Green Bay Coach and GM

[Sho Nuff 720]

TT is a dope.......he ran favre out of town and almost killed the packers.......good luck sunday.........the cards are gonna get TT fired .

 

almost killed the Packers?

6-10...followed by 11-5, franchise QB found...D playing solid...young team still getting better.

Yeah...he sure killed them.

[Sho Nuff 720]

There really is nothing else for me to add. Favre has had the better year. He has out played Rodgers and beat the Packers twice. I have always contended he was the better QB, and would have lead any GM's team who knew what he was doing to at least 2 more Super Bowl games. Anything else you need to hear for the hundredth time? You could do one of those cute little things where you break down every sentence of a post and respond. That's always kinda neat!! or add smileys that make you think you are right or are proving something.

 

Ron Wolf knew what he was doing and Favre did not lead his teams to 2 more SBs.

So why do you think it was all the GM?

 

As for Favre vs. Rodgers. Both had great years for their teams.

This postseason will either prove Thomopson right or horribly wrong.

If Favre wins a title, it proves the entire Packers' brass wrong in their thought that Favre could no longer deliver a title.

Then again...helps him that he will not have to go outdoors (not an excuse...just a fact that part of the decision was based on the cold winters in Wisconsin).

If he comes up short...in a way, they are vindicated a tad. Rodgers play on its own has also vindicated them a bit.

[donhaas 18]

There really is nothing else for me to add. Favre has had the better year. He has out played Rodgers and beat the Packers twice.

 

You still didn't answer the original question where somebody said Rodgers is better and you responded "Favre had the better year."

 

At this point I care about Favre's team beating Rodger's team about as much as I care about Rich Campbell's 53-man team beating Joe Montana's team one time in the 80s.

 

I do not see Rich Campbell's bust in Canton despite his great achievement vis a vis Joe Montana. It's just a dumb argument. One that you make over and over... Favre played on a better team than Rodgers, for a variety of reasons and especially early in the season.... that doesn't make him better.

[i know you know this]

 

I think you are a smart enough fan to be able to objectively gauge how Favre would do with the silly-bad o-line the Packers had.... Heck, you saw Favre start to crumble (and almost get benched) when his great o-line started to underperform a tiny bit and he started to get some pressure on him this last month.

 

Any fool can see that Rodgers > Favre... if not for the only reason that making plays on his feet have been crucial to the Packers offense when o-line breakdowns happened early and often

 

You didn't see a much younger Favre chuck up 29 INTs and lead the Pack to a 4-12 record when he last faced adverse conditions?

How did that get erased from your memory?

 

It's silly to think what Rodgers would do with AP and that O-line.... it's likewise silly to think what Favre would have done earlier in this season with the Packers suck-ass line...

 

It's silly that you can't recognize this

 

 

Rodgers > Favre

[Blue_Star_Wrecking_Crew 0]

almost killed the Packers?

6-10...followed by 11-5, franchise QB found...D playing solid...young team still getting better.

Yeah...he sure killed them.

get back to me sunday after the game...........You will find me in the "Rodgers is 0-1 in the playoffs" thread that I have started.

[Sho Nuff 720]

get back to me sunday after the game...........You will find me in the "Rodgers is 0-1 in the playoffs" thread that I have started.

 

Maybe...going on the road to a team that made the Super Bowl next year.

 

Still won't mean Thompson killed the team.

[ManitowocDave 1]

get back to me sunday after the game...........You will find me in the "Rodgers is 0-1 in the playoffs" thread that I have started.

 

Hey Blue Star,

 

Would you be willing do make a signature bet with me on this weekends Packer game....heads-up? I don't want any points because I think that the Packers will win the game. Make the duration of the bet for as long as the Packers or Cards survive in the playoffs? And if one of these teams wins the Super Bowl, the signature line payment will last until the start of the playoffs for next season.

 

I don't talk a bunch of crap, but when I talk it I am willing to back it up with actions.

 

Please take me up on this bet.

[remote controller 143]

You still didn't answer the original question where somebody said Rodgers is better and you responded "Favre had the better year."

I guess you can't comprehend what you read.

 

Quote:

 

There really is nothing else for me to add. Favre has had the better year. He has out played Rodgers and beat the Packers twice. I have always contended he was the better QB, and would have lead any GM's team who knew what he was doing to at least 2 more Super Bowl games. Anything else you need to hear for the hundredth time? You could do one of those cute little things where you break down every sentence of a post and respond. That's always kinda neat!! or add smileys that make you think you are right or are proving something

[remote controller 143]

Ron Wolf knew what he was doing and Favre did not lead his teams to 2 more SBs.

So why do you think it was all the GM?

 

As for Favre vs. Rodgers. Both had great years for their teams.

This postseason will either prove Thomopson right or horribly wrong.

If Favre wins a title, it proves the entire Packers' brass wrong in their thought that Favre could no longer deliver a title.

Then again...helps him that he will not have to go outdoors (not an excuse...just a fact that part of the decision was based on the cold winters in Wisconsin).

If he comes up short...in a way, they are vindicated a tad. Rodgers play on its own has also vindicated them a bit.

My contention is that every good team has a window of Super Bowl Oppurtunity. When Rodgers slid in the draft, they had no intention of taking a QB there. This was a knee jerk reaction that caused them to to vere from pre draft plans. The fact that he then, years later felt the need to take Brohm and back Brohm up with Flynn in the same draft, tells me he was clue searching, and throwing a whole lot of $hit at a wall hoping a few pieces stick. I feel both sides are vindicated at the present. Favre totally vindicated, and Ted partially. Favre went into Lambeau and stuck it to Ted, and has had a great year. Rodgers has been the highlight of the Packers the past two years. I have always loved the way Rodgers has handled this mess, and performed. For hopefully the last time. I am upset with the way that Ted Thompson failed to put weapons around Brett for another couple Super Bowl runs. If the two teams meet again, I am going to be in a tough spot. I want Favre to get his Super Bowl win, but I want the same for Rodgers and the Packers.

 

I guess the easy way out for me is to hope that it is a great game, and that both teams play well, and that ADP fumbles it away!!

[donhaas 18]

I have always contended he was the better QB,

 

In his prime, yes, Favre is the better QB...... but Rodgers is not in his prime yet and Favre is far, far from his prime.

 

As I've laid out many times -- immobile old Favre with that pathetic offensive line from the first half of the season is something I glad I never had to sit through.

As I've said many times -- Rodgers far superior mobility and his amazing numbers on 3rd down facing crazy pressure is what puts him ahead of Favre when statistics are almost identical....

 

But we will agree to disagree on this point.

 

 

 

I think we both can agree that TT and MM have not quite turned out to be the dumb and dumber that the threadstarter had hoped....

I think that we can also agree that Favre's drama queen ways, his crying after games, and all the theatrics created the monster that is Aaron Rodgers -- and nobody -- not TT himself -- ever dreamed he would be this good this fast....

 

Cheers

[Sho Nuff 720]

My contention is that every good team has a window of Super Bowl Oppurtunity. When Rodgers slid in the draft, they had no intention of taking a QB there. This was a knee jerk reaction that caused them to to vere from pre draft plans. The fact that he then, years later felt the need to take Brohm and back Brohm up with Flynn in the same draft, tells me he was clue searching, and throwing a whole lot of $hit at a wall hoping a few pieces stick. I feel both sides are vindicated at the present. Favre totally vindicated, and Ted partially. Favre went into Lambeau and stuck it to Ted, and has had a great year. Rodgers has been the highlight of the Packers the past two years. I have always loved the way Rodgers has handled this mess, and performed. For hopefully the last time. I am upset with the way that Ted Thompson failed to put weapons around Brett for another couple Super Bowl runs. If the two teams meet again, I am going to be in a tough spot. I want Favre to get his Super Bowl win, but I want the same for Rodgers and the Packers.

 

I guess the easy way out for me is to hope that it is a great game, and that both teams play well, and that ADP fumbles it away!!

 

First off on Rodgers...when you have a QB at the age Favre was...hinting at retirement. And a possible top of the draft QB falls to you in the 20s...you take him. I still can't believe some want to harp on that pick as a mistake.

Favre had a ton of time under Wolf to win his multiple SBs...you said "and would have lead any GM's team who knew what he was doing to at least 2 more Super Bowl games."

So why could he not do it with Wolf's teams? Wolf was there til June 2001.

 

While it was not in their plan...it certainly was the right pick...and we are seeing that now.

 

As for Brohm...bad pick for sure. But again, look at the situation. You have one QB on the roster at the time. Your HOF QB just told you again he was staying retired right before the draft. The QB on your roster, as much faith as they have in him, has not shown the ability to stay on the field through limited work. And you have a QB dropping to you who is said to be the most NFL ready. It was an insurance policy. One that turned up crappy. Flynn...meh, 7th round flier...they took quite a few of those on QBs over the years I believe (Ingle Martin and so on). Many teams will take a late QB like that hoping to get a 3rd stringer.

 

As for Favre vindicated. Sure he got his 2 wins vs. the Packers. But do you think he would still feel vindicated if they came into the Metrodome and beat the Vikings?

 

And its funny how Brett did not have the weapons around him...yet they went to the NFC championship game in 2007. And now in 2009 GB is back in the playoffs and are a hot team that can contend. So how were the weapons not there?

Basically, you seem mad at Thompson for not flexing the cap for a few years and mortgaging the future for a late 35+ year old QB who had been talking retirement for a few years.

 

Are you also mad at Wolf for not doing enough to get Brett another title?

[donhaas 18]

First off on Rodgers...when you have a QB at the age Favre was...hinting at retirement. And a possible top of the draft QB falls to you in the 20s...you take him. I still can't believe some want to harp on that pick as a mistake.

Favre had a ton of time under Wolf to win his multiple SBs...you said "and would have lead any GM's team who knew what he was doing to at least 2 more Super Bowl games."

So why could he not do it with Wolf's teams? Wolf was there til June 2001.

 

While it was not in their plan...it certainly was the right pick...and we are seeing that now.

 

As for Brohm...bad pick for sure. But again, look at the situation. You have one QB on the roster at the time. Your HOF QB just told you again he was staying retired right before the draft. The QB on your roster, as much faith as they have in him, has not shown the ability to stay on the field through limited work. And you have a QB dropping to you who is said to be the most NFL ready. It was an insurance policy. One that turned up crappy. Flynn...meh, 7th round flier...they took quite a few of those on QBs over the years I believe (Ingle Martin and so on). Many teams will take a late QB like that hoping to get a 3rd stringer.

 

As for Favre vindicated. Sure he got his 2 wins vs. the Packers. But do you think he would still feel vindicated if they came into the Metrodome and beat the Vikings?

 

And its funny how Brett did not have the weapons around him...yet they went to the NFC championship game in 2007. And now in 2009 GB is back in the playoffs and are a hot team that can contend. So how were the weapons not there?

Basically, you seem mad at Thompson for not flexing the cap for a few years and mortgaging the future for a late 35+ year old QB who had been talking retirement for a few years.

 

Are you also mad at Wolf for not doing enough to get Brett another title?

 

Good posting

[Walter34 3]

For the record, I think GB made the right decision to move on from Favre to Rodgers a couple of years ago. If anything, Rodgers has excelled despite their mishandling of the situation. The whole summer was waffling and bickering through the press, alleged trips down south to talk him into coming back, lies and BS from both sides through the press.

 

In the end, they fell into the right move which they should have made sooner and more firmly.

 

What Favre has done since is irrelavent. he played like sh!t in NY and played good to date this year - so what? Stringing Rodgers along for more time while favre the prima donna annually waited until the last minute to make up his mind was a loser situation. You can say that favre earned the right to do so or you could say that he owed GB the respect to make up his mind and not leave them in the lerch for a year because it was too late to adjust if he did retire.

[FeelingMN 273]

For the record, I think GB made the right decision to move on from Favre to Rodgers a couple of years ago. If anything, Rodgers has excelled despite their mishandling of the situation. The whole summer was waffling and bickering through the press, alleged trips down south to talk him into coming back, lies and BS from both sides through the press.

 

In the end, they fell into the right move which they should have made sooner and more firmly.

 

What Favre has done since is irrelavent. he played like sh!t in NY and played good to date this year - so what? Stringing Rodgers along for more time while favre the prima donna annually waited until the last minute to make up his mind was a loser situation. You can say that favre earned the right to do so or you could say that he owed GB the respect to make up his mind and not leave them in the lerch for a year because it was too late to adjust if he did retire.

 

 

The Rodgers/Favre comparison is a moot point. Both are playing at a high level....and their respective teams are enjoying a high level of success and are poised for championship runs. So all parties involved have to be pleased with how things have turned out.

 

But looking back, the entire situation was butchered by TT and Favre. The fact was the Packers had a legitimate shot at making another title run in 2008 and both sides should have recognized that.....especially Favre. But obviously there was some sh!t going on behind the scenes, and it was the reason Favre took the events so personally....and for that I blame Thompson. But like I said, it's all water under the bridge now because everyone should be happy with where they're at in 2010.

 

And I'll give TT props for moving up and getting Mathews at the end of the first. The guy is gonna be a stud.

[donhaas 18]

For the record, I think GB made the right decision to move on from Favre to Rodgers a couple of years ago. If anything, Rodgers has excelled despite their mishandling of the situation. The whole summer was waffling and bickering through the press, alleged trips down south to talk him into coming back, lies and BS from both sides through the press.

 

In the end, they fell into the right move which they should have made sooner and more firmly.

 

What Favre has done since is irrelavent. he played like sh!t in NY and played good to date this year - so what? Stringing Rodgers along for more time while favre the prima donna annually waited until the last minute to make up his mind was a loser situation. You can say that favre earned the right to do so or you could say that he owed GB the respect to make up his mind and not leave them in the lerch for a year because it was too late to adjust if he did retire.

 

Good posting

[donhaas 18]

 

The Rodgers/Favre comparison is a moot point. Both are playing at a high level....and their respective teams are enjoying a high level of success and are poised for championship runs. So all parties involved have to be pleased with how things have turned out.

 

But looking back, the entire situation was butchered by TT and Favre. The fact was the Packers had a legitimate shot at making another title run in 2008 and both sides should have recognized that.....especially Favre. But obviously there was some sh!t going on behind the scenes, and it was the reason Favre took the events so personally....and for that I blame Thompson. But like I said, it's all water under the bridge now because everyone should be happy with where they're at in 2010.

 

And I'll give TT props for moving up and getting Mathews at the end of the first. The guy is gonna be a stud.

 

Good posting

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

The Rodgers/Favre comparison is a moot point. Both are playing at a high level....and their respective teams are enjoying a high level of success and are poised for championship runs. So all parties involved have to be pleased with how things have turned out.

 

But looking back, the entire situation was butchered by TT and Favre. The fact was the Packers had a legitimate shot at making another title run in 2008 and both sides should have recognized that.....especially Favre. But obviously there was some sh!t going on behind the scenes, and it was the reason Favre took the events so personally....and for that I blame Thompson. But like I said, it's all water under the bridge now because everyone should be happy with where they're at in 2010.

 

And I'll give TT props for moving up and getting Mathews at the end of the first. The guy is gonna be a stud.

 

I agree with most.

On blaming just TT for how Favre took things personally. Yeah...its his job to keep the guys happy and all...but not all can be kept happy. I think the biggest thing TT struggles with is communication. I don't think he talks enough with the players/agents behind the scenes enough. Between the Favre thing where we seemingly learned more from both sides talking through ESPN rather than sitting down early on to work the crap out...to Packers players (Nick Collins) not knowing if the team is even negotiating anything with them or if they will be.

 

Between that and his inability at building the Oline (needing to be bailed out by Tauscher)...those are his biggest liabilities for sure as a GM.

[remote controller 143]

I can agree with most everything here outside of that crazy Cannuck! LOL! I have never slammed Rodgers for his play or ability. I questioned his ability to close out games last year, and the beginning of this year some, but I am damn glad we have him. I just wanted the pieces for the additional runs 4 years back, and have always felt that both sides were wrong but TT was wronger!!!

[Phurfur 70]

I can agree with most everything here outside of that crazy Cannuck! LOL! I have never slammed Rodgers for his play or ability. I questioned his ability to close out games last year, and the beginning of this year some, but I am damn glad we have him. I just wanted the pieces for the additional runs 4 years back, and have always felt that both sides were wrong but TT was wronger!!!

 

I think Mike Sherman was the GM that screwed up a run at another SB or two. Favre did not want to play in GB and he used a chicken sh$t way to get out. Favre never was and never will be a classy guy.

[remote controller 143]

I think Mike Sherman was the GM that screwed up a run at another SB or two. Favre did not want to play in GB and he used a chicken sh$t way to get out. Favre never was and never will be a classy guy.

I agree and mentioned it in my post then erased it because it was getting off point. I felt it was a big mistake to not grant Holmgren those powers....lose him, then give those powers to Sherman who really didn't even request them. That request lost Holmgren, and the continuity we had acheived with wolf/holmgren.

[Sweetness_34 0]

almost killed the Packers?

6-10...followed by 11-5, franchise QB found...D playing solid...young team still getting better.

Yeah...he sure killed them.

 

That over-rated Defense looked great today .... what an awful performance by the D. Show up next time. Season ovah.... oh and Favre said he is still going to be playing next week. Rodgers with 2 horrible turnovers, missed open WRs on game changing plays etc.

[donhaas 18]

That over-rated Defense looked great today .... what an awful performance by the D. Show up next time. Season ovah.... oh and Favre said he is still going to be playing next week. Rodgers with 2 horrible turnovers, missed open WRs on game changing plays etc.

 

This is what you came out of hiding for???

 

425, 5 TDS, and one INT in a playoff game????

 

4440, 30 TDs and 7ints (5 more TDs on the ground) for the season??

 

 

Do you realize who your quarterback is?

Do you realize the crapass record he led your team to?

Do you realize how much of the Bears future was mortgaged to get him?

 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

 

 

Thread FAIL!!!!!

 

 

11-5 > 7-9

[Sho Nuff 720]

That over-rated Defense looked great today .... what an awful performance by the D. Show up next time. Season ovah.... oh and Favre said he is still going to be playing next week. Rodgers with 2 horrible turnovers, missed open WRs on game changing plays etc.

 

D had a tough day...as would any that gives Warner that much time to throw.

 

Show up? Where did the Bears show up today?

Funny you wait til now to post in this thread.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/recap?gid=2009...009&prov=ap

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/recap?gid=20091213003

 

Those 2 TOs are far fewer than the mountain of turnovers your golden boy Cutler had this year too...oh...and enjoy not having a first day pick this year.

 

You, as usual, are a turd.

[Bruce_Leroy 0]

That over-rated Defense looked great today .... what an awful performance by the D. Show up next time. Season ovah.... oh and Favre said he is still going to be playing next week. Rodgers with 2 horrible turnovers, missed open WRs on game changing plays etc.

the funny part of all of this is that he still has defender. Dude lit up the scoreboard but winning and being clutch is all about eliminating the costly turnovers. That cant be taught, it must be a killer instinct

[Sho Nuff 720]

the funny part of all of this is that he still has defender. Dude lit up the scoreboard but winning and being clutch is all about eliminating the costly turnovers. That cant be taught, it must be a killer instinct

 

The funny part is the only people who agree with you on things are a guy with 12 aliases...who its becoming more and more clear you are probably him anyway....and sweetness...teh biggest moron on this board.

[e-factor 13]

Anyone who thinks the Packers made the wrong decision going with Rodgers is either totally lacking in football knowledge or a troll, or both. Rodgers is scary good and it's only his second year as a starter. If he's not the best QB in football in 2010, he will be in 2011. Green Bay is set for the next 10 years at the most important position. Future looks pretty bright in Green Bay...........

 

As a Niner fan, I can only wonder "what if"...................

[Bruce_Leroy 0]

D had a tough day...as would any that gives Warner that much time to throw.

 

Show up? Where did the Bears show up today?

Funny you wait til now to post in this thread.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/recap?gid=2009...009&prov=ap

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/recap?gid=20091213003

 

Those 2 TOs are far fewer than the mountain of turnovers your golden boy Cutler had this year too...oh...and enjoy not having a first day pick this year.

 

You, as usual, are a turd.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXHgfYytxC8...player_embedded

 

is this you?

[remote controller 143]

Anyone who thinks the Packers made the wrong decision going with Rodgers is either totally lacking in football knowledge or a troll, or both. Rodgers is scary good and it's only his second year as a starter. If he's not the best QB in football in 2010, he will be in 2011. Green Bay is set for the next 10 years at the most important position. Future looks pretty bright in Green Bay...........

 

As a Niner fan, I can only wonder "what if"...................

Unless TT continues to draft his possible replacements, which he has already drafted two of them instead of support players. Brohm, and Flynn were wasted picks if the Almighty Ted new he had a Pro Bowler iin Rodgers. Would have been nice to see what those two picks could have brought in support for Rodgers, or maybe in protecting him. At this years rate, Rodgers won't make 10 years, and Brohm is gone already.

[donhaas 18]

Unless TT continues to draft his possible replacements, which he has already drafted two of them instead of support players. Brohm, and Flynn were wasted picks if the Almighty Ted new he had a Pro Bowler iin Rodgers. Would have been nice to see what those two picks could have brought in support for Rodgers, or maybe in protecting him. At this years rate, Rodgers won't make 10 years, and Brohm is gone already.

 

I think they were drafted more as back-up QBs.... I don't think it had to do with faith in Rodgers....Quarterbacks go down constantly in the NFL.

Yes.... I can't believe that TT wasted a seventh-round on Flynn.....(who is now the back-up QB)..... that's almost as bad as taking a punter in the third round....

Well, I hope that 1 or 2 of TT's other picks work out to minimize this damage!!!

[Sho Nuff 720]

Unless TT continues to draft his possible replacements, which he has already drafted two of them instead of support players. Brohm, and Flynn were wasted picks if the Almighty Ted new he had a Pro Bowler iin Rodgers. Would have been nice to see what those two picks could have brought in support for Rodgers, or maybe in protecting him. At this years rate, Rodgers won't make 10 years, and Brohm is gone already.

 

7th round picks are now wasted in finding a backup QB?

Brohm sure...at this point.

But again...you are looking at it in hindsight knowing that Rodgers showed his talent quite well and has played in all 32 regular season games since taking over as a starter.

But when the draft came along...Rodgers was the only QB on the roster...Rodgers was not totally known what he could do over a full season...nor was it certain he was durable enough. A QB who was rated a 1st rounder at one point fell into the 2nd round...was said to be the most NFL ready. Hindsight says it was a bad wasted pick.

But this ignores the situation at the time the pick was made.

[Sweetness_34 0]

Getting your azz handed to you to the tune of 51 pts must be good for a nap

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENvmq-rkVZc...player_embedded

 

[donhaas 18]

Getting your azz handed to you to the tune of 51 pts must be good for a nap

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENvmq-rkVZc...player_embedded

 

:music_guitarred:

 

 

Too much obsession.....

 

Packers -- youngest team in the league -- going to overtime in the house of the NFC champs.... one wide-open throw away from winning

 

Bears fans -- watching figure skating on TV once again during post-season..... mortgaging their future for their 17th crappy quarterback in 15 years....

 

 

Packers = Great present; great future

Bears = No present; no future

 

 

But do you remember 1985???? That was awesome!!! :thumbsdown:

[Walter34 3]

yadda, yadda, yadda

 

The dude was asleep - that's hilarious. Comments?

[donhaas 18]

The dude was asleep - that's hilarious. Comments?

 

Hilarious? SCTV was hilarious....

 

Mildly amusing maybe....

[Walter34 3]

Hilarious? SCTV was hilarious....

 

Mildly amusing maybe....

 

 

GB Defence with headset: "Ok coach, 3rd and long, what's the call?"

 

Capers: "zzzzzzzz"

 

GB defence: "Coach, all I hear is static"

 

Capers: "zzzzzzzz"

 

GB Defence: "Damn technology!!@@!! Ok boys, let's blitz I guess - ARRRRRR"

 

 

But yes, you are correct - SCTV was great

[donhaas 18]

I am curious, Walter, how strange it is -- as the GB defense is constantly maligned after that game (and rightfully so) -- that not a single word is said about AZ's defense (not just in this trolling thread, but anywhere)...

 

 

They were the defending NFC champs playing at home with all the home-field advantages and the huge advantages of crowd noise, and they got shredded just as bad by a second-year quarterback making his first playoff start ever....

After the first play of the game, they did not make a play the whole game except for the last play of the game (which was a penalty that wasn't called) set up by another play (in which a penalty was committed but not called)....

 

 

Just because Rodgers didn't hit Jennings streaking 15 yards pass the AZ crapass defense ending AZ's season doesn't make that defense any less crapass....

 

Still waiting to see footage of their coordinators sleeping

[Walter34 3]

I am curious, Walter, how strange it is -- as the GB defense is constantly maligned after that game (and rightfully so) -- that not a single word is said about AZ's defense (not just in this trolling thread, but anywhere)...

They were the defending NFC champs playing at home with all the home-field advantages and the huge advantages of crowd noise, and they got shredded just as bad by a second-year quarterback making his first playoff start ever....

After the first play of the game, they did not make a play the whole game except for the last play of the game (which was a penalty that wasn't called) set up by another play (in which a penalty was committed but not called)....

Just because Rodgers didn't hit Jennings streaking 15 yards pass the AZ crapass defense ending AZ's season doesn't make that defense any less crapass....

 

Still waiting to see footage of their coordinators sleeping

 

I dont think anyone would argue that they also sucked. Both teams defences gambled all day long going for the ball instead of the man. Every highlight you see from both sides you see a defensive guy diving or trying to make the big play, but missing. Both defensive coaches got caught up in the shootout and didnt reel their players in to add some discipline.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if they were also sleeping, but at the same time, there are no cards fans on the board keeping threads alive a week after the game.

[donhaas 18]

I dont think anyone would argue that they also sucked. Both teams defences gambled all day long going for the ball instead of the man. Every highlight you see from both sides you see a defensive guy diving or trying to make the big play, but missing. Both defensive coaches got caught up in the shootout and didnt reel their players in to add some discipline.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if they were also sleeping, but at the same time, there are no cards-hating fans on the board keeping threads alive a week after the game.

 

Truer words were never spoken by you!

[Walter34 3]

Truer words were never spoken by you!

 

I dont hate the pack. The only motivation I would have to cheer for their failures would be to come here and razz you about it.

[Bruce_Leroy 0]

Getting your azz handed to you to the tune of 51 pts must be good for a nap

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENvmq-rkVZc...player_embedded

 

wow. he is sleeping in a playoff game. he should be fired. Of course this just gives the pack an excuse for getting raped by a 38 year old qb.

[Joey Gladstone 33]

wow. he is sleeping in a playoff game. he should be fired. Of course this just gives the pack an excuse for getting raped by a 38 year old qb.

 

You didn't get banned for plagiarism?