Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

[IGotWorms 4,058]

7 minutes ago, Reality said:

Spoiler alert, they'll figure it out after some negotiating. 

These responses are really stupid.

They probably will, but that doesn’t explain why little b1tch Trump reneged on the previously scheduled one. Only explanation is he’s afraid of Harris, which doesn’t fit this fake little “reality” you’ve concocted for yourself  

[Fireballer 2,642]

11 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

 

Here’s the problem Jerry: right now what you call “the leftie echo chamber” is encompassing most of the nation. And what you refer to as “most reasonable people” is in the minority. What you don’t seem to have picked up on yet is that the dynamics of this election have completely changed. 
 

Another point: you guys keep posting old statements by Kamala where she admittedly struggles at times to make her point. Since then she’s gotten about 1,000 times better in her delivery. Thats why none of this stuff is going to work. She’s become an extremely impressive speaker. She’s risen to the moment at hand. 

Holy smokes you’re blind.  1000 times better at what?  Delivery of predetermined statements?  That’s the measuring stick?  She still can stitch together coherent thoughts when challenged and without prepared statements.  She got destroyed in all debates in the primary and with Pence.  You can’t teach what she lacks.

[Reality 3,121]

2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

They probably will, but that doesn’t explain why little b1tch Trump reneged on the previously scheduled one. Only explanation is he’s afraid of Harris, which doesn’t fit this fake little “reality” you’ve concocted for yourself  

Noting to reneg on, there was never an agreement for a Trump\Harris debate. You sound really stupid each time to repeat it.

[Engorgeous George 2,331]

Just now, Fireballer said:

Holy smokes you’re blind.  1000 times better at what?  Delivery of predetermined statements?  That’s the measuring stick?  She still can stitch together coherent thoughts when challenged and without prepared statements.  

Neither candidate is a good speaker byany traditioanl sense of the term, yet both seem to appeal to their base, 

[thegeneral 3,214]

9 minutes ago, Reality said:

Spoiler alert, they'll figure it out after some negotiating.

Yep.

Trump with his ridiculous antics aside they will get a deal for multiple debates.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

Noting to reneg on, there was never an agreement for a Trump\Harris debate. You sound really stupid each time to repeat it.

And you sound really pathetically desperate when trying to waive away your boy’s b1tch move in the face of a supposedly stupid DEI hire  

[Reality 3,121]

2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

And you sound really pathetically desperate when trying to waive away your boy’s b1tch move in the face of a supposedly stupid DEI hire  

Really pathetically desperate, lol. 

You sound like a retard.

[Dizkneelande 1,101]

6 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Holy smokes you’re blind.  1000 times better at what?  Delivery of predetermined statements?  That’s the measuring stick?  She still can stitch together coherent thoughts when challenged and without prepared statements.  She got destroyed in all debates in the primary and with Pence.  You can’t teach what she lacks.

She can read off a teleprompter without saying “repeat the line”

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Just now, Reality said:

Really pathetically desperate, lol. 

You sound like a retard.

 

[squistion 2,202]

12 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

It’s not your business. Everyone who has asked has been paid, including a guy who is suspended until September. Thats all you need to know. 

Bet I know who that is, as there has been someone conspicuously absent from the Jan 6 thread. 

[Reality 3,121]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

 

Lol, that's what I thought.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

7 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Yep.

Trump with his ridiculous antics aside they will get a deal for multiple debates.

I dunno about multiple debates. That’s an interesting calculus for both. Trump doesn’t want to get his ass kicked multiple times but he also kinda needs them now given Harris’ apparently strong position. Harris probably doesn’t need multiple debates but you don’t want to put all your eggs in one basket either 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Just now, Reality said:

Lol, that's what I thought.

What, that you sound like you’re eight years old calling me a retard?

[Reality 3,121]

Just now, IGotWorms said:

What, that you sound like you’re eight years old calling me a retard?

Well, you do.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

Well, you do.

What? That doesn’t even make sense

[Reality 3,121]

8 minutes ago, Reality said:

Really pathetically desperate, lol. 

You sound like a retard.

 

4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

What, that you sound like you’re eight years old calling me a retard?

3 minutes ago, Reality said:

Well, you do.

Just now, IGotWorms said:

What? That doesn’t even make sense

Well shlt, it was kind of a joke but, you might actually be retarded. Sorry man, I didn't know. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

 

Well shlt, it was kind of a joke but, you might actually be retarded. Sorry man, I didn't know. 

Haha, it does change when you cut out half the posts  

[squistion 2,202]

5 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

What, that you sound like you’re eight years old calling me a retard?

They use insults here that would embarrass most middle school kids. 

[The Real timschochet 6,765]

26 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

Seems to me when I made an argument structured much as this one is structured you excoriated me publicly in several posts, and in extremely unkind terms for having done so.  Now, when it serves your purpose you make the same kind of argument.  Interesting.

Yep. I was wrong to do so and I apologized to you which you graciously accepted. 
Had I not apologized I might be a hypocrite for making this argument. 

[Reality 3,121]

Just now, IGotWorms said:

Haha, it does change when you cut out half the posts  

Oh boy, rough morning for you. 

Chin up fella, tomorrow is a new day. 

1 minute ago, squistion said:

They use insults here that would embarrass most middle school kids. 

Lol, I guess you conveniently missed his posts.

[The Real timschochet 6,765]

23 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Holy smokes you’re blind.  1000 times better at what?  Delivery of predetermined statements?  That’s the measuring stick?  She still can stitch together coherent thoughts when challenged and without prepared statements.  She got destroyed in all debates in the primary and with Pence.  You can’t teach what she lacks.

I don’t think you saw the same debate with Pence that I did. She won easily. She was also excellent in the primary debates. She lost because she was unable to carve out a space for herself between Biden and Bernie Sanders. 

[thegeneral 3,214]

9 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

I dunno about multiple debates. That’s an interesting calculus for both. Trump doesn’t want to get his ass kicked multiple times but he also kinda needs them now given Harris’ apparently strong position. Harris probably doesn’t need multiple debates but you don’t want to put all your eggs in one basket either 

I think they’ll get at least two. Trump looks like a big puss here if he only says it can be on Fox. Kamala says fine we also do one on CNN or what ever network he always cries about. 

[The Real timschochet 6,765]

Ex-Trump White House officials, dozens of Republicans endorse Kamala: 

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2024/08/04/trump-white-house-kamala-harris-election.html

[IGotWorms 4,058]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t think you saw the same debate with Pence that I did. She won easily. She was also excellent in the primary debates. She lost because she was unable to carve out a space for herself between Biden and Bernie Sanders. 

She definitely whooped Pence. I don’t think she was as good in the primary debates and did not run a good primary campaign in 2020. She has undoubtedly improved at campaigning since then but there’s still some unknown 

[Engorgeous George 2,331]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

She definitely whooped Pence. I don’t think she was as good in the primary debates and did not run a good primary campaign in 2020. She has undoubtedly improved at campaigning since then but there’s still some unknown 

I just wish, for once, in my fevered imaginings, that one of the candidates would come out and be honest, and so too their supporters by saying as bad as we are, we are the lesser of two evils.  So vote for evil, but the lesser one!

[5-Points 3,533]

3 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Again you’re wrong. He agreed to debate the Democratic nominee. 

As I already pointed out, as the incumbent potus, everybody with any common sense assumed that Trump would be debating Biden, because the dems had been gaslighting everybody about Biden's brain functionality. 

Plenty of us here told you Biden was gone mentally but you believed what the msm told you despite all of the evidence to the contrary. 

The bottom line is, the Dems changed the game by forcing the rightful nominee out and installing a new one, who nobody wanted or voted for. 

Trump is well within his rights to renegotiate the terms of any debate with a new opponent. 

You guys can  about it all you want. It's pathetic, but, honestly, it's to be expected at this point. It's what you do when you can't tilt the playing field in your favor. 

 

[thegeneral 3,214]

7 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

As I already pointed out, as the incumbent potus, everybody with any common sense assumed that Trump would be debating Biden, because the dems had been gaslighting everybody about Biden's brain functionality. 

Plenty of us here told you Biden was gone mentally but you believed what the msm told you despite all of the evidence to the contrary. 

The bottom line is, the Dems changed the game by forcing the rightful nominee out and installing a new one, who nobody wanted or voted for. 

Trump is well within his rights to renegotiate the terms of any debate with a new opponent. 

You guys can  about it all you want. It's pathetic, but, honestly, it's to be expected at this point. It's what you do when you can't tilt the playing field in your favor. 

 

Why would Trump be fine debating one person on ABC and not another?

[Fireballer 2,642]

16 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t think you saw the same debate with Pence that I did. She won easily. She was also excellent in the primary debates. She lost because she was unable to carve out a space for herself between Biden and Bernie Sanders. 

She doesn’t have it.  She crumbles when pressed.  I’ve seen people like her my entire career. They usually end up in logistics or the training academy. I’ve seen people be good managers, but lose their shat when placed in a pressure situation.  She’s book smart, I’m sure, but not a leader at all.  She’s a paper tiger.

[The Real timschochet 6,765]

2 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

She doesn’t have it.  She crumbles when pressed.  I’ve seen people like her my entire career. They usually end up in logistics or the training academy. I’ve seen people be good managers, but lose their shat when placed in a pressure situation.  She’s book smart, I’m sure, but not a leader at all.  She’s a paper tiger.

I think you’re wrong. But even if you were right I’d still have to take her over Trump. It’s not even a close question. 
But hey we’ll have 4 years to find out, right? 

[5-Points 3,533]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Why would Trump be fine debating one person on ABC and not another?

Trump, magnanimously agreed to Biden's "I'm cognitively impaired and bright lights and large crowds trigger my dementia" rules. 

Unless Commiela suffers from the same disabilities, she shouldn't be afforded the same concessions. 

It's really simple. The fact that so many of you have a hard time grasping that concept is telling. 

You don't think she can debate Trump without the special rules agreed upon for a demented old man. You're basically admitting she was a DEI hire and isn't fit for the job. 

[Cdub100 3,908]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I think you’re wrong. But even if you were right I’d still have to take her over Trump. It’s not even a close question. 
But hey we’ll have 4 years to find out, right? 

Of course you would. It's in your DNA to destroy the countries you invade. It's been proven at a minium 109 times through out history.

[squistion 2,202]

7 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

As I already pointed out, as the incumbent potus, everybody with any common sense assumed that Trump would be debating Biden, because the dems had been gaslighting everybody about Biden's brain functionality. 

Plenty of us here told you Biden was gone mentally but you believed what the msm told you despite all of the evidence to the contrary. 

The bottom line is, the Dems changed the game by forcing the rightful nominee out and installing a new one, who nobody wanted or voted for. 

Trump is well within his rights to renegotiate the terms of any debate with a new opponent. 

You guys can  about it all you want. It's pathetic, but, honestly, it's to be expected at this point. It's what you do when you can't tilt the playing field in your favor. 

There is so much wrong with the above.

1) We believed what our eyes told us about Biden, not the MSM. With the exception of one Malaprop, he looked fine for 90 minutes in The State Of The Union address, including an unscripted call-and-response with Republicans. No one can explain how he did that if he was gone mentally.

2) Biden was not forced out. The decision ultimately was his and he did what he felt was best for the country

3) It is not true,that  nobody wanted Kamala as evidenced by the enthusiasm and excitement by Democrats since Biden's announcement (not to mention the record amount of fundraising).

4) When we voted for Biden we were also voting for Harris (Fun Fact: both names were on the ballot)

5) Yes, Trump is within his rights to try to renegotiate what had been agree upon, but Kamala is within her rights not to accept it and is dealing from a position of strength as it is a Win/Win proposition for her if they debate or they don't.  

[Fireballer 2,642]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I think you’re wrong. But even if you were right I’d still have to take her over Trump. It’s not even a close question. 
But hey we’ll have 4 years to find out, right? 

It’s obvious Tim.  You take her from the comfort of pre-determined exchanges, she’s lost.  It’s like night and day.  You can pull up any footage of her and quickly tell when she’s pressured v/s rehearsed and prepared.  She vomits word salads. 

[The Real timschochet 6,765]

8 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

Of course you would. It's in your DNA to destroy the countries you invade. It's been proven at a minium 109 times through out history.

Ah yes my Jewish DNA. Can’t help yourself can you? 

[League Champion 1,911]

53 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I think they’ll get at least two. Trump looks like a big puss here if he only says it can be on Fox. Kamala says fine we also do one on CNN or what ever network he always cries about. 

Our cities are burning.

 

[thegeneral 3,214]

29 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Trump, magnanimously agreed to Biden's "I'm cognitively impaired and bright lights and large crowds trigger my dementia" rules. 

Unless Commiela suffers from the same disabilities, she shouldn't be afforded the same concessions. 

It's really simple. The fact that so many of you have a hard time grasping that concept is telling. 

You don't think she can debate Trump without the special rules agreed upon for a demented old man. You're basically admitting she was a DEI hire and isn't fit for the job. 

He said he didn’t want to debate on ABC now because of a lawsuit or something, wasn’t that lawsuit a thing before? He only wants to debate on FOX makes him sound like a betch.

[seafoam1 3,025]

20 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Ah yes my Jewish DNA. Can’t help yourself can you? 

There is no direct correlation  between the Jews and the pansy liberal mind. They are seperate things. 

[The Real timschochet 6,765]

4 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

There is no direct correlation  between the Jews and the pansy liberal mind. They are seperate things. 

Talk to @Cdub100

[seafoam1 3,025]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Talk to @Cdub100

You are both liberals? You two share the same thoughts and you can't speak for yourself? 

[5-Points 3,533]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

He said he didn’t want to debate on ABC now because of a lawsuit or something, wasn’t that lawsuit a thing before? He only wants to debate on FOX makes him sound like a betch.

The suit against ABC is superfluous. 

The terms agreed to against one opponent don't apply to a different opponent. 

It ain't rocket surgery. Unless you want to make excuses.