Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Swerski's Airbag

Do you support invasion and annexation of Greenland?

Do you support invasion and annexation of Greenland?  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you support invasion and annexation of Greenland?



Recommended Posts

Is bill swerski still alive?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Invasion, I thought they were welcoming the US take over, not so much, violence keeps growing in the US. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dogcows said:

My bad, sorry for falsely accusing you of intelligent behavior.

dogcrap says what? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jerryskids said:

He believes in peace through strength.  You call that TACO because you view everything he does through a lens of him being evil incarnate.  So I don't see much more to discuss.

I don't see a model where we invade, but sure, it's possible.  Enjoy your win.  :thumbsup: 

Why do you keep falling for the same garbage over and over again? These dopes repeat themselves over and over and over saying the same TDS infused BS and you keep trying to actually argue with this cult of hardcore liberal useless pieces of root rot. 

Give it up dude. You are giving them credibility. You are not doing anything other than allowing them to get into your head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Well let's see.  Given what I said to Fnord above:

This act would be America First and preparing for isolationism.  Personally, I don't believe in isolationism as a proactive strategy, but in this case it is a contingency plan.  And I already said I don't think we will invade Greenland, and would oppose if we did.  Nation building?  Are you just shotgun blasting now?  :lol: 

And it's not about natural resources, but you share Gutter's TDS lens, so I'm not going to convince you otherwise.

So what do you call what Trump is trying to do in Venezuela?

He says he is in control of Venezuela.

Venezuela is not a security threat to this country. Venezuela does not send copious amounts of drugs into our country. 

He's all about the natural resources.

It's in every country's best interests to put their country first, but imperialism isn't the way to go, because then other countries see us as a threat and do something about it.

You think Russia and China will just sit around and let us take over Greenland?

It's idiocy, but this is what your Daddy tells you to think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Threatening NATO allies is not peace through strength. It shows insecurity and weakness.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, FrancieFootball said:

So what do you call what Trump is trying to do in Venezuela?

He says he is in control of Venezuela.

Venezuela is not a security threat to this country. Venezuela does not send copious amounts of drugs into our country. 

He's all about the natural resources.

It's in every country's best interests to put their country first, but imperialism isn't the way to go, because then other countries see us as a threat and do something about it.

You think Russia and China will just sit around and let us take over Greenland?

It's idiocy, but this is what your Daddy tells you to think.

Well Rusty, if Russia and China would not just sit around while we over Greenland, then a smart person might ask themselves why that is.  

It's comical how these discussions go.  Whenever I provide an alternative hypothesis to whatever comes out of your Trump-sucks-omatic werd generator, and/or in this case show that your post is a shotgun blast of pablum (nation building, still waiting to hear on that one :lol: ), you guys respond with some version of me listening to Daddy Trump, with zero self-awareness that you completely follow your TDS religious tenets.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Well Rusty, if Russia and China would not just sit around while we over Greenland, then a smart person might ask themselves why that is.  

It's comical how these discussions go.  Whenever I provide an alternative hypothesis to whatever comes out of your Trump-sucks-omatic werd generator, and/or in this case show that your post is a shotgun blast of pablum (nation building, still waiting to hear on that one :lol: ), you guys respond with some version of me listening to Daddy Trump, with zero self-awareness that you completely follow your TDS religious tenets.  

I'm old enough to remember you telling me I had TDS because I thought Trump was going to levy tariffs and you told me it was just the art of the deal.  Who was right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

I'm old enough to remember you telling me I had TDS because I thought Trump was going to levy tariffs and you told me it was just the art of the deal.  Who was right?

You're about a year old?  Apparently you aren't old enough to actually remember what I've repeatedly said:

There are more.  Presuming you are too lazy to read the ones above, I've been consistent in my hope, but not insistence, that the tariffs were some combination of punitive (China) and/or Art of the Deal, but that I disagreed with him if he unilaterally applied them.

Thanks for helping to show that I can objectively disagree with Trump.  In fact I'm about to start a thread where I'll disagree with Trump's plan to cap CC interest.

Meanwhile, you have never acknowledged a single good thing that Trump has done, but you think you are Mr. Objectivity like most pseud Lefties, and while telling me how I follow whatever Daddy says.  :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good thing trump has done, doesn’t exist, nothing to mention, but supported by socialism fans that voted for him .  Shame. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Good thing trump has done, doesn’t exist, nothing to mention, but supported by socialism fans that voted for him .  Shame. 

There is no way English is this guy's first language.  :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

You're about a year old?  Apparently you aren't old enough to actually remember what I've repeatedly said:

There are more.  Presuming you are too lazy to read the ones above, I've been consistent in my hope, but not insistence, that the tariffs were some combination of punitive (China) and/or Art of the Deal, but that I disagreed with him if he unilaterally applied them.

Thanks for helping to show that I can objectively disagree with Trump.  In fact I'm about to start a thread where I'll disagree with Trump's plan to cap CC interest.

Meanwhile, you have never acknowledged a single good thing that Trump has done, but you think you are Mr. Objectivity like most pseud Lefties, and while telling me how I follow whatever Daddy says.  :thumbsup: 

As I side, I was right, as I've been largely right about what Trump has done while you keep accusing me of having TDS.

In would suit you better to start listening to people like me and not newsmax and gateway pundit when it comes to trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be good when Cuba falls. More baseball prospects and th prices in Florida and the Bahamas should drop. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

45 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

As I side, I was right, as I've been largely right about what Trump has done while you keep accusing me of having TDS.

In would suit you better to start listening to people like me and not newsmax and gateway pundit when it comes to trump.

More TDS from this clown. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said:

As I side, I was right, as I've been largely right about what Trump has done while you keep accusing me of having TDS.

In would suit you better to start listening to people like me and not newsmax and gateway pundit when it comes to trump.

You were wrong about me pushing the tariffs as a good thing, which was the point of this discussion, dummy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The U.S. has five major inhabited territories—Puerto Rico, Guam, U.S. Virgin Islands, Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa—mostly acquired through cession (treaties after war) like Puerto Rico/Guam (Spain) and purchase/treaty (USVI from Denmark, American Samoa from Germany/UK/native chiefs). Other uninhabited islands in the Pacific and Caribbean are also U.S. territories, gained via treaties, discovery (Guano Act), or UN Trust status. 

Oh look, we've done this several times before. No reason Greenland shouldn't be next.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Population of Greenland is only 55K, or about 10K less than go to average pro football game.

Get them on a welfare program with direct deposit, ship in some good food for them.  Build a couple of airstrips and bases, a golf course and some condos and their life will be better off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Well Rusty, if Russia and China would not just sit around while we over Greenland, then a smart person might ask themselves why that is.  

It's comical how these discussions go.  Whenever I provide an alternative hypothesis to whatever comes out of your Trump-sucks-omatic werd generator, and/or in this case show that your post is a shotgun blast of pablum (nation building, still waiting to hear on that one :lol: ), you guys respond with some version of me listening to Daddy Trump, with zero self-awareness that you completely follow your TDS religious tenets.  

Always the victim.

🙁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said:

Population of Greenland is only 55K, or about 10K less than go to average pro football game.

Get them on a welfare program with direct deposit, ship in some good food for them.  Build a couple of airstrips and bases, a golf course and some condos and their life will be better off.

Convince the population that Greenland is one giant, long term escape room game involving the entire population of the island.  Get them to solve the puzzle and they will all happily escape to Iceland or Denmark.  When it is unoccupied we move in.  The State flag should be Opus, from Bloom County.  They do have puffins there, don't they?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said:

Population of Greenland is only 55K, or about 10K less than go to average pro football game.

Get them on a welfare program with direct deposit, ship in some good food for them.  Build a couple of airstrips and bases, a golf course and some condos and their life will be better off.

Man, a Greenland golf course would kick ass. Everyone would be launching 500-yard drives thanks to balls skittering along the glaciers, and water hazards would be aimed at due to being frozen.

FORE!

🏌️‍♂️ 🍙

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said:

Population of Greenland is only 55K, or about 10K less than go to average pro football game.

Get them on a welfare program with direct deposit, ship in some good food for them.  Build a couple of airstrips and bases, a golf course and some condos and their life will be better off.

85% of Greenlanders don't want to be annexed or to be any part of the US.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

The U.S. has five major inhabited territories—Puerto Rico, Guam, U.S. Virgin Islands, Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa—mostly acquired through cession (treaties after war) like Puerto Rico/Guam (Spain) and purchase/treaty (USVI from Denmark, American Samoa from Germany/UK/native chiefs). Other uninhabited islands in the Pacific and Caribbean are also U.S. territories, gained via treaties, discovery (Guano Act), or UN Trust status. 

Oh look, we've done this several times before. No reason Greenland shouldn't be next.

Because NOTHING has changed in the world since imperialism and territory grabs ended more than a century ago.

Things now are excatly the way they were then!

Weeeeee!!!!!

America First!

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, squistion said:

85% of Greenlanders don't want to be annexed or to be any part of the US.

FOCK 'EM! AMERICA FIRST!

And we would have gotten away with it if it weren't through all those other meddling nations of the world!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, squistion said:

85% of Greenlanders don't want to be annexed or to be any part of the US.

That's only 50K people..no biggie. Once those checks start rolling in every month they will change their tune.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, FrancieFootball said:

Always the victim.

🙁

Well, you deserve it princess rusty. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said:

That's only 50K people..no biggie. Once those checks start rolling in every month they will change their tune.

So what 85% want doesn't matter. Got it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, dogcows said:

Aliens? 👽 

Kudos for being one of the few MAGA fans to realize global warming is real though :clap:

Why do you think we went into Iraq?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

You were wrong about me pushing the tariffs as a good thing, which was the point of this discussion, dummy. 

I said that you called it the art of the deal, and you were wrong.  Dummy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, squistion said:

So what 85% want doesn't matter. Got it. 

In your poll (lie) were they offered money? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

I read we have a Space Force base on Greenland already. Beef that up and there you go.

Wrong coast

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that populist maga crowd didn’t care for expansion. That we caused the Ukriane war by meddling in their country forcing Russia to respond.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An invasion of Greenland is stupid and will hurt the Republicans in future elections.

A purchasing of Greenland is not a bad idea at all.

 

Trump is at a 10 out of 10 in regards to this Greenland thing.  If he dialed it back to about a 4 out of 10....it would go better.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, zsasz said:

An invasion of Greenland is stupid and will hurt the Republicans in future elections.

A purchasing of Greenland is not a bad idea at all.

 

Trump is at a 10 out of 10 in regards to this Greenland thing.  If he dialed it back to about a 4 out of 10....it would go better.  

Prez Clownzo will not invade Greenland. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Prez Clownzo will not invade Greenland. 

Thegenital. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×