Bill O'Reilly Finally Gets It Right...

[mobb_deep 917]

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/12/20/bill_o_reilly_defends_the_white_establishment_against_democrats.html

 

@oreillyfactor: “The left wants power taken away from the white establishment and they want a profound change in the way America is run.”

 

I'd go a little further and say the "white male establishment", but I think this is the first time I've ever agreed with Bill O'Reilly. This is exactly what I want, Bill!

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/12/20/bill_o_reilly_defends_the_white_establishment_against_democrats.html

 

 

I'd go a little further and say the "white male establishment", but I think this is the first time I've ever agreed with Bill O'Reilly. This is exactly what I want, Bill!

Why?

[BunnysBastatrds 1,920]

Large urban cities have been doing that for the past two decades. Look how that's turning out. Fail.

[mobb_deep 917]

Why?

 

Because I want a government that accurately reflects and governs for the diverse cultures and races, that both helped build and make up the present day population of the country. Not just a bunch of billionaire white guys writing policies that help them get richer, to the detriment of everybody else and the planet as a whole.

[TimmySmith 2,782]

He said it within the context of removing the Electoral College, which represents everyone.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

 

Because I want a government that accurately reflects and governs for the diverse cultures and races, that both helped build and make up the present day population of the country. Not just a bunch of billionaire white guys writing policies that help them get richer, to the detriment of everybody else and the planet as a whole.

So it's an economic thing, not a white thing then.

[Brad GLuckman 518]

A lot of guys on the left are super ashamed that they have a pen1s.

[porkbutt 861]

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/12/20/bill_o_reilly_defends_the_white_establishment_against_democrats.html

 

 

I'd go a little further and say the "white male establishment", but I think this is the first time I've ever agreed with Bill O'Reilly. This is exactly what I want, Bill!

you focking liberals really are focking something. jeezus

[Big Guy 1,400]

White guys built this Country, why shouldn't they continue to build it?

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

I'm white and I voted Trump.

 

You're Welcome America.

[Bert 1,091]

 

Because I want a government that accurately reflects and governs for the diverse cultures and races, that both helped build and make up the present day population of the country. Not just a bunch of billionaire white guys writing policies that help them get richer, to the detriment of everybody else and the planet as a whole.

Just like Chicago, New Orleans and DC?

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Just like Chicago, New Orleans and DC?

 

Throw Atlanta, Cleveland, Philly and Baltimore in there too. Rampant corruption and blight throughout but a select few be livin' large.

[BLS 313]

Some people just really are stupid.

 

If we were gazelle, you'd be the ones the cheetahs pick.

[Baker Boy 1,485]

A lot of guys on the left are super ashamed that they have a pen1s.

Actually they are just wearing their ovaries on the outside.

[Baker Boy 1,485]

Because I want a government that accurately reflects and governs for the diverse cultures and races, that both helped build and make up the present day population of the country. Not just a bunch of billionaire white guys writing policies that help them get richer, to the detriment of everybody else and the planet as a whole.

The gap between rich and poor grew under Obama but I suppose it was his white half that was guilty.

[jerryskids 5,206]

 

Because I want a government that accurately reflects and governs for the diverse cultures and races, that both helped build and make up the present day population of the country. Not just a bunch of billionaire white guys writing policies that help them get richer, to the detriment of everybody else and the planet as a whole.

The common factor has not been billionaire white guys, it has been elite intellectuals who have no idea how the real world works. Trump is changing that. You can thank him later.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

A guy concerned about billionaires is upset Hillary didn't win. Way to pay attention.

[mobb_deep 917]

The common factor has not been billionaire white guys, it has been elite intellectuals who have no idea how the real world works. Trump is changing that. You can thank him later.

I'm leaning more towards you're all going to regret it later, but we'll see how it all shakes out. I'll be onboard this time next year, if we have a balanced budget and we're not getting ourself mired down in another war.

 

Hell, even if Trump operates at the same 1/2 tril deficit Obama has year after year I'll be stunned and supportive of him and his cabinet.

 

All of the other SJW far left crap is of absolutely zero importance to me, sans a woman's right to choose.

[mobb_deep 917]

A guy concerned about billionaires is upset Hillary didn't win. Way to pay attention.

Hillary wouldn't be appointing billionaire lobbyists to run government departments they either hate, sued, have no knowledge of, or would otherwise undermine. Guys like Tillerson, Sessions and Pruit give me great unease. Especially Tillerson. He's going to get us involved in another unwinnable war. Count on it.

 

And just to be clear. I'm not upset Hillary lost. I'm worried that Trump won. I supported Bernie Sanders.

[IGotWorms 3,315]

The common factor has not been billionaire white guys, it has been elite intellectuals who have no idea how the real world works. Trump is changing that. You can thank him later.

 

I fear you're in for a VERY rude awakening

[Bert 1,091]

Hillary wouldn't be appointing billionaire lobbyists to run government departments they either hate, sued, have no knowledge of, or would otherwise undermine. Guys like Tillerson, Sessions and Pruit give me great unease. Especially Tillerson. He's going to get us involved in another unwinnable war. Count on it.

 

And just to be clear. I'm not upset Hillary lost. I'm worried that Trump won. I supported Bernie Sanders.

Why do you believe Tillerson is going to get us involved in another war?

[Bert 1,091]

The common factor has not been billionaire white guys, it has been elite intellectuals who have no idea how the real world works. Trump is changing that. You can thank him later.

Can I agree with the first sentence and not the last two?

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

Hillary wouldn't be appointing billionaire lobbyists to run government departments they either hate, sued, have no knowledge of, or would otherwise undermine. Guys like Tillerson, Sessions and Pruit give me great unease. Especially Tillerson. He's going to get us involved in another unwinnable war. Count on it.

 

And just to be clear. I'm not upset Hillary lost. I'm worried that Trump won. I supported Bernie Sanders.

So, who did Obama appoint after Wall Street wrecked the place? That's right, a bunch of Wall Street guys. And his AG. the guy who would be charged with prosecuting financial crimes, was a Wall Street lawyer. Lo and behold, nobody went to jail. And that AG went right back to his job when he stepped down.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

Why do you believe Tillerson is going to get us involved in another war?

Because Hillary did?

[jerryskids 5,206]

Can I agree with the first sentence and not the last two?

The first one was my main point. The last two were more fishing.

[mobb_deep 917]

Why do you believe Tillerson is going to get us involved in another war?

Because he's an oil tycoon that would put his own business interests before morality and the nation.

[JTB 52]

I'd go a little further and say the "white male establishment", but I think this is the first time I've ever agreed with Bill O'Reilly. This is exactly what I want, Bill!

 

 

Because I want a government that accurately reflects and governs for the diverse cultures and races, that both helped build and make up the present day population of the country. Not just a bunch of billionaire white guys writing policies that help them get richer, to the detriment of everybody else and the planet as a whole.

So it's an economic thing, not a white thing then.

Mob conveniently missed this.....white guilt at its finest on display and ya didn't even realize it. Or did you?

[Bert 1,091]

Because he's an oil tycoon that would put his own business interests before morality and the nation.

Wow. He is far from being an oil tycoon he isn't even worth $200 million.

[JTB 52]

The first one was my main point. The last two were more fishing.

Eeeuuuuwww

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

 

Mob conveniently missed this.....white guilt at its finest on display and ya didn't even realize it. Or did you?

I do. But it's this whole revisionist history going on. The 13th amendment didn't just outlaw slavery. It also outlawed indentured servitude. Who does Mobb think they were? Sometimes, no often times, that was worse than slavery.

[Baker Boy 1,485]

Hillary wouldn't be appointing billionaire lobbyists to run government departments they either hate, sued, have no knowledge of, or would otherwise undermine. Guys like Tillerson, Sessions and Pruit give me great unease. Especially Tillerson. He's going to get us involved in another unwinnable war. Count on it.

And just to be clear. I'm not upset Hillary lost. I'm worried that Trump won. I supported Bernie Sanders.

What a pleasure having these accomplished Americans working for us rather than the stream of professional politicians and community organizers that we have been force fed the last eight years. Obama's cabinet was the first in American History not to have one person from the private sector. And then we had this or did you forget?

 

Unprecedented level of tax evasion among Obama appointees.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2204511/posts

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

Obamas cabinet appointments to secretary of labor never held a private sector job or created one. And they get on Trump about Ben Carson.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 3,585]

Because he's an oil tycoon that would put his own business interests before morality and the nation.

 

as opposed to Hillary taking money from middle east countries to help Obama's agenda forward?

[mobb_deep 917]

 

as opposed to Hillary taking money from middle east countries to help Obama's agenda forward?

Hillary lost. You guys need to find a better "but but..." to deflect with.

 

I voted for the Bern anyways. My hands are clean regardless. By far the best candidate of the bunch.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,653]

Hillary lost. You guys need to find a better "but but..." to deflect with.

 

I voted for the Bern anyways. My hands are clean regardless. By far the best candidate of the bunch.

How did Hillary manage to win the popular vote when no one claims to have voted for her?

[RaiderHaters Revenge 3,585]

Hillary lost. You guys need to find a better "but but..." to deflect with.

 

I voted for the Bern anyways. My hands are clean regardless. By far the best candidate of the bunch.

 

so the guy that preaches free stuff for everyone as a right, and pushes socialist communism to the forefront is "the best candidate?" Thank god the rest of the Dems and Hillary cheated to not allow him to run

 

although I do think hes a decent guy, hes a total moron on policy

[cbfalcon 824]

The common factor has not been billionaire white guys, it has been elite intellectuals who have no idea how the real world works. Trump is changing that. You can thank him later.

I understand the rebellion against the elites, by why would anyone imply that being an intellectual is a negative? Intellectuals are the ones we should want thinking critically and proposing solutions.

[jerryskids 5,206]

I understand the rebellion against the elites, by why would anyone imply that being an intellectual is a negative. Intellectuals are the ones we should want thinking critically and proposing solutions.

It's not smart people per se, it is smart people who haven't ever worked in the real world. "Intellectual elite" is a combined phrase, not meant to be parsed.

[BunnysBastatrds 1,920]

 

I fear you're in for a VERY rude awakening

The MSM approves of this post.

[cbfalcon 824]

It's not smart people per se, it is smart people who haven't ever worked in the real world. "Intellectual elite" is a combined phrase, not meant to be parsed.

Even so, elitist intellectuals are far preferable to elitist dumb people, no? If we agree on that, then maybe we should just be against elitists.

 

And I know it probably comes off like I'm nitpicking your phrase, but I am doing so because there does somehow now actually seem to be an undercurrent in place in which being intelligent is viewed as a negative.

 

Obviously what's happening is we've turned on a certain archetype, and thus we are condemning all the characteristics associated with it. But if we get to the point in which we actually start condemning things like intelligence, success, education, etc, then we are going to really set this country back in a damaging and long term sort of way.