Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 17, 2017 they started the whaaaa russia conspiracy way before the election. Dumbo Then why...if this was all a set up...did they not roll this out before? Psst...it's simply not a logical stance for you all to make. Though...you don't seem to ever really be logical. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,912 Posted July 17, 2017 Then why...if this was all a set up...did they not roll this out before? Psst...it's simply not a logical stance for you all to make. Though...you don't seem to ever really be logical. Irony.....meter....overload. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 17, 2017 Irony.....meter....overload. No irony at all...keep up the trolling though. Beats your attempts to actually participate in any discussion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,912 Posted July 17, 2017 No irony at all...keep up the trolling though. Beats your attempts to actually participate in any discussion. Meh....participate in what? Watching your dumbass get tied to the tree? You bore me to be honest....nobody takes you seriously. But you talking about others lack of logic is like a fockin Kardashian ripping on other people's lack of talent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 17, 2017 Meh....participate in what? Watching your dumbass get tied to the tree? You bore me to be honest....nobody takes you seriously. But you talking about others lack of logic is like a fockin Kardashian ripping on other people's lack of talent. The tied to a tree is my favorite bs post you make. And you can't really even point out posts of mine that were not based in sound logic. But whatever...keep on keepin on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted July 17, 2017 Then why...if this was all a set up...did they not roll this out before? Psst...it's simply not a logical stance for you all to make. Though...you don't seem to ever really be logical. they didn't expect to lose, they thought the fake 17 whores story would do it. They needed an excuse, so they pre-packaged one. There's billions at stake too, the corrupt deep state isn't letting it go easy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 17, 2017 they didn't expect to lose, they thought the fake 17 whores story would do it. They needed an excuse, so they pre-packaged one. There's billions at stake too, the corrupt deep state isn't letting it go easy. Cuckoo!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,504 Posted July 18, 2017 Time for a thread title change: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/18/hillary-clinton-sided-with-russia-on-sanctions-as-bill-made-500g-on-moscow-speech.html 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,788 Posted July 18, 2017 Time for a thread title change: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/18/hillary-clinton-sided-with-russia-on-sanctions-as-bill-made-500g-on-moscow-speech.html You can always tell when shiit's getting tight for these guys - but HIllary?!!!! Takes about 3 seconds to realize that 1) Magnitski act was approved by Congress - both houses, both parties. 2) SOS doesn't control Congress - Hell, doesn't even have a vote. - It's amazing how much power Trumpettes assign to HRC - while simultaneously denigrating the State Dept. Still, if the best D you have is comparing yourself to an ethical punching bag like HRC... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,504 Posted July 18, 2017 You can always tell when shiit's getting tight for these guys - but HIllary?!!!! Takes about 3 seconds to realize that 1) Magnitski act was approved by Congress - both houses, both parties. 2) SOS doesn't control Congress - Hell, doesn't even have a vote. - It's amazing how much power Trumpettes assign to HRC - while simultaneously denigrating the State Dept. Still, if the best D you have is comparing yourself to an ethical punching bag like HRC... You guys don't even give a fock about this entire Russia thing, you only care because it is Trump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 18, 2017 You guys don't even give a fock about this entire Russia thing, you only care because it is Trump. Or because it's highly likely his campaign worked with a foreign adversary to fock with our election process. But Hillary is not a defense jackass. ButvTrump and his State Sponsored News (Fox) surese intent on ignoring the actual problems and just complaining about Hillary and Obummer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted July 18, 2017 Or because it's highly likely his campaign worked with a foreign adversary to fock with our election process. But Hillary is not a defense jackass. ButvTrump and his State Sponsored News (Fox) surese intent on ignoring the actual problems and just complaining about Hillary and Obummer. define the "fock with" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,912 Posted July 18, 2017 Or because it's highly likely his campaign worked with a foreign adversary to fock with our election process. But Hillary is not a defense jackass. ButvTrump and his State Sponsored News (Fox) surese intent on ignoring the actual problems and just complaining about Hillary and Obummer. Ha its called hypocrisy. You guys want to compare a meeting his son had getting dirt on Clinton to what a sitting president and his secretary of state wife actually did. It's comical that you think these things are in the same ballpark but it's not surprising. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted July 18, 2017 Or because it's highly likely his campaign worked with a foreign adversary to fock with our election process. But Hillary is not a defense jackass. ButvTrump and his State Sponsored News (Fox) surese intent on ignoring the actual problems and just complaining about Hillary and Obummer. According to Dumbeski, Russia hasn't been an adversary since the 80's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 18, 2017 define the "fock with" Go on campaign to release fake news and real information illegally obtained in order to creat chaos in American Democracy. Do so by even compromising members of one campaign to do your bidding. In addition attempt to infiltrate election systems in several states. Including using information to target people in certain areas with their propaganda. But that's all fine with you jackholes since it was Trump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,912 Posted July 18, 2017 Go on campaign to release fake news and real information illegally obtained in order to creat chaos in American Democracy. Do so by even compromising members of one campaign to do your bidding. In addition attempt to infiltrate election systems in several states. Including using information to target people in certain areas with their propaganda. But that's all fine with you jackholes since it was Trump. Hahahahaha....NOW he's concerned with fake news and illegally obtained information. Holy fock is that irony. You are in rare form bruh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,788 Posted July 18, 2017 Time for a thread title change: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/18/hillary-clinton-sided-with-russia-on-sanctions-as-bill-made-500g-on-moscow-speech.html God, this is just such piss-poor writing. 2010- HILLARY (apparently she herself alone personally) opposed some visas 2011 -The State Department (NOT Hillary this time - even though she ran it) approved those visas. 2012 - Bill is passed into law. And psychic Bill? Gave and got paid for his speech A FULL TWO YEARS before the legislation was even introduced - much less voted upon. Jesus, these guys cant even deflect well. Right up there with "Why didn't the Secret Service stop this meeting?" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 18, 2017 Ha its called hypocrisy. You guys want to compare a meeting his son had getting dirt on Clinton to what a sitting president and his secretary of state wife actually did. It's comical that you think these things are in the same ballpark but it's not surprising. Obama did what? Other than his reluctance on things was due to trying the reset (which failed)?And you keep calling it the same thing...but it's not even close. Hillary...as much of a corrupt rat she is.,,disclosed the speech as required. Didn't need to lie about it as Trump officials have done over and over. Further...Hillary was not involved in the measures being investigated by our Intel community and special counsel. What's comical is your attempt and others to continue to deflect by spewing this foxnews garbage. Trump has you all trained well. Scream fake news unless he or his chosen media is saying it. Hypocrisy? Yes...you all are neck deep in it and still trying to claim it's everyone else being hypocritical. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 18, 2017 Hahahahaha....NOW he's concerned with fake news and illegally obtained information. Holy fock is that irony. You are in rare form bruh. No...I'm laughing at the people who scream fake news the most believe the shot that Fox and Trump spew. And you don't seem to understand the word irony Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 18, 2017 God, this is just such piss-poor writing. 2010- HILLARY (apparently she herself alone personally) opposed some visas 2011 -The State Department (NOT Hillary this time - even though she ran it) approved those visas. 2012 - Bill is passed. And psychic Bill? Gave and got paid for his speech A FULL TWO YEARS before the legislation was even introduced - much less voted upon. Jesus, these guys cant even deflect well. Right up there with "Why didn't the Secret Service stop this meeting?" You are using logic and reason to try and deal with unreasonable and illogical people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,788 Posted July 18, 2017 You guys don't even give a fock about this entire Russia thing, you only care because it is Trump. Ah, brings back the days of - "You guys don't even CARE about Iraq - you just HATE George Bush!!! " The whole 'you hate me!' 'NOBODY's ever been treated so meanly as me!' thing is really childish - and right up Trump's alley. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,912 Posted July 18, 2017 Ah, brings back the days of - "You guys don't even CARE about Iraq - you just HATE George Bush!!! " The whole 'you hate me!' 'NOBODY's ever been treated so meanly as me!' thing is really childish - and right up Trump's alley. Bush isnt president...sorry. Can't use that line of arguement. This is how stupid you guys sound when you whine how obama or Hillary are not president. HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,504 Posted July 18, 2017 Obama official Samantha Power agrees to testify before House intel panel http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/18/obama-official-samantha-power-agrees-to-testify-before-house-intel-panel.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted July 18, 2017 8th person at the Trump Jr. meeting was a guy accused of money laundering. His reaction to the investigation? He called it a "witch hunt". https://mobile.nytimes.com/2000/11/29/business/laundering-of-money-seen-as-easy.html This is particularly interesting seeing how some, including Eliot Spitzer, have alluded to the fact that AG Schneiderman might be investigating potential money laundering within the Trump campaign. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted July 18, 2017 And more layers of the onion are peeled away Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 18, 2017 8th person at the Trump Jr. meeting was a guy accused of money laundering. His reaction to the investigation? He called it a "witch hunt". https://mobile.nytimes.com/2000/11/29/business/laundering-of-money-seen-as-easy.html This is particularly interesting seeing how some, including Eliot Spitzer, have alluded to the fact that AG Schneiderman might be investigating potential money laundering within the Trump campaign. Dude has a ton of dirty financial ties. American based...but all business ties seem to be Russian. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted July 18, 2017 Obama official Samantha Power agrees to testify before House intel panel http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/18/obama-official-samantha-power-agrees-to-testify-before-house-intel-panel.html That...could be interesting. Her disdain for HRC is not hidden https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/07/obama-aide-apologizes-for-calling-clinton-a-monster/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,174 Posted July 18, 2017 248 posts. Jesus Christ. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 18, 2017 248 posts. Jesus Christ. And you've still offered nothing to any discussion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 18, 2017 So...apparently Trump met with Putin twice at G20...the second meeting was only Putin, Trump, and Putins translator. Which would be a breach in national security protocol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,661 Posted July 18, 2017 So...apparently Trump met with Putin twice at G20...the second meeting was only Putin, Trump, and Putins translator. Which would be a breach in national security protocol. fake news Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,788 Posted July 18, 2017 So, top of my head, Rachel Maddow and the others have at least two more stories to keep the Russia narrative alive. That's what Murdoch and so many others are talking about. For fucksake, just reveal everything instead of making it a constant drip of repeating news Cycles. Can't believe it's about the media talking about this everyday when you provide at least one new story about it every damn day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,851 Posted July 19, 2017 Another week and still nothing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted July 19, 2017 fake news That's why the White House acknowledged it? https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/07/18/world/europe/trump-putin-undisclosed-meeting.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&referer=https://t.co/l66u0Ka5Fr Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 19, 2017 Another week and still nothing. And? You realize these investigations take time, right. Also...another week and no good explanation as to why so many meetings with Russians that were not disclosed and outright lied about. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,788 Posted July 19, 2017 Wow. That 8th guy? Ain't exactly an afterthought: 1. Turns out, this guy founded a company called IBC. He created thousands of fake companies and bank accounts through BOA - and came right out when caught and said that it was for the purposes of laundering Russian money through American companies. - To the tune of 1.4 BILLION! So, King of Russian Money-Laundering. I've said before that's what Mueller's hires are indicating they're going after - not election law - money laundering and foreign sourced income evasion. 2. This 'breaking news'? Mueller already knew about it. - Dude's got on hell of a source inside the camp. - Likely flipped for immunity. 3. Mueller's latest hire? A prosecutor who's last big gig was - prosecuting a federal employee for lying on his disclosure form. - The same on that Jared's been lying on. - Think THAT's a coincidence? To me, what's most interesting so far is that Mueller is very quietly not taking the bait - he's just putting together this killer case - with killer staff - and yet, we don't hear a word from him. But GDamn! #8 is so bad, they had to re-write the entire US banking law! - Think he was there to talk about 'adoptions'? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted July 19, 2017 Or because it's highly likely his campaign worked with a foreign adversary to fock with our election process. But Hillary is not a defense jackass. ButvTrump and his State Sponsored News (Fox) surese intent on ignoring the actual problems and just complaining about Hillary and Obummer. Kind of like the Democrats and Ukrainians? Democrats taking illegal contributions from Russia? Clinton Foundation taking MILLIONS in foreign cash while HRC was SOS? And you've still offered nothing to any discussion. I disagree. He is offering the comedic value of pointing out your batsh!t crazy Trump obsession. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted July 19, 2017 So...apparently Trump met with Putin twice at G20...the second meeting was only Putin, Trump, and Putins translator. Which would be a breach in national security protocol. An administration official said Trump and Putin “briefly” spoke during a dinner the night of the G-20 summit.First lady Melania Trump was seated next to Putin, and the president approached Putin at the end of the night, the official said. They spoke through a Russian translator.The administration official pushed back against the interaction being characterized as a “meeting.”“There was no ‘second meeting’ between President Trump and President Putin, just a brief conversation at the end of a dinner,” the official said. “The insinuation that the White House has tried to ‘hide’ a second meeting is false, malicious and absurd.” Sorry that's not the clandestine meeting you're hoping it was. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted July 19, 2017 An administration official said Trump and Putin briefly spoke during a dinner the night of the G-20 summit. First lady Melania Trump was seated next to Putin, and the president approached Putin at the end of the night, the official said. They spoke through a Russian translator. The administration official pushed back against the interaction being characterized as a meeting. There was no second meeting between President Trump and President Putin, just a brief conversation at the end of a dinner, the official said. The insinuation that the White House has tried to hide a second meeting is false, malicious and absurd. Sorry that's not the clandestine meeting you're hoping it was. It was supposedly 55 minutes. When you keep getting your narrative from Foxnews and the administration...you won't get the truth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted July 19, 2017 It was supposedly 55 minutes. When you keep getting your narrative from Foxnews and the administration...you won't get the truth. Link to one of your credible sources that DOESN'T have more Anti-Trump stuff than wiff's daily thread creations? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites