Hardcore troubadour 15,429 Posted January 10 So they arrested climate change? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,907 Posted January 10 1 hour ago, edjr said: This is why I have zero sympathy for these people. They keep voting for these deranged, mentally ill, DEI, grifters. So when fires, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods etc... happen the leadership they voted in was more concerned about the color of people's skin and what's between their legs oh and apparently a focking field mouse, rather than if they can do the focking job! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,907 Posted January 10 2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: So they arrested climate change? All the liberals beotching about Trump calling out the sh1tty cali government were quick to promote their climate change griff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,429 Posted January 10 15 minutes ago, Cdub100 said: This is why I have zero sympathy for these people. They keep voting for these deranged, mentally ill, DEI, grifters. So when fires, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods etc... happen the leadership they voted in was more concerned about the color of people's skin and what's between their legs oh and apparently a focking field mouse, rather than if they can do the focking job! They can watch that and still deny. Liberals love being lied to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,331 Posted January 10 On 1/9/2025 at 10:42 AM, Strike said: Karen Bass says if you need help visit "URL.". She literally said URL. Are we sure she did not say Earl. Earl is pretty darn helpful. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,270 Posted January 10 If only CA were run by Republicans, the party known for spending money on forward looking thinking what/if prevention projects. 1 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,429 Posted January 10 1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said: If only CA were run by Republicans, the party known for spending money on forward looking thinking what/if prevention projects. It’s no one’s fault. Nothing could have been done better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,331 Posted January 10 2 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: If only CA were run by Republicans, the party known for spending money on forward looking thinking what/if prevention projects. Cynicism aside isn't that what secure borders, a strong military ,and well funded first responders are? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,265 Posted January 10 2 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: If only CA were run by Republicans, the party known for spending money on forward looking thinking what/if prevention projects. Right? If only the great and mighty Donald were there to whip out his no-doubt gigantic member, he could piss the fires away. But Cali votes blue, so they can fock off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,270 Posted January 10 1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said: Cynicism aside isn't that what secure borders, a strong military ,and well funded first responders are? Nobody is against a strong military, evidenced by the fact we spend nearly 3X more than the 2nd biggest spender on military(I think that is insane and way too much of our GDP). I'm not informed enough to comment on the first responders in this particular situation, but another thing most people don't cheap out on. But I'm specifically talking about money for natural disasters, global warming issues and the like and the GOP doesn't have a great track record when it comes to things like that. See Texas a last year(?) when they were completely unprepared for a prolonged freeze, that experts had warned them would cause the exact results that happened. So, a GOP run California spending money on fire prevention, and such, I don't see it happening. We are speaking in hypotheticals though, so Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TK0001 99 Posted January 10 12 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: If only CA were run by Republicans, the party known for spending money on forward looking thinking what/if prevention projects. Maybe. It does appear that the taxpayer raised money by the state government for forest management at the very least was not managed and allocated properly. Same with the money raised to build reservoirs, desalination plants, to battle the homeless issue, etc. Seems to me these were just clever ways to extract money from the pockets of the taxpayers. The one common denominator is Democrat leadership. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,429 Posted January 10 9 minutes ago, Fnord said: Right? If only the great and mighty Donald were there to whip out his no-doubt gigantic member, he could piss the fires away. But Cali votes blue, so they can fock off. TRUMP! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,541 Posted January 10 The following video is FOUR years old. https://x.com/JohnStossel/status/1877396163617341949?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1877396163617341949|twgr^ccf54554b5b75b6c6a2278768470412d44d140f8|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fbrandon_morse%2F2025%2F01%2F10%2Fjohn-stossel-already-debunked-the-idea-that-climate-change-caused-the-california-wildfires-n2184189 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,331 Posted January 10 10 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: Nobody is against a strong military, evidenced by the fact we spend nearly 12X more than the 2nd biggest spender on military(I think that is insane and way too much of our GDP). I'm not informed enough to comment on the first responders in this particular situation, but another thing most people don't cheap out on. But I'm specifically talking about money for natural disasters, global warming issues and the like and the GOP doesn't have a great track record when it comes to things like that. See Texas a last year(?) when they were completely unprepared for a prolonged freeze, that experts had warned them would cause the exact results that happened. So, a GOP run California spending money on fire prevention, and such, I don't see it happening. We are speaking in hypotheticals though, so I have always thought we could easily get by with military expenditure equal to the next two biggest spenders, combined. As for the GOP, well I have no more faith in them than I do the Dems, which is to say none. I believe they eaach serve their own desire for power for their friends, and their friends are not their voters, they are their megadonors. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,541 Posted January 10 25 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said: Are we sure she did not say Earl. Earl is pretty darn helpful. Then why did the Dixie Chicks kill him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,331 Posted January 10 9 minutes ago, Strike said: Then why did the Dixie Chicks kill him? Because they did not understand that Earl was trying to help Wanda be a better wife and those stupid, confused dixie chicks could not find the good in Earl. It was their failure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,797 Posted January 10 1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said: Nobody is against a strong military, evidenced by the fact we spend nearly 12X more than the 2nd biggest spender on military(I think that is insane and way too much of our GDP). I'm not informed enough to comment on the first responders in this particular situation, but another thing most people don't cheap out on. But I'm specifically talking about money for natural disasters, global warming issues and the like and the GOP doesn't have a great track record when it comes to things like that. See Texas a last year(?) when they were completely unprepared for a prolonged freeze, that experts had warned them would cause the exact results that happened. So, a GOP run California spending money on fire prevention, and such, I don't see it happening. We are speaking in hypotheticals though, so It's hard to believe that we spend 12X of China. Aren't they building one or more warships per day or something crazy like that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,265 Posted January 10 10 minutes ago, jerryskids said: It's hard to believe that we spend 12X of China. Aren't they building one or more warships per day or something crazy like that? They don't have a million overseas bases to maintain like we do. I would imagine that's a big chunk of the difference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,797 Posted January 10 If it hasn't been mentioned, the Rams/Vikes game is officially moved to Phoenix on Monday. Some people are butt hurt because our stadium is "State Farm Stadium," and they are hating on insurance companies. My kids got tickets; my daughter works for a Minny-based company, and my son is just a big sports fan, and they were pretty cheap for playoff tix. My wife and I are flying back from Michigan that day so we passed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,775 Posted January 10 “I’m literally speaking with the president right now “ then a few seconds later “ I don’t have cell service “ he’s such a sleazy guy and why the hell doesn’t he have a satellite phone Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,270 Posted January 10 2 hours ago, jerryskids said: It's hard to believe that we spend 12X of China. Aren't they building one or more warships per day or something crazy like that? It's 3X - 916B vs 330B. I misremembered stats, and it was the US spends more on military than the next 12 countries combined. Been years, since I looked that up and now it's only the next 10 counties combined. Edited original to be correct. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 1,368 Posted January 10 10 minutes ago, jerryskids said: If it hasn't been mentioned, the Rams/Vikes game is officially moved to Phoenix on Monday. Some people are butt hurt because our stadium is "State Farm Stadium," and they are hating on insurance companies. My kids got tickets; my daughter works for a Minny-based company, and my son is just a big sports fan, and they were pretty cheap for playoff tix. My wife and I are flying back from Michigan that day so we passed. It's because State Farm dropped property coverage over the Summer in the very area where these fires are. https://sports.yahoo.com/vikings-vs-rams-nfl-playoff-151907949.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall Last summer, more than 1,600 policies for homeowners in Pacific Palisades, California, one of the areas affected by fires in California, were dropped by State Farm, the insurance company, according to reports from USA TODAY and others. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Hunt 282 Posted January 10 It was only a matter of time before California had a major catastrophic event. Not counting the homeless, mass store robberies and closings Elections do have consequences and unfortunately Cally is reaping what they sowed right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 554 Posted January 10 Just now, Mike Hunt said: It was only a matter of time before California had a major catastrophic event. Not counting the homeless, mass store robberies and closings Elections do have consequences and unfortunately Cally is reaping what they sowed right now. What did Democrats do to cause these fires? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,429 Posted January 10 Joe Biden, pre dementia and outright crime spree, once said if you show me your budget you show me your priorities. He was right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,429 Posted January 10 1 minute ago, TrailGuy said: What did Democrats do to cause these fires? Climate change. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,541 Posted January 10 8 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: What did Democrats do to cause these fires? I posted a video earlier. Go do your homework and then come back. Try not to get banned again while you're doing it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,270 Posted January 10 3 hours ago, Strike said: The following video is FOUR years old. https://x.com/JohnStossel/status/1877396163617341949?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1877396163617341949|twgr^ccf54554b5b75b6c6a2278768470412d44d140f8|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fbrandon_morse%2F2025%2F01%2F10%2Fjohn-stossel-already-debunked-the-idea-that-climate-change-caused-the-california-wildfires-n2184189 44 minutes ago, Strike said: I posted a video earlier. Go do your homework and then come back. Try not to get banned again while you're doing it. I watched it. the main guy in the in the video says climate change is playing a part in these fires, he also says that Trump and Newsom came to agreement 4 years ago to better manage forests, so what point do you think the video is stating that puts the onus on democrats? And I'll give you a pass on the fact that this is just one guys opinion! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,331 Posted January 10 1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said: It's 3X - 916B vs 330B. I misremembered stats, and it was the US spends more on military than the next 12 countries combined. Been years, since I looked that up and now it's only the next 10 counties combined. Edited original to be correct. Its been years since I looked at the figures but I remember we spend something like three times as much as the next four or five nations combined, and some of those nations are our friends. I think we need to find a way to make due with maybe spending only twice what Russia and China spend combined and be done with it, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,270 Posted January 10 3 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said: Its been years since I looked at the figures but I remember we spend something like three times as much as the next four or five nations combined, and some of those nations are our friends. I think we need to find a way to make due with maybe spending only twice what Russia and China spend combined and be done with it, China - 330B, Russia 130B, US 916B---I think double the largest would be enough. Regardless, 2x the largest or both, we have gotten into the endless military spending cycle that's just been insane---Eisenhower warned about it back in 1959 and yet we keep doing it. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. Number via wiki source Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lod001 1,344 Posted January 10 They will march to their masters orders in unison until they are called out and then they turn on each other spectacularly. It is always fun when that happens. Woketard fire chief turns on woketard mayor and blames her for this disaster because the alphabet soup freak cut the other alphabet soup freaks budget. Now she throws the other freak under the bus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,458 Posted January 10 6 hours ago, The Real timschochet said: I am running into unscrupulous landlords who are raising apartment prices in the LA area. This is anecdotal but I’ve spent the last 24 hours trying to arrange apartment tours for my in laws through Zillow and the prices are being updated as we speak. 6 hours ago, iam90sbaby said: I’m happy that the degenerate capital of the world is burning. Hopefully the casualties are high. Get focked California This guy gets it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,907 Posted January 11 Liberal playbook 101. When something comes up that you don't want to address e.g. lack of water at the fire hydrants Step 1: "It's not happening." Whoops... https://x.com/GavinNewsom/status/1877823208273178995 Gavin Newsom @GavinNewsom NEW: I am calling for an independent investigation into the loss of water pressure to local fire hydrants and the reported unavailability of water supplies from the Santa Ynez Reservoir. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,458 Posted January 11 13 minutes ago, Cdub100 said: Liberal playbook 101. When something comes up that you don't want to address e.g. lack of water at the fire hydrants Step 1: "It's not happening." Whoops... https://x.com/GavinNewsom/status/1877823208273178995 Gavin Newsom @GavinNewsom NEW: I am calling for an independent investigation into the loss of water pressure to local fire hydrants and the reported unavailability of water supplies from the Santa Ynez Reservoir. Why was the Pacific Palasades Resevour offline and empty? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 754 Posted January 11 3 minutes ago, Horseman said: Why was the Pacific Palasades Resevour offline and empty? Liberals. 100%true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,429 Posted January 11 30 minutes ago, Horseman said: Why was the Pacific Palasades Resevour offline and empty? The Dobbs decision? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,458 Posted January 11 Fire defense budgets were cut to send more money for homeless drug addicts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 554 Posted January 11 2 hours ago, Strike said: I posted a video earlier. Go do your homework and then come back. Try not to get banned again while you're doing it. Not watching a video boyo. You're an adult. You can use your words my friend, have a conversation. Or maybe you can't which is why you just post videos. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,023 Posted January 11 6 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: Not watching a video boyo. You're an adult. You can use your words my friend, have a conversation. Or maybe you can't which is why you just post videos. What? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites