Does MAGA have a problem with teh gheys or no?

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

Also on the transgender stuff- from his interview in Time magazine:

 

Quote

I don’t want to get into the bathroom issue. Because it's a very small number of people we're talking about, and it's ripped apart our country, so they'll have to settle whatever the law finally agrees. 

 

See- Trump thinks it is a minor issue. He just used it to get votes because its been turned into a wedge issue of culture war....

[MDC 7,408]

3 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Also on the transgender stuff- from his interview in Time magazine:

 

 

See- Trump thinks it is a minor issue. He just used it to get votes because its been turned into a wedge issue of culture war....

They’ll trot it out for the midterms. It’s the new migrant caravan!  

[Patented Phil 1,469]

Every time trannies are discussed a Republican gets a vote.  It’s the gift that keeps on giving.  And it’s hilarious when Democrats argue that it’s a small, insignificant issue.  Hey dimwits, if it’s such a small and insignificant issue, why not punt on it?    Stupid focks.

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

1 hour ago, Patented Phil said:

Every time trannies are discussed a Republican gets a vote.  It’s the gift that keeps on giving.  And it’s hilarious when Democrats argue that it’s a small, insignificant issue.  Hey dimwits, if it’s such a small and insignificant issue, why not punt on it?    Stupid focks.

Trump essentially called it a minor issue too pillow fvcker

[Hardcore troubadour 15,420]

2 hours ago, Patented Phil said:

Every time trannies are discussed a Republican gets a vote.  It’s the gift that keeps on giving.  And it’s hilarious when Democrats argue that it’s a small, insignificant issue.  Hey dimwits, if it’s such a small and insignificant issue, why not punt on it?    Stupid focks.

I’ve been saying that the whole time. It’s a great gift.  Big loser at the polls. 

[iam90sbaby 2,610]

I’m cool with it they just shouldn’t be able to adopt children 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

Trump essentially called it a minor issue too pillow fvcker

We all agree it’s a minor issue in terms of the number of people actually affected.  But it’s a hot issue at the polls, and it moves votes.  So who’s the dummy here?  Trump, who rightfully made it a campaign issue and stomped through the election in a landslide?  Or Democrats, who continue fighting for a losing issue that only affects a small portion of their constituency?  Ponder that, Manboobs.

[squistion 2,197]

1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

Trump essentially called it a minor issue too pillow fvcker

As usual, it was a minor issue among voters:

https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/new-post-election-poll-equality-voters-overwhelmingly-backed-harris-walz-ticket-anti-trans-attack-ads-proved-ineffective-with-broad-swath-of-voters

"Like in previous elections, MAGA’s attacks on transgender people failed to move voters."

 

[supermike80 1,907]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

As usual, it was a minor issue among voters:

https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/new-post-election-poll-equality-voters-overwhelmingly-backed-harris-walz-ticket-anti-trans-attack-ads-proved-ineffective-with-broad-swath-of-voters

"Like in previous elections, MAGA’s attacks on transgender people failed to move voters."

 

It's such a shame he lost.   

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

4 hours ago, Patented Phil said:

We all agree it’s a minor issue in terms of the number of people actually affected.  But it’s a hot issue at the polls, and it moves votes.  So who’s the dummy here?  Trump, who rightfully made it a campaign issue and stomped through the election in a landslide?  Or Democrats, who continue fighting for a losing issue that only affects a small portion of their constituency?  Ponder that, Manboobs.

In a pie chart of reasons why Trump won- trans stuff is a small portion of that pie pillow fvcker

[Patented Phil 1,469]

4 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

In a pie chart of reasons why Trump won- trans stuff is a small portion of that pie pillow fvcker

Well I actually do have a chart for this, Manboobs.  It’s not a pie chart, but it is color coded so even “guys” like you can understand it.  Of the 25 reasons given in the poll for people voting Trump over Harris, guess what was the #3 reason?

#3 - Kamala Harris is focused more on cultural issues like transgender issues rather than helping the middle class

[Hardcore troubadour 15,420]

Libtards and the centrists that vote with them and always defend them don’t think the girls sports tranny issue had an affect.  Ignorant. 

[5-Points 3,526]

Remember when people said ghey marriage was a slippery slope that would lead to more perverse things that the left would push for and some bored lefties assured us that would never happen?

Yeah, me too. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,099]

5 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Remember when people said ghey marriage was a slippery slope that would lead to more perverse things that the left would push for and some bored lefties assured us that would never happen?

Yeah, me too. 

Yep.  We're already down the slope.  That's why you can never give the left anything.  Ever.

[avoiding injuries 1,580]

If EVERYTHING wasn’t so focked up, the trans issue would have had a bigger slice of the pie. 

[TimHauck 2,866]

1 hour ago, Patented Phil said:

Well I actually have a chart for this, Manboobs.  It’s not a pie chart, but it is color coded so even “guys” like you can understand it.  Of the 25 reasons given in the poll for people voting Trump over Harris, guess what was the #3 reason?

#3 - Kamala Harris is focused more on cultural issues like transgender issues rather than helping the middle class

Meh, that doesn’t mean tranny issues are the cultural issues they’re concerned about.  Besides, did Harris herself even talk much if any about trannies other than that years old interview about the prisoners?

[TimHauck 2,866]

On 12/11/2024 at 7:00 PM, jerryskids said:

 

- Harris married a guy who slapped his girlfriend around.  Facts.

 

Seems a stretch to call this 12 year old allegation by an anonymous woman that we first learned about in October as a “fact.”

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Seems a stretch to call this 12 year old allegation by an anonymous woman that we first learned about in October as a “fact.”

Geek club: marrying a guy who is rumored to have slapped his wife is disqualifying

Also geek club: votes for an adjudicated rapist with dozens of other sexual assault allegations including raping a child.

[5-Points 3,526]

49 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yep.  We're already down the slope.  That's why you can never give the left anything.  Ever.

The Tranny thing was a forgone conclusion. But who could've forseen the enthusiasm for mutilating children or the attempted normalization of child molestation? 

 

They're despicable. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,099]

10 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Seems a stretch to call this 12 year old allegation by an anonymous woman that we first learned about in October as a “fact.”

What if the allegation was like 35 years old and kamala's husband was a supreme Court Justice nominee? Would you believe it then?

[TimHauck 2,866]

5 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

What if it was like 35 years old and kamala's husband was a supreme Court Justice nominee? Would you believe it then?

No.  I didn’t really believe the Kavanaugh thing.

Edit. And I’m not saying I don’t believe this one.  Just that it’s a stretch to call it a “fact.”

[Hardcore troubadour 15,420]

22 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Geek club: marrying a guy who is rumored to have slapped his wife is disqualifying

Also geek club: votes for an adjudicated rapist with dozens of other sexual assault allegations including raping a child.

If you were a smart man I’d say you are trolling. Seeing as you are not a smart man I’d say you actually believe this. Sad clown. 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Seems a stretch to call this 12 year old allegation by an anonymous woman that we first learned about in October as a “fact.”

Here comes Wrong-Take Tim.  Right on cue.

[TimHauck 2,866]

6 hours ago, Patented Phil said:

Here comes Wrong-Take Tim.  Right on cue.

Interesting that the GC now believes decade old anonymous allegations.

[Voltaire 5,316]

10 hours ago, Patented Phil said:

Well I actually do have a chart for this, Manboobs.  It’s not a pie chart, but it is color coded so even “guys” like you can understand it.  Of the 25 reasons given in the poll for people voting Trump over Harris, guess what was the #3 reason?

#3 - Kamala Harris is focused more on cultural issues like transgender issues rather than helping the middle class

This 

The intersection of drag queens and children is a potent vote-churner gold mine. This stuff is disgusting and normal people are fed up with getting bullied by perverts over it. Anyone who posts in fftoday.com's geek club for the past few years and doesn't recognize that is beyond retarded.

 

[TimHauck 2,866]

6 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

This 

The intersection of drag queens and children is a potent vote-churner gold mine. This stuff is disgusting and normal people are fed up with getting bullied by perverts over it. Anyone who posts in fftoday.com's geek club for the past few years and doesn't recognize that is beyond retarded.

 

No it’s not.  99% of the country is not getting “bullied by perverts over it,” although yes that 1% could have had some impact on the election:  Most of the people outraged by it are the ones that go looking for it (like @League Champion / @Maximum Overkill) and were already voting Republican.

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

56 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Most of the people outraged by it are the ones that go looking for it (like @League Champion / @Maximum Overkill) and were already voting Republican.

Wait?? Except it's your party that celebrates crossdressers like they're special. You voted for Wokeness and you got it. I voted against Wokeness and I got it. 

Simple right? 

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

11 hours ago, Patented Phil said:

Well I actually do have a chart for this, Manboobs.  It’s not a pie chart, but it is color coded so even “guys” like you can understand it.  Of the 25 reasons given in the poll for people voting Trump over Harris, guess what was the #3 reason?

#3 - Kamala Harris is focused more on cultural issues like transgender issues rather than helping the middle class

 

Yeah of course you don't see the issues with the poll. Maybe move the pillow out of the way so you can see better.

1.) "cultural issues" is a catch all term being used here so it skews that category

2.) a lot of the categories are worded similar or fall from one another so the whole poll is wonky or skewed.

 

[jerryskids 6,792]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

No it’s not.  99% of the country is not getting “bullied by perverts over it,” although yes that 1% could have had some impact on the election:  Most of the people outraged by it are the ones that go looking for it (like @League Champion / @Maximum Overkill) and were already voting Republican.

Nice numbers. Explains why Bud Light saw virtually no fallout from the trans cans. You are right, almost nobody cares. Keep it up, Lefties, you're on the right path!

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

33 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Nice numbers. Explains why Bud Light saw virtually no fallout from the trans cans. You are right, almost nobody cares. Keep it up, Lefties, you're on the right path!

You don't seem to understand that this is a manufactured crisis.  Probably because you're the victim.

In the simplest of terms and most convenient of definitions, 99.9% of us are unaffected by transgender people in our every day lives.

To that end, it is probably politically advantageous for the left to throw these people under the bus and not support them at all.  But if you abide by the words of the founders where all persons are free by nature and are equal in their inherent and inalienable rights, then it's only natural to defend these people from prosecution from the right.

[jerryskids 6,792]

29 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

You don't seem to understand that this is a manufactured crisis.  Probably because you're the victim.

In the simplest of terms and most convenient of definitions, 99.9% of us are unaffected by transgender people in our every day lives.

To that end, it is probably politically advantageous for the left to throw these people under the bus and not support them at all.  But if you abide by the words of the founders where all persons are free by nature and are equal in their inherent and inalienable rights, then it's only natural to defend these people from prosecution from the right.

It is that same logic that should protect the few actual females affected by it.  The rape victim in the locker room with the naked dude in the shower.  The athlete who loses her spot, or her teeth, because of a male competitor.  

And there are a helluva lot more than 0.1% of kids getting the message that they are the other gender.

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

It is that same logic that should protect the few actual females affected by it.  The rape victim in the locker room with the naked dude in the shower.  The athlete who loses her spot, or her teeth, because of a male competitor.  

And there are a helluva lot more than 0.1% of kids getting the message that they are the other gender.

Yes, we should be able to find solutions that protect everyone, but that's not what Maga is about.  Maga is about villainizing the transgender community.

Also you prove my point in thinking there are any significant number of adults telling kids they are the wrong gender.

 

[jerryskids 6,792]

7 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Yes, we should be able to find solutions that protect everyone, but that's not what Maga is about.  Maga is about villainizing the transgender community.

Also you prove my point in thinking there are any significant number of adults telling kids they are the wrong gender.

 

I said adults?

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

I said adults?

So you're referring to kids telling other kids on social media that they are the wrong gender?  What should we do about that?

[jerryskids 6,792]

41 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

So you're referring to kids telling other kids on social media that they are the wrong gender?  What should we do about that?

We can start by teaching kids that the answer to their problems is probably not to change genders.  

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

We can start by teaching kids that the answer to their problems is probably not to change genders.  

You think that's the government's job or the parent's job?

[TimHauck 2,866]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Nice numbers. Explains why Bud Light saw virtually no fallout from the trans cans. You are right, almost nobody cares. Keep it up, Lefties, you're on the right path!

I didn’t say almost nobody cares, I said almost nobody “is getting bullied by perverts over it,” or were outraged enough about it that it actually impacted their vote considering there were much bigger issues at play in the election.  The overwhelming majority of people getting outraged over it were already voting Republican.    Who also happen to be a large portion of (former) Bud Light drinkers.

[jerryskids 6,792]

8 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

You think that's the government's job or the parent's job?

Parents, government, teachers, psychologists. 

[The Phantom's Phantom 254]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

government, teachers

This is where we disagree.  I prefer the government stay out of the private lives of citizens. I don't want the govt or teachers telling my how to raise my kids.  But that's a conservative principal, or at least it used to be.

[Patented Phil 1,469]

2 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Nice numbers. Explains why Bud Light saw virtually no fallout from the trans cans. You are right, almost nobody cares. Keep it up, Lefties, you're on the right path!

Exactly.  And Wrong-Take Tim is most definitely a Lefty, no matter what he says.