Global Warm, er, Climate Chan, er, SCIENCE = WRONG!

[Strike 4,015]

 

 

 

Now, I'm not going to sit here and claim that global warming is the biggest threat to humanity,

 

Of course not. We all know the biggest threat to humanity is dumb Liberals.

 

:banana:

[IMMensaMind 460]

I think you have me confused with someone that would waste a minute of my time debating with an azzhole like you. You lost that privilege when you personally attacked me and my family. Die in a puddle of aids.

 

Link?

[Hardcore troubadour 12,764]

We should have less pollution and recycle more. Our landfills are getting full and the ocean has a lot of garbage in it. Mostly from third world shitholes.

[MDC 5,915]

I like how scientists fudge data to get lucrative climate change science grants but the oil industry reports the truth cause they are nice.

[mobb_deep 917]

 

Link?

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=473009&p=6096007

 

Which is funny now that I read it, because my hair isn't even remotely red, my teeth are perfectly straight and gap free, and I've never worn a hat with a brim turned up. PS. My wife is beautiful.

 

Now, please go die in a puddle of aids. Or waste your time replying to me over and over. This will be the last post I ever read from you.

[Strike 4,015]

I like how scientists fudge data to get lucrative climate change science grants but the oil industry reports the truth cause they are nice.

 

Thank god I don't listen to the oil companies. Whew. I dodged a bullet there!!!!

[MDC 5,915]

 

Thank god I don't listen to the oil companies. Whew. I dodged a bullet there!!!!

I dont listen to scientists. Theyre living like gangsters off those big $ federal grants.

[Mike Honcho 4,054]

 

Thank god I don't listen to the oil companies. Whew. I dodged a bullet there!!!!

 

Yes, we know that you wait for somebody else to pick up the research they paid for before regurgitating it here.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

How much jet fuel is used each year for these bozos to preach about Climate Change?

[RaiderHaters Revenge 3,611]

just to clarify for Mobb

 

the majority of scientists don't agree on global warming

 

the 97% thing is a myth, 97% of scientists who work in the field of global warming funding based companies agree

[Mike Honcho 4,054]

How much jet fuel is used each year for these bozos to preach about Climate Change?

 

I'm not a scientists, but off-hand I'll guess 9 gallons.

[Sho Nuff 719]

IMMensaMind won this thread...

Youre slow enough to believe that.

[penultimatestraw 473]

Just because you dont understand something, doesnt mean it isnt true.

This guy gets it.

[posty 2,297]

Youre slow enough to believe that.

[penultimatestraw 473]

just to clarify for Mobb

 

the majority of scientists don't agree on global warming

 

the 97% thing is a myth, 97% of scientists who work in the field of global warming funding based companies agree

What percentage of scientists with adequate climatology training disagree with the concepts of anthropogenic climate change? How does this compare to other scientific disciplines?

 

Fvck, how many climate scientists do you follow?

 

This whole “debate” is inane.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 3,611]

What percentage of scientists with adequate climatology training disagree with the concepts of anthropogenic climate change? How does this compare to other scientific disciplines?

 

Fvck, how many climate scientists do you follow?

 

This whole “debate” is inane.

 

I follow 3 extensively, but I have read and heard at least a dozen others debunking this consensus

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

This guy gets it.

Just because you give medical advice, doesn't mean you're a doctor.

[IMMensaMind 460]

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=473009&p=6096007

 

Which is funny now that I read it, because my hair isn't even remotely red, my teeth are perfectly straight and gap free, and I've never worn a hat with a brim turned up. PS. My wife is beautiful.

 

Now, please go die in a puddle of aids. Or waste your time replying to me over and over. This will be the last post I ever read from you.

Ah. The link where you attacked me first. What a whiny biatch you are.

 

And yes, you are that guy. I remember your pic, Sta-Puft. So do plenty of other posters. I asked for the link because doing so would clearly force you to display who started the bullsht. If you don't want to get slammed, I suggest you stay the fock out of my face.

 

See ya later, bowling pin.

[penultimatestraw 473]

Just because you give medical advice, doesn't mean you're a doctor.

True. It’s the degree that does it.

[penultimatestraw 473]

I follow 3 extensively, but I have read and heard at least a dozen others debunking this consensus

What percentage of climatologists do you think disagree with the consensus? Why did you choose to follow the three?

[mobb_deep 917]

Ah. The link where you attacked me first. What a whiny biatch you are.

 

And yes, you are that guy. I remember your pic, Sta-Puft. So do plenty of other posters. I asked for the link because doing so would clearly force you to display who started the bullsht. If you don't want to get slammed, I suggest you stay the fock out of my face.

 

See ya later, bowling pin.

 

Whatever you say, Mike. I said you were a bad poster. I didn't attack you personally. Let alone your family. But, that's ok... I know what you look like too bud. Your little surveillance company in BFE Wisconsin. Eyebrows like Anthony Davis. You're not fooling anyone.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,764]

 

Whatever you say, Mike. I said you were a bad poster. I didn't attack you personally. Let alone your family. But, that's ok... I know what you look like too bud. Your little lacrosse company in BFE Wisconsin. Eyebrows like Anthony Davis. You're not fooling anyone.

Davis' eyebrows freak me out. Seriously. I can't watch him shoot a free throw.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 3,611]

What percentage of climatologists do you think disagree with the consensus? Why did you choose to follow the three?

 

cause they have challenged other climatologists to debates and nobody will debate them

 

hes my favorite right here

 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/15/greenpeace-founder-delivers-powerful-annual-lecture-praises-carbon-dioxide-full-text/

 

Patrick Moore

 

also for what its worth no climate scientist says that climate change doesnt exist, they just argue the affect of man which we have no way of knowing, and the long term effect, which again even the most liberal argument says .5 degrees by 2100 which is nothing

 

CO2 is not a bad thing

[IMMensaMind 460]

Whatever you say, Mike. I said you were a bad poster. I didn't attack you personally.

Uh...that's a personal attack, and it was unsolicited. You shouldn't have done that, but it wasn't the first time. You got what you deserved.

 

What happened to 'last time you read a post'? Is everything you write bullsht?

 

Let alone your family. But, that's ok... I know what you look like too bud. Your little surveillance company in BFE Wisconsin. Eyebrows like Anthony Davis. You're not fooling anyone.

 

Eyebrows like Anthony Davis? You're gonna have to clarify that one; dunno what you're talking about.

[mobb_deep 917]

Uh...that's a personal attack, and it was unsolicited. You shouldn't have done that, but it wasn't the first time. You got what you deserved.

 

What happened to 'last time you read a post'? Is everything you write bullsht?

 

Eyebrows like Anthony Davis? You're gonna have to clarify that one; dunno what you're talking about.

 

I haven't made it to the ignore section yet. Looks like your old lady needs to lose a few pounds too. Persians usually get fat after kids though. She's a very pretty lady. I'll give you that much.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,764]

 

I haven't made it to the ignore section yet. Looks like your old lady needs to lose a few pounds too. Persians usually get fat after kids though. She's a very pretty lady. I'll give you that much.

Hourglass perhaps?

[Baker Boy 1,489]

I think you have me confused with someone that would waste a minute of my time debating with an azzhole like you. You lost that privilege when you personally attacked me and my family. Die in a puddle of aids.

Wow, you got your butt kicked.

[mobb_deep 917]

Hourglass perhaps?

Shes got quite the rack on her.

[MDC 5,915]

 

I haven't made it to the ignore section yet. Looks like your old lady needs to lose a few pounds too. Persians usually get fat after kids though. She's a very pretty lady. I'll give you that much.

You just signed your own death warrant pal.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,575]

Wow, you got your butt kicked.

 

Like a beeyotch. Holy ######, I haven't seen a beat down like that since, well, yesterday when I planted my shoe in SloNuff's ass multiple times. But, nonetheless, Mensa knocked mobb OUT!

[Baker Boy 1,489]

What percentage of scientists with adequate climatology training disagree with the concepts of anthropogenic climate change? How does this compare to other scientific disciplines?

Fvck, how many climate scientists do you follow?

This whole “debate” is inane.

Once you doctor the facts you have no credibility! HTH

[Baker Boy 1,489]

I haven't made it to the ignore section yet. Looks like your old lady needs to lose a few pounds too. Persians usually get fat after kids though. She's a very pretty lady. I'll give you that much.

 

Well the sure sign of getting your butt kiced is insulting and calling names. This is the MO of the Progressive Socialist And they have to use it a lot these days.

[mobb_deep 917]

Well the sure sign of getting your butt kiced is insulting and calling names. This is the MO of the Progressive Socialist And they have to use it a lot these days.

Look at B.B. trying to be relevant. Ill toss you a pity reply, since everybody else here ignores you.

[penultimatestraw 473]

cause they have challenged other climatologists to debates and nobody will debate them

 

hes my favorite right here

 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/15/greenpeace-founder-delivers-powerful-annual-lecture-praises-carbon-dioxide-full-text/

 

Patrick Moore

 

also for what its worth no climate scientist says that climate change doesnt exist, they just argue the affect of man which we have no way of knowing, and the long term effect, which again even the most liberal argument says .5 degrees by 2100 which is nothing

 

CO2 is not a bad thing

You still havent answered my question. Do you think the majority of climate scientists think anthropogenic climate change is a significant problem?

 

Most scientists dont go to debates to challenge a minority opinion in their field. Especially one as politically charged as this. For example, I think most naturopathic medicine is nonsense, but I would never debate a naturopath. Its way too easy to sway laypeople regarding complex scientific topics using appeals to emotion, etc.

 

If you doubt climate changes significance, you are basically saying the majority of a scientific discipline is corrupt, while the naysayers have no ulterior motive. Business is predicated on making money, so Im never surprised by greed and corruption. Science is based on describing natural phenomena, searching for truth. While all humans are subject to bias, what makes climate science deniers more credible than the consensus? What has Patrick Moore contributed to the field of climate science, and what is his scientific background?

[IMMensaMind 460]

I haven't made it to the ignore section yet. Looks like your old lady needs to lose a few pounds too. Persians usually get fat after kids though. She's a very pretty lady. I'll give you that much.

 

 

You're confused. My wife is and has never been overweight, and she's not Persian. Nothing about her appearance could be construed as Persian; she's blonde and Germanic. The only thing you got right is that she is very pretty.

 

Sounds to me like you saw a pic of Ayrabs and thought somehow that it was me.

[IMMensaMind 460]

You just signed your own death warrant pal.

Fishtown Fraud says what?

 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 3,611]

You still haven’t answered my question. Do you think the majority of climate scientists think anthropogenic climate change is a significant problem?

 

Most scientists don’t go to debates to challenge a minority opinion in their field. Especially one as politically charged as this. For example, I think most naturopathic medicine is nonsense, but I would never debate a naturopath. It’s way too easy to sway laypeople regarding complex scientific topics using appeals to emotion, etc.

 

If you doubt climate change’s significance, you are basically saying the majority of a scientific discipline is corrupt, while the naysayers have no ulterior motive. Business is predicated on making money, so I’m never surprised by greed and corruption. Science is based on describing natural phenomena, searching for truth. While all humans are subject to bias, what makes climate science deniers more credible than the consensus?

 

no what I am saying is that science isnt a consensus, about 40% of scientists I think disagree with the MMCC theories presented.

 

A famous scientist by the name of Albert Einstein said, “that genius abhors consensus because when consensus is reached, thinking stops.” consensus in science is an oxymoron. From Galileo to Einstein, one scientist with proof is more convincing than thousands of other scientists who believe something to be true ... To many of us, there is no convincing evidence that carbon dioxide produced by humans has any influence on the Earth’s climate.”

 

The problem is that their isnt a proof and science again isnt based on consensus

 

As far as debate, why wouldn't the leading scientist on Climate Change Theory want to debate the leading scientist on its counter. Through discussion comes resolution

 

As far as corruption, mankind is inherently corrupt, and scientists need money to do research regardless of their views. Do you think any funding would come across by a scientist saying hey I think humans are ruining the climate...Oh really how sure are you?? Well I think I am a little sure how bout you fund me

 

quote taken from http://www.lakelandtimes.com/main.asp?SectionID=11&SubSectionID=11&ArticleID=20332

 

when the leading voices for MMCC are Al Gore and Bill Nye (neither climate scientists) it says what I need to know

 

and like I have said it doesn't hurt anyone from recycling and doing what they can to cut back on waste, if everyone did that then we wouldnt need climate change funding, but that wouldn't fit an agenda

[RaiderHaters Revenge 3,611]

here are 1350+ papers that nobody ever wants to talk about. All peer reviewed

 

http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html

 

and this is where I get alot of my research and find people who I follow

 

also I must admit, Joe Rogan Podcasts lead me to some others especially Randall Carlson

[penultimatestraw 473]

no what I am saying is that science isnt a consensus, about 40% of scientists I think disagree with the MMCC theories presented.

 

A famous scientist by the name of Albert Einstein said, that genius abhors consensus because when consensus is reached, thinking stops. [/size]consensus in science is an oxymoron. From Galileo to Einstein, one scientist with proof is more convincing than thousands of other scientists who believe something to be true ... To many of us, there is no convincing evidence that carbon dioxide produced by humans has any influence on the Earths climate.[/size]

 

The problem is that their isnt a proof and science again isnt based on consensus

 

As far as debate, why wouldn't the leading scientist on Climate Change Theory want to debate the leading scientist on its counter. Through discussion comes resolution

 

As far as corruption, mankind is inherently corrupt, and scientists need money to do research regardless of their views. Do you think any funding would come across by a scientist saying hey I think humans are ruining the climate...Oh really how sure are you?? Well I think I am a little sure how bout you fund me

 

quote taken from http://www.lakelandtimes.com/main.asp?SectionID=11&SubSectionID=11&ArticleID=20332

 

when the leading voices for MMCC are Al Gore and Bill Nye (neither climate scientists) it says what I need to know

 

and like I have said it doesn't hurt anyone from recycling and doing what they can to cut back on waste, if everyone did that then we wouldnt need climate change funding, but that wouldn't fit an agenda

Both sides are subject to bias and corruption. If its a topic I dont fully understand, I tend to err in believing the most preeminent scientists in the field, those with the most peer-reviewed publications. I aint talking about Gore or Nye. Who are the most reputable scientists, and are they a part of the dissenting 40% ...and while youre at it, can you send a link where that number came from?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,575]

 

no what I am saying is that science isnt a consensus, about 40% of scientists I think disagree with the MMCC theories presented.

 

A famous scientist by the name of Albert Einstein said, “that genius abhors consensus because when consensus is reached, thinking stops.” consensus in science is an oxymoron. From Galileo to Einstein, one scientist with proof is more convincing than thousands of other scientists who believe something to be true ... To many of us, there is no convincing evidence that carbon dioxide produced by humans has any influence on the Earth’s climate.”

 

The problem is that their isnt a proof and science again isnt based on consensus

 

As far as debate, why wouldn't the leading scientist on Climate Change Theory want to debate the leading scientist on its counter. Through discussion comes resolution

 

As far as corruption, mankind is inherently corrupt, and scientists need money to do research regardless of their views. Do you think any funding would come across by a scientist saying hey I think humans are ruining the climate...Oh really how sure are you?? Well I think I am a little sure how bout you fund me

 

quote taken from http://www.lakelandtimes.com/main.asp?SectionID=11&SubSectionID=11&ArticleID=20332

 

when the leading voices for MMCC are Al Gore and Bill Nye (neither climate scientists) it says what I need to know

 

and like I have said it doesn't hurt anyone from recycling and doing what they can to cut back on waste, if everyone did that then we wouldnt need climate change funding, but that wouldn't fit an agenda

 

Most of the people that I know that don't recycle and throw all their ###### in the trash and drive gas guzzlers are liberals who support climate change. Some of the worst hypocrites you would ever see.

 

But, it goes with the liberal ideology: Do as I say, not as I do. We want YOU to sacrifice for climate change, not us.