Horseman 2,657 Posted 10 hours ago 15 minutes ago, josh wiley said: I don’t pretend to be some sort of anything by posting on here. I call a spade a spade. That’s it. Do u get some sort of sense that u are someone important because u post here more than me? That’s sad You're what most people call a limp noodle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
josh wiley 63 Posted 9 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Horseman said: You're what most people call a limp noodle. I tell u what I’m not going to resort to name calling just as I teach my children. But let’s both hope this country doesn’t keep sliding off the side of a cliff. Now back to point of topic, once again, admin needs to release all the files and/or lists immediately so there can be true justice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,657 Posted 9 hours ago 2 minutes ago, josh wiley said: I tell u what I’m not going to resort to name calling just as I teach my children. But let’s both hope this country doesn’t keep sliding off the side of a cliff. Now back to point of topic, once again, admin needs to release all the files and/or lists immediately so there can be true justice Hopefully your kids have someone else they can look up to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,822 Posted 9 hours ago 25 minutes ago, josh wiley said: I don’t pretend to be some sort of anything by posting on here. I call a spade a spade. That’s it. Do u get some sort of sense that u are someone important because u post here more than me? That’s sad You're a racist, too? Figures. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,822 Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, Horseman said: Hopefully your kids have someone else they can look up to. Uncle MDC. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
josh wiley 63 Posted 9 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Horseman said: Hopefully your kids have someone else they can look up to. I took the high road. U just keep on creeping through the sewers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,382 Posted 8 hours ago 3 hours ago, jerryskids said: I've made the mistake of re-engaging on this. Last comment and I'm done. Walk me through another situation where the government collected testimony, determined not to prosecute, then released the data they collected anyway. I am asking you to explain your answer, If you don’t want to then don’t. Spare the dramatics. I don’t think you are really getting put out here. In any case if a person was passing large amounts of money to Epstein then who gives a shet if their name is tossed out there. Too bad. Bill Gatea for example. His name has been tossed out there. Let him clear himself. There have been TWO arrests for this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,241 Posted 4 hours ago 4 hours ago, thegeneral said: I am asking you to explain your answer, If you don’t want to then don’t. Spare the dramatics. I don’t think you are really getting put out here. In any case if a person was passing large amounts of money to Epstein then who gives a shet if their name is tossed out there. Too bad. Bill Gatea for example. His name has been tossed out there. Let him clear himself. There have been TWO arrests for this. So anyone "tossing" someone's name "out there" should force a person to be on the defensive and have to prove their innocence of whatever it is. Got it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,836 Posted 3 hours ago Horsesh1t thinks trump wasn't smart enough to create that card in 2003 Like it even matters though, whether he created it or someone did it for him, he signed it. But he didn't look at it. He's dumb enough to sign some creepy card without looking at it. I know Jerry isn't stupid enough to believe that theory, he's just dishonest. But horsesh1t actually is stupid enough to believe it. Horsesh1t doesn't even realize that the huge golf checks are novelty. Thats not even the trump story. Trump still maintains he didn't create it, he didn't sign it, which would take even more leaps to explain how it got into the book. Let me help you folks out. Here is what you should be saying. It's very likely trump created the card or at the very least signed it and knew about it. It's a bad look for Trump but still doesn't prove he raped anyone. Which is all true. But it's another example on top of a pile where Trump looks really really bad, and your defense of him looks really really bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,241 Posted 3 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Horsesh1t thinks trump wasn't smart enough to create that card in 2003 Like it even matters though, whether he created it or someone did it for him, he signed it. But he didn't look at it. He's dumb enough to sign some creepy card without looking at it. I know Jerry isn't stupid enough to believe that theory, he's just dishonest. But horsesh1t actually is stupid enough to believe it. Horsesh1t doesn't even realize that the huge golf checks are novelty. Thats not even the trump story. Trump still maintains he didn't create it, he didn't sign it, which would take even more leaps to explain how it got into the book. Let me help you folks out. Here is what you should be saying. It's very likely trump created the card or at the very least signed it and knew about it. It's a bad look for Trump but still doesn't prove he raped anyone. Which is all true. But it's another example on top of a pile where Trump looks really really bad, and your defense of him looks really really bad. Jeez. You have problems.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,836 Posted 3 hours ago Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell exchanged cryptic emails about removing President Donald Trump from a list of high-powered people Maxwell sent Epstein shortly after he was criminally charged in 2006, according to emails reviewed Bloomberg that Trump denied—the latest allegation linking Trump to the convicted sex offender amid a flurry of new evidence connecting the pair. https://share.google/gGxi7YPYa6F5u2NgK It's a drumbeat. Looking forward to the latest spin here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,635 Posted 2 hours ago Imagine sitters by behind your keyboard and calling a billionaire POTUS dumb. I don’t care for Jeff Bezoss’ politics, but I know he isn’t dumb. I also don’t have BDS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,093 Posted 2 hours ago 10 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said: Imagine sitters by behind your keyboard and calling a billionaire POTUS dumb. I don’t care for Jeff Bezoss’ politics, but I know he isn’t dumb. I also don’t have BDS I don’t know why @Horseman is doing that. I actually think Trump knew how to use a computer in 2003 (and 2025). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,008 Posted 2 hours ago 11 hours ago, jerryskids said: I already answered this: To answer your followup of "but why did they say they would?!" the likely answer was that they got there thinking they would, but through combinations of legal and other advice, they didn't. And yes, "other" likely includes "you don't want to piss off these people." This isn't a whataboutism, but I always respected Obama for not closing Gitmo. Remember how he was going to close it on day 1? Yeah, he never did. The rational explanation was that he got into office and was privy to the reasons it was still being used, reasons that you don't learn as a candidate. I'm tagging @SaintsInDome2006in hopes that he reads it and doesn't engage with me again without reading what I wrote. I'd tag Gutter as well, but he is a hopeless cause. So they say on the campaign trail they are going to release everything. February 27th, 2025 they make a huge production of giving binders to all these MAGA influencers and call it "The Epstein Files: Phase 1." Before that Bondi said there is a list sitting on my desk. Then in July they say "There is no list" and try to make it as some Democrat conspiracy. Why wouldn't they consult all their legal advice and everything before they started putting anything else or popping off at the mouth? Furthermore, I didn't say a birthday card was like enacting federal law you dink. I said people say Trump is a genius but then also say he is just signing things in a similar way as Biden was without reading it. Which is something you floated on page 58 here. I'd have far more respect if you'd say what is almost assuredly the correct answer- they never had any intention of releasing anything from the list. No one does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,657 Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said: Horsesh1t thinks trump wasn't smart enough to create that card in 2003 Like it even matters though, whether he created it or someone did it for him, he signed it. But he didn't look at it. He's dumb enough to sign some creepy card without looking at it. I know Jerry isn't stupid enough to believe that theory, he's just dishonest. But horsesh1t actually is stupid enough to believe it. Horsesh1t doesn't even realize that the huge golf checks are novelty. Thats not even the trump story. Trump still maintains he didn't create it, he didn't sign it, which would take even more leaps to explain how it got into the book. Let me help you folks out. Here is what you should be saying. It's very likely trump created the card or at the very least signed it and knew about it. It's a bad look for Trump but still doesn't prove he raped anyone. Which is all true. But it's another example on top of a pile where Trump looks really really bad, and your defense of him looks really really bad. Third grade summaries are the best. How big of a Life Loser are you that you wake up at 5am to post this garbage? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 466 Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, jerryskids said: I'm tagging @SaintsInDome2006in hopes that he reads it and doesn't engage with me again without reading what I wrote. Hey Jerry - I got it & actually agree. That was the basis for the judge, the Bush, Obama, Trump1 & Biden administration for not releasing the material. It’s longstanding DOJ policy & I agree with it. Problem is the Trump2 administration has completely rejected that policy & even created a special projects office for Ed Martin, who couldn’t cut it as USA for DC, to dredge up innuendo on any political opponents the President directs him to. Now I didn’t direct a post towards you about that but I’m glad to see someone raise it. I did ask you about a totally separate item in the JE birthday book, but seriously you don’t have to respond. I was just curious. Have a good one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 698 Posted 1 hour ago Did they get him yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 466 Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Meglamaniac said: Did they get him yet? Guys let me help on this one. In this country we’ve decided legally the President had limitless power & morally there is no behavior which disqualifies any President from holding office. So no hypothetically we can’t ever get any president for anything. We can’t even make him leave office. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 698 Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Guys let me help on this one. In this country we’ve decided legally the President had limitless power & morally there is no behavior which disqualifies any President from holding office. So no hypothetically we can’t ever get any president for anything. We can’t even make him leave office. So no Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 466 Posted 1 hour ago 12 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said: So no Ha of course not. The guy’s already been convicted of felonies. He’s beyond law enforcement. All this talk about the rich & powerful being beyond normal laws. People c’mon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 698 Posted 1 hour ago Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said: Ha of course not. The guy’s already been convicted of felonies. He’s beyond law enforcement. All this talk about the rich & powerful being beyond normal laws. People c’mon. just checking 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,681 Posted 1 hour ago 20 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Guys let me help on this one. In this country we’ve decided legally the President had limitless power & morally there is no behavior which disqualifies any President from holding office. So no hypothetically we can’t ever get any president for anything. We can’t even make him leave office. Limitless power? The courts keep telling him no and he keeps listening. This type of rhetoric is getting people killed. Stop it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,382 Posted 56 minutes ago 3 hours ago, seafoam1 said: So anyone "tossing" someone's name "out there" should force a person to be on the defensive and have to prove their innocence of whatever it is. Got it. Say you wire transferred 300K to the Epstein rape fund. Yeah not to worried about that person having to explain what was going on. You probably thought Hillary assassinates people and ran a child blood harvesting cabal out of a pizza parlor in DC so it’s not like these people aren't sort of familiar with this type of thing. The comedy value of watching people like you twist themselves up in knots about stuff like this birthday card love letter to buddy Epstein from Don is bonus content, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 466 Posted 56 minutes ago 19 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Limitless power? The courts keep telling him no and he keeps listening. This type of rhetoric is getting people killed. Stop it. The President has immunity from prosecution. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,681 Posted 32 minutes ago 23 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: The President has immunity from prosecution. For official acts. Stop spewing your ignorance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 466 Posted 31 minutes ago Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: For official acts. Stop spewing your ignorance. And everything is an official act. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,681 Posted 29 minutes ago 1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: And everything is an official act. So why did the court specifically say official acts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 466 Posted 27 minutes ago Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: So why did the court specifically say official acts? Because the Court gave Trump a personal loophole he could drive a lorry through & now it relates to all presidents. The President decides what’s an official act. Go see what they’ve done with emergency powers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,681 Posted 26 minutes ago Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said: Because the Court gave Trump a personal loophole he could drive a lorry through & now it relates to all presidents. The President decides what’s an official act. Go see what they’ve done with emergency powers. No. I don’t think hitting his wife would be considered and official act. You’re useless Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 466 Posted 24 minutes ago Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: No. I don’t think hitting his wife would be considered and official act. You’re useless And how are we going to find out about this domestic battery? DOJ? A President can fire the FBI director. Congress? Nope, executive authority. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,681 Posted 20 minutes ago Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said: And how are we going to find out about this domestic battery? DOJ? A President can fire the FBI director. Congress? Nope, executive authority. Unhinged. Trump ruined you. You babble like a moron. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,836 Posted 18 minutes ago 7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: No. I don’t think hitting his wife would be considered and official act. You’re useless According to trump if a wife claims domestic violence she is lying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 466 Posted 9 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Unhinged. Trump ruined you. You babble like a moron. Buddy, I can read a legal opinion. I’ll add you specifically raised domestic violence. The current President’s Ex-wife alleged he raped her in court pleadings. *No one cares*. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites