Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
squistion

Trump says Rachel Maddow is "the enemy of the people"

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I mean, he is not exactly “wrong”.  Maddie represents a segment of Democrats mouthpieces dedicated to empowerment of a political party at the expense of the people 

Maddie?  :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gepetto said:

United States affirmed that the First Amendment is not absolute, "you can't shout fire in a crowded theater" is frequently used as a red herring when discussing whether or not a particular instance of speech falls under exceptions set by the Supreme Court.

And you can't shout about false Sandy Hook conspiracy theories and lies about 2020 election voting machines, but CNN, MSNBC and Rachel Maddow facts and fair-commentary criticisms don't rise to those levels. Not sure of your point, and butthurt over reporting and opinions that meet free-speech and journalistic ethics guidelines isn't the same thing.

I spent 30 years as a journalist, so I know more about the First Amendment, free media, libel, slander and fair and balanced reporting than you or anyone else on this forum does.

MAGAs just want to snuff the information outlets that make their butt hurt, plain and simple. 

MAGA hypocrisy: free speech as long as we agree with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

@squistion is really tore up over this whole Rachel Maddow thing 😂 

How much whining will MAGAs be doing when she's on five nights a week ripping Clownzo.

Don't recall any Biden whining about MAGAturd media attacks.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Death said:

free speech as long as we agree with it.

⬆️ Liberals just months ago 😭 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Death said:

Don't recall any Biden whining about MAGAturd media attacks

There's only one person here whining and it's you 😭 🌈 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Maximum Overkill said:

⬆️ Liberals just months ago 😭 

That dude doesn't even know what the 1st amendment is. Typical liberal. They fight for things they know nothing about. They think they are right when they are wrong, they think smart people are wrong when they are right, and they spend every waking moment of their lives crying about Trump. The greatest president this country has seen ever. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

There's only one person here whining and it's you 😭 🌈 

He thinks conservatives are going to be still interested in creepy joe in another week or two. Right now, it will take a little time to clean up after the biden disaster, but then it will be "biden who?".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

⬆️ Liberals just months ago 😭 

You're a waste of intellectual investment, incapable of a true, facts-based debate.

On ignore you go, boyo. On ignore you.

Bye bye.

Get interesting and cerebrally challenging, and I'll consider taking you off ignore.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Death said:

You're a waste of intellectual investment, incapable of a true, facts-based debate.

On ignore you go, boyo. On ignore you.

Bye bye.

Get interesting and cerebrally challenging, and I'll consider taking you off ignore.

 

@Maximum Overkill Get ready to be told that by pimpledoosh every time you post. He lets me know he is "ignoring" me 80% of the time I reply to one of his posts.  And then he makes a new post about what I had said. This libtard is extra special. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Death said:

ignore you go, boyo. On ignore you.

Bye pvssy!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clownzo is the enema of the people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote
You've chosen to ignore content by seafoam1. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by Maximum Overkill. Options 

😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Death said:

 

Get interesting and cerebrally challenging, 

 

 

16 minutes ago, Death said:

Clownzo is the enema of the people.

Posted 15 minutes from each other.  The irony.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Death said:

And you can't shout about false Sandy Hook conspiracy theories and lies about 2020 election voting machines, but CNN, MSNBC and Rachel Maddow facts and fair-commentary criticisms don't rise to those levels. Not sure of your point, and butthurt over reporting and opinions that meet free-speech and journalistic ethics guidelines isn't the same thing.

I spent 30 years as a journalist, so I know more about the First Amendment, free media, libel, slander and fair and balanced reporting than you or anyone else on this forum does.

MAGAs just want to snuff the information outlets that make their butt hurt, plain and simple. 

MAGA hypocrisy: free speech as long as we agree with it.

Really?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Death said:

You're a waste of intellectual investment, incapable of a true, facts-based debate.

On ignore you go, boyo. On ignore you.

Bye bye.

Get interesting and cerebrally challenging, and I'll consider taking you off ignore.

 

One wonders how you would know if he got interesting, what with him on ignore and all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

@squistion is really tore up over this whole Rachel Maddow thing 😂 

Squissy @squistion will delete this thread like a lot of others that went sideways on him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Dizkneelande said:

Trying to figure out of this list which of these conspiracies netted the corrupted media the most since they sell so well according to fatboy.

- Russia collusion
- Hunter Biden laptop
- Charlottesville
- Bubba Wallace
- Jussie Smollett
- Covington Catholic students
- Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot
- COVID lab leak was a “conspiracy theory”
- Steele dossier
- Don’t Say Gay was in the bill
- Migrant “kids In cages”
- GA election integrity was the new “Jim crow”
- Duke lacrosse kids
- Jan 6 video footage
- “Peaceful” BLM riots
- Ivermectin is a horse dewormer
- Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a bible photo

Nice roundup of the MSM lies 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

One wonders how you would know if he got interesting, what with him on ignore and all.

He just responds with the same tired crap. I'll occasionally unlock the ignore and see, but I don't expect much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, squistion said:

So...Rachel Maddow being critical of Trump on MSNBC is like shouting fire in a crowded theater? Yeah, that makes sense. :wacko:

I'm just saying she has first amendment rights but the Supreme Court has ruled free speech has a definition in that it is "not absolute" That's the fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

I'm just saying she has first amendment rights but the Supreme Court has ruled free speech has a definition in that it is "not absolute" That's the fact.

For a start...

The categories of unprotected speech include obscenity, child pornography, defamatory speech, false advertising, true threats, and fighting words.

And those are broken down into more detailed categories if anyone cares to see the full on details. 

Liberals don't understand these things. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Death said:

And you can't shout about false Sandy Hook conspiracy theories and lies about 2020 election voting machines, but CNN, MSNBC and Rachel Maddow facts and fair-commentary criticisms don't rise to those levels. Not sure of your point, and butthurt over reporting and opinions that meet free-speech and journalistic ethics guidelines isn't the same thing.

I spent 30 years as a journalist, so I know more about the First Amendment, free media, libel, slander and fair and balanced reporting than you or anyone else on this forum does.

MAGAs just want to snuff the information outlets that make their butt hurt, plain and simple. 

MAGA hypocrisy: free speech as long as we agree with it.

Alex Jones' Sandy Hook conspiracy remains the heavyweight champion of fake news. But corporate media is not far behind. And there is no active move to snuff them out. They have three problems, one is they are wed to a dying business model with excess overhead and under heavy pressure from low cost online competition. Second, they've lost all credibility by lying constantly, and third they serving as the propaganda arm of one of the political parties. There is no need to snuff them out. With no outside help at all, they will lose credibility, go unwatched/unread, lose advertisers, then ossify and crumble and collapse under their own weight.

Learn to code motherf0ckers.

2 hours ago, Engorgeous George said:

Really?

Rusty was indeed a journalist when this site was young. He's devolved into a delusional lunatic filled with lies and provides firsthand evidence why the profession has lost all credibility in our lifetime. Who the fock would hire this guy to write for them? The people he admires and worships in that line of work all think his is old and the wrong gender and pigmentation - something he nods along to and agrees with them on completely. His potential employers can pat themselves on the back and feel good about themselves by hiring a black transgender Hindu midget to spout the same nonsense instead.  Rusty admires them for this keen insight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Voltaire said:

Alex Jones' Sandy Hook conspiracy remains the heavyweight champion of fake news. But corporate media is not far behind. And there is no active move to snuff them out. They have three problems, one is they are wed to a dying business model with excess overhead and under heavy pressure from low cost online competition. Second, they've lost all credibility by lying constantly, and third they serving as the propaganda arm of one of the political parties. There is no need to snuff them out. With no outside help at all, they will lose credibility, go unwatched/unread, lose advertisers, then ossify and crumble and collapse under their own weight.

Learn to code motherf0ckers.

Rusty was indeed a journalist when this site was young. He's devolved into a delusional lunatic filled with lies and provides firsthand evidence why the profession has lost all credibility in our lifetime. Who the fock would hire this guy to write for them? The people he admires and worships in that line of work all think his is old and the wrong gender and pigmentation - something he nods along to and agrees with them on completely. His potential employers can pat themselves on the back and feel good about themselves by hiring a black transgender Hindu midget to spout the same nonsense instead.  Rusty admires them for this keen insight.

My comment to him was not about whether or not he may have been a journalist, whatever that entails in this day and age of everyone with a phone or a keyboard thinking they are a journalist.  My comment was about him presuming that the qualification of being a journalist necessarily makes him more authoritative on the meaning of the first amendment than say, a lawyer.  I admire the marriage of arrogance and ignorance that assertion took and so I commented.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Voltaire said:

Alex Jones' Sandy Hook conspiracy remains the heavyweight champion of fake news. But corporate media is not far behind. And there is no active move to snuff them out. They have three problems, one is they are wed to a dying business model with excess overhead and under heavy pressure from low cost online competition. Second, they've lost all credibility by lying constantly, and third they serving as the propaganda arm of one of the political parties. There is no need to snuff them out. With no outside help at all, they will lose credibility, go unwatched/unread, lose advertisers, then ossify and crumble and collapse under their own weight.

Learn to code motherf0ckers.

Rusty was indeed a journalist when this site was young. He's devolved into a delusional lunatic filled with lies and provides firsthand evidence why the profession has lost all credibility in our lifetime. Who the fock would hire this guy to write for them? The people he admires and worships in that line of work all think his is old and the wrong gender and pigmentation - something he nods along to and agrees with them on completely. His potential employers can pat themselves on the back and feel good about themselves by hiring a black transgender Hindu midget to spout the same nonsense instead.  Rusty admires them for this keen insight.

Journalist?  No way. Printed Letters to Blue Boy magazine doesn’t make someone a “journalist.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Engorgeous George said:

One wonders how you would know if he got interesting, what with him on ignore and all.

When you put someone on ignore you still see any threads that they start. In addition, if someone quotes them in a thread, you will see that. 

Also, while you remain in a thread for a period of time, you will see all new posts in it, including those you have on ignore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Maximum Overkill said:

@squistion is really tore up over this whole Rachel Maddow thing 😂 

Maddow is part of the community.

 

Maddow's view of the country are the same views that cost Dems all the elections. They are being rejected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said:

Maddow is part of the community.  

Maddow's view of the country are the same views that cost Dems all the elections. They are being rejected.

And they are unable to come to terms with it, which is why they are so hysterical about this.  Instead of introspection, they keep blaming everyone else.  That's par for the course for Liberals in general.

The leftist agenda is DOA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said:

Maddow is part of the community.  

 

Maddow's view of the country are the same views that cost Dems all the elections. They are being rejected.

I do not think those on the far left are capable of self reflection, or really reflection of any kind.  You either believe as they do, or else....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I do not think those on the far left are capable of self reflection, or really reflection of any kind.  You either believe as they do, or else....

💯    And that has been their demise.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I do not think those on the far left are capable of self reflection, or really reflection of any kind.  You either believe as they do, or else....

Oh. the irony, with Trump threatening retribution for those such as Maddow, who are speaking out against him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maddow is the only woman that Squis has been remotely attracted to besides his sister.  You can probably tell why. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

They have to compete with CNN as the main voice of reason these days. But CNN appears to be abandoning that role so I expect MSNBC to do much better in the months to come. 

I'm trying to imagine MSNBC being considered the "main voice of reason."  Struggling with that...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Death said:

So much for MAGAturds being all about free speech - as long as it's what they and their beloved Clownzo want to hear.

🤣

🤣

Trolls gonna troll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

They have to compete with CNN as the main voice of reason these days. But CNN appears to be abandoning that role so I expect MSNBC to do much better in the months to come. 

LOL, you said "voice of reason", when referring to CNN & MSNBC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, squistion said:

Oh. the irony, with Trump threatening retribution for those such as Maddow, who are speaking out against him. 

No irony, there is only one side tearing people down for working with the other side, and that is YOUR people....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Dizkneelande said:

Trying to figure out of this list which of these conspiracies netted the corrupted media the most since they sell so well according to fatboy.

- Russia collusion
- Hunter Biden laptop
- Charlottesville
- Bubba Wallace
- Jussie Smollett
- Covington Catholic students
- Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot
- COVID lab leak was a “conspiracy theory”
- Steele dossier
- Don’t Say Gay was in the bill
- Migrant “kids In cages”
- GA election integrity was the new “Jim crow”
- Duke lacrosse kids
- Jan 6 video footage
- “Peaceful” BLM riots
- Ivermectin is a horse dewormer
- Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a bible photo

1. Russian collusion in the 2016 election really did happen per the Mueller report. Mainstream media didn’t lie about that; Fox News did. 
2. The Hunter Biden laptop story was reported at the time but conservatives complained it wasn’t stressed enough and then later falsely insisted it was concerned up. In any event it was a minor story which had no impact on the 2020 election. 
3. Charlottesville was correctly reported. Trump’s damning comments were caught on tape. 
4. The MSM did not create the Bubba Wallace noose story; they reported what they were told at the time, which is their proper role. When the facts revealed it was not a hate crime that was reported to. 
5. Jussie Smollett- see point#4. 
 

I could go on and on. The MSM didn’t lie in ANY of these stories. 
 

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Death said:

I'm asking a serious question

Who do you think you're kidding here?  That stopped happening a long time ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Death said:

Are you for free speech for CNN, MSNBC and Rachel Maddow?

So, I read the communist propaganda website, and I didn't find where Trump said, "the government will [or should], silence [or shutdown], Rachel Maddow, CNN, and/or MSNBC".  Looks like he's just calling them out for misinformation.  I thought the Libs were in favor of calling out misinformation like Trump is doing.  Oh wait, they're not...  the Libs are for silencing what they believe is misinformation.

Wow, this is weird.  You might want to stop and re-think about what's going on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

1. Russian collusion in the 2016 election really did happen per the Mueller report. Mainstream media didn’t lie about that; Fox News did. 
2. The Hunter Biden laptop story was reported at the time but conservatives complained it wasn’t stressed enough and then later falsely insisted it was concerned up. In any event it was a minor story which had no impact on the 2020 election. 
3. Charlottesville was correctly reported. Trump’s damning comments were caught on tape. 
4. The MSM did not create the Bubba Wallace noose story; they reported what they were told at the time, which is their proper role. When the facts revealed it was not a hate crime that was reported to. 
5. Jussie Smollett- see point#4. 

I could go on and on. The MSM didn’t lie in ANY of these stories. 

Don't try to confuse them with the facts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×