Trump's NY Election Interference Trial - Trump is found guilty on all 34 counts

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,002]

17 minutes ago, mattman7168 said:

Respond like a 15 year old, stomp your feet, call names, insult, and ignore facts written in plain English. Yeah, now I know what I'm dealing with. 

Or, conversely, respond like a petulant child when you're Snopes link blows up in your face and act like it's everyone else that is the problem. 

I see the liberal side of the house here at the GC has added yet another retard to their ranks. 

Seriously, you used a Snopes link to "back up" your argument.  That's about as dumb as it gets.   

[Engorgeous George 2,271]

2 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Judy was a teenager ya fockin perv$#@!   

alsoacartoon

When I was watching that show she was an older woman compared to my age then.  Regardless, yes I am a perv.

[squistion 2,101]

6 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Or, conversely, respond like a petulant child when you're Snopes link blows up in your face and act like it's everyone else that is the problem. 

I see the liberal side of the house here at the GC has added yet another retard to their ranks. 

Seriously, you used a Snopes link to "back up" your argument.  That's about as dumb as it gets.   

Again, when has Snopes been shown wrong in their fact checking, which they did not immediately correct when informed of their error?

[jonmx 2,425]

26 minutes ago, mattman7168 said:

Respond like a 15 year old, stomp your feet, call names, insult, and ignore facts written in plain English. Yeah, now I know what I'm dealing with. 

You are not only an idiot, you are too stupid to know when you have been completely embarrassed.   

[squistion 2,101]

Our favorite (or at least mine) Trump Trial reporter subbing for Lawrence O'Donnell tonight.

https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1795990987002560751

In the chair tonight for @Lawrence! Hope you’ll join us at 10 pm ET on @MSNBC!

[Engorgeous George 2,271]

7 minutes ago, squistion said:

Our favorite (or at least mine) Trump Trial reporter subbing for Lawrence O'Donnell tonight.

https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1795990987002560751

In the chair tonight for @Lawrence! Hope you’ll join us at 10 pm ET on @MSNBC!

I like to get to them before they grow fangs.

[jerryskids 6,704]

I'll admit that this Katie Phang is not hard on the eyes.  Relatively unusual for a progressive woman.   

[Mike Honcho 5,250]

 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

Cry harder fockwads

[shadrap 226]

10 hours ago, squistion said:

Again, when has Snopes been shown wrong in their fact checking, which they did not immediately correct when informed of their error?

you get tired of being another political hack?

Snopes' Biden blunder is the latest example of fact-checkers getting facts wrong | Fox News

[squistion 2,101]

2 minutes ago, shadrap said:

you get tired of being another political hack?

Snopes' Biden blunder is the latest example of fact-checkers getting facts wrong | Fox News

Per your link. Snopes issue a retraction when their error was pointed out to them, which confirms what I said. 

[shadrap 226]

6 minutes ago, squistion said:

Per your link. Snopes issue a retraction when their error was pointed out to them, which confirms what I said. 

sure, when pressured to do so.  enjoy life with head in sand seeing one side of things.  dementia maybe?

[squistion 2,101]

Just now, shadrap said:

sure, when pressured to do so.  enjoy life with head in sand seeing one side of things.  dementia maybe?

No, not just when pressured. Snopes has never claimed that their fact checking is infallible. When they have made an error and it is pointed out to them, they always make a correction. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,224]

Just now, squistion said:

No, not just when pressured. Snopes has never claimed that their fact checking is infallible. When they have made an error and it is pointed out to them, they always make a correction. 

They make a lot of corrections.  But they get out front with the propaganda. And then do it all over again. You just don’t won’t get it. You like being lied to. 

[edjr 6,580]

 

Lock him up!  Lock him up!  Lock him up!  

[GutterBoy 2,898]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You like being lied to. 

Says Tucker Carlson's biggest fan.

[Mike Honcho 5,250]

35 minutes ago, shadrap said:

you get tired of being another political hack?

Snopes' Biden blunder is the latest example of fact-checkers getting facts wrong | Fox News

Holy crap, the backwards hat controversy---boy that is a day that is etched in my memory, talk about a day the Earth stood still.   

[Sean Mooney 1,966]

22 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Says Tucker Carlson's biggest fan.

HT's whole gimmick here is lying. He gets off on it I think.

[Engorgeous George 2,271]

1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

Cry harder fockwads

Imagine.  People never cease to surprise me, which is to say disappoint and disgust me.

[squistion 2,101]

https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1796172721178468431

It’s Day 23/Day 2 of Verdict Watch of Trump’s NY election interference trial. The jury returns at 9:30 am ET to resume deliberations.

But first they will have 4 read backs by a court reporter of testimony by key witnesses, David Pecker and Michael Cohen.

The jury will also advise Judge Merchan as to whether it wants all of the jury instructions read back or just a select few.

Court is now in session.

[jonmx 2,425]

You have to be a brain-dead idiot to believe there is any legitimacy to this case and what the court is doing.   This is the most political and most rigged case in the history of this country.  What a focking disgrace. 

[squistion 2,101]

https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1796174526645944750

JUST IN: The jury has another note. (Note #3)

It appears the jury wants a readback of how they should consider the evidence, including what inferences they can draw, as well as a re-read of the instructions pertinent to Count One.

Judge Merchan says he interprets their request as asking to be re-read pages 7-35 of the jury instructions.

In addition: The jurors also asked for headphones for the laptop that is inside the deliberations room with them. Judge Merchan responds that he can provide headphones or speakers, and the parties ask that he give both to the jury.

The note becomes Court's Exhibit #6.

 

[Mike Honcho 5,250]

• Quote

   

  • Pecker’s testimony about his phone conversation with Trump in June 2016
  • Pecker's testimony about not finalizing Trump’s payment to AMI for Karen McDougal’s life rights
  • Pecker's testimony about the August 2015 Trump Tower meeting
  • Cohen’s testimony about the Trump Tower meeting

   

  I don't think that bodes well for Trump if they are going over the details of when this was all hatched up. 

[squistion 2,101]

https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1796177633463378346

The jury has entered the courtroom and has been seated.

The foreperson asks for the instructions to be read back first.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

7 minutes ago, jonmx said:

You have to be a brain-dead idiot to believe there is any legitimacy to this case and what the court is doing.   This is the most political and most rigged case in the history of this country.  What a focking disgrace. 

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[squistion 2,101]

Just now, Mike Honcho said:

• I don't think that bodes well for Trump if they are going over the details of when this was all hatched up. 

It is one of those think that cuts both ways and legal commentators are not all in agreement what it means.

But it disputes the claim that has been made that the case is rigged with jurors against Trump (why would they bother to have this testimony read back to them if they have already decided he is guilty?)

[squistion 2,101]

https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1796177875667685625

Judge Merchan now reads from the Jury Instructions beginning at Page 6 and will read through Page 35.

[shadrap 226]

33 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Holy crap, the backwards hat controversy---boy that is a day that is etched in my memory, talk about a day the Earth stood still.   

yea, amazing that snopes would lie about something so idiotic.

[squistion 2,101]

https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1796179599128137866

Several jurors are taking notes as Judge Merchan reads back this portion of the Jury Instructions.

Each and every juror is engaged and their body language appears that they are focused on Judge Merchan and what he is reading. Several continue to take notes as Merchan speaks.

[Strike 5,383]

I hope they are reading back, and the jury is taking notes on, the instruction that says if the jury finds that a witness lied on any point during their testimony that the jury can discount their entire testimony as not credible..  If so, the jury will be able to discount the entire prosecution case and this trial will be over by lunchtime.

[squistion 2,101]

https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1796187210363843024

The reading back of the jury instructions has concluded.

We are now on the court reporter doing the first read back of Pecker's testimony.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,224]

Like so many young people today, Sean Mooney seeks out victimhood status, and will embellish or even outright lie to achieve it. Jussie Smoolet. 

[squistion 2,101]

https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1796188485570740247

The court reporter is asking the questions and her colleague is seated in the witness stand answering them.

They've read back the second and the third portion read backs also so far.

To be clear: the two sides agreed on three of the four testimony readbacks last night. There was one disputed read back (Pecker's testimony regarding the 2015 TT meeting). The judge ruled this morning on what was going to be the extent of the read back.

 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,224]

There are two lawyers on this jury.  I can see one being an ignorant lunatic like Worms. But two? Only in NY folks, only in NY. 

[jonmx 2,425]

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

There are two lawyers on this jury.  I can see one being an ignorant lunatic like Worms. But two? Only in NY folks, only in NY. 

Yeah, I am not sure it was wise.  For a legit prosecution, having attorney's would help get a conviction.  But here any competent attorney would be appalled at the total disregard for law and justice unless they are TDS.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,224]

4 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Yeah, I am not sure it was wise.  For a legit prosecution, having attorney's would help get a conviction.  But here any competent attorney would be appalled at the total disregard for law and justice unless they are TDS.  

Two TDS lawyers in NYC is not only possible, but more than likely. Then you have to factor in what happens to them professionally if they hold out and Trump walks. A lawyer without a good name in NYC may as well hang it up.  Easily replaced. The left has already shown their willingness to ruin people with their do not hire lists for anyone that worked for Trump.  

[IGotWorms 4,057]

Wanting the instructions re-read on drawing inferences could be bad for Trump. What I’ve been saying all along is even if you completely disregard the entirety of cohen’s testimony, you can still easily get there through circumstantial evidence and inferences (which is how most cases are made)

[squistion 2,101]

https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1796199804332093441

The last read back has completed. The jury has left the courtroom to resume their deliberations.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,224]

14 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Wanting the instructions re-read on drawing inferences could be bad for Trump. What I’ve been saying all along is even if you completely disregard the entirety of cohen’s testimony, you can still easily get there through circumstantial evidence and inferences (which is how most cases are made)

Thinks Cohen provided credible testimony. 

[jonmx 2,425]

17 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Wanting the instructions re-read on drawing inferences could be bad for Trump. What I’ve been saying all along is even if you completely disregard the entirety of cohen’s testimony, you can still easily get there through circumstantial evidence and inferences (which is how most cases are made)

Have you ever heard of a trial where the jury was not given a hard copy of the jury instructions????  This judge is so bizzare.  It is as if the judge wants to control how the jury hears the instructions and to be able to spin it.