MDC 7,185 Posted Sunday at 08:35 PM Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said: To get rid of minority children. I'm sure you're familiar with that? I mean, Margaret Sanger was no saint. That is well known. Does that have anything to do with this story? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,901 Posted Sunday at 08:36 PM Just now, MDC said: Does that have anything to do with this story? I was responding to your post about the black single mother. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,185 Posted Sunday at 08:39 PM 2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: I was responding to your post about the black single mother. I was asking CDub cause he’s a racist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 651 Posted Sunday at 09:11 PM 32 minutes ago, MDC said: I was asking CDub cause he’s a racist. So from one racist to another was your thinking? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,795 Posted Sunday at 09:53 PM 1 hour ago, MDC said: What was the purpose? You know exactly why planned parenthood was formed. Say it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,043 Posted Sunday at 10:25 PM Centrist MDC is all worked up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,661 Posted Sunday at 10:53 PM My name is Buck... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,851 Posted Sunday at 11:58 PM 3 hours ago, MDC said: Would you feel different if I told you the mom was unmarried and black? Yes, black people should have access to free abortions and get paid $1000 for their troubles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,901 Posted Sunday at 11:59 PM Just now, Cdub100 said: Yes, black people should have access to free abortions and get paid $1000 for their troubles. Margaret Sanger approved! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,507 Posted Monday at 12:03 AM 4 minutes ago, Cdub100 said: Yes, black people should have access to free abortions and get paid $1000 for their troubles. And a complimentary vasectomy for all black men Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,851 Posted Monday at 12:06 AM 1 minute ago, iam90sbaby said: And a complimentary vasectomy for all black men This is a good idea too. Blacks are struggling to survive and can't afford contraceptives like condoms and birth control pills. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,297 Posted Monday at 12:12 AM 8 hours ago, MDC said: I can only speculate as to whether a woman would want her brain dead living corpse kept alive in order to bring a first trimester fetus to viability. I didn't say anything about a brain dead living corpse in my question. I asked you if at 8 or 9 weeks you would agree that she wanted the child. Before she went brain dead. And twice you've refused to answer that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,185 Posted Monday at 01:34 AM 1 hour ago, Strike said: I didn't say anything about a brain dead living corpse in my question. I asked you if at 8 or 9 weeks you would agree that she wanted the child. Before she went brain dead. And twice you've refused to answer that. Now that she’s a vegetable one can only guess. But yes: Before going brain dead she probably did intend to keep the kid. Now she and her family have no choice. The state decides. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,120 Posted Monday at 01:40 AM Save a life when possible, life is precious, if the family doesn't want the baby, put it up for adoption. Pretty simple stuff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,043 Posted Monday at 02:34 AM Remember, democrats, and centrists, tell women abortion is empowering. So don’t take anything they have to say on the subject seriously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,901 Posted Monday at 02:36 AM 1 hour ago, MDC said: Now that she’s a vegetable one can only guess. But yes: Before going brain dead she probably did intend to keep the kid. Now she and her family have no choice. The state decides. Is the kid even going to be viable? Isn't he essentially dead too? If not, don't you think the parents would want the child born as that child is a part of their daughter? Why would they ever abort it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,328 Posted Monday at 10:23 AM 18 hours ago, Mike Honcho said: So she's like most Georgia voters. More like California and New York State voters Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,795 Posted Monday at 10:34 AM 8 hours ago, Reality said: Save a life when possible, life is precious, if the family doesn't want the baby, put it up for adoption. Pretty simple stuff. Exactly! I'll never understand why Liberals like @MDC are so excited to kill babies? They'll fight for trash like George Floyd but can't wait to kill an innocent. It's crazy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,390 Posted Monday at 11:51 AM 21 hours ago, MDC said: It’s possible the family would’ve decided to keep her alive for the remaining 7 or so months of her pregnancy. But the state made that medical and moral decision for them. Change the law then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,497 Posted Monday at 12:45 PM 21 hours ago, MDC said: You cared enough to reply. I’m merely stating facts here: It doesn’t matter what she or her family would have wanted. The State of Georgia thinks this is best. The State of Georgia is also protecting the mother's rights. Prior to the situation, she apparently didn't want the abortion either. Her body, her choice... right? Her last choice on the matter was to have the baby. We know this because we knew she was pregnant and never chose to get an abortion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,185 Posted Monday at 01:20 PM 33 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said: The State of Georgia is also protecting the mother's rights. Prior to the situation, she apparently didn't want the abortion either. Her body, her choice... right? Her last choice on the matter was to have the baby. We know this because we knew she was pregnant and never chose to get an abortion. It is likely she intended to carry the baby to term, before going brain dead and being forced onto a ventilator for the next few months. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,208 Posted Monday at 03:03 PM Curious. If some late night orderly allowed someone sexual access to the woman as was a plot point in the movie Kill Bill, would that person committing the act be charged with rape or with abusing a corpse? What is the woman's current legal status? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,497 Posted Monday at 03:17 PM 1 hour ago, MDC said: It is likely she intended to carry the baby to term, before going brain dead and being forced onto a ventilator for the next few months. So no one loses. Why is there an issue then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,497 Posted Monday at 03:20 PM 21 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said: Curious. If some late night orderly allowed someone sexual access to the woman as was a plot point in the movie Kill Bill, would that person committing the act be charged with rape or with abusing a corpse? What is the woman's current legal status? I'm not 100% against abortion. I'm fine with rape or medical reasons, being an acceptable exception. Outside of that 0.05% of situations, my preference is that I'm fine with banning abortions. That said, I'm ok with a standard of any degenerate can kill their unborn baby whenever she wants, as long as she's covering 100% of the cost and undergoes mandatory out-patient psychiatric care... or go to prison for M1. I'm ok with forgoing the mandatory psychiatric care and M1 charge, if they forever forfeit their right to vote. In my opinion, the unborn baby has rights. There used to be a time where the Democrats and ACLU fought for those with no voice (I mean, they're doing now with illegals... when just 6 months ago, they didn't). Guess that doesn't count here because the unborn baby can't vote but the mom can. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,185 Posted Monday at 03:26 PM 8 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said: So no one loses. Why is there an issue then? Can’t you guess? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,497 Posted Monday at 03:27 PM Just now, MDC said: Can’t you guess? Click-bait? Democrats pandering? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,185 Posted Monday at 03:27 PM Just now, TBayXXXVII said: Click-bait? Democrats pandering? That must be it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,497 Posted Monday at 03:31 PM 2 minutes ago, MDC said: That must be it. Not surprised. Libbies gonna libby Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheNewGirl 1,391 Posted Monday at 03:43 PM I find it very sad that both sides are trying to use this as a political talking point. It's a family matter, IMO. Getting all these republicans and democrats involved must be painful and infuriating for the family, they have lost a daughter. Perhaps they see saving the child as a way to keep her alive as well. For people asking if the baby is also affected (brain dead), it is not. As long as her heart is beating and she has nutrition, it should grow like a normal fetus would - I assume. I imagine there is more to it than that she's not really eating food. The baby will likely leech the calcium from her bones for its own, depleting her further. Our female bodies do amazing things to keep a baby alive. I can assume hers is no different given that she's on life support. Now, ICU costs roughly $80k a DAY. Is her family willing to pay for this for the next 3 to 4 months? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites