drobeski 3,061 Posted February 17, 2014 Bunny winningyup, bunny and fox are winning Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted February 17, 2014 If all biased news outlets were boycotted the only one left would be CSPAN Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,449 Posted February 17, 2014 Thank you, another example of why they should not be taken seriously as a news outlet Why is that Worms? Are you saying beautiful women can't be smart and taken seriously? Are you implying that they can't be inteligent and sexy? Only ugly women like Candy Crowley are smart enough to be taken seriously?. How chaauvanistic of you. Not only are you a racists for not aloowing your unborn daughter to date a black guy because you can't stand the thought of it, now you're a chauvanist pig because you believe beutiful women on Fox News "should not be taken seriously". Damn Worms. You don't really believe that do you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted February 17, 2014 Wait, Fox News righties declaring a Fox News rightie the thread winner. Get out!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted February 17, 2014 Holy fukk!!!!!1 Worms is getting killed. Fukking killed!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 17, 2014 bad day for worms , maybe newbs can beg him for a blow job to lift his spirit's Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted February 17, 2014 Why is that Worms? Are you saying beautiful women can't be smart and taken seriously? Are you implying that they can't be inteligent and sexy? Only ugly women like Candy Crowley are smart enough to be taken seriously?. How chaauvanistic of you. Not only are you a racists for not aloowing your unborn daughter to date a black guy because you can't stand the thought of it, now you're a chauvanist pig because you believe beutiful women on Fox News "should not be taken seriously". Damn Worms. You don't really believe that do you? If a person isn't ghey, black, or muslim -- or better yet a ghey / black / muslim - worms couldn't care less about them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted February 17, 2014 bad day for worms , maybe newbs can beg him for a blow job to lift his spirit's If a fvckin' retard like you thinks I'm "losing", I'll take that as a good sign Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted February 17, 2014 bad day for worms , maybe newbs can beg him for a blow job to lift his spirit's When is it not a bad day for him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,515 Posted February 17, 2014 I think it's pretty clear that the New York Times doesn't belong in the same discussion as Fox News and MSNBC. Why not? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted February 17, 2014 Why not? Deleted that post, don't feel like arguing with you focks over that. If you can't see the difference at the outset, I can't help you. And before you even get started, I would include the Wall Street Journal as a legitimate news source even though they lean right editorially. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,515 Posted February 17, 2014 Deleted that post, don't feel like arguing with you focks over that. If you can't see the difference at the outset, I can't help you. And before you even get started, I would include the Wall Street Journal as a legitimate news source even though they lean right editorially. One's on TV the other is on paper? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted February 17, 2014 Remember Worms, if a source doesn't lean drastically to the right, they are liberal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,449 Posted February 17, 2014 Wait, Fox News righties declaring a Fox News rightie the thread winner. Get out!! You do understand how and why Fox News was created don't you Newbie? You think it was by accident? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted February 17, 2014 If a fvckin' retard like you thinks I'm "losing", I'll take that as a good sign Tards are always smiling. Even when they walk around with their thick tongue hanging out and drool on their shirt. Congrats, I guess. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BudBro 183 Posted February 17, 2014 i'd like to see cnn take megan kelly over there? except nobody that visits cnn would want to talk with her. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,826 Posted February 17, 2014 Deleted that post, don't feel like arguing with you focks over that. If you can't see the difference at the outset, I can't help you. And before you even get started, I would include the Wall Street Journal as a legitimate news source even though they lean right editorially.I'm on my phone, can somebody find Worms a link to the letter from the retiring NYT managing editor where he admitted that the paper had a liberal bias? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,449 Posted February 17, 2014 I'm on my phone, can somebody find Worms a link to the letter from the retiring NYT managing editor where he admitted that the paper had a liberal bias? Won't do any good. Only Old Grey Ladies are worthy and capable of reporting the news to him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,515 Posted February 17, 2014 I'm on my phone, can somebody find Worms a link to the letter from the retiring NYT managing editor where he admitted that the paper had a liberal bias? Arthur Brisbane, the departing public editor at the New York Times, has accused the paper of having a progressive bias, even as he champions its disciplined approach to fair and balanced reporting. "When The Times covers a national presidential campaign, I have found that the lead editors and reporters are disciplined about enforcing fairness and balance, and usually succeed in doing so," Brisbane writes in his final column. "Across the paper’s many departments, though, so many share a kind of political and cultural progressivism — for lack of a better term — that this worldview virtually bleeds through the fabric of The Times." "As a result, developments like the Occupy movement and gay marriage seem almost to erupt in The Times, overloved and undermanaged, more like causes than news subjects," he continues. http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/08/ny-times-public-editor-progressive-worldview-bleeds-133188.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 17, 2014 So you're saying that people who watch Fox News don't get any more of their news from "many other outlets"? I bet your average Fox News viewer knows who their representitives are in congress more than CNN viewers do. Doubtful...considering polls have shown that FoxNews watchers are typically less informed than others. http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2011/11/21/fox-news-viewers-uninformed-npr-listeners-not-poll-suggests/ 2011 info...doubt it got any better. Cue people whining about the validity of the polling next. Fox and MSNBC blow...they present their slanted views of the news as well as very biased commentary. Its obvious to pretty much anyone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted February 17, 2014 How quickly we forget NBC News issued an apology Tuesday for the way it handled the broadcasting of the 911 conversation between George Zimmerman and a police dispatcher in the Trayvon Martin case. Following reports that NBC aired audio of the call was edited in a way that implied Zimmerman was racist, the network launched an internal investigation. NBC's "Today" show ran the edited audio of Zimmerman's phone call to a police dispatcher, seeming to show Zimmerman saying, "This guy looks like he's up to no good he looks black." A transcript of the complete 911 call shows that Zimmerman said, "This guy looks like he's up to no good. Or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around, looking about." The 911 officer responded saying, "OK, and this guy is he black, white or Hispanic?" "He looks black," Zimmerman said. The abridged conversation between Zimmerman and the dispatcher that NBC ran on March 27 has been blasted by media watchdog groups as misleading. Critics have said the edited version was made to suggest that Zimmerman targeted Martin because he was black -- an accusation by many that is still under investigation. The Associated Press MK-Ultra Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 17, 2014 Yes, one link to an issue means FoxNews is great because NBC focked that one up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted February 17, 2014 I'm on my phone, can somebody find Worms a link to the letter from the retiring NYT managing editor where he admitted that the paper had a liberal bias? I'm not interested in the "mainstream media" debate--you guys get far too hysterical on that subject for my tastes. However I would think that even you would agree there is a substantive difference between infotainment outlets like Fox News and MSNBC on the one hand and traditional news outlets like the NY Times and Fox News on the other. Maybe I am giving you too much credit though? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted February 17, 2014 http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/08/ny-times-public-editor-progressive-worldview-bleeds-133188.html Yea, but... /Thread Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,826 Posted February 17, 2014 I'm not interested in the "mainstream media" debate--you guys get far too hysterical on that subject for my tastes. However I would think that even you would agree there is a substantive difference between infotainment outlets like Fox News and MSNBC on the one hand and traditional news outlets like the NY Times and Fox News on the other. Maybe I am giving you too much credit though?You said Fox News twice, which is actually accurate. There are opinion shows like Hannity which are far right. But I'd put Neil Cavutu up against any journalist from another station for integrity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted February 17, 2014 I'm not interested in the "mainstream media" debate--you guys get far too hysterical on that subject for my tastes. However I would think that even you would agree there is a substantive difference between infotainment outlets like Fox News and MSNBC on the one hand and traditional news outlets like the NY Times and Fox News on the other. Maybe I am giving you too much credit though? Wtf are you even trying to say here.. Jesus dude. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,826 Posted February 17, 2014 I'm not interested in the "mainstream media" debate--you guys get far too hysterical on that subject for my tastes. However I would think that even you would agree there is a substantive difference between infotainment outlets like Fox News and MSNBC on the one hand and traditional news outlets like the NY Times and Fox News on the other. Maybe I am giving you too much credit though?Also you aren't interested because the thought that you've been MK-Pivened this whole time makes your haid splode. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 17, 2014 Yea, but... /Thread So the NYT has admitted bias...so that means FoxNews is not biased? And this ends the thread how? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,826 Posted February 17, 2014 So the NYT has admitted bias...so that means FoxNews is not biased? And this ends the thread how? You try to claim you aren't liberal, but this post shows your bias. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted February 17, 2014 traditional news outlets like the NY Times and Fox News on the other. Dude is punch drunk from the massive beatdown he has endured in multiple threads today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 18, 2014 How's the boycott going ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted February 18, 2014 You try to claim you aren't liberal, but this post shows your bias. He is a Progressive Socialist and isn't smart enough to know it. HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted February 18, 2014 How's the boycott going ? They will all be here in the AM telling us WTF happened on Fox tonight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted February 18, 2014 They will all be here in the AM telling us WTF happened on Fox tonight. I thought they were boycotting this bored. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drizzay 723 Posted February 18, 2014 So, since Fox News is #1, it proves that the "liberal media" is just a red herring, right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted February 18, 2014 I thought they were boycotting this bored. They were.............before the weren't. They had such high hopes for Ed's clusterfukk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,826 Posted February 18, 2014 CNN is often propped by the libs here as an unbiased news agency; I present to you the article from CNN in Frozenbeernuts' "Kansas Dbags" thread. I challenge the libs here to read this account of the proposed bill and determine if it is a fair, unbiased representation. I honestly don't know because I haven't studied the actual bill. But it sure reads like it has an opinion, and then begrudgingly admits there are some "concessions," like the business still has to provide the service to gheys. http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/13/us/kansas-bill-same-sex-services/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,607 Posted February 18, 2014 Notice who you didn't show up in the thread about how much the site is worth. Fraud. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 18, 2014 You try to claim you aren't liberal, but this post shows your bias. Saying that the NYT has admitted bias...that Fox is biased...now means I am biased and a liberal? Eventhough I also say that MSNBC is biased. It does not take a liberal to admit the bias that is out there in certain news sources. But its funny how the lemmings go crazy when you make fun of foxnews. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 18, 2014 He is a Progressive Socialist and isn't smart enough to know it. HTH Care to post one link to anything I have supported that is progressive or socialist? Ive already destroyed your claims of being a libertarian many times over (as have others). Just point out one thing I have said...and making fun of you and FoxNews is not a sign anyone is either of those things. I won't hold my breath because I know you won't find a single thing. As usual. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
