Jump to content
NewbieJr

What if it's found that Trump did help the Russians

Recommended Posts

Constant fake news? You've been programmed well.

 

Now you are changing to results...not just substance (because there has been plenty of that).

 

Kushner lying on his SF 86 form about contacts with foreign officials? There is one for you.

Here is a great link too. Goes over the lengths it takes to claim this is all nothing.

 

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449480/donald-trump-russia-witch-hunt-narrative-hard-believe

 

thats is im never voting for Kushner

 

also that article seems to be written by a 14 year old

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

thats is im never voting for Kushner

 

also that article seems to be written by a 14 year old

You realize he is a close Advisor and son in law of the President right? And we are discussing the administration in this thread right?

Are youbunder the impression that all of these undisclosed meetings were all just his officials and he knew nothing of them?

 

The article perfectly describes the crew here who make as many excuses as possible for the crapass job Trump is doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

yes its the constant fake news left garbage, along with their entire agenda, I don't see how its so hard to understand

 

and once again, I am waiting for actual results rather than chasing 9 months of RUSSIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Give me just one criminal offense that has been committed

Moving the goal posts. Bwahahahaha

 

It used to be a big nothing burger. Then it was, show me one sign there was any collusion... Now it's show me one thing that's a criminal offense. ROFL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moving the goal posts. Bwahahahaha

 

It used to be a big nothing burger. Then it was, show me one sign there was any collusion... Now it's show me one thing that's a criminal offense. ROFL

 

well considering as of today, its still nothing, and there has never been 1 example of how Russia changed the election, so its down to show me how criminally Trump or staff talking to Russia is anything at all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

well considering as of today, its still nothing, and there has never been 1 example of how Russia changed the election, so its down to show me how criminally Trump or staff talking to Russia is anything at all

...Or, and here's a thought - Educate yourself? - I know, crazy talk.

 

 

But here's one to get you started: Lying on a federal form is - wait for it - a Federal Felony.

Not to mention the whole election law stuff, yadda yadda...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

well considering as of today, its still nothing, and there has never been 1 example of how Russia changed the election, so its down to show me how criminally Trump or staff talking to Russia is anything at all

Soon you'll just say show me proof that Trump murdered someone. Drip drip drip :clap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soon you'll just say show me proof that Trump murdered someone. Drip drip drip :clap:

Let's see if we can guess what's next?

 

  1. It's a felony? Then what about Al Gore, (Rutherford B Hayes, etc..)
  2. They were PRIVATE CITIZENS AT THE TIME!
  3. That prosecutor once voted for a homecoming queen WHO IS NOW A DEMOCRAT! Recuse!
  4. So, that doesn't prove that Donald knew about it!
  5. What if Trump DOES pardon Kushner? - Bill PClinton, Marc Rich,etc.
  6. Nothing the POTUS does is illegal!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...Or, and here's a thought - Educate yourself? - I know, crazy talk.

 

 

But here's one to get you started: Lying on a federal form is - wait for it - a Federal Felony.

Not to mention the whole election law stuff, yadda yadda...

 

k no prob, if its true, than you know, Kushner should be prosecuted

 

I mean we went thru the whole Hillary email , and nothing ever came of it, just going to wait til this one has something official as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

, just going to wait til this one has something official as well

:cheers:

 

Good plan. Like I said, the other day, the MSM is acting like all of this is a f'ait accompli.

But all of it's worthless unless and until Mueller does his thing and actually recommends charges.

 

But I think the reason the Trump crew is already attacking his and his staff is that Bob is telegraphing his punches;

A huge chunk of his staff are some of the best and heaviest hitters in the Financial Crimes area.

 

Seems to be indicating that Bob's a crapload less worried about election law , disclosures, etc. in and of themselves -

And MUCH more focused on guys like Flynn and Manfart potentially playing fast and loose with millions in foreign sourced income.

Remember, Flynn already got caught lying on where his checks came from and went to. Manfart got $19M. Thats huge!

 

Playing detective here, but: There's a BIG (criminal) difference between getting money from a private foreign entity - and doing so from a Foreign State actor - or agent on behalf of a foreign state. Looking at the CV's of his staff, dollars to donuts that's where Bob's headed. - Probably bc he knows its a fool's errand to try and re-litigate the election.

 

All he has to do is flip one - And Flynn's lawyer has alrady come out publicly begging to flip for immunity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Helplessly hoping...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fwiw I would gladly take pence in charge with trump policy

Things keep on the current trajectory (Rep and Dem) and you'll have him for about ten years.

 

 

...Better get your ghey on now!!! :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pence isn't a populist. HTH.

And you really think trump is?

 

I'm not being snarky, I'm genuinely curious. Do you reall believe trump is a populist looking out for the common man?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you really think trump is?

 

I'm not being snarky, I'm genuinely curious. Do you reall believe trump is a populist looking out for the common man?

He is a Trumpist...only out for all things Trump.

Even paying his kid's legal fees from his campaign.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you really think trump is?

 

I'm not being snarky, I'm genuinely curious. Do you reall believe trump is a populist looking out for the common man?

Did Obama look out for the common man? Do any politicians? Puhlease...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

shep jumped ship long before Trump

although you've never spoken about it, I would bet my life that you hate the guy. And want him off of Fox News.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump's lawyer:

 

"I wonder why the Secret Service - if this was nefarious - why the Secret Service allowed these people in?" Sekulow said. "The president had Secret Service protection at that point, and that raised a question with me."

 

Well, I know I can't see any logic issues, straw grasping, or downside whatsoever to partially putting this on the Secret Service. Maybe someone more intelligent than I can do so if there is one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the lies keep coming:

 

 

Donald Trump was doing a rally in the state of Florida, so I traveled with the president that day," Corey Lewandowski said July 13, 2017.

Was Trump in Florida on June 9, 2016, the day his son, Donald Trump Jr., and others met with a Russian lawyer in New York?

No.

Trump was in New York. Trump attended a fundraising lunch at the Four Seasons in New York before spending the rest of the day at Trump Tower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Give me just one criminal offense that has been committed

They rattle their sabers but any law they think is broken wasn't. I've asked multiple times for an example of which law was broken and the one time they cited a law I smacked them down. They won't make that mistake again. It'll just be muh Russia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They rattle their sabers but any law they think is broken wasn't. I've asked multiple times for an example of which law was broken and the one time they cited a law I smacked them down. They won't make that mistake again. It'll just be muh Russia.

No...yiu actually did t smack anything down.

 

Just because Trump said something and you believe it...de Any mean yiunjustbclaim things here and everyone will believe it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No...yiu actually did t smack anything down.

 

Just because Trump said something and you believe it...de Any mean yiunjustbclaim things here and everyone will believe it.

Which law was that again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which law was that again?

I'm not sure how many times or how many threads we have to talk about this in. Let me give you a little bit of an appetizer at least since you need to s*** spoon-fed to you. Lying on a federal form is a federal felony. Making mistake first time? You lawyer can get you off. Making a mistake by forgetting allegedly over and over again? That's a f****** felony.

 

And yeah, they're very well could be more. But like I've said before, none of this is until Mueller comes in with his findings and recommendations. And right now, he's leaning more towards Financial crimes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic. Trump's shyster lawyer is now trying to blame the Secret Service for allowing the meeting to happen. There's only two things wrong with that. One they weren't protecting Donald jr. At the time. And two that's not their job.

 

The buck stops where?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama DOJ admits Kremlin lawyer in..............

 

 

It's clear the Dems DID help the Russians.

That's the new talking point?

 

Again...if it was some great plan by Obama...they wouldn't have waited until June/July of 2017 to get this out there.

 

Or just realize she had an actual legal reason to be here and nobody held a gun to Jrs head and forced him to meet with multiple Russians he thought were government officials giving him help as part of the Russian government support of Donald Trump.

 

Your excises again are not logical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the new talking point?

 

Again...if it was some great plan by Obama...they wouldn't have waited until June/July of 2017 to get this out there.

 

Or just realize she had an actual legal reason to be here and nobody held a gun to Jrs head and forced him to meet with multiple Russians he thought were government officials giving him help as part of the Russian government support of Donald Trump.

 

Your excises again are not logical.

 

Did the Obama DOJ permit her access? Yes.

 

According to the timeline released by the Department of Homeland Security, the Obama Justice and Homeland Security departments granted her a special type of “parole” to be in the U.S. from September 2015 through February 2016 to work on a court case in New York. After that expired, according to DHS, the State Department issued her a B1/B2 non-immigrant visa in June 2016, according to DHS, just in time for her meeting with Trump Jr., Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner and then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/14/mystery-solved-timeline-shows-how-russian-lawyer-got-into-us-for-trump-jr-meeting.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29&utm_content=Yahoo+Search+Results

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Did the Obama DOJ permit her access? Yes.

 

According to the timeline released by the Department of Homeland Security, the Obama Justice and Homeland Security departments granted her a special type of parole to be in the U.S. from September 2015 through February 2016 to work on a court case in New York. After that expired, according to DHS, the State Department issued her a B1/B2 non-immigrant visa in June 2016, according to DHS, just in time for her meeting with Trump Jr., Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner and then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/14/mystery-solved-timeline-shows-how-russian-lawyer-got-into-us-for-trump-jr-meeting.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29&utm_content=Yahoo+Search+Results

To work a court case.

So how is that relevant to Trump Jr meeting with her and others under the pretense of accepting Russian government support for the Trump campaign?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To work a court case.

So how is that relevant to Trump Jr meeting with her and others under the pretense of accepting Russian government support for the Trump campaign?

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/16/schiff-washington-democrats-meeting-with-ukrainian-officials-for-trump-dirt-would-have-been-inappropriate.html

 

“If you are looking for an example of a campaign coordinating with a foreign country or a foreign source, look no further than the DNC, which actually coordinated opposition research with the Ukrainian Embassy,” White House Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Monday. “This is not an accusation. That is an on-the-record action that they took.”

 

So getting information from a foreigner against your opponent is bad, right? Dems used Ukraine, former MI-6 agent (still a foreigner) for the Dossier, etc.

 

She wouldn't have been in the country without Obama's DOJ which over rode someone else's decision to not let her in the country. Access granted to work a court case doesn't pass the smell check.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/16/schiff-washington-democrats-meeting-with-ukrainian-officials-for-trump-dirt-would-have-been-inappropriate.html

 

If you are looking for an example of a campaign coordinating with a foreign country or a foreign source, look no further than the DNC, which actually coordinated opposition research with the Ukrainian Embassy, White House Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Monday. This is not an accusation. That is an on-the-record action that they took.

 

So getting information from a foreigner against your opponent is bad, right? Dems used Ukraine, former MI-6 agent (still a foreigner) for the Dossier, etc.

 

She wouldn't have been in the country without Obama's DOJ which over rode someone else's decision to not let her in the country. Access granted to work a court case doesn't pass the smell check.

So you moved on from one idiotic talking point back to another that has already been discussed.

Enjoy your deflection.

 

And

Listing HuckSanders BS as proof of anything is just hilarious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pay attention folks...........Slo has changed 'Holy Fock' to 'Deflection' for his special needs way of saying 'No mas por favor.......no mas'.

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the new talking point?

 

Again...if it was some great plan by Obama...they wouldn't have waited until June/July of 2017 to get this out there.

 

Or just realize she had an actual legal reason to be here and nobody held a gun to Jrs head and forced him to meet with multiple Russians he thought were government officials giving him help as part of the Russian government support of Donald Trump.

 

Your excises again are not logical.

this was plan b, plan a was parading out 17 women to claim the potus fondled them. Neither will work. What happened to those sluts anyway ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Obama look out for the common man? Do any politicians? Puhlease...

He said pence isn't. Implying that trump is. You guys are the ones running around saying that he won with the working blue collar man.

 

And yeah, compared to trump, Obama was. And it ain't close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pay attention folks...........Slo has changed 'Holy Fock' to 'Deflection' for his special needs way of saying 'No mas por favor.......no mas'.

 

:lol:

Just pointing out the fact that I slapped you around on blaming Obama for letting the Russian lawyer in (rather than giving a damn that Trump Jr met with her and other Russian officials)...and moved on to the idiotic Ukraine talking point about Hillary.

 

How is it not deflecting when in a thread about Trump and the Trump campaign you bring up Obama and Clinton constantly?

 

And as I and others have said...if there is anything to the Ukraine thing...why is Trumps AG not recommending a special counsel for Hillary? And if they did and found something...lock her up. I don't give a fock. None of that will change or excuse actions by Trump and his campaign/family.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this was plan b, plan a was parading out 17 women to claim the potus fondled them. Neither will work. What happened to those sluts anyway ?

Plan B wasto wait months after the election and inauguration?

You all are dumb enough to believe that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plan B wasto wait months after the election and inauguration?

You all are dumb enough to believe that.

they started the whaaaa :cry: russia conspiracy way before the election. Dumbo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×