Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

[thegeneral 3,214]

6 minutes ago, jonmx said:

 Lol...lunatics.  Harris has a very slim chance of winning.   So-called mainstream pollsters early polling in presidential races have heavily slanted towards Democrats in every election since at least Reagan.  The Real numbers nationally are anywhere from Trump +3 to Harris +1.  Trump wins every time if those numbers stay the same.  It is so cute that lefitist idiots keep believing the fraud pollsters.  

The Thomas Miller disagrees!

[jonmx 2,429]

4 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

The Thomas Miller disagrees!

Wow, he kind of predicted one presidential race correctly.  Betting markets are biased towards propaganda.  Good luck with that.  

[Fnord 2,273]

30 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Many people are saying landslide

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13868199/Kamala-Harris-grows-leads-key-swing-states-data-scientist-correctly-called-election-makes-shock-blowout-claim-unnerve-Donald-Trump.html

I'm not buying it, but we can hope. If it's not particularly close, at least it takes some of the wind out of the inevitable "FRAUD!!!" claims we're going to be inundated with.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,438]

26 minutes ago, jonmx said:

 Lol...lunatics.  Harris has a very slim chance of winning.   So-called mainstream pollsters early polling in presidential races have heavily slanted towards Democrats in every election since at least Reagan.  The Real numbers nationally are anywhere from Trump +3 to Harris +1.  Trump wins every time if those numbers stay the same.  It is so cute that lefitist idiots keep believing the fraud pollsters.  

I wouldn’t say slim. Life on the line I’m picking her. Media, money,  cheat game all strong. She’s an incredibly weak candidate,  but I’d favor her based on those three aspects.  I’m just glad blue collar working people are seeing the light.  Bodes well for the future. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

Many people are saying landslide

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13868199/Kamala-Harris-grows-leads-key-swing-states-data-scientist-correctly-called-election-makes-shock-blowout-claim-unnerve-Donald-Trump.html

I remember when they were saying the same thing about Hillary too. 

[HellToupee 1,778]

1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

Many people are saying landslide

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13868199/Kamala-Harris-grows-leads-key-swing-states-data-scientist-correctly-called-election-makes-shock-blowout-claim-unnerve-Donald-Trump.html

Sounds a lot like timmay 

[thegeneral 3,214]

2 hours ago, jonmx said:

Wow, he kind of predicted one presidential race correctly.  Betting markets are biased towards propaganda.  Good luck with that.  

You seem like a fun guy to hang with.

[thegeneral 3,214]

1 hour ago, HellToupee said:

Sounds a lot like timmay 

Landslide

[thegeneral 3,214]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I remember when they were saying the same thing about Hillary too. 

You do hahahahaha

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

16 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

You do hahahahaha

We all do.  I remember when you guys were all giddy that Hillary was going to just steamroll Trump.

So, yeah, that happened.  Just like your doing now. 

[thegeneral 3,214]

5 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

We all do.  I remember when you guys were all giddy that Hillary was going to just steamroll Trump.

So, yeah, that happened.  Just like your doing now. 

Tell me more. Fascinating!

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

7 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Tell me more. Fascinating!

I don't need to!  You were there doing it!!! 

Like you're doing now!!!! 

[thegeneral 3,214]

4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I don't need to!  You were there doing it!!! 

Like you're doing now!!!! 

Have you ever considered doing a newsletter or podcast?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

16 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Have you ever considered doing a newsletter or podcast?

No amount of distraction by you is going to change the fact you're acting the same way now as you did when Hillary was running.  

You and the rest of the liberal retards were 200% SURE she was going to steamroll.  Just like you're doing now with Kamala.

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.  i hope you're readying yourself.

[Reality 3,121]

Yup, landslide. Go with that. 

Kamala is polling worse at the same point than Biden & Hillary, definitely landslide...

[TrailGuy 554]

Trump tonight says it's the Jews fault if he loses.

Same day his endorsed candidate gets outed as a Nazi.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

12 minutes ago, Reality said:

Yup, landslide. Go with that. 

Kamala is polling worse at the same point than Biden & Hillary, definitely landslide...

Literally acting like they were in 2016.  How did that turn out? 

[The Real timschochet 6,769]

An electoral landslide is certainly possible- I could see Harris winning every battleground state. It’s entirely possible. On the other hand I could see her winning a very close contest decided basically by Pennsylvania. And I could see her losing a close contest by losing Pennsylvania- that could happen quite easily too. 
 

But I don’t see Trump winning a landslide. If Trump wins it’s going to be close. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,350]

8 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Trump tonight says it's the Jews fault if he loses.

Same day his endorsed candidate gets outed as a Nazi.

oh yah, I am sure an endorsed candidate is a Nazi, spare me

 

[TrailGuy 554]

Just now, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

oh yah, I am sure an endorsed candidate is a Nazi, spare me

 

A self proclaimed black Nazi no less!

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,350]

Just now, TrailGuy said:

A self proclaimed black Nazi no less!

im sure

 

[The Real timschochet 6,769]

Robinson is going down but we knew that before these latest revelations. The real question is will he carry Trump with him? 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,350]

5 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

A self proclaimed black Nazi no less!

 

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Robinson is going down but we knew that before these latest revelations. The real question is will he carry Trump with him? 

I am sure, you guys are supposed to give the black man the benefit of the doubt, I mean don't be hypocrits

he says it wasn't him, and so what if it is, thats like if I ran and they used the crap we post here like it means anything

if he likes tranny porn who cares, you guys should love him for that

[thegeneral 3,214]

30 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

No amount of distraction by you is going to change the fact you're acting the same way now as you did when Hillary was running.  

You and the rest of the liberal retards were 200% SURE she was going to steamroll.  Just like you're doing now with Kamala.

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.  i hope you're readying yourself.

No way!

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

29 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

No way!

Fo Sho!

[BrahmaBulls 765]

34 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Robinson is going down 

Like Kamala did?

[Beaker15 242]

55 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

An electoral landslide is certainly possible- I could see Harris winning every battleground state. It’s entirely possible. On the other hand I could see her winning a very close contest decided basically by Pennsylvania. And I could see her losing a close contest by losing Pennsylvania- that could happen quite easily too. 
 

But I don’t see Trump winning a landslide. If Trump wins it’s going to be close. 

Trump will win in a landslide 

[jonmx 2,429]

10 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

An electoral landslide is certainly possible- I could see Harris winning every battleground state. It’s entirely possible. On the other hand I could see her winning a very close contest decided basically by Pennsylvania. And I could see her losing a close contest by losing Pennsylvania- that could happen quite easily too. 
 

But I don’t see Trump winning a landslide. If Trump wins it’s going to be close. 

You are brainwashed.  Trump could easily get 311 EVs.  Kamala's supposed lead is given by fraudulant polls which are assuming a makeup of an obscene weighting of Democrat voters, some polls assuming 50 percent Democrats when it should be closer to 35.   Kamala has no chance in Ohio or Geogia and Pennselvania is a long shot. 

[Dizkneelande 1,101]

34 minutes ago, jonmx said:

You are brainwashed.  Trump could easily get 311 EVs.  Kamala's supposed lead is given by fraudulant polls which are assuming a makeup of an obscene weighting of Democrat voters, some polls assuming 50 percent Democrats when it should be closer to 35.   Kamala has no chance in Ohio or Geogia and Pennselvania is a long shot. 

2020 Wisconsin polls had Biden +10 on Nov. 1 and he barely won by 20k probably fraudulent votes. She’s toast. 

[TrailGuy 554]

12 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

2020 Wisconsin polls had Biden +10 on Nov. 1 and he barely won by 20k probably fraudulent votes. She’s toast. 

Why probably fraudulent?  Evidence?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,438]

39 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

2020 Wisconsin polls had Biden +10 on Nov. 1 and he barely won by 20k probably fraudulent votes. She’s toast. 

True. Zuckerberg and his unsecured in the middle of nowhere ballot drop boxes won’t be in play this time.  But Madison and Milwaukee will try and to make up for it. It will be more difficult,  but not impossible. The democrats cheat game is strong in the hood. 

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

14 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I wouldn’t say slim. Life on the line I’m picking her. Media, money,  cheat game all strong. She’s an incredibly weak candidate,  but I’d favor her based on those three aspects.  I’m just glad blue collar working people are seeing the light.  Bodes well for the future. 

You just made every liberal here a Trump supporter.

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

11 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

An electoral landslide is certainly possible- I could see Harris winning every battleground state. It’s entirely possible. On the other hand I could see her winning a very close contest decided basically by Pennsylvania. And I could see her losing a close contest by losing Pennsylvania- that could happen quite easily too. 
 

But I don’t see Trump winning a landslide. If Trump wins it’s going to be close. 

An electoral landslide is only possible in that anything is possible. But it probably has less than a 2% chance at best. I just don't believe the political makeup of the country and the system anymore will lead to that unless the Republicans can somehow someday swing California or the Democrats can somehow swing Texas. But even if that were to happen I would venture that is because of changing demographics of voter makeups in other states. So the Dems might lose California but those people relocate to like Texas or Florida and swing those states the other way. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,438]

Up in the morning and out to school

The teacher is teaching the golden rule

American history and practical math 

You work your fingers to the bone hoping to pass 

Ring ring goes the bell 

[jonmx 2,429]

1 hour ago, Dizkneelande said:

2020 Wisconsin polls had Biden +10 on Nov. 1 and he barely won by 20k probably fraudulent votes. She’s toast. 

All the polls which they call A+ polls had numerous double digits misses in their state polling and missed every time in favor of Democrats.  All the polling they dismiss as having right bias stayed within polling error margins.   Their fantasy that the media and their polls are accurate and unbiased is laughable.  They are nothing but mouthpieces for the elitist authoritarians who have wrecked this country over the last decades. 

[jonmx 2,429]

The spineless bootlickers on this forum sickens me.   They are too dumb to even realize they are manipulated cult members who blindly support corrupt authoritarians.   Really dumb bastards who are not worth engaging and I am happy the cowards only respond with laughing emojis.  It displays just how pathetic they are. 

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

1 minute ago, jonmx said:

The spineless bootlickers on this forum sickens me.   They are too dumb to even realize they are manipulated cult members who blindly support corrupt authoritarians.   Really dumb bastards who are not worth engaging and I am happy the cowards only respond with laughing emojis.  It displays just how pathetic they are. 

Before I leave an emoji- which ones are acceptable to you?

[jonmx 2,429]

12 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Before I leave an emoji- which ones are acceptable to you?

I could not care less.  If spineless idiot bastards only response is an anonymous emoji they are pathetic losers who are incapable of making a logical argument.  

[MDC 7,431]

2 hours ago, jonmx said:

You are brainwashed.  Trump could easily get 311 EVs.  Kamala's supposed lead is given by fraudulant polls which are assuming a makeup of an obscene weighting of Democrat voters, some polls assuming 50 percent Democrats when it should be closer to 35.   Kamala has no chance in Ohio or Geogia and Pennselvania is a long shot. 

Just so you know, the one laughing emoji on this post was from me.  

[Rabbit Range 51]

3 hours ago, TrailGuy said:

Why probably fraudulent?  Evidence?

Evidence? Well, they have a lot of theories, just no evidence. It's strange how they've never found any evidence whatsoever to back up the rantings of a pathological liar.