Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

[thegeneral 2,915]

5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I think most people have forgotten about Trumps poor showing and are now  being shown Kamala’s lies and ABC pulling punches on her behalf.  

Trump thinks he won

[JuneJuly 193]

Undecided Voters Not Swayed by the Debate - Times 

 

[JuneJuly 193]

Independent Voters Tracked with Trump During the Debate. 

[thegeneral 2,915]

6 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Laura Loomer looks a lot like the Red Woman from Game of Thrones. 

A cheap facsimile. Plastic surgeons can only do so much!

[squistion 1,954]

46 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I didn’t say it was cool. I wrote I didn’t have a problem with it so long as he was referring to only those who were violent felons. You’re correct that reading is fundamental and you need to read what I wrote a little more carefully.

You also need to realize something; the only reason that @HellToupee uses that term is to trigger you. He mentions it in the exact same way Kamala mentioned crowd size in the debate: because he knows it will get a reaction from you every time. And it does. 

Which means that referring to Latinos like that is cool for you, as I suspected.

I have him on ignore, so he isn't triggering me by saying that as I don't see it, but it has gained your acceptance by repeating it. 

[JuneJuly 193]

13 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Trump thinks he won

Data.  Your probably not familiar with it. 

 

 

[TrailGuy 552]

Anyone who thinks trump won the debate is dumber than a cat eating Haitian.

[thegeneral 2,915]

9 minutes ago, JuneJuly said:

Data.  Your probably not familiar with it. 

 

 

 

[thegeneral 2,915]

12 minutes ago, JuneJuly said:

Data.  Your probably not familiar with it. 

 

 

 

[thegeneral 2,915]

13 minutes ago, JuneJuly said:

Data.  Your probably not familiar with it. 

 

 

https://www.investing.com/news/politics/kamalaharris-extends-lead-over-trump-reutersipsos-poll-shows-3614218

[thegeneral 2,915]

9 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Anyone who thinks trump won the debate is dumber than a cat eating Haitian.

Everyone who watched who is honest knows it was a pretty bad beatdown. Will it matter is another issue. 

[seafoam1 2,803]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Everyone who watched who is honest knows it was a pretty bad beatdown. Will it matter is another issue. 

True. Trump annihilated her. But libtards are good at cheating in elections. Who knows at this point? 

[JuneJuly 193]

14 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Anyone who thinks trump won the debate is dumber than a cat eating Haitian.

You should just delete your account right now with the crap you posted in the cat eating thread.  Oooof.  Yikes.  

[JuneJuly 193]

15 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

 

Slingshot Strategies?  The Democratic firm working for New Youk congressmen. 

Jesus dude. Vet your Twitter links for fok sake.  

[thegeneral 2,915]

3 minutes ago, JuneJuly said:

Slingshot Strategies?  The Democratic firm working for New Your congressmen. 

Jesus dude. Vet your Twitter links for fok sake.  

You posted a handful of twat “independents” from a Fox News group spinning dials

[JuneJuly 193]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

You posted a handful of twat “independents” from a Fox News group spinning dials

Yes, news reporting is almost dead in the country.  But it's what we have. 

You're saying our news might be lying with fake independents. I'm say I know for sure your link is lying, they work for the democrats.  

I've got some good books on critical thinking if you'd like to borrow them. 

[thegeneral 2,915]

Just now, JuneJuly said:

Yes, news reporting is almost dead in the country.  But it's what we have. 

You're saying our news might be lying with fake independents. I'm say I know for sure your link is lying, they work for the democrats.  

I've got some good books on critical thinking if you'd like to borrow them. 

I’m saying they probably had Sean Hannity on one of those dials dumbass

It was clear who won the debate, everyone who watched it saw it. Big puss Don said “no mas”. He will go back to getting his interviews from TikTokers and doing pep rallies. It’s actually pretty smart.

[The Real timschochet 6,441]

The people who thought Kamala lost her momentum last week should check out her rally in NC today. Crazy. 

[IndyColtsFan 325]

DTIAFP.

[Sean Mooney 1,939]

9 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Well Sean, I don't know why anyone cares who Tay Tay endorses, but I'm being told by the Left that it's a big thing.  Hundreds of thousands of adults who weren't registered to vote did so through her link, after Swift posted about her position on the election.  But don't vote just because of her, do your own research!

 

Well Jerry, it seems like a lot of people here seem to care about who Tay Tay endorses. They didn't seem to have a problem with who Hulk Hogan or Kid Rock endorsed. Perhaps you could point me to some of those posts of outrage from you or some of the other people skyscreaming in here. And I know you'll say "Where are the posts of people mocking who Kid Rock wants to vote for but not Tay Tay." To that- I'll say- who cares who Kid Rock is voting for similar to who cares who Taylor Swift is voting for.?

It is good that 407,000 people (so far) signed up to vote because of Taylor Swift. I think we should aim for 100% of people eligible to vote to be registered for voting but that will never happen. Do we not want people registered to vote now? With respect to the 407K number it is a story of some level that arguably the biggest singer in the world encouraged people to register to vote and was successful to a degree.

Should people do their own research? Of course. I assume there will be idiots who vote for Kamala Harris just because Taylor Swift will. I'm sure there are idiots who will vote for Donald Trump just because Hulk Hogan and Kid Rock will. They are all idiots. 

But arguably not as big an idiot as the people who are very deeply triggered here in this thread by Taylor supporting Kamala Harris. 

[Sean Mooney 1,939]

8 hours ago, thegeneral said:

 

The people who skyscream about "the biased media" literally post stuff from FOX News to support their point not realizing (or just plain outright stupidly not seeing) that they are just as manipulated as anyone else by biased media

[Hardcore troubadour 14,950]

11 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Well Jerry, it seems like a lot of people here seem to care about who Tay Tay endorses. They didn't seem to have a problem with who Hulk Hogan or Kid Rock endorsed. Perhaps you could point me to some of those posts of outrage from you or some of the other people skyscreaming in here. And I know you'll say "Where are the posts of people mocking who Kid Rock wants to vote for but not Tay Tay." To that- I'll say- who cares who Kid Rock is voting for similar to who cares who Taylor Swift is voting for.?

It is good that 407,000 people (so far) signed up to vote because of Taylor Swift. I think we should aim for 100% of people eligible to vote to be registered for voting but that will never happen. Do we not want people registered to vote now? With respect to the 407K number it is a story of some level that arguably the biggest singer in the world encouraged people to register to vote and was successful to a degree.

Should people do their own research? Of course. I assume there will be idiots who vote for Kamala Harris just because Taylor Swift will. I'm sure there are idiots who will vote for Donald Trump just because Hulk Hogan and Kid Rock will. They are all idiots. 

But arguably not as big an idiot as the people who are very deeply triggered here in this thread by Taylor supporting Kamala Harris. 

TL/dr

[Sean Mooney 1,939]

So a user on X at the handle @docnetyoutube puts out a Tweet saying he has an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower saying the debate was rigged and Kamala was given the answers ahead of time. Also, ABC promised Kamala they would only fact check Trump and not her. So someone from ABC with a massive news story like this- went to a user on X with 105,000 followers to break this massive story wide open?

Then a few other accounts of people deeply associated with MAGA (@MILALOVESJOE- 68,000 followers, @chuck callesto- 821,000 followers, and @realbengeller- 24,000 followers) amplify the story by posting it- none of them supplying evidence BTW- and then MAGA world picks this up and decides this is the smoking gun that proves the point that they were already trying to make BEFORE the debate ended on Tuesday night. Do you all really not see how you are being manipulated by fake social media stories?

1.) Trump lost the debate. It was easily his worst performance in a debate in the 9 years he has been part of the election cycles. He has been considerably better before eating up the GOP candidates in 2016 and holding serve against Hillary in that year as well.

2.) It may not matter that he lost the debate because he still has lots of supporters and the flux of the perception of the economy doesn't exactly help Kamala.

3.) There is no vendetta against Trump by the media. This is the media that knows Trump stories sell to the public. If anything I would wager there are a lot of people in the "biased left MSM" that secretly want Trump to win because it means they get 4 more years of stories out of him. 

4.) The real issue here is- with as unpopular a presidency as Biden/Harris have this should be a cakewalk for the GOP candidate. Instead the GOP again put forth a very unlikable candidate which is taking what should be a rout and turning it into a close game late in the 4th. 

[Sean Mooney 1,939]

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

TL/dr

More like you just can't read. 

Also, step aside and let the adults discuss things there rent a cop. 

[Fireballer 2,639]

40 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Well Jerry, it seems like a lot of people here seem to care about who Tay Tay endorses. They didn't seem to have a problem with who Hulk Hogan or Kid Rock endorsed. Perhaps you could point me to some of those posts of outrage from you or some of the other people skyscreaming in here. And I know you'll say "Where are the posts of people mocking who Kid Rock wants to vote for but not Tay Tay." To that- I'll say- who cares who Kid Rock is voting for similar to who cares who Taylor Swift is voting for.?

It is good that 407,000 people (so far) signed up to vote because of Taylor Swift. I think we should aim for 100% of people eligible to vote to be registered for voting but that will never happen. Do we not want people registered to vote now? With respect to the 407K number it is a story of some level that arguably the biggest singer in the world encouraged people to register to vote and was successful to a degree.

Should people do their own research? Of course. I assume there will be idiots who vote for Kamala Harris just because Taylor Swift will. I'm sure there are idiots who will vote for Donald Trump just because Hulk Hogan and Kid Rock will. They are all idiots. 

But arguably not as big an idiot as the people who are very deeply triggered here in this thread by Taylor supporting Kamala Harris. 

I asked someone here yesterday with no response, but there are actually 407k new voters because of Swift?  Where is that data from?

[Sean Mooney 1,939]

1 minute ago, Fireballer said:

I asked someone here yesterday with no response, but there are actually 407k new voters because of Swift?  Where is that data from?

From the New York Times via the organizations listed (I also overshot the number by a thousand...my mistake):
 

Quote

 

Her post on Instagram included a link to Vote.gov, a website run by two federal agencies, the General Services Administration and the Election Assistance Commission. About 406,000 people clicked on the link in the 24 hours after Ms. Swift posted it, according to a spokeswoman for the G.S.A.

That link accounted for more than half of the roughly 727,000 visitors Vote.gov received from Tuesday to Wednesday. The remainder was likely driven by the debate itself. Last week, from Sept. 3-9, the site received an average of about 30,000 visitors per day, according to the agency.

 

Now I guess technically vote.gov takes you to your state registering page so perhaps not everyone who clicked the link actually signed up to vote fully. I would assume in a week or two we might know the actual number of new voters from this event. 

[HellToupee 1,591]

13 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C_1eMoHNXTj/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
 

epic. Can’t see a reason ANYONE would oppose 

This is a great proposal. Of course the unproductive class won’t like it but it’s good for workers 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,706]

11 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

This is a great proposal. Of course the unproductive class won’t like it but it’s good for workers 

So good Kamala will announce it as her own to thunderous applause from MSM?

[MDC 7,135]

Trump says he won’t do another debate. Probably a good call. He got bullied, mocked and belittled during the last one. 

[seafoam1 2,803]

Liberals are still flailing about and trying to get in their zingers. Saying the same thing they've been screaming for the past 10 years 

All that shows is after that debate that Trump once again destroyed not only his on stage libtard opponent, but also all the TDS infected liberal voters running around this country. They don't know what to do. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,485]

16 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Yeah that’s probably it. 

Hey, you finally made a statement that makes you seem reasonable.

[TBayXXXVII 2,485]

16 hours ago, MDC said:

I agree, Don did very well. His bits about migrant dog eating and post birth abortion were particularly powerful. I look forward to an encore.

You don't even need to watch anything.  He was the President for 4 years and the country was going great until COVID.  She's been in the W.H. for 3+ years and the countries been crappy the whole time.  I mean, why do you need either of them to pander for 2 hours on National TV?  You're a sucker for watching it.

[thegeneral 2,915]

1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Hey, you finally made a statement that makes you seem reasonable.

Nah…Trump is

[Engorgeous George 2,142]

16 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

She won’t agree to any terms that would put the debate on any halfway neutral footing.  She has said no to Fox.  We now know she was given the questions prior to the debate, was told she would not be fact checked and Trump would be, and she was allowed to wear an earpiece.  Additionally, she had a sorority sister as a moderator.  
 

 

That all sounds less than equitable, and from a party and a candidate who supposedly champion equity, but is that all true? 

[MDC 7,135]

7 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

You don't even need to watch anything.  He was the President for 4 years and the country was going great until COVID.  She's been in the W.H. for 3+ years and the countries been crappy the whole time.  I mean, why do you need either of them to pander for 2 hours on National TV?  You're a sucker for watching it.

All this was true before Trump got onstage and allowed himself to be bullied and publicly humiliated by a nobody. His handlers know now that he’s too mentally weak to not get easily baited and beclowned. 

I watched purely for the lolz and it delivered!  

[Mike Honcho 5,101]

11 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

As a general rule I think Haitians make terrific Americans and their presence anywhere in this country is a benefit to that place. As an even more general rule I believe this of all migrants. And I hate bigotry. 

 

[Horseman 2,369]

59 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

From the New York Times via the organizations listed (I also overshot the number by a thousand...my mistake):
 

Now I guess technically vote.gov takes you to your state registering page so perhaps not everyone who clicked the link actually signed up to vote fully. I would assume in a week or two we might know the actual number of new voters from this event. 

Guys humiliating themselves by keeping track of clicks for a pigeon nosed crappy pop singer. 

[seafoam1 2,803]

11 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

That all sounds less than equitable, and from a party and a candidate who supposedly champion equity, but is that all true? 

Who the hell cares about the liberal version of 'equity'? It's farcical. 

[seafoam1 2,803]

1 minute ago, Horseman said:

Guys humiliating themselves by keeping track of clicks for a pigeon nosed crappy pop singer. 

If it's not the TDS kicking in, it's the little girl bands' political opinions that the liberals follow that gets them all fired up in life.  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,950]

14 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Guys humiliating themselves by keeping track of clicks for a pigeon nosed crappy pop singer. 

So true.  Guys like Mooney are fortunate that guys like me are polite and just don’t push them out of the way when we want something.