Details released on bipartisan immigration bill that MAGAturds don't want because it vaporizes a Clownzo campaign issue

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,350]

2 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

How do we know how many countries they’ve travelled through if we can’t process them? 
 

Processiny them doesn’t mean letting them in. If you’re correct about the law (I have no idea) then the ones who went through several countries would be deemed ineligible and not allowed to stay. But I don’t see how we can determine that if we don’t have the manpower to investigate it. 

the point is that NOBODY could seek asylum in the Unites States unless they were seeking it from Canada or Mexico

Mexico takes asylum seekers, so there you go, keep going with your BS belief that they are just asylum seekers, they use that term to convince dumb people on the issue like yourself

oh yah and thats before we even get into the definition of what Asylum is

seeking economic opportunity IS NOT ASYLUM

you could just read a bit and educate yourself though

[Hardcore troubadour 15,435]

3 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

the point is that NOBODY could seek asylum in the Unites States unless they were seeking it from Canada or Mexico

Mexico takes asylum seekers, so there you go, keep going with your BS belief that they are just asylum seekers, they use that term to convince dumb people on the issue like yourself

 

They like being lied to. They need it. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Tapes surfacing of Biden talking about illegal immigrants way back in 2008. Sounds just like someone else. Even brings up criminals, terrorists and drugs coming in. The call is coming from inside the house. 

No one is saying that criminals, terrorists and drugs are not mixed in with those who are seeking a better life. 

Not exactly a gotcha, boyo.

[jerryskids 6,799]

6 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

He doesn’t realize it’s not a Thing and makes him look like a dope?

TDS is a religion to @Pimpadeaux. His persistent use of such dehumanizing words as Clownzo and Magaturd are, in a way, similar to @weepawspersistent bumping of his Bible thread.  The difference being that weepaws does it in the name of an actual religion, he uses Bible quotes instead of insults, and I respect his persistence at it.

Pimpadeaux will laugh smugly at this comment, because he knows he is on the side of right.  As has been the position of every religious zealot in the history of mankind.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,350]

the best idea and one that should be immediately implemented is as follows

you apply to enter the united states

you apply to work in the united states

a farmer needs workers he goes to the office of immigration/agriculture and applies for 50 job applicants to come work at his farm, they get 6 month work visas.  Stay out of trouble easy extension

done and done

 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

TDS is a religion to @Pimpadeaux. His persistent use of such dehumanizing words as Clownzo and Magaturd are, in a way, similar to @weepawspersistent bumping of his Bible thread.  The difference being that weepaws does it in the name of an actual religion, he uses Bible quotes instead of insults, and I respect his persistence at it.

Pimpadeaux will laugh smugly at this comment, because he knows he is on the side of right.  As has been the position of every religious zealot in the history of mankind.

I love that my use of those terms keeps getting you frothed up. Time to double down!

[Strike 5,547]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

Read my post again. I said I couldn’t find that, but it’s not really important since I agreed with you about securing the border.

Again, you seem more interested in scoring points than you do in actually discussing solutions. 

So when I specifically asked for a link to support a specific assertion you made, and you didn't have one, you thought the best thing to do was provide me a link that had nothing to do with what I was asking for?  Why not just admit you were full of it when you made the assertion and said you had posted a link that supports it instead of wasting my time?  

 

[The Real timschochet 6,766]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

So when I specifically asked for a link to support a specific assertion you made, and you didn't have one, you thought the best thing to do was provide me a link that had nothing to do with what I was asking for?  Why not just admit you were full of it when you made the assertion and said you had posted a link that supports it instead of wasting my time?  

 

Because I thought you were asking a broader question about the source of undocumented immigration. 

And lol, but I really don’t care about wasting your time. If you’re posting in this thread you have time to waste. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,435]

43 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

No one is saying that criminals, terrorists and drugs are not mixed in with those who are seeking a better life. 

Not exactly a gotcha, boyo.

Well they aren’t seeking a better life. I guess some Americans being killed or maimed is the cost of doing business. What a hack you are. 

[Horseman 2,458]

1 hour ago, Stryker Ryker said:

Normally I don’t even comment in these threads cause it’s just the two sides in here talking Sh1t about each other & not getting anything done. But I HAD to comment on this RETARDED and HYPOCRITICAL take the AUDACITY to now all of a sudden care about the border, saying walls work, and getting upset over the flood of illegal immigrants is insane. Last 7 years you didn’t care about it and even called Trump a racist for wanting to secure the border. NOW, Biden asks for billions of dollars so he can “fix” it & you support that You can’t even write hypocrisy this bad Not only that, you’re doubling down on it being Trump’s fault & how HE is the one that’s gonna mess it up YOU are a retarded ass moron just like anyone else that’s still supporting this asinine idiocy. By GOD you deserved to have ur ass kicked in front of ur family (whom we all know u don’t have). 

That's top shelf emoji use.  

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Well they aren’t seeking a better life. I guess some Americans being killed or maimed is the cost of doing business. What a hack you are. 

Ignorance isn't just your middle name. It's your first and last name as well.

Most of these people are absolutely desperate to get away from their home country and get to the United States. 

The journey is perilous, and many die along the way. 

I don't want them here any more than you do, and immigration ranks among our country's biggest issues.

But to say they're all criminals, drug dealers, etc., is just parroting Clownzo.

But now we have a bipartisan bill on the table, and Clownzo and his deluded followers hate it because it diminishes his ability to campaign hard on it in a most catastrophizing way.

[seafoam1 3,026]

2 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Ignorance isn't just your middle name. It's your first and last name as well.

Most of these people are absolutely desperate to get away from their home country and get to the United States. 

The journey is perilous, and many die along the way. 

I don't want them here any more than you do, and immigration ranks among our country's biggest issues.

But to say they're all criminals, drug dealers, etc., is just parroting Clownzo.

But now we have a bipartisan bill on the table, and Clownzo and his deluded followers hate it because it diminishes his ability to campaign hard on it in a most catastrophizing way.

Has anyone ever seen this much TDS in their life?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,435]

Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

Ignorance isn't just your middle name. It's your first and last name as well.

Most of these people are absolutely desperate to get away from their home country and get to the United States. 

The journey is perilous, and many die along the way. 

I don't want them here any more than you do, and immigration ranks among our country's biggest issues.

But to say they're all criminals, drug dealers, etc., is just parroting Clownzo.

But now we have a bipartisan bill on the table, and Clownzo and his deluded followers hate it because it diminishes his ability to campaign hard on it in a most catastrophizing way.

Oh. So their countries became fraught with peril just a few years ago? Tell us what happened then that’s any different than 10 years ago? Oh that’s right, they lived in Shittholes then as well, we just weren’t inviting them in.  You speaking of ignorance is hilarious.  You can’t debate for shitt. You just throw emotional stupidity up against the wall and hope it sticks. You’re very womanly.  

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Oh. So their countries became fraught with peril just a few years ago? Tell us what happened then that’s any different than 10 years ago? Oh that’s right, they lived in Shittholes then as well, we just weren’t inviting them in.  You speaking of ignorance is hilarious.  You can’t debate for shitt. You just throw emotional stupidity up against the wall and hope it sticks. You’re very womanly.  

The original point was how you portrayed them all as criminals, drug traffickers, etc. And you're wrong on that point. 

This is a decades-old problem that's getting worse.

But you don't care because addressing this issue will take a bite out of the centerpiece in Clownzo's platform.

[seafoam1 3,026]

1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

The original point was how you portrayed them all as criminals, drug traffickers, etc. And you're wrong on that point. 

This is a decades-old problem that's getting worse.

But you don't care because addressing this issue will take a bite out of the centerpiece in Clownzo's platform.

Fentanyl is AWESOME dude!!! 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,435]

2 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

The original point was how you portrayed them all as criminals, drug traffickers, etc. And you're wrong on that point. 

This is a decades-old problem that's getting worse.

But you don't care because addressing this issue will take a bite out of the centerpiece in Clownzo's platform.

My original post was that not long ago your hero was concerned about those issues as well, same as orange Hitler. Now he’s not, obviously.  So neither are you. Woof -woof. That’s a good boy.  

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

My original post was that not long ago your hero was concerned about those issues as well, same as orange Hitler. Now he’s not, obviously.  So neither are you. Woof -woof. That’s a good boy.  

A bipartisan bill is on the table to address the immigration problem, and Clownzo and his ilk are trying to derail it. Compromise and negotiation led to the bill's creation.

Clownzo doesn't want the bill because he'll have one fewer thing for which he can hypercatastrophize, fearmonger and fabricate information in his campaign. It's shameful. 

Biden would sign this bill. Clownzo does not.

This is what you wanted. This is immigration reform.

Quit trying to whatabout it away. 

[seafoam1 3,026]

1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

A bipartisan bill is on the table to address the immigration problem, and Clownzo and his ilk are trying to derail it. Compromise and negotiation led to the bill's creation.

Clownzo doesn't want the bill because he'll have one fewer thing for which he can hypercatastrophize, fearmonger and fabricate information in his campaign. It's shameful. 

Biden would sign this bill. Clownzo does not.

This is what you wanted. This is immigration reform.

Quit trying to whatabout it away. 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,435]

7 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

A bipartisan bill is on the table to address the immigration problem, and Clownzo and his ilk are trying to derail it. Compromise and negotiation led to the bill's creation.

Clownzo doesn't want the bill because he'll have one fewer thing for which he can hypercatastrophize, fearmonger and fabricate information in his campaign. It's shameful. 

Biden would sign this bill. Clownzo does not.

This is what you wanted. This is immigration reform.

Quit trying to whatabout it away. 

What are you talking about? The speaker of the house said it’s DOA.  A couple of rino senators doesn’t make it bi- partisan.  

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

What are you talking about? The speaker of the house said it’s DOA.  A couple of rino senators doesn’t make it bi- partisan.  

MAGAturds are the ones who are RINO.

A self-serving paradigm of hate, whining and no solutions.

You should actually read something that might influence your uneducated opinions.

You're way below my paygrade in the debate department.

 

[seafoam1 3,026]

11 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

MAGAturds

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,435]

45 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

MAGAturds are the ones who are RINO.

A self-serving paradigm of hate, whining and no solutions.

You should actually read something that might influence your uneducated opinions.

You're way below my paygrade in the debate department.

 

Can’t even come up with an original Comeback. I’d say I’m flattered but it’s you. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

19 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Can’t even come up with an original Comeback. I’d say I’m flattered but it’s you. 

It's not a comeback. You can't stay on point because when you realize you're focked on one point you try to pivot to another point and subsequently create multiple points in order to drive the conversation away from the point upon which you've decisively been proven wrong. That's called gish galloping.

The originial point is that your boy doesn't want a bipartisan immigration bill passed because it would fock up his top campaign fearmongering issue.

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,435]

8 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

It's not a comeback. You can't stay on point because when you realize you're focked on one point you try to pivot to another point and subsequently create multiple points in order to drive the conversation away from the point upon which you've decisively been proven wrong. That's called gish galloping.

The originial point is that your boy doesn't want a bipartisan immigration bill passed because it would fock up his top campaign fearmongering issue.

 

I told you earlier you’re a shitt debater.  And what do you come back with a little later? The same thing. I know I struck a nerve, I’m good like that. But come up with your own material. It’s one of the many reasons you’re a shitt debater. 

[Voltaire 5,316]

1 hour ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I

The originial point is that your boy doesn't want a bipartisan immigration bill passed because it would fock up his top campaign fearmongering issue.

 

The original point is an easily disproven lie and repeating it 20 times doesn’t make it true. Trump says that he would support a deal that sufficiently closes the border. I gave you that quote. He opposes the deal because he fees it is a bad deal. Presumably he’s been tipped off as to the contents.
 

As for the rest of us, we don’t know what is in the bill. if it is a good bill, he can pound sand and we should support it. As I implored you last time, maybe we should all wait for the content to be revealed and make up our own minds. Few of the people involved in the negotiations have ever taken border security seriously. But ‘few’ isn’t ‘none.’ 
 

I again suggest you wait and also to stop lying. Everyone knows you’re full of sh’t and shamelessly and deliberately lying about President Trump’s reasoning.

[seafoam1 3,026]

pimpledoosh is so focking stupid. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

9 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

The original point is an easily disproven lie and repealing it 20 times doesn’t make it true. Trump says that he would support a deal that sufficiently closes tho border. I gave you that quote. He opposes the deal because he fees it is a bad deal. Presumably he’s been tipped off as to the contents.
 

As for the rest of us, we don’t know what is in the bill. if it is a good bill, he can pound sand and we should support it. As I implored you last time, maybe we should all wait for the content to be revealed and make up our own minds. Few of the people involved in the negotiations have ever taken border security seriously. But ‘few’ isn’t ‘none.’ 
 

I again suggest you wait and also to stop lying. Everyone knows you’re full of sh’t and shamelessly and deliberately lying about President Trump’s reasoning.

It's a bipartisan bill, and MAGAturds categorize the Republicans who support it as RINOS because they can't compromise, negotiate and even remotely accept anything to the left of themselves. Straight out of the authoritarian playbook. 

Even the Clownzo-stacked Supreme Court has ruled against deadly Texor MAGAturd border measures.

Let that sink in, schleppy. 

The MAGAturd deflection point on the bipartisan immigration bill is pivoting that the Biden administration hasn't taken the issue seriously, so let's throw the baby out with the bathwater and dimiss the bill because a bill hasn't come up sooner, or that far-right MAGAturds label the Republican support as RINO.

Again, MAGAturdism and Clownzo cultism is RINO, just extremists who pander to the ignorant followers and uneducated.

Sad.

 

[Horseman 2,458]

3 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Even the Clownzo-stacked Supreme Court has ruled against deadly Texor MAGAturd border measures.

No they didnt.    Learn to read idiot. 

[Voltaire 5,316]

29 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

It's a bipartisan bill, and MAGAturds categorize the Republicans who support it as RINOS because they can't compromise, negotiate and even remotely accept anything to the left of themselves. Straight out of the authoritarian playbook. 

Even the Clownzo-stacked Supreme Court has ruled against deadly Texor MAGAturd border measures.

Let that sink in, schleppy. 

The MAGAturd deflection point on the bipartisan immigration bill is pivoting that the Biden administration hasn't taken the issue seriously, so let's throw the baby out with the bathwater and dimiss the bill because a bill hasn't come up sooner, or that far-right MAGAturds label the Republican support as RINO.

Again, MAGAturdism and Clownzo cultism is RINO, just extremists who pander to the ignorant followers and uneducated.

Sad.

 

You don’t know what’s behind door #2 but you aren’t alone. Neither does the media or most of the Senate. You just embrace it anyway. I don’t rightly know your position on border security as you seldom post on it, but you’re siding with Biden over Texas tips your hand that you don’t take it seriously as does your embracing the lie about President Trump's position.

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

19 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

You don’t know what’s behind door #2 but you aren’t alone. Neither does the media or most of the Senate. You just embrace it anyway. I don’t rightly know your position on border security as you seldom post on it, but you’re siding with Biden over Texas tips your hand that you don’t take it seriously as does your embracing the lie about President Trump's position.

I haven't sided with anyone. That's you siding me.

I pointed out that this is a bipartisan bill, which is a fact.

I pointed out that Trumpanzee worked to derail the bill, which is a fact.

I pointed out that the Trumpanzee-stacked Supreme Court ruled against Texor border-control measures, which is a fact.

I embrace facts, not No. 2 doors, conspiracies, reckless speculations, hypercatastrophizing and fear-mongering.

Nice try whatabouting the facts, but they are solid facts.

What you embrace is squishy at best, and you grasp those straws because you can't think for yourself and recognize facts over fabrication.

Sad.

[Voltaire 5,316]

7 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I haven't sided with anyone. That's you siding me.

I pointed out that this is a bipartisan bill, which is a fact.

I pointed out that Trumpanzee worked to derail the bill, which is a fact.

I pointed out that the Trumpanzee-stacked Supreme Court ruled against Texor border-control measures, which is a fact.

I embrace facts, not No. 2 doors, conspiracies, reckless speculations, hypercatastrophizing and fear-mongering.

Nice try whatabouting the facts, but they are solid facts.

What you embrace is squishy at best, and you grasp those straws because you can't think for yourself and recognize facts over fabrication.

Sad.

Well tell us the facts about the border deal then, because I don't know them. Maybe I'll agree with you. Just providing a link will do.

[Horseman 2,458]

If it was bipartisan it would made it out of the Senate no problem.   Some people just believe whatever they're told.  

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

12 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Well tell us the facts about the border deal then, because I don't know them. Maybe I'll agree with you. Just providing a link will do.

Whatever it is has bipartisan support, so why would the RINOS crap the bed and work to derail it?

Why are they scurrying around like ants in a freshly kicked mound when they don't know what's in it?

Thanks for proving my point.

Even the hint that a bipartisan immigration bill has some traction makes them fearful because they totally need immigration as the No. 1 issue to fear-monger in the Clownzo campaign. 

You're right. Let's see the bill before it gets judged and railed against.

 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

5 minutes ago, Horseman said:

If it was bipartisan it would made it out of the Senate no problem.   Some people just believe whatever they're told.  

There is a difference between bipartisan and getting the votes it needs to pass, you knuckle-dragging, Confederate-flag-waving tobacco spittoon. 

Bipartisan means it has support from both parties, not total approval from both parties.

Focking idiot.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Kinda hard for republicans to explain why they’re against this

[Voltaire 5,316]

8 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Kinda hard for republicans to explain why they’re against this

True.

You'll also note it's been hard for anyone to explain why they're for it as well.

And the reason for both of those conditions to be simultaneously true has been restated over and over again, many many times in this thread....

[IGotWorms 4,058]

8 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

True.

You'll also note it's been hard for anyone to explain why they're for it as well.

And the reason for both of those conditions to be simultaneously true has been restated over and over again, many many times in this thread....

I’m for it. Border is a problem. This law would give Biden the authority to close it

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

12 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

True.

You'll also note it's been hard for anyone to explain why they're for it as well.

And the reason for both of those conditions to be simultaneously true has been restated over and over again, many many times in this thread....

I'd like to think it's in the spirit of negotiation, compromise and getting problems solved, but the far right already is yipping, which bigly looks like a panic over having the rug of their biggest campaign issue yanked out from under them. 

[Voltaire 5,316]

4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

I’m for it. Border is a problem. This law would give Biden the authority to close it

More accurately, it could potentially force him to do some things he doesn't want to do.

[Gepetto 1,368]

7 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

I’m for it. Border is a problem. This law would give Biden the authority to close it

Which law? You think this is how laws are formed? What wording exactly are you calling "this law"?