Jump to content
NewbieJr

What if it's found that Trump did help the Russians

Recommended Posts

Oh, if Rhorerbacher said he didn't do anything wrong, then I'm sure he wouldn't lie. None of Trump's cronies would ever do that. This isn't a pattern or anything. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, drobeski said:

Did you watch the video ? I was recorded pre-election! 

He doesnt need to be bribed to claim russia didnt give him the emails. He was already making the claim long before then.

Because they didn't. 

Yeah... I watched the video. And Seth Rich’s parents are suing Fox News over these allegations, so.... :dunno:

I get that this is part of his defense on why he shouldn’t be extradited... but if they’re going to play this angle, I would think there will have to be evidence submitted. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Oh, if Rhorerbacher said he didn't do anything wrong, then I'm sure he wouldn't lie. None of Trump's cronies would ever do that. This isn't a pattern or anything. 

His statement says he went to Assange on his own to get proof it wasn’t the Russians, and if he could give it to him, he’d talk to Trump about a pardon. That doesn’t sound like an unrealistic statement to me. It also wouldn’t be the first time the news has gotten twisted. Both sides are spinning this to their advantage... 

I’m more curious about what will be entered into evidence to support his claim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh for fock’s sake... The "evidence" is another lawyer’s statement that she was present when the offer was made. 🤣

If I would have just read the Washington Post article first... :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://ibb.co/dWgGp3h

Aug 2016 "Russia is not our source" - Assange

Jan 2017 "We can say we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party" - Assange

Jun 2017 "It wasn't Russia" - Assange

Fake news says in August 2017 Rorbacker meets with Assange and tells him Trump will pardon him if he says it wasn't Russia. 

So what does Rorbacker actually say without the fake news twist?

https://www.rohrabacher.com/news

At no time did I talk to President Trump about Julian Assange.  Likewise, I was not directed by Trump or anyone else connected with him to meet with Julian Assange. I was on my own fact finding mission at personal expense to find out information I thought was important to our country.  I was shocked to find out that no other member of Congress had taken the time in their official or unofficial capacity to interview Julian Assange.  At no time did I offer Julian Assange anything from the President because I had not spoken with the President about this issue at all.  However, when speaking with Julian Assange, I told him that if he could provide me information and evidence about who actually gave him the DNC emails, I would then call on President Trump to pardon him. At no time did I offer a deal made by the President, nor did I say I was representing the President.

 

No surprise the useful idiots fall for fake news AGAIN! :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

https://ibb.co/dWgGp3h

Aug 2016 "Russia is not our source" - Assange

Jan 2017 "We can say we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party" - Assange

Jun 2017 "It wasn't Russia" - Assange

Fake news says in August 2017 Rorbacker meets with Assange and tells him Trump will pardon him if he says it wasn't Russia. 

So what does Rorbacker actually say without the fake news twist?

https://www.rohrabacher.com/news

At no time did I talk to President Trump about Julian Assange.  Likewise, I was not directed by Trump or anyone else connected with him to meet with Julian Assange. I was on my own fact finding mission at personal expense to find out information I thought was important to our country.  I was shocked to find out that no other member of Congress had taken the time in their official or unofficial capacity to interview Julian Assange.  At no time did I offer Julian Assange anything from the President because I had not spoken with the President about this issue at all.  However, when speaking with Julian Assange, I told him that if he could provide me information and evidence about who actually gave him the DNC emails, I would then call on President Trump to pardon him. At no time did I offer a deal made by the President, nor did I say I was representing the President.

 

No surprise the useful idiots fall for fake news AGAIN! :lol:

It only took me 3 news sources to get the whole story, and surprisingly it was the Washington Post. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, drobeski said:

 

 

Government - We are charging you with attacking our election.

Trolls - What proof do you have we are Russian spys

Government - Other than spicy memes? Nothing... charges dropped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EXCLUSIVE: Transcripts of House Intelligence Committee interviews that have been cleared for release show top law enforcement and intelligence officials affirming they had no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election
.

the numerous transcribed interviews could raise further questions about committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s past statements saying that there was “direct evidence” of collusion

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/russia-transcripts-collusion-schiff-panic-mode-sources

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So now, what if it is found that Obama or Hillary helped the Chinese? If Biden DID sexually harass some chick?  What if we find out that Chris Cuomo did molest a small child?

What other baseless sh!t can we smear people with?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Newbie should really peenie this thread. What a fool. The Russia house of cards has collapsed but clowns like him, Sho, and saints are hanging on to the bitter end.  Fools.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Obama Sends Private Letter to National Archives Claiming ‘Confidentiality’ To Not Release Biden-Ukraine Docs

https://thegreggjarrett.com/obama-sends-private-letter-to-national-archives-claiming-confidentiality-to-not-release-biden-ukraine-docs/?utm_source=socialflow

What's Hussein trying to hide?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, 12th Man said:

Newbie should really peenie this thread. What a fool. The Russia house of cards has collapsed but clowns like him, Sho, and saints are hanging on to the bitter end.  Fools.  

You seem upset.  Although that seems to be your natural state. I'd never delete this thread.  It's gold

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Observer said:

You seem upset.  Although that seems to be your natural state. I'd never delete this thread.  It's gold

I know you'd never delete it. You should though. Just shows how dumb and gullible you are. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if it's found that Hillary conspired with Obama and the FBI to frame Trump to ensure an election victory?  If so, will Democrats care?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

What if it's found that Hillary conspired with Obama and the FBI to frame Trump to ensure an election victory?  If so, will Democrats care?

I do recall James Comey and the FBI making a public statement that they are reopening an investigation into her emails. Three weeks before the election.  What a crazy way to try to steal her the election. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/19/2020 at 8:21 PM, OldMaid said:

Oh for fock’s sake... The "evidence" is another lawyer’s statement that she was present when the offer was made. 🤣

If I would have just read the Washington Post article first... :doh:

In this country, you don't need to submit evidence that you didn't do something. It is the prosecution's duty to prove guilt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Observer said:

I do recall James Comey and the FBI making a public statement that they are reopening an investigation into her emails. Three weeks before the election.  What a crazy way to try to steal her the election. lol

Yeah, because we all know how honest Comey was. :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Yeah, because we all know how honest Comey was. :doh:

I didn't speak to his honesty. I stated the fact that he announced to the public that the FBI was reopening the investigation into her emails just before the election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Observer said:

I do recall James Comey and the FBI making a public statement that they are reopening an investigation into her emails. Three weeks before the election.  What a crazy way to try to steal her the election. lol

🤣 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

What if it's found that Hillary conspired with Obama and the FBI to frame Trump to ensure an election victory?  If so, will Democrats care?

Hell no. They love it and support it.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They forget that Comey let her off the hook in July of 2016. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, The Observer said:

I didn't speak to his honesty.

🤣🤣🤣 classic empty speak.  Can't make this up folks.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, 12th Man said:

🤣🤣🤣 classic empty speak.  Can't make this up folks.  

TDS + being a meathead= newbie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Observer said:

I didn't speak to his honesty. I stated the fact that he announced to the public that the FBI was reopening the investigation into her emails just before the election.

In my opinion, because he's not trustworthy, any actions and decisions he made, have no credibility.  Yeah, he reopened the investigation, but he didn't so that he can clear her.  He cleared is another way of saying, he covered it up.  Now, you can trust he acted properly, but I do not.  Which is why I asked my question initially.  If it's found that the whole Russian collusion claim was a deliberate attempt by Hillary, Obama, and Comey, to beat Trump, then what would your reaction be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, shouldn’t the question at this point be what if it’s found that Trump didn’t help the Russians? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

In my opinion, because he's not trustworthy, any actions and decisions he made, have no credibility.  Yeah, he reopened the investigation, but he didn't so that he can clear her.  He cleared is another way of saying, he covered it up.  Now, you can trust he acted properly, but I do not.  Which is why I asked my question initially.  If it's found that the whole Russian collusion claim was a deliberate attempt by Hillary, Obama, and Comey, to beat Trump, then what would your reaction be?

So you think it was some well-coordinated sinister plan, but they screwed up and accidentally called a press conferrer right before the election to tell the american people that Hillary is under investigation?   Or are you suggesting they did that to hurt Hillary, so that Trump could win the election, and then they'd try to get him impeached with Russia accusations?   So, teh plan was to help Trump win and then complain about it?  lol  Come on. You're smarter than this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

In my opinion, because he's not trustworthy, any actions and decisions he made, have no credibility.  Yeah, he reopened the investigation, but he didn't so that he can clear her.  He cleared is another way of saying, he covered it up.  Now, you can trust he acted properly, but I do not.  Which is why I asked my question initially.  If it's found that the whole Russian collusion claim was a deliberate attempt by Hillary, Obama, and Comey, to beat Trump, then what would your reaction be?

I think he did that to try and cover what went on since they assumed Hillary would win. Then all hell broke lose when Trump won.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So, shouldn’t the question at this point be what if it’s found that Trump didn’t help the Russians? 

Yes and no.  Yes, that would be a simplified question, but I think the Democrats could just say, "well, we still think he did... just covered it up."  I'm more interested in their opinion if they found out that not only was Trump innocent, that the Democrats literally created the whole thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Observer said:

So you think it was some well-coordinated sinister plan, but they screwed up and accidentally called a press conferrer right before the election to tell the american people that Hillary is under investigation?   Or are you suggesting they did that to hurt Hillary, so that Trump could win the election, and then they'd try to get him impeached with Russia accusations?   So, teh plan was to help Trump win and then complain about it?  lol  Come on. You're smarter than this

I'm suggesting that they did that so that they can find her innocent, right before the election, so that the problem goes away 'after she won the election'.  I think they were so arrogant to think that Hillary was going to win anyway.  The Russian accusations were one, lessen the Trump popularity, and two a backup plan to get rid of Trump had he managed to win the election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Mr. Hand said:

I think he did that to try and cover what went on since they assumed Hillary would win. Then all hell broke lose when Trump won.

I agree completely.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I'm suggesting that they did that so that they can find her innocent, right before the election, so that the problem goes away 'after she won the election'.  I think they were so arrogant to think that Hillary was going to win anyway.  The Russian accusations were one, lessen the Trump popularity, and two a backup plan to get rid of Trump had he managed to win the election.

They had already closed the investigation. Because they found nothing. There is no way to spin it so that Comey announcing the reopening when he did was beneficial to Hillary. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When the interpretation of what occured is “it doesn’t rise to the level of criminality” that doesn’t mean nothing was found. Something was found,  but Comey and Lynch gave her a pass. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mr. Hand said:

Breaking news....Justice Dept. dropping charges against Flynn!!!!

God bless America. And god bless Donald Trump. And fock Jeff Sessions.  Coward. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×