Voltaire 5,316 Posted December 21, 2023 1 hour ago, seafoam1 said: Sure. biden getting his ass kicked in every swing state until after the polls closed and they locked the door and pulled down the shutters. Then all of a sudden truck loads of biden only ballots started rolling in. You've been had peanut. There exist videos that suspiciously look like this may have happened. Democrats claim that they didn't rig the election, but they did have the time and means to do so. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,316 Posted December 21, 2023 Congrats to Tim and Squistion for showing that even Trump haters have enough sense to criticize Colorado on this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted December 21, 2023 2 hours ago, Alias Detective said: May? Bwahahahahah Yep. Might be. These are very thorny issues with few black and white answers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,429 Posted December 21, 2023 6 minutes ago, Voltaire said: There exist videos that suspiciously look like this may have happened. Democrats claim that they didn't rig the election, but they did have the time and means to do so. Unless you have video and DNA evidence, Democrats want to criminalize to even question the integrity of the election. This big push for absentee ballots made stuffing the ballot box way too easy with little or no validation. These last minute vote count swings and especially the shenanigans in places like Mariposa County which took days extra to count ballots provides little confidence that some level of tampering took place. The idea thst we must completely trust these hyper-partsan fanatics is purely stupid. And the judges in these areas will defend these shenanigans to the death. Trump has to win some of these swing states by 200,000 votes to ensure he wins. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106 Posted December 21, 2023 39 minutes ago, RLLD said: Of course....the Liberals are "good".....they are "right".....when they do something, no matter how vile....its in pursuit of "goodness"....and thus anything they might do is justified.... conversely, anything their opponents do....and I mean.....ANYTHING....is evil. Sound like a religion? Nope. Sounds like a cult. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,202 Posted December 21, 2023 15 minutes ago, League Champion said: What Insurrection? Jan 6 attempted coup, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,350 Posted December 21, 2023 1 minute ago, squistion said: Jan 6 attempted coup, lol you are so delusional have you talked to a therapist about mental health? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,911 Posted December 21, 2023 Just now, squistion said: Jan 6 attempted coup, Ohh, the "Controlled Insurrection" that was run by Democrats? The one that Trump isn't going to jail for? That one? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106 Posted December 21, 2023 Just now, squistion said: Jan 6 attempted coup, Again, there has been NO conviction or even a charge. How about we send you to prison for murder without a charge or conviction? That's basically what happened here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,202 Posted December 21, 2023 Just now, RaiderHaters Revenge said: lol you are so delusional have you talked to a therapist about mental health? I've seen the videos. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,350 Posted December 21, 2023 Just now, squistion said: I've seen the videos. did you see the May 29, 2020 coup attempt? far worse more cops hurt, fires started you should really open a history book and watch some actual coups Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,202 Posted December 21, 2023 Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Again, there has been NO conviction or even a charge. How about we send you to prison for murder without a charge or conviction? That's basically what happened here. I am on record in this thread not supporting the Colorado decision because Trump has not been given due process. I still believe however that he did encourage the attempted coup or insurrection. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,911 Posted December 21, 2023 1 minute ago, squistion said: still believe however that he did encourage the attempted coup or insurrection. Except he NEVER DID. He in fact asked for "Patriots" to respect the Capitol Police and go home. Ya probably didn't see that huh?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,911 Posted December 21, 2023 3 minutes ago, squistion said: I am on record in this thread not supporting the Colorado decision because Trump has not been given due process. I still believe however that he did encourage the attempted coup or insurrection. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,202 Posted December 21, 2023 Just now, League Champion said: Except he NEVER DID. He in fact asked for "Patriots" to respect the Capitol Police and go home. Ya probably didn't see that huh?? Yes. Too little, too late. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,611 Posted December 21, 2023 10 minutes ago, League Champion said: Ohh, the "Controlled Insurrection" that was run by Democrats? The one that Trump isn't going to jail for? That one? I too like to stand inside the red velvet ropes and walk in an orderly line when performing an insurrection Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,911 Posted December 21, 2023 2 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said: I too like to stand inside the red velvet ropes and walk in an orderly line when performing an insurrection FREE TOUR OF THE CAPITOL with every insurrection. All are invited! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Hunt 282 Posted December 21, 2023 1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said: Congrats, you are the author of the dumbest post today! Not my thoughts, is what was discussed on POTUS Radio last night. Supreme Courts in border states can make that decision. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted December 21, 2023 18 minutes ago, squistion said: Jan 6 attempted coup, This dude is growing on me. Troll level = max Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Hunt 282 Posted December 21, 2023 38 minutes ago, squistion said: They may feel that way, but the Constitution does not give them that right, unlike an act of insurrection. But Trump was not convicted of insurrection by the federal government. There was no trial in Colorado. Trump never was subpoenaed. No depositions of witnesses. Just Colorado judges deciding on their own. It will be overturned but should never have happened. Make no mistake, last thing I want is a rematch on Biden-Trump. I want them both parties to bring in younger fresh people. But not by states taking it into their own hands. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,230 Posted December 21, 2023 10 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said: But Trump was not convicted of insurrection by the federal government. There was no trial in Colorado. Trump never was subpoenaed. No depositions of witnesses. Just Colorado judges deciding on their own. It will be overturned but should never have happened. Make no mistake, last thing I want is a rematch on Biden-Trump. I want them both parties to bring in younger fresh people. But not by states taking it into their own hands. Agree on your points here, and would like to add that these desperate/extreme manuevers create some sinister precedents that could come back to bite them and us later. They seem to care nothing for the dangerous path they are striding..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,545 Posted December 21, 2023 1 hour ago, thegeneral said: Lots of crayons being used IMO. Whatever works. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,545 Posted December 21, 2023 1 hour ago, RLLD said: Of course....the Liberals are "good".....they are "right".....when they do something, no matter how vile....its in pursuit of "goodness"....and thus anything they might do is justified.... conversely, anything their opponents do....and I mean.....ANYTHING....is evil. Sound like a religion? Pretty much. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,429 Posted December 21, 2023 Very high-level leftist judges do maneuvers like this to win. These should be the cream of the crop with the highest level of education and the utmost integrity. Yet they are nothing but power-hungry leftist authoritarian bastards who will rationalize any sleezy action to win an election. But yet we are suppose to believe low-level workers would not cheat and stuff ballot boxes or sabotage voting machines to win. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,532 Posted December 21, 2023 1 hour ago, RLLD said: Agree on your points here, and would like to add that these desperate/extreme manuevers create some sinister precedents that could come back to bite them and us later. They seem to care nothing for the dangerous path they are striding..... You realize this lawsuit was filed by Republicans right? Not sure who "they" is to you, boyo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,911 Posted December 21, 2023 Just now, Ron_Artest said: boyo Awesome! BOYO calling someone BOYO. You can't make this stuff up! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,532 Posted December 21, 2023 3 minutes ago, League Champion said: Awesome! BOYO calling someone BOYO. You can't make this stuff up! Go create another transexual thread, creep. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,911 Posted December 21, 2023 OO Just now, Ron_Artest said: Go create another transexual thread, creep. Go oil up another Brazilian Cabana Boy BOYO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,546 Posted December 21, 2023 So I just finished reading most of the CO SC ruling on this case. It's pretty much a joke and will easily be overturned by the SCOTUS. The blueprint for that appeal will be the dissent of JUSTICE SAMOUR, starting on page 146: https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf Strike's recommend reading for the day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,937 Posted December 21, 2023 https://media.greatawakening.win/post/9HbA3XT5TmDA.jpeg 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,429 Posted December 21, 2023 14 minutes ago, Strike said: So I just finished reading most of the CO SC ruling on this case. It's pretty much a joke and will easily be overturned by the SCOTUS. The blueprint for that appeal will be the dissent of JUSTICE SAMOUR, starting on page 146: https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf Strike's recommend reading for the day. Regardless of one's position on the applicability of this clause to a president, the complete lack of due process should have been a compelling arguement for any judge at any level. But here we are at the Colorado Supreme Court and 4 of 7 judges have no issue denying Trump due process in order to feed their TDS. During the last few years, I have completely lost faith in our Justice system including most state courts, most federal district courts, the DOJ, FBI, and CIA. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,546 Posted December 21, 2023 5 minutes ago, jonmx said: Regardless of one's position on the applicability of this clause to a president, the complete lack of due process should have been a compelling arguement for any judge at any level. But here we are at the Colorado Supreme Court and 4 of 7 judges have no issue denying Trump due process in order to feed their TDS. During the last few years, I have completely lost faith in our Justice system including most state courts, most federal district courts, the DOJ, FBI, and CIA. If you read the dissent I recommended, you'll see that this proceeding didn't even meet the time frame requirements of the statute they're using to disqualify Trump. For so many reasons this thing is DOA at the SCOTUS. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,429 Posted December 21, 2023 4 minutes ago, Strike said: If you read the dissent I recommended, you'll see that this proceeding didn't even meet the time frame requirements of the statute they're using to disqualify Trump. For so many reasons this thing is DOA at the SCOTUS. It is like these lower level judges don't give a crap about the reasoning in their BS rulings. They just want to throw thousands of darts at Trump and hope one might stand. At the very least they are hoping the headlines hurt Trump or that it might fuel other states to join them. Our justice system has morphed into a radical politically-charged pile of manure. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,546 Posted December 21, 2023 Just now, jonmx said: It is like these lower level judges don't give a crap about the reasoning in their BS rulings. They just want to throw thousands of darts at Trump and hope one might stand. At the very least they are hoping the headlines hurt Trump or that it might fuel other states to join them. Our justice system has morphed into a radical politically-charged pile of manure. What? The lower level court in this case ruled in Trump's favor. It was the SC of CO that overturned that ruling and removed Trump from the primary ballot. That's not a "lower level judge." 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,429 Posted December 21, 2023 28 minutes ago, Strike said: What? The lower level court in this case ruled in Trump's favor. It was the SC of CO that overturned that ruling and removed Trump from the primary ballot. That's not a "lower level judge." Yes and no. The lower court essentially convicted Trump as an insurrectionists but did not believe the law applied to Trump. Without the lower court ruling that Trump was in fact an insurrectionist, the Colorado Supreme Court would of had no basis to rationalize this pile of Horseshit they dumped on us. It is almost like the courts colluded to come up with this strategy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted December 21, 2023 27 minutes ago, Strike said: What? The lower level court in this case ruled in Trump's favor. It was the SC of CO that overturned that ruling and removed Trump from the primary ballot. That's not a "lower level judge." See this is why you got stuck as some sh1tty paralegal or something. The trial court found that Trump did engage in insurrection. Oops However, the trial court also found that the 14th Amendment does not apply to presidents. So even though Trump definitely engaged in an insurrection, per the trial court, he could not be removed from the ballot. Legal nuance is hard Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted December 21, 2023 1 minute ago, jonmx said: Yes and no. The lower court essentially convicted Trump as an insurrectionists but did not believe the law applied to Trump. Without the lower court ruling that Trump was in fact an insurrectionist, the Colorado Supreme Court would have had no basis to rationalize this pile of Horseshit they dumped on us. jonmx gets it. He may be crazier than a sh1thouse rat, but he is smart and stuff Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,546 Posted December 21, 2023 2 minutes ago, jonmx said: Yes and no. The lower court essentially convicted Trump as an insurrectionists but did not believe the law applied to Trump. Without the lower court ruling that Trump was in fact an insurrectionist, the Colorado Supreme Court would of had no basis to rationalize this pile of Horseshit they dumped on us. That's fair. And look at @IGotWorms thinking he's an actual lawyer. If we were he'd acknowledge that this thing is DOA at the SCOTUS. I bet he hasn't even read the decision. What an idiot. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,429 Posted December 21, 2023 1 minute ago, Strike said: That's fair. And look at @IGotWorms thinking he's an actual lawyer. If we were he'd acknowledge that this thing is DOA at the SCOTUS. I bet he hasn't even read the decision. What an idiot. I think most people would actually become stupider from reading the ruling. The mental gymnastics it took for them to get from point A to point B has got to be complete dumbfukery. The dissent is the only thing that made legal sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,429 Posted December 21, 2023 6 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: jonmx gets it. He may be crazier than a sh1thouse rat, but he is smart and stuff If what our government and the forces behind it are doing ever gets fully exposed, there will be 300 million crazy MFers wanting to empty the trash. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites