MedStudent 56 Posted August 14, 2014 Tony Conigliaro. Never saw him play but boston old timers say he had the perfect swing for Fenway. Youngest Homerun champion. Youngest to 100 homers when he was 22 years old. He was also 22 when he got beaned and he was never the same. Dale Murphy is another but he may eventually make the hall. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TylerRoseFan 16 Posted August 15, 2014 Dale Murphy was the first one that came to mind. I remember a sports Illustrated article in 1986/87 that attempted to list all the players at the time who were potential HOF players. I remember when they mentioned his name "He's already in"...or something like that. This is a great thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vikings4ever 496 Posted August 15, 2014 Not sure fire, but Chuck Knoblach was making a case for himself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted August 15, 2014 Gregg Olson had 160 saves by 26. I figured he'd easily be the 1st to 500. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 Gregg Olson had 160 saves by 26. I figured he'd easily be the 1st to 500. Yeah but how many career closers are in the HOF? 2? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 I have a good one Bret Saberhagen Dude was a monster. 1st year 1984, wins the cy young in 1985 and 1989 and then never won more than 15 games again. Dude should have never left Kansas City, how often do you hear that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 This is a great thread. don't get that around here lately. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted August 15, 2014 Yeah but how many career closers are in the HOF? 2? Rivera and Hoffman are the only 2 with 500+, both will be in the HOF. If Olson got there first, he would be in already. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 Tony Conigliaro. Never saw him play but boston old timers say he had the perfect swing for Fenway. Youngest Homerun champion. Youngest to 100 homers when he was 22 years old. He was also 22 when he got beaned and he was never the same. One of the most tragic on field accidents in the history of MLB He was hit in the face 1967, when he was hit he was a career .275 hitter in 1970 he hit 36 HR and had 116 RBI. He was traded to the Angels after that season and somehow left his eyesight in Boston. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 Rivera and Hoffman are the only 2 with 500+, both will be in the HOF. If Olson got there first, he would be in already. so there is only 1 career reliever in the HOF now? Gossage? I was assuming Rivera was a lock. I forgot about Hoffman, is he a lock? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted August 15, 2014 so there is only 1 career reliever in the HOF now? Gossage? I was assuming Rivera was a lock. I forgot about Hoffman, is he a lock? Fingers for sure. Hoffman has 600 saves, he has to be a lock. Gossage, Sutter, Wilhelm. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
patweisers44 697 Posted August 15, 2014 Eckersley wasn't a career reliever but I think was better known out of the bullpen than as a starter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 Eckersley wasn't a career reliever but I think was better known out of the bullpen than as a starter. For sure, but he was a 20 game winner as a starter and won about 100 games before he left Boston 197 wins and 390 saves off the focking charts, will never be duplicated look at this silliness 1988 - 45 saves 1989 - 33 saves 1990 - 48 saves 1991 - 43 saves 1992 - 51 saves 1993 - 36 saves Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted August 15, 2014 look at this silliness 1988 - 45 saves 1989 - 33 saves 1990 - 48 saves 1991 - 43 saves 1992 - 51 saves 1993 - 36 saves Francisco Rodríguez 2005 - 45 2006 - 47 2007 - 40 2008 - 62 2009 - 35 2010 - 25 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 Francisco Rodríguez 2005 - 45 2006 - 47 2007 - 40 2008 - 62 2009 - 35 2010 - 25 was he 32 his 1st year as a closer and already won 150 games? I wasn't saying Eck had the greatest stretch, I'm saying check out this silliness after already being in the majors for 12 years! Dude was a rookie at 20, he won 13 games Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted August 15, 2014 was he 32 his 1st year as a closer and already won 150 games? I wasn't saying Eck had the greatest stretch, I'm saying check out this silliness after already being in the majors for 12 years! Dude was a rookie at 20, he won 13 games Eck was a freak. He might have won 300 if he was not a drinker. Same with Dennis Martinez. Smoltz is another guy who dominated at a starter and closer and back to a starter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 Eck was a freak. He might have won 300 if he was not a drinker. Same with Dennis Martinez. Smoltz is another guy who dominated at a starter and closer and back to a starter. and the way MLB teams baby everyone, very few guys are given the opportunity to start at 20 he was 13 and 7 with a 2.60 era at 20? NEVER see that anymore. had 50 wins by the time he was 23. Some guys haven't even made the majors by then. the pussification of MLB pitching Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 Sidd Finch the kid from American Pie? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted August 15, 2014 and the way MLB teams baby everyone, very few guys are given the opportunity to start at 20 he was 13 and 7 with a 2.60 era at 20? NEVER see that anymore. had 50 wins by the time he was 23. Some guys haven't even made the majors by then. the pussification of MLB pitching It's never worked. Ever. 19 and 20 year old MLB everyday starters simply do not last and never have except in very rare situations. Jim Palmer had 20 wins by 20 and then missed most of 2 years with an arm injury, which saved his arm and his career. Nolan Ryan broke in at 19 and also had an arm injury that took away 2 years and saved his career. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mungwater 588 Posted August 15, 2014 It's never worked. Ever. 19 and 20 year old MLB everyday starters simply do not last and never have except in very rare situations. Jim Palmer had 20 wins by 20 and then missed most of 2 years with an arm injury, which saved his arm and his career. Nolan Ryan broke in at 19 and also had an arm injury that took away 2 years and saved his career. Bob feller came in before he was 18, but I think he lost some years because of WW2, interesting to think that a war might have extended his career Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 It's never worked. Ever. 19 and 20 year old MLB everyday starters simply do not last and never have except in very rare situations. Jim Palmer had 20 wins by 20 and then missed most of 2 years with an arm injury, which saved his arm and his career. Nolan Ryan broke in at 19 and also had an arm injury that took away 2 years and saved his career. Um, so they don't pitch in the minor leagues at 19 and 20? Is pitching in the minors, somehow different pitching? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
patweisers44 697 Posted August 15, 2014 Eckersley had a two year stretch (89-90 maybe) where he had more saves that baserunners allowed. That is mind boggling. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 Eckersley had a two year stretch (89-90 maybe) where he had more saves that baserunners allowed. That is mind boggling. 89 - .607 WHIP 90 - .614 WHIP 81 saves and 80 BRA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mungwater 588 Posted August 15, 2014 89 - .607 WHIP 90 - .614 WHIP 81 saves and 80 BRA Damn, I can't even do that on a playstation Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 15, 2014 Damn, I can't even do that on a playstation 6 base runners allowed for every 10 innings. ridiculous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Uncle Leo 16 Posted August 17, 2014 Pudge Rodriguez. Carlos Baerga Jose Reyes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Saint Elistan 106 Posted August 17, 2014 Nick Adenhart Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted August 17, 2014 Pudge Rodriguez. Carlos Baerga Jose Reyes Pudge will get in first ballot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kozmiq 70 Posted August 17, 2014 An argument can be made for Brady Anderson if you google his first 5-6 seasons or so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted August 17, 2014 This begins and ends with 1 name -- Dwight Gooden. Could have been one of the greatest pitchers to ever play the game. People were sayng he was maybe better than Bob Gibson after his first 2 seasons. Then Doc started doing a lot of drugs and fell off the map. Gooden diodn't just miss out on the HOF he missed out on being in the Elite of the Elite of the games history Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted August 18, 2014 Agreed. DR. K is the all time king of this category. What amazes me is that he STILL has borderline HOF numbers on paper. Take away what you know of his wasted potential. - 194-115 Record. - Top 50 winning %, beating guys like Greg Maddux, Cy Young, Warren Spahn, etc. - Top 50 All Time in Strikeouts. - Career 3.51 ERA - Cy Young Award - Pitching Triple Crown - Rookie of the Year - No hitter - 4x All Star - 3x World Series Champ I'm not arguing he should get in. I'm just saying that had we changed the order of his accomplishments and eliminated the reasons, on paper he at least had a career in which we would have to debate it some. And basically he did that by achieving about 30% of what he would have likely become. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kilroy69 994 Posted August 18, 2014 albert "dont call me joey" belle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,710 Posted August 18, 2014 Don Mattingly Don Mattingly should be in the HOF regardless, he was the best all around hitter for a 6 year stretch before he hurt his back. Not to mention he collected Gold Gloves yearly. He was Gayle Sayers, truly great. Baseball writers are so consumed with compilers and it is absurd, true greatness should be celebrated and Donny Baseball had it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,564 Posted August 18, 2014 Agreed. DR. K is the all time king of this category. What amazes me is that he STILL has borderline HOF numbers on paper. Take away what you know of his wasted potential. - 194-115 Record. - Top 50 winning %, beating guys like Greg Maddux, Cy Young, Warren Spahn, etc. - Top 50 All Time in Strikeouts. - Career 3.51 ERA - Cy Young Award - Pitching Triple Crown - Rookie of the Year - No hitter - 4x All Star - 3x World Series Champ I'm not arguing he should get in. I'm just saying that had we changed the order of his accomplishments and eliminated the reasons, on paper he at least had a career in which we would have to debate it some. And basically he did that by achieving about 30% of what he would have likely become. Which is why guys like Bert Blyleven and others that pitch for 20 years get in when they shouldn't. They get in based on longevity which is absurd. The hall of fame should be for guys that at least dominated for a 5 year stretch. Not guys that hung on for 20 years and compiled numbers. Give me Doc over Blyleven any day. Fock Blyleven was top 10 in Cy Young voting 4 times in his entire career, never finishing higher than 3rd? Give me a focking break Dude is a focking joke http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/blylebe01.shtml The MLB HOF is a joke because guys like Blyleven are in and guys like Doc Gooden are not Share this post Link to post Share on other sites