she's fat and ugly.

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

16 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

She’s not a scumbag and I don’t think she’s a crook either .

I just showed proof of being a crook are you this much of a partisan hack? 

[cmh6476 1,010]

Damn I thought this was about this lady my friend concocted a scratch and sniff mail piece against

 

https://www.rollcall.com/2010/10/25/heard-on-the-hill-the-scent-of-a-congresswoman/

[The Real timschochet 6,416]

1 hour ago, Dizkneelande said:

I just showed proof of being a crook are you this much of a partisan hack? 

No. You linked to an unproven allegation. 
 

I think you’re the partisan hack in that you tend to demonize those you disagree with. You’re not the only one here who does that, 

[The Real timschochet 6,416]

2 hours ago, iam90sbaby said:

She married a fraudster, she's pro immigration, she's anti gun and she's fat and ugly.

Her views on immigration and guns tend to match my own: Your sexism about her looks is irrelevant though it’s telling about you. 

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

8 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

No. You linked to an unproven allegation. 
 

I think you’re the partisan hack in that you tend to demonize those you disagree with. You’re not the only one here who does that, 

You’re a total douche bag. Her husband went to prison for something she was directly involved in. 
 

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/wireStory/california-congresswomans-husband-sentenced-prison-connecticut-fraud-case-99414345

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

Another thread where Tim fawns over a total crap bag Democrat. What’s the count of how many of these crap bags Tim has fawned over? 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,701]

1 minute ago, Dizkneelande said:

Another thread where Tim fawns over a total crap bag Democrat. What’s the count of how many of these crap bags Tim has fawned over? 

Then he Pearl clutches over anything Trump does. Zero credibility.  

[The Real timschochet 6,416]

11 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

You’re a total douche bag. Her husband went to prison for something she was directly involved in. 
 

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/wireStory/california-congresswomans-husband-sentenced-prison-connecticut-fraud-case-99414345

I wasn’t aware of this. 
 

It’s upsetting to read. I really liked her personally. I don’t know very many politicians. I hope she’s not a criminal herself. If she is then I feel betrayed. 

[RLLD 4,143]

13 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I wasn’t aware of this. 
 

It’s upsetting to read. I really liked her personally. I don’t know very many politicians. I hope she’s not a criminal herself. If she is then I feel betrayed. 

I might suggest that you should not feel anything about this person.  Politicians are not worthy of our feelings in this way.  They are not heroic.   They are just people, and people who sought power.  That alone should ensure our cautious allowance for them.

We need to stop elevating government, and the people in it, to some celebratory status. 

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

11 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I might suggest that you should not feel anything about this person.  Politicians are not worthy of our feelings in this way.  They are not heroic.   They are just people, and people who sought power.  That alone should ensure our cautious allowance for them.

We need to stop elevating government, and the people in it, to some celebratory status. 

I would think pretty much all of them are dirty in some way.

[Voltaire 5,195]

 at the Marcus Allen line of questioning from the same dingbat from the Congressional Baseball game flap. That's embarassing.

Giving Maxine Waters a run for the money as the Congressional Democrat's ding-dong clown.

[TBayXXXVII 2,483]

11 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

No. You linked to an unproven allegation. 
 

I think you’re the partisan hack in that you tend to demonize those you disagree with. You’re not the only one here who does that, 

LOL, the irony.

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

5 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

LOL, the irony.

He’s the ultimate dogmatist. Here’s true irony. I despise the Republican Party but I’m the partisan hack. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,483]

On 5/20/2023 at 3:16 PM, squistion said:

It is impossible for anyone to seriously address the issue when the OP refers to the Congresswoman as (HOR-D/CA38).

Why?  When I read that, I saw it as "House Of Representatives".  I mean, Congresswomen can be Senators too, can they not?

Wait... I get it.  It's you projecting how you feel onto others.  My bad.  Now I get it.

[TBayXXXVII 2,483]

28 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

He’s the ultimate dogmatist. Here’s true irony. I despise the Republican Party but I’m the partisan hack. 

Yeah, I mean the audacity of someone from the left to say that after the 2016-2020 time frame in this country is pretty astounding.

[RLLD 4,143]

2 hours ago, Voltaire said:

 at the Marcus Allen line of questioning from the same dingbat from the Congressional Baseball game flap. That's embarassing.

Giving Maxine Waters a run for the money as the Congressional Democrat's ding-dong clown.

Predictable......it is the goto.   They cannot argue the facts so instead they have to denigrate the person.  Liberlism in action. 

[DonS 3,292]

2 hours ago, Voltaire said:

 at the Marcus Allen line of questioning from the same dingbat from the Congressional Baseball game flap. That's embarassing.

Giving Maxine Waters a run for the money as the Congressional Democrat's ding-dong clown.

I vaguely remember some congresswoman (HOR - (D)umb b1tch) complaining about something during the baseball game.  What were the details again?