Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

[Horseman 2,353]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

538 has em tied. Their simulations have Kamala winning a couple more times out of 100.

Fair.  They also have Trump ahead in more battleground states.  Let Tim know, would ya?   

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,828]

4 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

I will be here with a bucket to collect your tears. I could not be more certain.

I like the confidence.  is that confidence going to carry you thru the next 4 years if Trump wins?

I don't want to see you burning down neighborhoods, looting businesses and the like that the left likes to do when they don't get their way.  Just want to be sure you're going to stay above the fray.

[OldMaid 2,129]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I like the confidence.  is that confidence going to carry you thru the next 4 years if Trump wins?

I don't want to see you burning down neighborhoods, looting businesses and the like that the left likes to do when they don't get their way.  Just want to be sure you're going to stay above the fray.

Enough Max. I’m a middle aged white woman, who lives in California, I’ll be fine.

[Beaker15 233]

1 minute ago, OldMaid said:

Enough Max. I’m a middle aged white woman, who lives in California, I’ll be fine.

Explains a lot.  

[thegeneral 2,883]

It’s been said…but that Kamala is behind it with a tiny lead in these battleground polls is no bueno.

Sure they may have adjusted their methods of collecting info or whatever but this is bad news for the team blue tie.

[OldMaid 2,129]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

It’s been said…but that Kamala is behind it with a tiny lead in these battleground polls is no bueno.

Sure they may have adjusted their methods of collecting info or whatever but this is bad news for the team blue tie.

Think of this like the 2012 election when Romney pulled ahead of Obama in Oct but lost in the end.

[thegeneral 2,883]

14 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Think of this like the 2012 election when Romney pulled ahead of Obama in Oct but lost in the end.

Perhaps. We have two elections with Orange Julius though and both times the polls were off a few points in the Dems favor. 

I have a hard time believing he will win but it’s somehow close so who the hell knows.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,828]

20 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Enough Max. I’m a middle aged white woman, who lives in California, I’ll be fine.

Fun Fact: Squiz is also a middle-aged white woman who lives in California!

 

[Horseman 2,353]

16 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Think of this like the 2012 election when Romney pulled ahead of Obama in Oct but lost in the end.

Why wouldn't you compare it to the last two presidential elections when Trump faced off against women?  

Think about it for a minute.  You had to go all the way back to 2012, when Trump wasn't even on the ballot, to get it to work out the way you want it.  

[Strike 5,182]

45 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

538 is a poll aggregator.  They just run the numbers.  Wheres the bias?

And yet whenever I check 538 they seem to be missing some polls.  I wonder why..........

[Horseman 2,353]

When did 538 stop including Rasmussen polls?

Why doesn't 538 include any PEW Research polls since September?

Rhetorical.  

[OldMaid 2,129]

11 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Why wouldn't you compare it to the last two presidential elections when Trump faced off against women?  

Think about it for a minute.  You had to go all the way back to 2012, when Trump wasn't even on the ballot, to get it to work out the way you want it.  

You watch and see. 

[Horseman 2,353]

Musk campaigning for Trump today and all next week in PA is 

Mark PA, and thus the election down for Trump.  

[Gepetto 1,286]

I'm in a potential swing district for the one Electoral vote up for grabs in Nebraska. The other 4 electoral votes in Nebraska will almost certainly go Red/Republican.

I was texted asking who I am voting for by https://www.publiuspolls.com/ 

The text started off with my first name

I think this may be an inside organization for internal polling.

Choices were.

A) Kamala

B ) Trump

C ) Not voting

D ) Other

At first I blocked and deleted, but they contacted me again a few days later from a different phone number also starting with my first name and saying they were Publius Polls. 

I responded B 

They haven't bothered me since.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

46 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Enough Max. I’m a middle aged white woman, who lives in California, I’ll be fine.

So you don’t think democracy is on the line? 

[Horseman 2,353]

 

 

[Horseman 2,353]

"I'd love to see the crossover of puppet maters and the Epstein client list."

 

 

[BudBro 173]

23 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

You watch and see. 

What do you think of her today after she's been found out to be a race hoaxer?  Or, is it just tds?

[OldMaid 2,129]

2 minutes ago, Horseman said:

"I'd love to see the crossover of puppet maters and the Epstein client list."

 

 

 A 1000 puppet masters. Do they draw names out of a hat on who gets to pull the strings on any given day?

You guys are batshit insane!

[OldMaid 2,129]

Just now, BudBro said:

What do you think of her today after she's been found out to be a race hoaxer?  Or, is it just tds?

I think you are nuts. HTH

[BudBro 173]

Just now, OldMaid said:

I think you are nuts. HTH

Yeah, it's me.  So, just tds then?

[Gepetto 1,286]

I am Gepetto. I am the greatest puppet master!  BwaHAHAHA

[TrailGuy 552]

39 minutes ago, Horseman said:

When did 538 stop including Rasmussen polls?

Why doesn't 538 include any PEW Research polls since September?

Rhetorical.  

They dumped Rasmussen because they are biased.  You know this.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,828]

15 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

They dumped Rasmussen because they are biased.  You know this.

"All polls I don't agree with are biased!  I only believe my biased polls." 

FYP. 

 

[Horseman 2,353]

28 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

They dumped Rasmussen because they are biased.  You know this.

Oh I know why. I asked when. You don’t read so good do you.  

[TimHauck 2,598]

17 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

"All polls I don't agree with are biased!  I only believe my biased polls." 

FYP. 

 

Hey leave @jonmx out of this

[TimHauck 2,598]

I didn’t realize Georgia righties had been embarking on a voter suppression mission until John Oliver talked about it recently.  Looks like Trump will win Georgia after all.  

https://www.propublica.org/article/right-wing-activists-georgia-voter-challenges

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I didn’t realize Georgia righties had been embarking on a voter suppression mission until John Oliver talked about it recently.  Looks like Trump will win Georgia after all.  

https://www.propublica.org/article/right-wing-activists-georgia-voter-challenges

Yeah but they’re losing almost all of these challenges. And early voting in Georgia is setting records. I think she’s got a good chance to win there. 

[Mark Davis 338]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Yeah but they’re losing almost all of these challenges. And early voting in Georgia is setting records. I think she’s got a good chance to win there. 

Someone should tell Rob Manfred.  Remember when it was Jim Crow 2.0 and MLB moved the All Star Game?  They really showed them.  Cost that area and business there countless millions of dollars over that nonsense.

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

2 minutes ago, Mark Davis said:

Someone should tell Rob Manfred.  Remember when it was Jim Crow 2.0 and MLB moved the All Star Game?  They really showed them.  Cost that area and business there countless millions of dollars over that nonsense.

Well that’s on the Republicans. They never should have tried to change the rules. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

3 minutes ago, Mark Davis said:

Someone should tell Rob Manfred.  Remember when it was Jim Crow 2.0 and MLB moved the All Star Game?  They really showed them.  Cost that area and business there countless millions of dollars over that nonsense.

And the result was record turnout by black voters. And everyone else. Shouldn’t y’all stfu at this point? 

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

And the result was record turnout by black voters. And everyone else. 

Because black voters there heroically overcame the new restrictions. That doesn’t justify the blatant racism that went into them. 

[Mark Davis 338]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

Well that’s on the Republicans. They never should have tried to change the rules. 

Yeah, they made voting less restrictive than most blue states, go figure.  So they punish the businesses in Atlanta, many minority owned, as well as the franchise in MLB that's done probably the most to help the black community.  That was the most hypocritical political stunt I've seen them pull in awhile.  It was stupid, and it's proven out to be so in voting totals.  The numbers don't lie, they never do.  Hey, but it made them be able to virtue signal and that's really all they wanted.  Nothing changed, and the game is back, so it really shows what the truth was the entire time.

[Mark Davis 338]

8 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

And the result was record turnout by black voters. And everyone else. Shouldn’t y’all stfu at this point? 

You know how this goes, nobody ever admits they were wrong.  

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

10 minutes ago, Mark Davis said:

Yeah, they made voting less restrictive than most blue states, go figure.  So they punish the businesses in Atlanta, many minority owned, as well as the franchise in MLB that's done probably the most to help the black community.  That was the most hypocritical political stunt I've seen them pull in awhile.  It was stupid, and it's proven out to be so in voting totals.  The numbers don't lie, they never do.  Hey, but it made them be able to virtue signal and that's really all they wanted.  Nothing changed, and the game is back, so it really shows what the truth was the entire time.

There was no virtue signaling. I feel like some of you guys will never understand that. Not every boycott works, not every boycott is wise. But the intent is usually pure. In this case the folks who did this really believed that the new law was designed to reduce black voting, and that it was racist in outcome and intent. I agree with that assessment. So MLB responded. Maybe it didn’t work out the way they hoped but the problem was very real. 

[Mark Davis 338]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

There was no virtue signaling. I feel like some of you guys will never understand that. Not every boycott works, not every boycott is wise. But the intent is usually pure. In this case the folks who did this really believed that the new law was designed to reduce black voting, and that it was racist in outcome and intent. I agree with that assessment. So MLB responded. Maybe it didn’t work out the way they hoped but the problem was very real. 

Sure there was, from MLB 100%.  If someone didn't take the time to research what that organization had done for the community in Atlanta and realize how many minority owned businesses were hurt, to move to Denver of all places instead, well that's hard for me to view as pure.  The problem wasn't real, because if it were a problem it wouldn't be in the past tense, it would still be such an objectionable problem the game shouldn't be there.  The law is still the same and yet the game is back.  So either those wonderful pure hearted uninformed individuals were wrong from the start, or they are purely political beings and knew the whole time nothing was wrong and did it for political reasons.  Now, it can be either of the two, but it must be one of the two because nothing at all has changed.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

35 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Because black voters there heroically overcame the new restrictions. That doesn’t justify the blatant racism that went into them. 

So they couldn’t overcome the no restrictions earlier? Record turnout dumbass. 

[TimHauck 2,598]

55 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Yeah but they’re losing almost all of these challenges. And early voting in Georgia is setting records. I think she’s got a good chance to win there. 

I’m more concerned about the possibility that folks might think they’ll be ineligible (even if they’re really not) if they don’t show up to the hearing.

[The Real timschochet 6,391]

50 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’m more concerned about the possibility that folks might think they’ll be ineligible (even if they’re really not) if they don’t show up to the hearing.

After Harris wins you can bet the MAGA folks will come up with everything they can. They will never accept it. 

[Horseman 2,353]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

After Harris wins you can bet the MAGA folks will come up with everything they can. They will never accept it. 

Gimp, and serial liar.