Trump's NY Election Interference Trial - Trump is found guilty on all 34 counts

[Tree of Knowledge 1,869]

I could see a group of Feds like Patriot Front instigating a riot so the Biden Regime can use it as an excuse to come after all patriots.  Anyone voicing their displeasure of the verdict will be hunted down and stripped of their right to vote in November.  

[TBayXXXVII 2,552]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

You think people will riot if there is a non guilty verdict?

I'd bet against it, but I wouldn't be shocked.  I think the media and politicians will be a bigger threat than the public.

The origin of this tangent was if a jurist wrote a book.  We were just pointing out that historically, the Left is way more violent than the Right.

[edjr 6,602]

LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!

I want NY to burn to the ground!

[GutterBoy 2,899]

Just now, TBayXXXVII said:

I'd bet against it, but I wouldn't be shocked.  I think the media and politicians will be a bigger threat than the public.

The origin of this tangent was if a jurist wrote a book.  We were just pointing out that historically, the Left is way more violent than the Right.

Historically yes, but the leader of the right the past 8 years has been much more violent with his rhetoric than anyone from the left and it's not even close.  He orchestrated an attack on our capitol to overturn the election for focks sake.  Much more relevant than sh1t that happened 60 years ago.

[TBayXXXVII 2,552]

Just now, GutterBoy said:

Historically yes, but the leader of the right the past 8 years has been much more violent with his rhetoric than anyone from the left and it's not even close.  He orchestrated an attack on our capitol to overturn the election for focks sake.  Much more relevant than sh1t that happened 60 years ago.

"Yeah, but", thanks.  Moving on.

[Mike Honcho 5,287]

11 minutes ago, squistion said:

That is absurd. 

That is what passes as logic for these guys.  

[Mike Honcho 5,287]

1 minute ago, edjr said:

LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!

I want NY to burn to the ground!

How is that different from any other day from any other person who lives in Boston?

[edjr 6,602]

Just now, Mike Honcho said:

How is that different from any other day from any other person who lives in Boston?

This isn't a NY/Boston thing. I love NY and going there and I don't do the sports hate.

I want Boston and any other liberal run city to burn to the ground.

Michell Wu? Eric Adams?  

One at a time.

[GutterBoy 2,899]

3 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

"Yeah, but", thanks.  Moving on.

Sure, ignore the most violent and hate filled person in politics today, because it doesn't fit your agenda.  Smart move.

[TBayXXXVII 2,552]

9 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

He won't be in jail regardless.  It's all just a waste of time.

I think a heavy fine and house arrest & probation is a reasonable expectation.  That said, I put nothing past the liberals (politicians/activists/judges).

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

Just now, TBayXXXVII said:

I think a heavy fine and house arrest & probation is a reasonable expectation.  That said, I put nothing past the liberals (politicians/activists/judges).

Having a President who had been fined and on house arrest would be on par for our country.

[jonmx 2,429]

9 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Historically yes, but the leader of the right the past 8 years has been much more violent with his rhetoric than anyone from the left and it's not even close.  He orchestrated an attack on our capitol to overturn the election for focks sake.  Much more relevant than sh1t that happened 60 years ago.

You are a joke.  You asswipes hear Trump tell his followers to protest peacefully and you turn it into a call for an attack.  Just GTFO.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,121]

24 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

 

GutterD0uche: "This one instance is the same as our 1000+ instances!  1 = 1000+!!!  Gotcha!" 

Sorry pal, you lose again. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,552]

10 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Sure, ignore the most violent and hate filled person in politics today, because it doesn't fit your agenda.  Smart move.

If you say so.  LOL

[The Real timschochet 6,819]

4 minutes ago, jonmx said:

You are a joke.  You asswipes hear Trump tell his followers to protest peacefully and you turn it into a call for an attack.  Just GTFO.  

It will take longer than expected, but eventually Donald Trump will be prosecuted for what occurred on January 6. And then imprisoned: Justice will be served. 

[mattman7168 39]

For everyone saying all Trump's indictments are political, why did Trump announce he was running for president on November 15, 2022? Everyone agrees that was crazy early! But...he announced it so early because he knew these indictments were coming. He wanted to plant the seeds that his legal issues were political attacks. His supporters ate it up and still spit it out. Regardless, this has all played out exactly how he wanted it to, and it was all predicted here. The 2nd to last paragraph says it all, and it was written in 2022.

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

9 minutes ago, jonmx said:

You are a joke.  You asswipes hear Trump tell his followers to protest peacefully and you turn it into a call for an attack.  Just GTFO.  

Do you think Trump shares any responsibility for what happened that day?  Would those events still have happened if Trump didn't speak at all?

[jonmx 2,429]

18 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I think a heavy fine and house arrest & probation is a reasonable expectation.  That said, I put nothing past the liberals (politicians/activists/judges).

Why?  There is not one element of this crime that has been provided any proof of.   It would crazy, even with the most ridiculous jury instructions in history, to return a guilty verdict.   

1.  Cohen's claim that Trump directed his billing in a phone call was completely destroyed when it was shown that that 87 second phone call was for Cohen asking for protection against an online harassed.  

2.  Calling a payment tona Lawyer as legal services is accurate even if some of the payments were a reimbursement.

3.  Testimony showed Trump did not direct what category the accountant selected.  

4.  The bills and checks are not public records.  They are private records of a private company which no one should ever see, so there was no attempt to defraud the public.

5.  The billing and checks were all done after the election, so they had no possible influence on the election.  

So basically, this criminal fascist bastard of a judge will try to give jury instructions which say convict if you feel Trump is bad, and if the jury does not like Trump they might get a conviction.  But it will not be based on any law.  

[Tree of Knowledge 1,869]

2 minutes ago, mattman7168 said:

For everyone saying all Trump's indictments are political, why did Trump announce he was running for president on November 15, 2022? Everyone agrees that was crazy early! But...he announced it so early because he knew these indictments were coming. He wanted to plant the seeds that his legal issues were political attacks. His supporters ate it up and still spit it out. Regardless, this has all played out exactly how he wanted it to, and it was all predicted here. The 2nd to last paragraph says it all, and it was written in 2022.

Slate?  The far left predicted Trump would not roll over and let the leftists make an example of him?   GASP!!!!

[TBayXXXVII 2,552]

Just now, jonmx said:

Why?  There is not one element of this crime that has been provided any proof of.   It would crazy, even with the most ridiculous jury instructions in history, to return a guilty verdict.   

1.  Cohen's claim that Trump directed his billing in a phone call was completely destroyed when it was shown that that 87 second phone call was for Cohen asking for protection against an online harassed.  

2.  Calling a payment tona Lawyer as legal services is accurate even if some of the payments were a reimbursement.

3.  Testimony showed Trump did not direct what category the accountant selected.  

4.  The bills and checks are not public records.  They are private records of a private company which no one should ever see, so there was no attempt to defraud the public.

5.  The billing and checks were all done after the election, so they had no possible influence on the election.  

So basically, this criminal fascist bastard of a judge will try to give jury instructions which say convict of Trump is bad, and if the jury does not like Trump they might get a conviction.  But it will not be based on any law.  

You spent too much time on this post.  I don't care if there's proof or not... the city, the state, and the judge are doing everything they can to make sure there is a guilty verdict, and that's what I expect.  In NYC, the likelihood of a fair and impartial jury in a trial against Donald Trump is virtually impossible... I think we saw that with E. Jean Carroll trial.

[jonmx 2,429]

7 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

It will take longer than expected, but eventually Donald Trump will be prosecuted for what occurred on January 6. And then imprisoned: Justice will be served. 

On January 21, 2025, every January 6th victim will be released.  Investigations will done exposing the collusion between Pelosi, capital police, and the FBI to entrap citizens.  People within the FBI will be fired.  That will be the end result.  You little TDS fantasy will never happen. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,552]

Just now, jonmx said:

On January 21, 2025, every January 6th victim will be released.  Investigations will done exposing the collusion between Pelosi, capital police, and the FBI to entrap citizens.  People within the FBI will be fired.  That will be the end result.  You little TDS fantasy will never happen. 

I didn't follow the sentences of the people who were found guilty of crimes from Jan 6th.  Are you saying that their sentences will run out at that time or that Trump will pardon them on his last day in office?

[Tree of Knowledge 1,869]

3 minutes ago, jonmx said:

On January 21, 2025, every January 6th victim will be released.  Investigations will done exposing the collusion between Pelosi, capital police, and the FBI to entrap citizens.  People within the FBI will be fired.  That will be the end result.  You little TDS fantasy will never happen. 

I hope you are right.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,484]

The prosecution is planning on taking four hours plus for closing arguments. Further proof of this sham.  

[Mike Honcho 5,287]

8 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I didn't follow the sentences of the people who were found guilty of crimes from Jan 6th.  Are you saying that their sentences will run out at that time or that Trump will pardon them on his last day in office?

That would be Trump's first day in office.

[Voltaire 5,317]

1 hour ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

I think someone doxxed your business address.  We will start the riots there.  
 

(Kidding of course)

I feel bad but this deserves it. I owe you a thumbs up later.

[squistion 2,216]

9 minutes ago, jonmx said:

On January 21, 2025, every January 6th victim will be released.  Investigations will done exposing the collusion between Pelosi, capital police, and the FBI to entrap citizens.  People within the FBI will be fired.  That will be the end result.  You little TDS fantasy will never happen. 

Even the ones who violently assaulted police officers? It would probably not surprise anyone here that you feel the violent offenders (captured on camera) should be released to.

[thegeneral 3,236]

13 minutes ago, jonmx said:

On January 21, 2025, every January 6th victim will be released.  Investigations will done exposing the collusion between Pelosi, capital police, and the FBI to entrap citizens.  People within the FBI will be fired.  That will be the end result.  You little TDS fantasy will never happen. 

Will this be like the election fraud commission in 2016 and again in 2020

[squistion 2,216]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The prosecution is planning on taking four hours plus for closing arguments. Further proof of this sham.  

How is that proof of a sham?

[squistion 2,216]

https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1795456248172662891

Judge Merchan to jurors before closing arguments: "You are the finders of fact, and it is for you and for you alone to determine the facts from the evidence."

He reminded the jury that the "lawyers are not witnesses," and nothing in their summations constitutes "evidence."

"You and you alone are the judges of the facts in this case."

[squistion 2,216]

https://x.com/KatiePhang

Todd Blanche is up for Defense Closing:

[jonmx 2,429]

44 minutes ago, mattman7168 said:

For everyone saying all Trump's indictments are political, why did Trump announce he was running for president on November 15, 2022? Everyone agrees that was crazy early! But...he announced it so early because he knew these indictments were coming. He wanted to plant the seeds that his legal issues were political attacks. His supporters ate it up and still spit it out. Regardless, this has all played out exactly how he wanted it to, and it was all predicted here. The 2nd to last paragraph says it all, and it was written in 2022.

Could you be more stupid?  You are blaming Trump for the Democrats abusing the judicial system.  It is not the authoritarian bastards fault for bring political prosecutions, but Trump!  

[TBayXXXVII 2,552]

31 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

That would be Trump's first day in office.

Ugh, need new glasses... thought that was 2029. 

 

I don't think he should pardon anyone.  They broke the law, period.

[jonmx 2,429]

27 minutes ago, squistion said:

Even the ones who violently assaulted police officers? It would probably not surprise anyone here that you feel the violent offenders (captured on camera) should be released to.

Absolutely.  The whole event was entrapment and even so 99 percent  the charges were trumped up nonsense which would not have been charged unless they were anti-establishment types.  

[thegeneral 3,236]

Entrapment

[jonmx 2,429]

Just now, TBayXXXVII said:

Ugh, need new glasses... thought that was 2029. 

 

I don't think he should pardon anyone.  They broke the law, period.

1.  It was clearly entrapment

2.  Every Jan 6er was overcharged with enhancements which did not even apply.  

[Mike Honcho 5,287]

1 minute ago, jonmx said:

Absolutely.  The whole event was entrapment and even so 99 percent  the charges were trumped up nonsense which would not have been charged unless they were anti-establishment types.  

Can I have what you are smoking? 

[jonmx 2,429]

Just now, thegeneral said:

Entrapment

Yes you focking moron, entrapment.  Just like was found in the bogus Whitmer kidnapping, which was done by the exact same clowns. 

[squistion 2,216]

Just now, jonmx said:

Absolutely.  The whole event was entrapment and even so 99 percent  the charges were trumped up nonsense which would not have been charged unless they were anti-establishment types.  

A person can be entrapped into violently assaulting a police officer with clubs, flag poles, bear spray and other items they brought with them?

Seriously? If any of their attorneys made that argument it is no wonder they were found guilty. 

[Dozer FBG 325]

3 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Absolutely.  The whole event was entrapment and even so 99 percent  the charges were trumped up nonsense which would not have been charged unless they were anti-establishment types.  

You are STILL a delusional, ass kissing, whiney idiot.

Loser weak minded men like you are the problem with this GREAT nation.

Cry on, loser.